Memo to Washington Nationals: Stay the Course

Dave Nichols@@DaveNicholsDSPSenior Analyst IDecember 3, 2009

PHOENIX - OCTOBER 16:  Washington Nationals prospect Stephen Strasburg #37, playing for the Phoenix Desert Dogs, warms up before the Arizona Fall League game against the Scottsdale Scorpions at Phoenix Municipal Stadium on October 16, 2009 in Phoenix, Arizona.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)
Christian Petersen/Getty Images

There are plenty in the Natosphere that want Mike Rizzo and the Washington Nationals to make a big splash and sign a bunch of free agents this winter to improve the product on the field.

After two straight 100-loss seasons, I'm sure Rizzo is tempted to make a run at Matt Holliday, John Lackey, etc.

But prudence, rather than exuberance, should rule the day.

If you take a good look at the Nats' 2010 lineup, the hitters are credible enough to imitate a wild card caliber team.

If Nyjer Morgan can replicate his season from last year (minus the season-ending injury) and Cristian Guzman has one .300-hitting season left in him, those are decent enough table setters in front of All-Star 3B Ryan Zimmerman and sluggers Adam Dunn and Josh Willingham.

The six-seven-eight hitters are going to be a combination of Elijah Dukes in right field, Jesus Flores (once healthy) at catcher, and Ian Desmond at shortstop.

That's solid at the plate, and somewhat better in the field, with Desmond replacing Guzman at short and the Guz sliding over to second base.

The problem is pitching, both starting and relieving.

Rizzo went on record last summer stating a preference for finding two starters to take some of the pressure off youngsters John Lannan, Ross Detwiler, Garrett Mock, Collin Balester, J.D. Martin, and Craig Stammen at the major league level, while not rushing the more highly regarded prospects still in the minors, such as Stephen Strasburg, Aaron Thompson, Brad Meyers, Drew Storen, et al.

There's even more talent in the lower minors, with '09 draftees Trevor Holder and A.J. Morris just coming into their first full season as professionals.

Should the Nats spend $20 million this offseason, just because they have it?

Already one of the lower payrolls in the big leagues, the Nats see at least that much coming off the books this season, as the contracts of Dmitri Young, Ronnie Belliard, Nick Johnson, and Austin Kearns all either expired, were traded, or bought out.

They could even afford to offer Scott Olsen arbitration, get stuck with a 25-year-old lefty recovering from shoulder surgery, and still have Monopoly money to throw around.

But again, should they?

There are two "Type A" free agent starters available this season, John Lackey and Randy Wolf. Signing either would require the Nats to surrender a draft pick in the 2010 draft.

For a club whose best players are still several years from their prime, this doesn't seem to be prudent to me.

There are a bunch of "Type B" starters available that might be interesting, costing the Nats a little less—a second round pick. But most of these players are either injury cases (Erik Bedard, Justin Duchscherer, Rich Harden, Carl Pavano), old (Randy Johnson, Andy Pettitte), of questionable pedigree (Doug Davis, Braden Looper, Jason Marquis, Joel Pineiro), or just bat-guano crazy (Vicente Padilla).

Do the Nats give up a chunk of the future to acquire any of these gentlemen? There's not a name in there that doesn't scare me to one degree or another.

If the Type B's frighten, you can imagine what the rest of the list looks like. Reclamation projects, one-hit wonders, and former Nats (Odalis Perez or Daniel Cabrera) anyone?

My advice to Rizzo? If you want to take a chance rolling the dice on Doug Davis, Joel Pineiro, or Jarrod Washburn, and can do it reasonably, vaya con dios.

Otherwise, let the stable of young guys that you have fight it out again this season, bolster your bullpen with the rest, wait for Jordan Zimmermann to recover from Tommy John surgery and Stephen Strasburg to arrive next season, and THEN supplement with a veteran starter.

Just because you have $20 million to spend doesn't mean you should.


    Report: Nats Have 'No Plans' to Offer Bryce $300M Deal

    Washington Nationals logo
    Washington Nationals

    Report: Nats Have 'No Plans' to Offer Bryce $300M Deal

    Megan Armstrong
    via Bleacher Report

    It Seems Unlikely Scott Boras Has a $300-Million Bid for Bryce Harper

    Washington Nationals logo
    Washington Nationals

    It Seems Unlikely Scott Boras Has a $300-Million Bid for Bryce Harper

    Jeff Sullivan
    via FanGraphs Baseball

    MLB Rumors: Giants ‘Not Optimistic’ About Signing Bryce Harper

    Washington Nationals logo
    Washington Nationals

    MLB Rumors: Giants ‘Not Optimistic’ About Signing Bryce Harper

    Lea van der Merwe
    via The Inquisitr