The Addition-by-Subtraction Argument for 2013-14 L.A. Lakers Being Much Improved
Believe it or not, the Los Angeles Lakers are better off in 2013-14.
Sure, the losses of both Dwight Howard and Metta World Peace would cripple just about any franchise. But the Lakers may be the exception.
Letโs just call it addition by subtraction.
TOP NEWS

Only 2 Players Left from Russ' Draft Class

Bob Iger Talks Lakers Purchase

Most Expensive Team Sales Ever ๐ค
Los Angeles is coming off its worst season since 2007. The team finished 45-37, needed all 82 games to lock up a postseason berth and was swept in the first round by the San Antonio Spurs.ย Not exactly the results GM Mitch Kupchak was looking for when he brought in Howard and Steve Nash over the summer.
Now, the Lakers are spending their entire offseason prepping for a future littered with questions.
How will the team recover from losing Howard to free agency? Will Pau Gasol be able to fill the void at center? Was amnestying World Peace the best decision for Los Angeles?
Just fine. More than likely. Yes.
While itโs easy to speculate that the Lakers are heading towards a monumental disaster next season, there are several reasons to believe otherwise.
Moving the Rock
Thereโs no doubting the significant impact Howard has on a team. He's not only a dangerous low-post scorer but also a tremendous rebounder and great shot-blocker.
However, with Howard in the lineup, Los Angeles struggled to move the ball.
Over 2,722 minutes with the big man on the floor, the team averaged just 21.7 assists and committed 15.4 turnovers per game. During the 1,229 minutes Howard was on the bench, the Lakers averaged 24 assists and 13.2 turnovers per game.
Not only does the team distribute the basketball a lot more easily in Howardโs absence, but there were fewer mistakes made in the process.
As Nash mentioned to Lakers.comโs Mike Trudell, part of the problem could be due to Howardโs unwillingness to run the pick-and-rollโa staple of head coach Mike DโAntoniโs offense.
The decision itself makes little to no sense.
For starters, Howard played in a similar offense during his eight seasons with the Orlando Magic. Then thereโs the fact that nobody runs the pick-and-roll better than Nash.
As you can see, Nash helped both Gortatโwith the Phoenix Sunsโand Gasol increase their efficiency when he was on the court. The same cannot be said for Howard.
One possible reason could be traced back to Howardโs favoritism towards taking on opponents one-on-one down low. It was a strategy that left Nash without the ball more often than not.
Besides eliminating Los Angelesโ chances for easy buckets, Howardโs tactics take away one of the biggest advantages of having Nash on the floor. If you recall, this is the same guy who helped Amarโe Stoudemire increase his scoring from 20.6 points per game to 26.1 during their first season together on the Suns (2004-05).
And Howard couldnโt reap the same benefits?
Injuries to both Howard and Nash surely prevented the duo from really clicking. However, even 100 percent healthy, Howard seemed to be too stubborn to give into a system that likely could have made the Lakers a real threat in the Western Conference.
It was his way or the highway.
Luckily, the team doesnโt need to deal with that going forward. And better ball movement is likely the reward.
Will the Real Pau Please Stand Up?
One of the biggest effects of Howardโs stint in Los Angeles was Gasolโs diminishedย role in the offense.
After averaging 36 or more minutes a night for four straight seasons, he logged just 33.8 last yearโhis lowest total since 2005. Furthermore, Gasolโs 11.8 field-goal attempts per game ranked as his worst mark in his 12-year NBA career.
As expected, Gasol didnโt have the most impressive stat line, averaging 13.7 points, 8.6 rebounds and 4.1 assists per game. He also shot a career-worst 46.6 percent from the field.
Sure, injuries could have played a large part in the poor playโGasol missed 33 games due to knee injuriesโbut his positioning on the court is far more to blame.
Ever since trading for Gasol back in 2008, the Lakers have experimented with him at both center and power forward. With Howard last year and Andrew Bynum the year before, Gasol was utilized primarily at power forward.
Going by some of the 33-year-oldโs most recent numbers, thatโs a crying shame.
Itโs obvious that Gasol is most efficient at center. By playing him at forward, Los Angeles is basically surrendering Gasolโs quickness and athleticism advantages almost every night.
The presence of Howard on the court didnโt seem to help matters much either.
Over 994 minutes with Howard on the court, Gasol averaged 18.5 points, 11.3 rebounds, 3.5 turnovers and 1.5 blocks per 48 minutes. He also shot 45.9 percent from the floor while posting an offensive rating of 103.5 and a defensive rating of 104.2.
On the other hand, over 661 minutes with Howard on the bench, Gasol averaged 21 points, 13.6 rebounds, 2.3 turnovers and 2.2 blocks per 48 minutes. He also shot 47.8 percent from the field while registering an offensive rating of 110 and a defensive rating of 100.8.
Now, without Howard or Bynum to stand in his way, expect Gasol to re-assume his position as the top center on the Lakers depth chart.
Itโs a simple move that could prove far more effective than landing Howard last summer.
Making Peace with Less
The news that Los Angeles chose to part ways with World Peace didnโt sit well with many. One of those not too happy about the news was the Black Mamba himself.
Regardless, it was a move that was quite necessary for the Lakers.
By waiving World Peace via the NBAโs amnesty provision, the team will save about $15 million in luxury taxes. However, Los Angeles is still responsible for paying the 33-year-oldโs $7.7 million salary next season.
While World Peace wonโt be an easy player to replace, the team has done well to bring in some low-cost additions.
First, the Lakers utilized their taxpayer mid-level exception ($3.2M) to sign Chris Kaman, per theย Los Angeles Timesโ Eric Pincus. For a player that has averaged 14.1 points and 7.5 rebounds per game over the past four seasons, Kaman is an absolute steal.
Los Angeles found another bargain by adding Nick Young on a one-year deal at the veteranโs minimum, via ESPN.
Young possesses the scoring ability of Jamal Crawford and Brandon Jennings. Although he averaged just 10.6 points per game with the Philadelphia 76ers last season, he posted marks of 17.4 points and 16.6 points with the Washington Wizards in 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively. At 28, Young still has a lot to offer.
Although the Lakers still want to be competitive next season, the team also wants to set itself up to be big spenders for next seasonโs free agency. Itโs a class thatโs headlined by LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony and Zack Randolph.
As of now, per Hoopsworld, Los Angeles only has the contracts of Nash ($9.7M) and Robert Sacre ($915,243) on its books for next year. Thatโs a guaranteed total of just $10.6 million.
Winning may be the teamโs biggest priority next season. However, if all else fails, the Lakers are sure to make a splash next summer.
Summing It All Up
Los Angeles isnโt likely to win the NBA title next season. But the teamโs not likely to be at the bottom of the standings either.
There still is a lot of talent remaining on the roster.
Although they are all in their 30s, Bryant, Gasol and Nash are still very capable of leading the Lakers to success. Just two seasons ago, the Boston Celtics came within one game of the NBA Finals with a trioโPaul Pierce, Kevin Garnett and Ray Allenโall on the wrong side of 30.
Last season shouldnโt be the measuring stick to determine just how successful this team can be. Donโt forget that Bryant, Gasol, Nash and Howard all dealt with injuries throughout the season. Yet the team still managed to finish eight games over .500, capturing the franchiseโs eighth straight postseason bid in the process.
Itโs never wise to bet against Los Angeles. Especially in a season where Bryant will feel he has a lot to prove.
Heyโฆstranger things have happened in sports.
Unless otherwise noted, all stats are courtesy of NBA.comโs Media Central (subscription is required).


.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)
.jpg?w=2560)

_0.jpg?w=2560)