Generating profile stats...
I'm old, and proud. I'd be happy to discuss pre-1970s pugalism with anybody who loves the era as much as I
Jimmy Dean posted 875 days ago
Keep posting.. your knowledge on diabetes and lack of bias is refreshing.
jeremy batista posted 875 days ago
Pain killers doesn't interfere with insulin. if that was the cause somebody with diabetes is screwed if they got a headach .my grandma has had diabetes for 18 years and she take vocdon everyday for her hip. A tylenol isn't going to kill culter
jeremy batista posted 875 days ago
Maurice Pouncy was in crutches with ice on his knee and had to be helped of the field, he wasn't standing up listing to music on the exercise bike you saw where he got injured unlike jay cutler. The bears are going to make the injury sound as wrost as they can, who know how bad the injury really was
jeremy batista posted 876 days ago
he has been to two afc champion games, that has only happen once brother. you mad because sanchez is better half half the QB's in the leage
jeremy batista posted 876 days ago
mark sanchez has never been pulled out in his career what are you talking about??. Im from new york and i wacth every game. They dont defense there in the leage and he has won 4 playoffs games already jay cutler hasnt done shit. he won againt the 7-9 seahawk that aint nothing. learn about football before you speak
Calvin does not have any awards.
I aint one to get unduly upset, but I got to complain about Leo Reyes (again).
Just been on one of his articles, and I'd say 80% of the claims he makes have no sources whatsoever. Quotes, links, nothing. He's just saying "they happened".
What's more, a large portion of the article is based on something a Bleacher user said to him on his message board.
By that I mean, he's using something a bleacher user said, and is saying "sources have told me" like it's something official!?
You know, it's just gutter-journalism. Really is.
Not only that, but he's really trying to mislead on this. Trying to promote faked rumours, and myths as fact
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/576684-random-drug-tests-still-biggest-hurdle-in-pacquiao-mayweather-fight-negotiations
879 days ago
Hello there,
I’d like to discuss this chap. I see his articles appear every now and then, and occasionally leave a message.
In my opinion, he seems to be continually just trying to cause arguments. His articles are rarely little more than petty abuse of a fighter (always the same fighter) he doesn’t like, involving little information and fact other than he thinks he’s a “chicken” a “coward” and a “wife beater”.
It appears to me that he’s just one of these chaps, who is trying to create arguments. Is hoping to attract hate. Someone who likes inciting hate, and reading the replies he get. I say this as he seems to never reply to any comment, unless it’s someone else posting abuse.
I’m just bringing this up, as this sort of thing is awful for communities. And I consider myself (being old!) someone who’s been about long enough to see this more than a few times.
He’s trying to create an environment of hate, against a fighter, and his fans, in the hope that he can make it an uncomfortable place for them to go. It’s basic bullying I’m afraid. There’s no other way to describe it.
I write this, as I don’t think it’s a good example to reward this with featured columnist status. Someone who appears to have done little more than mount personal, quite abusive campaigns against a fighter he doesn’t like.
A lot of quite good, knowledgable young men, seem to be getting dragged into arguments, abusive arguments, and hate. People who just wouldn’t be doing this, if these sorts of articles, weren’t so visible on the front page.
I know from experience, that’s it’s very hard for even the most tolerant people, to stay calm, and avoid getting drawn into such exchanges, when they just can’t get away from the people trying to incite the hatred.
I will post you a quote, from the author, from the article. To demonstrate the level of writing. This isn’t even from the article, it’s a subsequent comment he’s put on.
“Floyd is the undisputed women's champ for beating his baby's mama, and abusin his kids.”
This is a comment from a featured writer? Not only is it probably libelous, but it’s in very bad taste. What does he mean by “abuse”. It’s a word that can be taken in terrible ways.
As a new-ish user, I’d just like to say that I, and the majority of readers, really don’t want to get involved in arguments, abuse, and hate. We’d much prefer to just debate boxing.
I do feel that it’s morally wrong for someone to be rewarded for this sort of article.
I also feel, that if there are people who want to get involved in this sort of thing, they can add the author as a fan, and look for the articles themselves.
I do feel, he’s only doing it, as he can get away with it. And as soon as people start ignoring him, and his reads drop to about 200, he’ll probably realize that it’s not acceptable.
I hope you find this feedback useful
Regards
Calvin
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/520920-floyd-mayweather-the-face-of-boxing
943 days ago
Calvin does not have any fans.
