Federer's Waterloo- Or, The Rise Of Jo Willie
Jo Wilfried Tsonga โ now thereโs a name one could learn to love hearing on a podium. โThe Great Jo Willie!โ
Iโm sure every respectable tennis aficionado saw what Jo Willie - I love saying that - did to Mr. Federer in Montreal. He played the way Iโve been saying you need to play to beat Federer for years: โBalls to the wallโ - as we say in surfing, loving every minute of it, aggressive, none of this โshowing Federerโs game respectโ mentality.
Jo Willie went out there swinging, hit with his incredible power and unfettered movement, and took the match to Roger. This match had the feel of a Waterloo, Roger came knowing he was going to have tough time but he didnโt expect the kind of weaponry that for once Tsonga brought to the match in its entirety.
TOP NEWS

Week 2 NFL Power Rankings ๐

Arch Apologizes to Holly Rowe

Top Week 2 Fantasy Football Pickupsย ๐
Federer has every shot in the book. Heโs powerful and consistent. Heโs Roger Federer -โnough said. But the players that beat Fed are the physical ones. They seem to intimidate him. Nadal has been showing the way for years - youโve got to be physically stronger than him, and some of the guys are finally figuring this out.
Murray is catching on, though it took getting over his teenage petulance to finally settle down and look outside of his prodigious talent to find the answer: Fitness.
If you want to beat Fed youโve got to show him you can stand toe to toe, not play from 4 yards behind the base line. Iโve screamed at Roddick on my TV a million times to step up to the baseline instead of trying stand next to the ball girls when heโs playing Fed. Though knowing The Rod-manโs reputation with the ladies, maybe there is something else going on back in the nether reaches of the courtsโฆ
Iโve taken a lot of flak for saying that I didnโt think Federer had a single big weapon, but that everything he did was on such a high level, and I think Iโm being proven right. Jo Willie proved he had bigger weapons. The only other time I have seen Roger Federer so shell shocked was last year at the French Open when Nadal decimated him.
So in the end, who are the guys that have chance against the Fed Express?
Murray: He is in superb shape, but does he have the weaponry and mental strength to take down Federer in a GS final?
Roddick: Again, superb physical shape and he has the weaponry, but heโs carrying that 2-19 monkey on his back.
Djokovic: Not a chance in Hell. Heโs got to figure things out, and his game is in crisis. Iโm beginning to question his desire.
Del Potro: Kind of a question mark, as the wheels fell off in Montreal. I donโt think he has it yet for the US Open, but he does have the weapons, and as long as his very tall body doesnโt fall apart he could do well in the future. Heโs still young yet and it remains to be seen if he has durability.
Jo Willie: This guy could be the next number one if he can just keep his body in one piece. Thereโs not a guy out there that can beat him when heโs healthy.
Nadal: Man, I donโt know what to think. Is he faking it, trying to set up a US Open win to get his Career Slam or is he just on his way out? This is a tough one to read.
So, who else out there has a chance?ย ย
.jpg?w=2560)




.jpg?w=2560)
