
Nebraska Football: Adidas Gets It Right (Mostly) with Cornhusker Alternate Uni
For the last few days, Nebraska fans have been on pins and needles, as Adidas teased the Cornhuskersโ new uniforms. On Thursday, we finally got a look at what Adidas has in mind.
"A tribute to history. A future advantage. @Huskers new TECHFIT x #Primeknit #HuskerBold uniform. #GBR #teamadidas pic.twitter.com/S0BELqcL1f
โ adidas Football US (@adidasFballUS) July 23, 2015"
This yearโs offering will be a one-off, worn on Oct. 24 against Northwesternโmuch like the Purples did last year with their Gothic-inspired alternates against Nebraska.
TOP NEWS
.png?w=2560)
Ohio State Falls Out Of Top 10 ๐ฑ
.png?w=2560)
Week 9 Winners & Losers ๐

Miami Remains Undefeated ๐
Itโs not quite as dramatic a look as Adidas gave Louisville for its alternate uniform. And itโs not the sweeping full-uniform change that Adidas put together for Miami this year. Nor is it the missed-opportunity disaster that Adidas fostered on UCLA.
So how did Adidas do in making Nebraska part of itsย #3StripeLife?
The Good
The helmet works well, basically replicating the standard helmet with a matte black base and chrome red striping. Functionally, itโs a matte version of the 2012 alternate helmet, which up to now was the sharpest of the helmet offerings.
There is one difference, though. On the back of the helmet, there will be giant-sized player numbers with the same horizontal slashes that permeate the design of the uniform.ย
"@PhilHecken has Adidas ever watermarked school names / nicknames into jerseys before? I've never seen it pic.twitter.com/xd0SAbRXYo
โ Jake Sanchez (@j_sanatez) July 23, 2015"
The jersey is a real amalgam of previous alternates for Nebraska. Since 2013, Adidas has used the stencil-like numerals for Nebraskaโs alternate, and this yearโs offering is no different. It has the black from Nebraskaโs 2013 alternate and incorporated the โmetallicโ look from the 2014 model.
However, by using a red-on-black color scheme, Adidas will hopefully make the numbers legible from a distance, a huge problem with the 2014 offering.
The pants are functionally identical to last yearโs model, with the color scheme being swapped (red-on-black instead of black-on-red) this year. The subtle sans-serifed N inside of the side stripes on the pants is repeated this year, which is a clever addition.
One other observation is the number Adidas chose for the uniform: 15. Probably not breaking news, but it's further confirmation that De'Mornay Pierson-El is slated to be the face of Nebraska's program for 2015.
The Bad
Yes, the undershirt is ridiculous, as pointed out by Paul Lukas of UniWatch.
"Embarrassing. I think the red "N" stands for "No." pic.twitter.com/GyNvcfEqVR
โ Paul Lukas (@UniWatch) July 23, 2015"
(And before you say it, yes, weโve all heard the one about the N standing for โknowledge,โ thank you very much.)
But itโs an undershirt. No one other than the players will ever see it outside of todayโs reveal.
Of bigger concern is the tire-tread stretch pattern on the jerseys. Of course, weโll hear from Adidas all about how it will make the players faster, lighter and stronger.
But, come on.
The primary reason for the design is to give a unified look to all Adidas-outfitted schools. The German outfitter wants you to know, at a glance, that a uniform is living the #3StripeLife, and the patternโalong with the diagonal slashes in the stripes, as seen with Nebraska, Miami and UCLAโis how Adidas will accomplish that goal.
And The Amalgam
Adidas has come under withering scrutiny over the last year or so for producing flops in uniforms. Itโs no accident that Michigan, Tennessee and Notre Dame have all stopped living the #3StripeLife when they got the chance recently.
So there was more than a little pressure on Adidas to get things right this year for their football offerings. After a huge fail (UCLA), an interesting alternate (Louisville) and a qualified success (Miami), what Adidas would do with Nebraska was a cross-your-fingers moment.
Taken on its own, the 2015 alternate is a success. For alternates, black seems to work better than red, as itโs easier to differentiate it from Nebraskaโs standard uniforms without being overly weird.
Prior to this seasonโs gear, the 2013 black uniforms were the best in my book, followed by the under-loved 2012 giant N uniforms (although Wisconsinโs that year were better) and then the 2014 โduct-tapeโ model, which worked far better in theory than in practice.
But when you look at the history of Nebraskaโs alternatesโnever mind how weird it is to think of alternate uniforms as having a โhistoryโโthis yearโs offering seems like a re-tread.
See what I did there, referring to Nebraskaโs tire-tread-pattered uniform as a โre-treadโ? Quality analysis at work.
Thereโs really not much new in these uniforms. Instead, it feels like taking the best parts of previous uniforms and melding them together in the hopes of getting something right.
Functionally, the uniform takes the black helmet from 2012, the black shirts from 2013, and the shiny numbers and N-pattered pant stripes from 2014 in a way that will be (hopefully) legible from a distance.
So overall, it should be fun to see Nebraska take the field on October 24 in these uniforms. Assuming the numbers are legible, Adidas managed to avoid a car-crash of a uniform. And the black uniforms and helmets should be a hit.
But itโs hard not to feel like this yearโs offering is anything more than a recycling of previous yearsโ models. And thatโs not what an alternate uniform is supposed to be.
This column first appeared at theย Double Extra Point, which you can follow on Twitterย @DblExtraPoint.






.png?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)