C has yet to fill out a bio.
You're not only a total pussy and a coward, you're a dumbass as well, Mizzou has been our bitch for over 30 years, THEY SUCK, always have, and joining the almighty SEC isn't going to change that, so shut your fucking mouth, go fuck your sister some more, and talk to me when UGA actually wins something...anything, your fucking dawgs are as big of a joke as you are, so fuck off you little bitch.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....Ameer and the Big Red may have lost but at least he isn't SUSPENDED for violating obvious NCAA rules.It wasn't like UGA was going anywhere this year anyway but you're fucked now buddy, your QB sucks and your Defense isn't good enough to carry them to victory, enjoy the rest of the year loser.
You still can't help but be a class act can you. You probably didn't even watch the game to see 8-9 in the box. The Spartans in case you didn't know is one of the best defenses in the country. Keep riding those apron strings of the west. Abdullah still has more yards and TD's than Gurley. Abdullah means more to NEBRASKA, than Gurley means to georgia. Took you long enough to post something on here, had to wait nearly a month for that, blah. Did mommy finally let you have your internet rights back? If you really want to stay in the present what's the over/under with how many more players are idiots and get kicked off the team this year?
And yet we still beat your Dawgs......and they had an NFL QB........You're a sad little piss ant and I still love to have that beer sometime, you just let me know when you're close coward,I'll choke your sister fuckin' ininbred ass out and stomp the shit out of you
Oh by the way a different screen name? Get over yourself. I'm not scared to put myself out there cock sucker.
Since you like links so much, there you go. I tried to find all of your comments after the game last year but for some reason you disappeared. I stay to the Husker boards. I actually do hope Gurley makes it through the year but the odds are against him on that team and his history. http://espn.go.com/college-football/heisman14/
That was a mistake, taken care of. Not a fan.
oh remember when we beat y'all last haha loser
I appreciate your eagerness to anonymously call my work poor on my wall. The fact that you don't even utilize a name—not even a fake one—only further my desires to meet your standards. Well played.
A few points I'd like to make.
None of my content involves sexual content, so calling headlines "salacious" is an inaccurate use of the word.
I am not paid based on page views, so the notion that I craft headlines around clicks is foolish. Further, I don't craft all of my headlines. Period. A large portion of topics are assigned. I have editors who often assign story angles, and even if an angle is my own, they often choose article wording.
If I'm consistently called out as the "misinformed Perez Hilton" of the team I cover, I must have missed that. I'm glad the aforementioned editors haven't come to that conclusion.
I'm assuming the "negative" article you're referencing at this time is the piece on Georgia's poor showing in the 2014 NFL Draft. With that assumption, two serious questions for you. And, I'd love to hear responses.
1. How would you counter my assertion that Georgia was under-represented in this year's draft relative to its rivals?
2. How would you counter the assertion that impressionable 17 and 18-year old kids value NFL dreams and several of Georgia's biggest rivals on the recruiting trail and on the field had more impressive draft classes this year?
If it we me, I'd counter with "But that was only one year!!!" Well, I already covered that point, saying, "Fortunately for Richt, this year's draft futility is an anomaly within the context of recent history."
I think the headline was fairly accurate to the content written, and I don't see holes in the content. The bulk of the article was about 1. schools using NFL numbers to drive recruiting, and 2. Georgia having only two players drafted this year.
As a challenge to you, please read through my last page of titles ( http://bleacherreport.com/users/539856-andrew-hall/archives/newest?rel=nofollow )and tell me which ones are so overtly negative. Then do some math and tell me what percentage bash the Dawgs. I think the ratio of negative/positive/neutral connotations in both titles and content is pretty balanced. And that's how it should be.
As for my "angle" and trying to make a living, even that assertion is off base. I spend a few hours a week writing my opinions on college football. I'm not trying to make a career out of this. Never was, never will. And if you think I know nothing about college football, then you'd really hate my writing on fashion and interior decorating.
Have a nice day, C. I'd love to get a response from you on these matter. Feel free to write it on BR or even email me - email@example.com.
keep hating we are better