Spread 'Em: NFL Week Eight Picks
Welcome back to another round of picks based on analysis, insight, and hunches. Itโs worked for me so far to the tune of 63-40 on the season.
After a 9-4 week seven, Iโm hoping for even greater success inย week eight.
Despite how well Iโve done so far, remember that all picks are for entertainment purposes only. Iโm not perfect. I never will be.
If youโre a faithful reader, you know by now that I base my picks on flawed logic, personal opinion, age-old gambling trends, and matchups. If youโre looking for high-end analysis...well...the NFL on Fox pregame showย occasionally has a nugget or two.
Here, now, are the weekย eight picks with the home team in bold.
Denver (+3.5) over Baltimore
At this point, itโs become laughable.
I understand that the Broncos have played several close games this season and that they havenโt proven to be a high-scoring offense, for the most part.
As a result, their margin for error is much smaller than most teamsโ would be at 6-0.
Still, a road underdog to a team thatโs lost three straight? No wonder Las Vegas is losing money on football wagers this year.
These arenโt the Ravens of 2000. The defense gives up well over 300 yards per game, and the last two teams to face Baltimore have had running backs top the 100-yard mark. Sure, their offense is better than itโs ever been, statistically speaking, but their wins have come against Kansas City, San Diego, and Cleveland. Lots of offenses have looked good against those teams.
Both teams are coming off their bye weeks. They should both be well-rested and prepared.
Iโm taking Denver for two reasons. First, no team in the NFL adjusts to the opposition as a game progresses better than the Broncos. Also, I believe Denver is better than Baltimore on both sides of the football.
Broncos 24, Ravens 20
Chicago (-13.5) over Cleveland
After a tough loss in Atlanta, the Bears were humiliated by the Bengals in Cincinnati last week. Jay Cutler has been particularly bad on the road. All 10 of his interceptions have come away from Chicago, and he has thrown five in the last two weeks.
If there was ever a team that needed an easy home win, it would be the 2009 Bears.
Just in the nick of time, the Cleveland Browns come to Chicago. The Bears need a win to stay in the NFC playoff picture. Granted, a win against Cleveland proves nothing, but it could provide the Bears a much-needed confidence boost.
Keep an eye on Matt Forte, who hasnโt run well all season. He should find some running lanes against one of the worst run defenses in the league.
Bears 34, Browns 13
Houston (-3.5) over Buffalo
At first, I was going to take the Bills. However, the Texans have recorded wins at Cincinnati and against the 49ers in the last two weeks and have won three of their last four overall. Matt Schaub may finally be developing into a franchise quarterback, and Steve Slaton could have a huge week against a porous Bills run defense.
Of course, theย flip side to all those positives is why I lacked confidence in this pick. The Texans are maddeningly inconsistent, for starters.
The Bills have won two straight themselves, both on the road.
Also, Houstonโs defense is not particularly good, so the Bills should be competitive and, with a turnover here and there, could win this game.
Still, I think the Texans are emerging as a quality team, and winning a third straight game in decisive fashion would make them 5-3 on the season and keep them in the mix for a playoff spot.
Texans 28, Bills 17
San Francisco (+12.5) over Indianapolis
Itโs been a while since the Colts have been tested, and conventional wisdom would have us believe theย 49ers, losers of three of their last four, are not capable of giving the Colts a game. After all, Big Bad Indianapolis is a near-two touchdown favorite.
Iโm not afraid to go against the grain once in a while, though.
Theย 49ers started the season 3-0. They played the Vikings tough at Minnesota and lost a close contest. They were down 21-0 at Houston last week and clawed back into that game. Theyโre a respectable team vying for a playoff spot in the NFC. Theyโve got a couple dynamic young playmakers in Vernon Davis and Michael Crabtree.
Iโm betting the 49ers make this game interesting, at least.
Colts 31,ย 49ers 24
NY Jets (-3) over Miami
Some teams present matchup difficulties, and the Miami Dolphins are a matchup problem for the Jets. They run the ball well, and without Kris Jenkins clogging the middle of the field, the Jets will likely struggle to stop the run. Additionally, the Dolphins do a good job stopping the run, and that is the Jetsโ strength on offense.
Despite the matchups that favor the Dolphins, Iโm taking the Jets. I think the Jets recognize they let a win slip through their fingers in Miami earlier in the season, and theyโll want to atone for that.
As much as I dislike picking a team based on how they might feel as opposed to how they might play, thatโs exactly what Iโm doing here. Itโs gambling, right? Iโm taking a chance, and I acknowledge that.
Jets 27, Dolphins 21
NY Giants (+1) over Philadelphia
Iโm well aware the Giants have lost two straight, both to quality NFC opponents, and theyโre on the road and playing yet another โqualityโ NFC opponent.
Iโm still picking the Giants. It boils down to this: I donโt believe the Giants are capable of losing three straight games.
I think getting pushed around at home by the Cardinals left many of the players on the team embarrassed. I think the memory of losing to the Eagles at home in the playoffs remains fresh in the minds of the Giants. I think having the now-healthy Cowboys and Eagles nipping at the Giantsโ heels in the NFC East will be motivation for the Giants to go into Philadelphia and win convincingly.
Here I go again, picking based on feelings instead of using statistics of fact. Well, how about these tidbits?
The point I made last week about the Giants not having beaten many quality teams rings true for the Eagles as well. Theyโve beaten Kansas City, Carolina, Tampa Bay, and Washington. Big deal. The Eagles havenโt run the ball well all season and rely on big plays to win ballgames.
If the Giants can contain the likes of DeSean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, and Brian Westbrook, theyโll win. Iโm betting on a disciplined tackling game by the Giants and a frustrated Eagles offense by gameโs end.
Giants 24, Eagles 14
Dallas (-9.5) over Seattle
Last week, the Cowboys clicked offensively against the Atlanta Falcons. With their starting offensive players all healthy and contributing, Dallas looks formidable when they have the ball.
Seattle has some quality players on offense also, and I could see Mattย Hasselbeck having a solid day, assuming heโs upright by dayโs end. The Seahawks donโt run the ball well, though, and theyโll need to sustain some long drives to keep the Cowboysโ offense off the field. Can the Seahawks do that through the air almost exclusively? I donโt see it happening.
Iโm expecting Dallas to top 30 points again, and Seattle canโt keep up with that.
Cowboys 34,ย Seahawks 17
St. Louis (+4) over Detroit
If the game pitting the two best teams in the league is called the Super Bowl, maybe this ought to be known as the Ugly Bowl.
Or the Toilet Bowl.
It needs a catchy nameโotherwise no one will watch.
I know Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson are likely back for the Lions this week, but this game is a toss-up, regardless.
The Lions are 1-22 in their last 23 games. The Rams are 2-21 in their last 23 games. Both teams make a lot of mistakes. Neither defense is any good, and neither offense has proven to be consistent. I like the Ramsโ running game better and believe they may win based on the strength of it.
Who needs analysis when writing about the Toilet Bowl anyway?
Rams 28, Lions 27
Jacksonville (+3) over Tennessee
Hereโs the Titans in a nutshell: Their coach wore a Peyton Manning jersey to an event recently in a poor attempt at humor, and the 86-year-old owner is making personnel decisions essentially, calling for Vince Young to start over Kerry Collins.
I never thought Iโd say this, but the Titans are Team Turmoil.
Since losing to the Jaguars 37-17 a month ago, the Titans have lost twice more. The combined score in those games was 90-9.
Tennessee is trying to figure out what their 2010 season will look like; their fate for 2009 is sealed.
Meanwhile, thereโs still something at stake for the Jacksonville Jaguars. Not that theyโve played great football in the last month either. They lost 41-0 at Seattle and then scraped by the Rams in overtime, 23-20. It hasnโt been pretty, and they certainly havenโt been consistent, but the Jags are 3-3.
Itโs absurd to me that the Jags are underdogs. As I wrote earlier, with wagers like these, itโs no wonder Vegas is losing money on the NFL this year.
Jaguars 24, Titans 20
San Diego (-16.5) over Oakland
Were it not for some late-game heroics from Philip Rivers and Darren Sproles, the Raiders would have already beaten San Diego this season.
Alas, the Chargers snuck out of Oakland with a close win, and the first chapter in a disastrous season was written by the Raiders.
San Diego comes into this game having flattened Kansas City last week, while the Raiders were steamrolled at home by the Jets. I expect both trends to continue.
The Chargers should have their way with the Raiders. The Raiders are ugly on offense and canโt stop the Chargers on defense. San Diego is trying to stay in the AFC playoff picture and could use a big win in front of their fans to ignite their fanbase. The motivation is there for the Chargers, and Iโm betting the players will be, too.
Chargers 35, Raiders 7
Arizona (-10) over Carolina
I canโt believe itโs come to this. Arizona is a double-digit home favorite. This must be as rare as a Chicago Cubs World Series appearance.
And yet, itโs completely warranted. The Cardinals allow fewer than 70 rushing yards per game, and theyโre fresh off a convincing 24-17 win over the Giants at the Meadowlands, traditionally the Cardinalsโ own House of Horrors.
Meanwhile, the Panthers face the team that knocked them out of the playoffs and helped cause Jake Delhommeโs professional downward spiral. Itโs entirely possible that Delhomme avenges his poor playoff performance and guides the Panthers to victory.
Itโs much more likely, though, that Delhomme is forced into a slew of poor decisions that lead to turnovers, and the Cardinals roll to their fourth straight win.
Cardinals 31, Panthers 17
Green Bay (-3) over Minnesota
After this weekend, weโll all have the answer to the question thatโs been weighing on all our minds since the summer:
Did the Favres reserve enough hotel rooms for this game?
Kidding aside, this figures to be a big swing game in the NFC North. The Vikings are 6-1, while the Packers are 4-2. The Vikings have already beaten the Packers. If the Vikings beat them again, they essentially hold a three-game lead over the Packers in the North. If Green Bay wins, it keeps them in the race for the division.
Last week, faced with a tough opponent on the road in the Pittsburgh Steelers, Favre turned the ball over twice late in the game and deep in Steelers territory. Both turnovers were returned for touchdowns, sealing the Vikingsโ fate.
Surely,ย Favre will want to atone for last week. Naturally, heโll want to have a big game in front of Ted Thompson, the Packersโ GM.
But what about Aaron Rodgers? The media attention, both nationally and in Green Bay, has focused on Favre ever since he left. All Rodgers has done is develop into a Pro Bowl-caliber quarterback.
Hopefully, the game will live up to the hype surrounding it. Iโm banking on a solid performance from Rodgers and more turnovers from Favre.
Packers 28, Vikings 24
Monday Night
New Orleans (-10) over Atlanta
The Saints have won all six of their games by 12 or more points. They average nearly 430 yards per game on offense, and theyโre facing a Falcons defense that gives up nearly 370 yards a game.
The Falcons may be a playoff contender, but this game simply isnโt a good matchup for them. In most cases, Atlanta can engage their opponent in a shootout. The Saintsโ defense is opportunistic, especially when they have a lead over another team, and I expect them to take an early lead and pull away.
Saints 37, Falcons 24

.jpg?w=2560)






.jpg?w=2560)
