Michael Vick Will Play Football Again, Like It Or Not
Finally out of prison and back home in Virginia, disgraced former Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick probably went to work this morning like so many of us do every day.
Working at a construction siteโthough most likely in a manner similar to the way Vito Spatafore and the rest of the guys did on "The Sopranos"โis a long way from being the supposed evolutionary link in the maturation of the NFL quarterback.
But, thatโs where Vickโs choices landed him.
TOP NEWS
.jpg?w=2560)
NFL House in Paris Closes for Protests
.jpg?w=2560)
Trevon Diggs Cut by Seahawks
.jpg?w=2560)
B/R's Expert Week 7 NFL Picks ๐ฎ
However, the thought that those choices should prevent Vick from possibly earning a living as an NFL quarterback is flat-out wrong and runs contrary to our propensity to forgive professional athletes for their various transgressions.
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell will obviously have his say before allowing Vick to step back on the field.
But, his employees always keep his disciplinary plate full with fresh charges of illegal drug use and distribution, aggravated assault, public mayhem, drunk and disorderly, vehicular manslaughter, spousal abuse, and so on and so on.
Yet, up until now, forgiveness was always just one big play away.
The bottom line is that Vick already paid his debt to society and shouldnโt be looked upon any more contemptuously than any other athleteโand thereโs a long list, by the wayโwhoโs run afoul of the law.ย ย ย
And while the burgeoning professional athletesโ criminal blotter certainly doesnโt minimize Vickโs cruelty to animals, it does make me wonder why we donโt seem to have the same compassion for our fellow human beings as we do for animals.
So, if you donโt want to have any compassion for Vick, then donโt.
But donโt tell me itโs because of a crime heโs already done his penance for, because if you do, then youโre engaging in the useless exercise of trying distinguish between shades of gray.
Iโm neither a Vick-supporter nor an animal-hater, but the bottom line is that we must punish equally (even in the court of public opinion), or not at all.
Itโs a lot less confusing that way.
.jpg?w=2560)








