NFL
HomeScoresDraftRumorsFantasyB/R 99: Top QBs of All Time
Featured Video
Chiefs' Mahomes Dilemma 🤔
FILE - In this Oct. 25, 2014 file photo, Nebraska defensive end Randy Gregory (4) warms up before an NCAA college football game against Rutgers in Lincoln, Neb. Gregory is projected to be a high first-round pick in the NFL draft but knows he has much to prove, starting at the scouting combine in two weeks. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik, File)
FILE - In this Oct. 25, 2014 file photo, Nebraska defensive end Randy Gregory (4) warms up before an NCAA college football game against Rutgers in Lincoln, Neb. Gregory is projected to be a high first-round pick in the NFL draft but knows he has much to prove, starting at the scouting combine in two weeks. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik, File)Nati Harnik/Associated Press

2015 NFL Draft: First-Round Order and Prospects on the Rise After Pro Days

Sterling XieMar 18, 2015

The long leadup to the NFL draft provides organizations ample time to over-think their initial reads on a prospect, a process that undoubtedly leads to draft-day mistakes.  Pro days embody this flaw in the system, as evaluating players in shorts working in familiar environments is hardly an accurate depiction of how they'll handle the professional pressure cooker.

Nevertheless, that hasn't stopped prospects like Teddy Bridgewater from seeing their stocks disproportionately affected by pro days.  While numerous quarterback-needy teams may be ruing passing over Bridgewater, that doesn't necessarily mean that pro days are an entirely silly exercise.  Injured players who missed the scouting combine need to provide reassurance to teams, while scouting departments may want a second look at a divisive prospect before making a final conclusion.

TOP NEWS

Chiefs Rookies Football
2025 Cheez-It Citrus Bowl - Texas v Michigan

Not all pro days are concluded—as this handy pro-day tracker from Jaguars.com illustrates, plenty of premier prospects have yet to work out—but based on the numerous workouts held so far, a few players have ostensibly seen their stocks change.  Our latest first-round mock draft attempts to reflect the fluidity inherent in the predraft process:

So which of the 32 players were most affected in the post-combine stage?  Honing in on players who reassured teams with recent workouts, let's take a look at potential fits for a trio of Day 1 hopefuls.

1Tampa Bay BuccaneersJameis Winston, QB, Florida State
2Tennessee TitansLeonard Williams, DT, USC
3Jacksonville JaguarsDante Fowler, OLB, Florida
4Oakland RaidersKevin White, WR, West Virginia
5Washington RedskinsRandy Gregory, OLB, Nebraska
6New York JetsShane Ray, DE, Missouri
7Chicago BearsMarcus Mariota, QB, Oregon
8Atlanta FalconsAmari Cooper, WR, Alabama
9New York GiantsBrandon Scherff, OT, Iowa
10St. Louis RamsDeVante Parker, WR, Louisville
11Minnesota VikingsLa'el Collins, OT, LSU
12Cleveland BrownsDanny Shelton, DT, Washington
13New Orleans SaintsVic Beasley, OLB/DE, Clemson
14Miami DolphinsTrae Waynes, CB, Michigan State
15San Francisco 49ersEric Kendricks, ILB, UCLA
16Houston TexansJaelen Strong, WR, Arizona State
17San Diego ChargersBud Dupree, DE, Kentucky
18Kansas City ChiefsMarcus Peters, CB, Washington
19Cleveland Browns (via Buffalo)Andrus Peat, OT, Stanford
20Philadelphia EaglesLandon Collins, S, Alabama
21Cincinnati BengalsBenardrick McKinney, ILB, Miss St
22Pittsburgh SteelersJalen Collins, CB, LSU
23Detroit LionsArik Armstead, DT, Oregon
24Arizona CardinalsTodd Gurley, RB, Georgia
25Carolina PanthersP.J. Williams, CB, Florida State
26Baltimore RavensDevin Funchess, WR/TE, Michigan
27Dallas CowboysMelvin Gordon, RB, Wisconsin
28Denver BroncosMalcom Brown, DT, Texas
29Indianapolis ColtsT.J. Clemmings, OT, Pittsburgh
30Green Bay PackersEddie Goldman, DT, Florida State
31New Orleans Saints (via Seattle)Carl Davis, DT, Iowa
32New England PatriotsKevin Johnson, CB, Wake Forest

Devin Funchess, WR/TE, Michigan

Oct 11, 2014; Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Wolverines wide receiver Devin Funchess (1) celebrates after scoring a touchdown during the first quarter against the Penn State Nittany Lions at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Weber-USA TODAY Sports

As a 6’4”, 232-pound tight end with virtually no blocking capacity or in-line experience, Funchess enters the NFL as a classic tweener. Today’s era of specialization means that such a designation isn’t as problematic as it once was, but after a painfully slow 4.70 40-yard dash time at the combine, Funchess’ chances of sticking at receiver appeared slim.

However, the ex-Wolverine subsequently ran a 4.48 40-time at his pro day, per Mark Snyder of the Detroit Free Press, a jaw-dropping improvement from his Indy showing. With concerns about his functional speed alleviated, teams appear more apt to focus on his catch radius and agility, where he certainly appears to represent a viable wide receiver: 

Consequently, Funchess has vaulted himself back into late Day 1 consideration after slipping out of that picture following the combine. The Ravens look like the most logical landing spot, having lost Torrey Smith and Owen Daniels from the passing attack. Moreover, Baltimore doesn’t really possess any young cost-controlled pass-catching talent apart from Michael Campanaro, a slot receiver who is essentially the antithesis of what Funchess could provide for Joe Flacco.

Funchess is still probably more likely to see his name called Day 2 because of his raw route running and inconsistent hands, but these are traits that reps can improve. Conversely, Funchess’ size is something that can’t be replicated, so now that he has flashed NFL-caliber speed, the Michigan product shouldn’t last too long in the draft.

Randy Gregory, OLB, Nebraska

Dec 27, 2014; San Diego, CA, USA; Nebraska Cornhuskers defensive end Randy Gregory (4) looks on before the game against the USC Trojans in the 2014 Holiday Bowl at Qualcomm Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jake Roth-USA TODAY Sports

In a class full of uber-athletic long edge-rushers, Gregory may stand above them all. The Nebraska edge-rusher weighed in at 238 pounds, per ESPN’s Mitch Sherman, which will likely limit him to the 3-4 outside linebacker spot. But considering that five of the top seven picks belong to teams employing 3-4 schemes, Gregory figures to come off the board within that range.

The real value in Gregory’s pro day came from the position drills, as he allowed his impressive 40-time, vertical leap and bench-press marks from the combine to stand up. According to Sherman’s review, though, Gregory tested out exclusively as a linebacker in position drills. Considering the movement toward smaller, faster linebackers to combat spacing-based offenses, Gregory’s receiver-like testing numbers should enthrall pro scouts: 

That’s not to suggest that Gregory is a perfect prospect, for his pass-rushing arsenal essentially consists of the same club move, as Football Outsiders’ Matt Waldman articulates in his must-read scouting report. That move helped Gregory compile 17.5 sacks over two seasons at Lincoln, but the ability to progress smoothly from move-to-move is indispensable against NFL tackles.

In terms of team fit, Washington at pick No. 5 looks like a strong bet after Brian Orakpo’s departure. Additionally, if the Jets don’t fall for Marcus Mariota, Gang Green represents a strong bet to select one of the top edge-rushers to round out their suddenly formidable defense. Right now, Gregory’s floor looks like Atlanta at No. 8, which could use a Leo rusher to feature in Dan Quinn’s defense.

Eric Kendricks, ILB, UCLA

PASADENA, CA - SEPTEMBER 15: Linebacker Eric Kendricks #6 of the UCLA Bruins returns a fumble 23 yards for a touchdown in the first quarter against the Houston Cougars at the Rose Bowl on September 15, 2012 in Pasadena, California.  (Photo by Stephen Dunn

In the early predraft process, the dearth at inside linebacker was glaring, with only Bernardrick McKinney and Denzel Perryman looking like potential late first-rounders. But UCLA’s Eric Kendricks has since become a scout’s crush, and while this current projection may be a tad ambitious, it’s not inconceivable to imagine him working his way up to the mid-first round by draft day.

A tweaked hamstring prevented Kendricks from finishing the combine, and while he refrained from running the 40 at his pro day, the vibe was generally positive after he went through other position drills. For what it’s worth, his 4.17-second short-shuttle time would have finished in the top 10 among combine linebackers, while his 7.16-second three-cone drill time would have placed in the top 15.

Those drills highlight Kendricks’ change-of-direction ability and burst, traits that made him one of the nation’s most productive linebackers. With sideline-to-sideline range as well as adequate coverage ability, Kendricks’ ceiling could be reminiscent of a former Defensive Player of the Year: 

For now, Kendricks isn’t a household name due to a relative lack of disruptive plays at Westwood. In four years, Kendricks had just 10 sacks, though he did see a big uptick in tackles for loss his senior season, compiling 11.5 after making just 14.5 such plays over his first three years.

But that’s also partially a byproduct of his role at UCLA, and with his ideal measurables for the position (6’0”, 232 lbs), it’s not hard to envision Kendricks becoming one of the league’s more well-rounded inside backers in due time. Teams seeking to augment the middle of their defense, like Miami and San Francisco, could make Kendricks a first-round prospect by the end of the predraft process.

*All measurables and combine numbers via NFL.com.

Chiefs' Mahomes Dilemma 🤔

TOP NEWS

Chiefs Rookies Football
2025 Cheez-It Citrus Bowl - Texas v Michigan
Cardinals Draft Love Football
Cowboys Commanders Football

TRENDING ON B/R