2012 NFL Draft: 3 Teams Sure to Botch First-Round Picks
Remember when the Minnesota Vikings didnโt make their first-round pick in time in the 2003 NFL draft?
How about the time the Oakland Raiders selected Darrius Heyward-Bey seventh overall in 2009?
Or that time in 1998 when the San Diego Chargers picked Ryan Leaf with their No. 2 overall selection?
TOP NEWS
.jpg?w=2560)
Mahomes Told Teammate to Leave Meeting

McCarthy Wins 1st Giants Start
.jpg?w=2560)
Baker Gets Glove From Rays ๐งค
My point: Teams botch their first-round picks pretty frequently. Itโs happened before and itโs sure to happen again this year.
So, letโs take a look at three teams that have the most potential to waste their first-round picks in the 2012 NFL draft.
Minnesota Vikings
The obvious choice for the Vikings at No. 3 is Matt Kalil from USC.
The Vikings need a left tackle, and it doesnโt get any better than Kalil in this draft class.
Still, there are rumors that the Vikings will trade out of the No. 3 spot if the right offer comes along.
They just need to stay put, draft Kalil, and build their offensive line around him for the next 10 to 12 years.
The Patriots need to start putting some first-round talent around Tom Brady, both offensively and defensively.
With two first-round picks this year (No. 27 and No. 31), thereโs no time like the present, especially since Brady wonโt be able to play at an elite level forever.
But, if I know Bill Belichick and his draft strategy, heโs probably looking to trade one or both of his first-round picks to stockpile picks for the future.
Normally, thatโs not a terrible idea, but this year, it might be the worst thing he could do.
The Bills are reportedly interested in safety Mark Barron. However, safety is not one of the teamโs top needs.
This โinterestโ in Barron could just be a ruse to try to get teams to trade up so the Bills can acquire more picks, but weโll see.
After all, these are the Buffalo Bills we are talking about.
Would anybody really be surprised if they actually did pick Barron at No. 10?

.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)

.jpg?w=2560)