Will Jack Wilshere's Return Disrupt Arsenal's New Balance in the Midfield?

H Andel@Gol Iath @gol_iathAnalyst IIIApril 8, 2013

LONDON, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 23:  Jack Wilshere of Arsenal gestures during the Barclays Premier League match between Arsenal and Aston Villa at the Emirates Stadium on February 23, 2013 in London, England.  (Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images)
Michael Regan/Getty Images

In the absence of Jack Wilshere, Arsenal seem at last to have found the right balance in the midfield, with Tomas Rosicky conducting affairs at the tip of the midfield while Mikel Arteta and Aaron Ramsey act both as double pivot for initiating offense and shield for the defense.

The reason for this balance is also why this system is beautiful.

Here, Arsene Wenger has abandoned the bridging midfield role, opting for more solidity at the base of the midfield. This is achieved by the shield provided by Arteta and Ramsey, who occupy the hole before the defense and take turns to push up to begin attacks or press for the ball.

A midfield so deployed would normally yield a different sort of problem.

It would shift "the hole" to the middle of the field—where the bridging midfielder (the box-to-box) normally operates—because the creative midfielder tends to sit closer to the attack (see: this article for a discussion on "the hole").

Wenger has solved the problem by having Rosicky collapse inward when Arsenal are biding their time in possession, when they need to press for the ball, when they must simply rearrange themselves in proper defensive formation when off the ball or when the offensive players seek to shed their markers.

When Rosicky reverts inside to offer balance in the midfield, Santi Cazorla—deployed structurally wide—collapses inward to take up the position vacated by Rosicky, while Nacho Monreal, the left full-back, pushes up to press either the winger or the full-back of the opposition.

In essence, Cazorla's role out wide isn't that of a winger. Instead, he operates as the so-called false 11, an extra midfielder and attacker. He alternatively swings inside to take up position in "the hole" when Rosicky pushes high or when Rosicky makes a diagonal scissors run to the left.

But one other reason why this system has been effective is by being compact.

This is achieved by a relatively high defensive line, which in turn prompts the two midfield anchors to push further infield, thereby reducing the space in the center where "the hole" would open up.

While both Arteta and Ramsey have been more defensively aware than has been the case in past Arsenal systems, they have not been content to merely sit flat and close to the defense. Doing so would yield too much problem infield, where the lone advanced midfielder would be overpowered.

The fact that the system as a whole pushes forward and high from the back eliminates part of the problem as noted above.

The other solution lies in the fact that Arteta and Ramsey have been very astute in taking turns to push forward to eliminate the space in the center, while the other partner provides the buffer from behind.

This simple pragmatism has yielded Arsenal's recent solidity both in the center of the pitch and at the back.

When the system operates thusly from the back, pushing cautiously high, it allows Rosicky to advance forward. With Cazorla pushing up and inward while Monreal provides width on the flank, the system becomes a 2-3-4-1. The high number of bodies forward allows for different passing options and retention of possession.

The fluidity of the system is seen in the ability of the players to both switch position with ease and revert back quickly and effectively to their default positions in the system.

The first of the two points has made Gervinho rather slippery, since he doesn't stay put in just one flank. This also is true of Cazorla, whose license to roam causes problem for his markers. The second allows the team to recover when possession is lost.

This new balance in the Arsenal system is what Wenger and Steve Bould have toiled to achieve all season long. First, Abou Diaby was the best option in the midfield, but with him, Arsenal played with a bridge in the center.

With Wilshere, Arsenal have struggled to find balance in the midfield. This is so because Wilshere is the kind of player who needs a team built around him. I am not convinced that Wenger has found the balance with Wilshere.

For one, he hasn't been as structurally pragmatic as Rosicky has been in the last three matches and this causes problem in the middle for Arsenal.

I am sure Wenger will find a way to get the right balance with Wilshere in the team. For now, it seems that the best balance for the team is the current combination in the midfield. It will be interesting to see what happens when Wilshere returns in the coming weeks.

One other problem Wenger will probably be looking to solve is how to reintegrate Lukas Podolski and Theo Walcott in the team. But as they say, when it is not broken, do not to try to fix it.

It might be best to start the next couple of matches with the current XI and having said players coming in as substitutes.

Then again, Wenger knows best.


    Guendouzi Rejects Morocco, Only Wants France

    Arsenal logo

    Guendouzi Rejects Morocco, Only Wants France

    Morocco World News
    via Morocco World News

    Messi Voted for Ronaldo, CR7 Didn't Do Same 😳 Who Voted for Who 👇

    World Football logo
    World Football

    Messi Voted for Ronaldo, CR7 Didn't Do Same 😳 Who Voted for Who 👇

    Football (soccer) greatest goals and highlights | 101 Great Goals
    via Football (soccer) greatest goals and highlights | 101 Great Goals

    FIFA Football Awards 2018: the Stars Come Out 📸

    World Football logo
    World Football

    FIFA Football Awards 2018: the Stars Come Out 📸

    Jim Powell
    via the Guardian

    Against Messi and Ronaldo, Modric Offers Substance Over Star Power

    World Football logo
    World Football

    Against Messi and Ronaldo, Modric Offers Substance Over Star Power

    The Independent
    via The Independent