Should the Milwaukee Brewers Look for New Leader?
Let me start off by saying that I am a Ned Yost fan and I love what he has done for the Milwaukee Brewers. HeĀ made the city of Milwaukee, as well as the state of Wisconsin, proudĀ to cheer for the Brewers again.
After several years of losing and numerous managers over that same time frame, the Brewers brought in a Bobby Cox pupil named Ned Yost. He was given the task of trying to bring winning back to Milwaukee.
Edgar Frederick "Ned" Yost III spent 1980-83 as a catcher for the Milwaukee Brewers, backing up Ted "Simba" Simmons, (who is now Yost's bench coach for Milwaukee). They were aĀ part of that "magical" 1982 World Series run for the Brewers.
TOP NEWS

Brewers Make SNL Cameo š¤©

Latest Free Agency Rumors š

Current Market for Kaima Taira š
Twenty years after he left, Ned was back in Milwaukee, trying toĀ manage the Crew back into the playoffs.
This transformation was not going to happen overnight though. It was going to take a couple of years for this team to start winning.
In his first year, 2003, Yost led the Brewers to a 68-94 record. This may seem mediocre to some, but seeing as how Milwaukee had only won 56 gamesĀ (meaning a club-record 106 losses)Ā in '02, this wasĀ a significantĀ improvement.Ā
However,Ā the Brewers were still theĀ cellar-dwellers in the NL Central.
2004 was no different, as the Brewers compiled a 67-94 record, again finishing dead last in the division.
In '05,Ā MilwaukeeĀ climbed out of theĀ basement and managed to win 81 gamesĀ toĀ end the year with a .500 record and a third-place finish.Ā Baseball was back in Milwaukee and they had Ned Yost to thank.
The BrewersĀ stumbled in '06 and only won 75 games, six less than the previous year. They also had to watch division rival St. Louis go on to win the World Series after winningĀ 83 games in the regular season.
2007 showed some promise as the Brewers blistered to a quick 24-10 start.Ā Milwaukee managed to increase their division lead to near double digits and looked like they were the team to beat in the Central.
But Brewers fansĀ wondered if the "Summer Slide" would be upon them once again. And no sooner than they wondered did the blow up take place.
The BrewersĀ could've been beaten by a little league team in July and August, andĀ they squandered the division lead to their hated rivals, the Chicago Cubs.
Even with their inconsistent play, the Brewers wereĀ still in the division race up until the last week of the season. But in the end it was simple; the Cubs wonĀ when they had to and the Brewers were just hoping that the Cubs would lose.
Ned Yost was easily blamed for making someĀ questionable managerial decisions in '07. Whether itĀ wasĀ leaving a reliever in too long (the bullpen blew 16 three+ run leads), not putting on a hit and run, or not bunting when the time came, Ned was on the hot-seat with many fans.
Through all of this, thereĀ have been Ned-haters and Ned-lovers (myself in the latter).Ā I have supported Yost and always thought he was the man who would lead us toĀ back to the "promised land".
InĀ Milwaukee's first 31 games this year, they haveĀ a 16-15 record, far off the expectations ofĀ every Brewers fan.Ā What Brewer fan would've expected this offense to struggle as much as they have in the first month of the season?
So thisĀ brings up the question ofĀ whether Ned Yost isĀ really the answer to all ofĀ Milwaukee's problems.
Maybe the furthest he wasĀ able to leadĀ them wasĀ to an above .500 record, no more. This is his sixth year in Milwaukee and YostĀ has an overall record of 390-450 (a .464 winning percentage).Ā The Brewers finally managed to play meaningful baseball in September of last year, butĀ still haven'tĀ found their way into October.
One thing Ned can't be blamed for is the injuries that happen to players. But the manager is almostĀ always blamed when a teamĀ performs below its expectations.Ā
So should Ned Yost really be given his ticket out of Brew Town? I guess only time will tell, and Ned Yost may not have as much as he thinks.Ā



.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)


.png?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)