Featured Video
Arsenal Missed Targets ๐Ÿซ 

Arsenal Transfer Retrospection: The Total Cost of RvP and 5 Other Superstars

Emile Donovan
Aug 22, 2012

So today at university, my eftpos card declined while I was attempting to purchase a $3.99 sandwich, and this got me thinking about football and money.

I recalled a period in the Robin van Persie transfer saga when newspaper headlines were grossly proclaiming that Juventus was putting together a ยฃ73 million deal for the Dutch striker.

When I first saw this, I was rather gobsmacked, as you could imagine. But upon reading the articles I ascertained that the figure was not a simple transfer fee, it also included van Persieโ€™s wages, which were suggested to be around ยฃ180,000 after tax.

Now, this is a premium case of information being taken out of context in order to sensationalize headlines and thus attract outraged readers. A transfer fee is always separate to the wages paid to the player. The fee is effectively money that โ€œbuys outโ€ the playerโ€™s existing contract, thus allowing that player to negotiate a new contract with the fee-paying club, while wages are, well, wages.

ยฃ73 million pounds sounds like an incorrigibly large sum of moneyโ€”and it is. But this got me wondering what the total transfer fees of other, better-paid, higher-priced players might be if we took into account their wages as well, and this, dear reader, is how articles are born.

In the following list, I have taken the weekly wage of the said player (according to paywizard.co.uk) and multiplied it by 52 (52 weeks in a year, for those Cro-Magnons among us).

That figure was then multiplied by the number of years that the contract originally stated, producing a gross sum of their football-related wages.

I then added their reported transfer fee to the number, plus 10%, which I presumed to be an overall average of a playerโ€™s signing-on fee.

I got all the information I used from the above source, and I realize that some of the figures may be stated as different in other sources. This is not intended to be an exhaustive auditing of clubsโ€™ player expenditure; it is simply an eye-opening look at the true costs of players in the modern climate.

The results are...well. See for yourself.

6: Robin Van Persie—Manchester United

1 of 6

Total Cost: ยฃ68,000,000

Van Persie takes sixth place on this list, with a transfer fee speculated at around ยฃ24 million on top of a four-year deal on ยฃ200,000 a week.

This means that United are cumulatively paying about ยฃ17 million a year for the Dutchmanโ€”or ยฃ46,000 a day.

For comic effect, each of these slides will involve a comparison made between the amount of money spent by the club, and an equivalent number of life necessities that could be purchased with the same amount of money.

Thus, with the money Manchester United spent on Robin van Persie, Alex Ferguson could have bought me 33,166,616 sandwiches from the Otago University campus shop, adjusted to the New Zealand Dollar of course.

In order to consume these sandwiches by the time van Persieโ€™s contract ran out, I would have to eat just under 23,000 sandwiches a day.

Suddenly, I donโ€™t feel quite as bad about van Persie leaving now.

5: Zlatan Ibrahimovic—PSG

2 of 6

Total Cost: ยฃ80,000,000

Ibraโ€™s move to the pointlessly wealthy Parisian club will cost his new employers around ยฃ80 million over three years, or a tad under ยฃ27 million a year, though given the enigmatic Swedeโ€™s past history, itโ€™ll be a miracle if he stays around long enough for the full sum to change hands.

Strangely, only ยฃ15.8 million of this sum is Ibrahimovicโ€™s transfer fee: he managed to land himself a sweet contract deal on about ยฃ400,000 per week before tax, which is enough money to genuinely scare most people, and leads me to question whether Ibra serves his guests blended up money cocktails at his dinner parties, as this would certainly be high on my priority list.

Ibrahimovicโ€™s total cost works out at a tad over ยฃ73,000 per day, which means PSG are paying the average yearly incomes of five New Zealanders every single day in exchange for Zlatan, though they may be able to recoup these funds if they capitalize on the Swedeโ€™s bizarre first name and statuesque appearance and create a superhero movie franchise based on his exploits.

Zlatan-man! Destroys villains with...er...his powerful kicks.

Anyway! I work at an Irish pub, and at that Irish pub a pint of Guinness costs me $9.60NZ, which is about ยฃ5.

I would need to drink 5,333,333 pints of Guinness every year for three years to spend the amount of money Ibra will cost PSG on Guinness.

This works out as being slightly under 15,000 pints a day, which, interestingly enough, is relatively close to Charlie Sheenโ€™s average daily consumption.

However, to put things into perspective, St Patrickโ€™s Day normally sees the world consume 13 million pints of black gold in 24 hours, so I suppose I have a bit of catching up to do.

4: Samuel Eto’o—Anzhi

3 of 6

Total Cost: ยฃ81,912,880

Heavens above.

Imagine something for me, indulge me for a second: you happen to be a genuinely top-drawer player from a burgeoning African nation who has played for three of the biggest clubs in world football, scored goals aplenty and is still at (or at least near) the top of your game.

What on earth would possess you to forsake your career among the elite clubs of world football to ply your trade in Russia of all places?

If you said โ€œwell, Emile, you witty and handsome young man, it would take about ยฃ366,000 a weekโ€, then you and Samuel Etoโ€™o would have something in common.

Etoโ€™o is the highest-paid player in world football. His annual earnings are cited by his Wikipedia page (that bastion of reliable information) as being in the region of ยฃ15.8 million per season after tax.

Etoโ€™oโ€™s (that seems to be a lot of apostrophes) deal is only for three years, so that ยฃ81,912,880 equals out at just over ยฃ27 million per year, roughly the same as that of Zlatan Ibrahimovic.

The rent at my flat is $110NZ per week. This means that, for the overall cost of Samuel Etoโ€™o, Anzhi football club could provide me with a roof over my head for about 27,000 years.

Cheers, guys. Real cool.

3: Yaya Toure—Manchester City

4 of 6

Total Cost: ยฃ90,191,000

Yaya Toureโ€™s mammoth ยฃ245,000 per-week five-year contract, ยฃ24 million transfer fee and presumed ยฃ2.4 million signing-on fee garner him third place in this list, with an overall cost just nudging over ยฃ90 million which, by all accounts, is slightly more money that you can shake a stick at.

Interestingly, Toure is the only player on this list who is not fundamentally an attacking player, which is ironic considering that goals conceded certainly cost a club more than goals scored, pun most decisively intended.

The length of Toureโ€™s contract means that his annual cost compared to that of Ibra is relatively measlyโ€”a mere ยฃ18,038,000 per yearโ€”and it could be argued that Toure is one of the most important components of the Man City team, and thus justifies his enormous cost.

However, itโ€™s easy to make it sound ridiculous as well. So letโ€™s do that, shall we!?

A 2000 Honda Civic gets around 30 miles to the gallon of petrol, and works out at having an annual cost of $1850US per year, presuming that you drive about 15,000 miles per year.

With the money City will end up spending on Yaya Toure, they could run one of these Honda Civics for about 48,000 years.

Hmm. Yes. Well. Obviously we canโ€™t purse our lips quite yetโ€”thereโ€™s still two to come!!

2: Kaka—Real Madrid

5 of 6

Total Cost: ยฃ144,962,344

When Kaka was bought by Real Madrid for a ยฃ56 million fee in 2009, Iโ€™m not entirely convinced they were sober.

The Brazilian was signed to a six-year contract on ยฃ267,187 per week, which meant that Real was aware of the fact that, in 2014, they would be still paying a 32-year-old enough money to fund and maintain a small military coup.

They will be feeling a bit sorry for themselves now, as Kaka has been leapfrogged in the Madrid pecking order by Mesut Oezil, Angel di Maria and, soon, Luka Modric.

But Kakaโ€™s bank account will continue ticking over. Now weโ€™re getting into silly numbers: the Brazilian playmaker will have cost Madrid over ยฃ140,000,000 if he sees out his contract, and thus the only way to do such an outrageous number justice is to compare it against something similarly outrageously-priced.

The most expensive food in the world is an Italian White Alba Truffle. The most expensive of these sold for ยฃ101,000 or $160,000US.

The most expensive bottle of white wine ever sold cost ยฃ75,000.

The most expensive steak in the world costs about ยฃ1,770.

If Florentino Perez ate the worldโ€™s finest steak every night for six years, and, every Saturday and Sunday, washed it down with a bottle of the worldโ€™s finest white wine and, also every Saturday and Sunday, then finished off with a White Alba Truffle...for six years...

Heโ€™d still have enough money left over to buy Luka Modric at the end of it all.

1: Cristiano Ronaldo—Real Madrid

6 of 6

Total Cost: TBA

Letโ€™s go through this one together, so that you can see that Iโ€™m not sensationalizing this figure.

According to Paywizard, Ronaldo is paid ยฃ545,935 per week before tax, as per his contract.

His contract runs for six years. Therefore, we go 545,935 x 6 x 52.

This comes to ยฃ170,331,720. On wages.

Now we add Ronaldoโ€™s transfer feeโ€”which is the highest of all time, at ยฃ80 million.

As a cherry, we add on another ยฃ8 million as a signing-on fee.

Total Cost: ยฃ258,331,720.

ยฃ41,721,953 per year.

ยฃ802,345 per week.

ยฃ114,620 per day.

ยฃ4,775 per hour, every hour of every day of every month of every year for six years. Thatโ€™s what Real are paying.

Yuck.