Featured Video
Chiefs-Seahawks Could Be Cinema šŸæ

John Fox or Jake Delhomme: One Must Go

Eddie Becker
Dec 29, 2009

In some places, mediocrity is the standard.

In the college ranks, winning half of your games gets you a spot in the postseason.

In the NFL, winning half of your games is acceptable if you're the Browns or the Lions, where eight winsĀ would equal your combined win total fromĀ the previous four years.

In Carolina,Ā winning half of your games has turned out to be acceptable, or so it seems.

So what steps need to be takenĀ by the Panthers' front office if they decide thatĀ mediocrity is no longer acceptable? It seems obvious to me: Either fire the coach or get rid of the quarterback.

It's certainly easy to throwĀ the first stoneĀ at Jake Delhomme, who has had one of the worst seasons for any starting quarterback in recent memory.Ā In fact,Ā one website'sĀ latest news release on Delhomme says, "Jake Delhomme is now in a place where he can't throw an interception.Ā He's on injured reserve."

I doubt, however, too many would be surprised if he threw a pick from there. DelhommeĀ threw 18 interceptions in only 321 attempts this season, aĀ statistic completely mind-boggling considering Delhomme only played in 11 games. To put that in perspective, Delhomme has thrown more picks this season than Kyle Orton and Tony Romo combined, while throwingĀ about 200Ā fewer passes.

Delhomme has also thrownĀ sevenĀ fewer touchdowns this year than he did last year.Ā While he played in fewer games this year, an 8-to-18Ā touchdown-to-interception ratio isn't goodĀ any wayĀ you slice it.

To top it off, Delhomme's passer rating this season is a paltry 59.4, putting him next-to-last among NFL starters,Ā ahead of only Jamarcus Russell.Ā Even rookies Matthew Stafford and Mark Sanchez boast a betterĀ quarterback rating.

Yet as bad as Delhomme has been this year,Ā some of the blame needs to be placed on his boss, John Fox.Ā 

Coming over from the Giants eight years ago, Fox brought a defensive swagger that had not been seen before in Carolina. In his first season, FoxĀ led the Panthers toĀ six more winsĀ than they hadĀ the year before. His second year in Carolina saw the PanthersĀ makeĀ a run to the Super Bowl before losing by a field goal to the Patriots.Ā 

Fox has had other winning seasons during the decade, butĀ the 2009 season will be the fifthĀ time since taking over as the Panthers' coach that Fox will have a team withĀ seven orĀ eight wins. Seven orĀ eight winsĀ won't putĀ you inĀ the playoffs.Ā 

Based on record alone, however, Fox's numbers aren't bad.Ā The knock against Fox isĀ his questionable decision this year to stick with Delhomme as the startingĀ quarterback despite his continual problems with turnovers. It wasn't until a Week 12 injury to Delhomme that Fox was forced to make a change at quarterback.Ā 

Much to Fox's delight, Matt Moore has come in and played lights out in his three starts.Ā But with such a small sample to draw from, we don't know ifĀ MooreĀ is a flash in the pan or a reliable, consistent starter.

After an impressive 2008 season in which the Panthers finished 12-4, it appeared Carolina was en route to setting up another NFC title run beforeĀ things went awry in a home game against Arizona.Ā Entering this season, many thought Carolina would be a lock for a wild card spot. However, ranking 30th in total offense and 24th in total defense won't get you there.Ā Probably the most puzzling thing is that this is nearly the exact same team the Panthers fielded last season and they haven't had to deal with as manyĀ injuries.Ā 

The front office in Carolina has already said that Fox and the entire staff will be given a chance to return in 2010. With the amount of talent on the roster, not making the playoffs next year will be inexcusable and heads will roll.

I have to wonder, though,Ā if heads willĀ roll this year.