martin kampmann has the best shot at beating gsp other tis than ellenberger. Condits takedown deffense is too poor to challenge gsp

You're welcome, Karlo!

Nice article, Karlo. Just a couple of minor grammatical fixes.

Great work, Karlo! Very clean article. The comparisons you make between the two matchups become quite clear as the piece progresses, but I thought the fourth paragraph could use some clarification--it took me a few reads before I got it. (The fifth paragraph, in contrast, is helpfully explicit; perhaps you could find a way to merge the two? Just a suggestion.)

You're welcome, Karlo!

Ah, lucky for you Karlo, I'm only now preparing to rest up for tomorrow, so I saw this relatively quickly. Thanks for the well wishes! Here were my comments:

Great article, Karlo. A unique look into a popular debate that applies to all sports, including and beyond MMA.

I made several grammatical edits, but here's a sentence I wasn't sure how to fix:

"No one can be blamed for ascribing to Jones a role-model status, for just about everyone who follows him and his exploits."

That's not a complete sentence; what does everyone who follows him and his exploits do?

Other than that, awesome work!

Great job, Karlo! Just a couple of questions: First, should the definition you cite in the first sentence include "of his facial muscles"? (Or maybe "of one's facial muscles"?) I assume a smile is not considered just any "lateral and upward movement," which is what your current use of quotation marks implies. (Might need to hit “The New Lexicon Webster’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language (1993 edition)” again...)

Second, is "psywar" a word you made up, or is it an established term? If the former, or if it's slang, perhaps it should be in quotes.

Keep up the awesome work!

Glad to help, Karlo! And yes, I'll be sure to celebrate this weekend. :-)

Excellent work, Karlo. It's always valuable to look at sports in relation to matters much more important than matches and statistics.

Outside of a few grammatical edits, my only suggestion pertains to the paragraph in which you directly link the children of St. Jude to MMA fighters:

"Our sport and the people at the front, sides and hind of it are still battling for mainstream acceptance. Our disease-stricken children may not only be struggling for acceptance, but most significantly, for survival."

Although the connection is a meaningful one, I think the sense in which you use "acceptance" varies greatly from MMA to sick children. For instance, you characterize the acceptance MMA seeks as "mainstream." It might be worth asking yourself, and clarifying in the article, what kind of acceptance are the children seeking? My guess is that you mean some kind of social acceptance.

Oh, and this is incredibly minor, but I think you can take out the supposition that the little girl Gracie is unrelated to the Gracies; I think saying that the name is a coincidence implies by itself that there is no relation. But that's your call.

Anyway, great job, and thanks for sharing another wonderful article!

Wow, thanks Karlo! Yup, graduation is this weekend. I don't have anything concrete set up right now for what to do after, so I'd be more than happy to resume editing your articles! :-)