http://apple.freebiejeebies.co.uk/770124

you can go to this link and get a free gift. first you must complete one offer and get referrals based on the product.

research first

Hey Kelly, dont get me wrong, I do not think the world is up of Clipper bandwaggoners and Laker fans. There are enough Laker bandwaggoners out there. Also, I dont care of they are Clippers, Lakers or whatever, I just cant stand them. And of course I dont think you are one of them.

Hey Kelly, I really appreciate you sticking up for Boozer in your last article. I agree that he doesn't deserve all the criticism he gets. Yes, he's overpaid, but what quality big man (with Boozer's offensive skill ) isn't? Something I noticed about his efficiency is that no one in the league who has his midrange efficiency has his RA efficiency, and his efficiency inside the paint is one of the best in the league. Another thing is, the Bulls run an offense centered around Rose's driving. In order to keep the paint open, Boozer is often at the elbow or baseline shooting jumpers. While his jumpshot is accurate, judging by his interior efficiency and some old Utah games I watched, his post up game is where his strength truly lies.

What I'm saying is that he's had to alter his game to benefit the team (I'm not sure I could name many players who would be willing, and most importantly able to make such a change). Everyone keeps talking about how the Bulls need a second scorer. I actually think that Boozer is skilled enough to be that second scorer, but he's used within the offense as more of a role player. Now the Bulls know that Rose needs to pace himself and not go 200mph for 48 minutes. When Rose dials back, that's the perfect opportunity for the Bulls to utilize Boozer inside; they could take advantage of having the best passing frontcourt in the NBA by having Boozer and Noah run a 2-man high-low game, or they could do a bit of an inside-out with Boozer in the post and Deng/Korver/Hamilton/Rose spotting up.

As a final thought, I think Boozer's defense is actually not terrible like people say it is. At least by my observations, he's an average defensive power forward. We all hear how he misses rotations etc. First of all, everyone misses the occasional rotation. Also, Thibodeau's defense is one that is difficult for any bigs that aren't at least 'good' defenders. Look at the bigs he's coached in Boston and Chicago; Garnett, Perkins, Noah, Gibson, Asik.

What are your thoughts?

I recently read your article on why the Bulls shouldn't be broken up. I just wanted to ask u something. While, this Bulls team is championship caliber aren't players like Boozer and Deng approaching their 30s while Rose is still like 24. So won't trading them for younger assets, tanking the next season with the ACL injury and a combination of high 2013 draft pick, Mirotic and the Charlotte pick be better for building a dynasty?

Hi Kelly,

Per B/R style guidelines, seeds should be notated as the following:

The acceptable constructions are "No. 1 seed" (or No. 2 seed, etc.) and "eighth seed" (or "eighth-seeded," etc.) instead of of "#1 seed," "number one seed," "1 seed," or "one seed." Note also that there is a space between the period and the digit in "No. 1."

By ranking construction, I meant using the No. in front of the numeral. You can use the numeral for seeding, but it has to include the "No." in front of it.

Hope this helps! Sorry for the delay in getting back to you...

Spent the past few days creating a database of this seasons defensive statistics from Synergy which I know you're fond of. Interestingly, John Lucas III is first among point guards in most categories, including OFG%, Iso and P+R Ball Handler. Surely you can only attribute so much of that ranking to the small sample size/help? Especially when CJ Watson's statistics are dreadful in comparison.

A trend I'm shocked at so far is the number of undersized players that are dominating defensively. Would like to hear your take on it as I've seen articles in the past where you've seen the story in the statistics.

Just goes to show how fast the news changes...thanks for the heads up!

Offseason trades for each NBA team?

Your article on the top playoff performers was really good...however you did make a mistake on the final slide. Michael jordan did have a shot that rings pain for all Jazz fans but that is not what is referred to as "The Shot." The Utah game was a reference to the 1998 playoffs i assume whereas "The Shot" was against the Cleveland Cavaliers in the 1989 playoffs, both were great plays but only one can be "The Shot."

The bad part about this whole thing is: it isn't just the fans. You would expect people who get paid to watch and write about sports to give an analytical and thought provoking opinion on the matter, but they don't. These same people were in love with Thibs last month, loathe him now. These same people who believed him to be a brilliant coach, think he should stick to being an assistant. Bulls fans may be loyal, but they can be harsh and overly critical as well. I haven't even been on B/R as much because of the ridiculousness that is going on with some of the writers.