
Portland Trail Blazers Are Slipping at the Exact Wrong Time
The grind of an NBA season is a curious thing, equally capable of testing mettle and derailing chemistry. Sometimes, such swings seem a weekly occurrence.
Just ask the Portland Trail Blazers. Once the NBAโs plucky darlings, the Blazers have fallen on hard times during the month of March, having lost four of their last six games andโmore crucial stillโAll-Star forward LaMarcus Aldridge to a back injury.
Portland is just 23-21 since its blistering 22-4, notice-serving start to the seasonโa slow, steady decline thatโs taken it from best in the West to the middle of the playoff pack.
TOP NEWS

2 Players Left from Russ' Draft Class

Bob Iger Talks Lakers Purchase

Re-Drafting Russ' Class ๐
Whatโs worse, with 12 games left to play and only four games between them and the ninth-seeded Phoenix Suns, the Blazers could fall further still, particularly with Aldridgeโs status remaining murky.
From The Oregonianโs Joe Freeman:
"Coach Terry Stotts refused to reveal further details โ whether or not Aldridge practiced, whether heโs making progress, etc. โ as has become the norm, so itโs unclear when Aldridge will return. On Saturday, before the Blazers were steamrolled by the Charlotte Bobcats, Aldridge went through extended shooting drills following the teamโs morning shootaround. But while that was a positive sign in his recovery, itโs anybodyโs guess as to when Aldridge will be healed enough to play.
"
Perhaps the Blazers are keeping Aldridge out as a precaution, hopeful they can stem the lowering tide long enough to get him back in time for the first round of the playoffs. But with a four-game road trip next upโa slate including dates with the Miami Heat and Atlanta Hawksโthat recession might only accelerate.
Last week, we took a long, hard look at whatโs been ailing Portland of late, placing special emphasis on its offensive regression, poor fourth-quarter performances and (no surprise here) how its offense and defense suffer with Aldridge on the sidelines.
Speaking with NBA.comโs Michael Holton and Adam Bjaranson on their weekly Trail Blazers Courtside podcast, head coach Terry Stotts acknowledged the toll injuries had taken on his young team:
"Well, the first thing I would say is that we were remarkably healthy in the first half of the season. We kept the same starting lineup throughout the season; we didn't have any injuries to speak of. Since then, LaMarcus (Aldridge) has missed some games; Joel Freeland was a big part of our bench. We don't know when he's (Aldridge) going to come back. That would be the first change from the beginning of the season to now.
"
Unfortunately, the teamโs issuesโthe chief reason why it's bowed out as a legitimate playoff threatโmight go even deeper than that.
Or not deep enough, to be precise.
In the nearly two weeks since Aldridgeโs injury, Portlandโs lack of bench depthโan area that had seen slight improvement over a woeful performance last seasonโhas once again begun to rear its ugly head.
In that span, the Blazers most oft-used lineup (Damian Lillard, Wesley Matthews, Dorrell Wright, Robin Lopez and Nicolas Batum) is registering a net rating of 5.6 over 100 minutes.
Their next six unitsโnone of which have tallied more than 30 minutes of court timeโare charting net ratings of minus-10.1, minus-17.3, minus-24.6, minus-25.4 and minus-54.3, respectively.
Rotational situations donโt get much more precarious than that.

Getting Aldridge back will certainly help mattersโparticularly in the playoffs, where a more measured schedule makes it possible for teams lacking depth to at least partially mask that weakness.
On the other hand, it might be high time to acknowledge a tried and true fact of NBA life: Sometimes, teams simply regress to their mean.
This past Thursday, the Blazers bested the Washington Wizards 116-103.
Why is this significant? It was the first time since February 1 that Portland had beaten a team above .500 (a 106-104 win over the Toronto Raptors).
Thatโs not exactly the kind of pedigree you want to see in a supposed playoff team.
Weirdly enough, however, the Blazers have fared considerably better against the Western Conference's elite than they have the more middling playoff brass.
| Team | W-L | Average Point Differential | |
| San Antonio | 2-2 | +1.0 | |
| Oklahoma City | 2-2 | -1.33 | |
| L.A. Clippers | 1-1 | -0.5 | |
| Houston | 1-3 | -6.5 | |
| Golden State | 1-2 | -1.33 | |
| Dallas | 1-2 | +3.0 | |
| Memphis | 0-2 | -13.5 |
NBA history is rife with well-laid plans of playoff positioning gone awry, which is why even the prospect of slipping toward the bottom of the conference playoff picture oughtnโt offer the Blazers much in the way of solace.
The issues here aren't anecdotal; they're systemicโthe necessary growth pangs of a team that flew in under the radar long enough to cause a scare but not so quietly that their enemies couldn't find and figure them out.
In Aldridge, Lillard and Batum, the Blazers boast one of the league's most potent young cores and a surefire conference threat for years to come. But whether by dint of makeup or misfortune, it's become increasingly clear that, for all its promise and upside, Portland has yet to learn thereโs no substitute for steadfast consistency.
All stats courtesy of NBA.com (subscription only) and are current as of March 23 unless otherwise noted.



.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
