Laveranues Coles Released by Cincinnati Bengals
With free agency in full effect, the 2010 NFL season is officially underway.
I am not going to try and make sense of the concept that is free agency because, frankly, it just gives me a headache. ย
Whether a player is a restricted or unrestricted free agent doesn't really matter to me. Personally, I am more excited to watch Chad Ochocinco on Dancing with the Stars than to discuss tender offers and compensatory draft picks.
TOP NEWS
.jpg?w=2560)
Pickens' Savage Response to Reporter ๐ณ
.jpg?w=2560)
Tomlin's Wild Quote on GTA 6 ๐
.jpg?w=2560)
๐จ Kirk Playing on Sunday
One roster move that did catch my attention occurred yesterday when the Bengals released wide receiver Laveranues Coles. ย
Coles had a very disappointing season, catching just 43 passes for 514 yards and five touchdowns. ย He was due to make $4.65 million in base salary this season.
Perhaps the most honest and accurate reaction to the Bengals parting ways with Coles came from my daughter. ย While sitting at dinner, I received the email notification and informed everyone at the table that Coles was not going to be back next year. ย
She said, "I don't remember him. ย When we watch the games, I hear you yelling good job to Chad or Carson but I don't remember him."
Thinking that being released is a form of punishment similar to being sent to timeout, she asked, "What did he do?"
I replied, "Nothing, sweetie. ย That was the problem."
Read more in The Wight Pages .
.jpg?w=2560)



.png?w=2560)


