L has yet to fill out a bio.
You are obviously talking about MJ, and it might interest you to see the messages he posted on my page because I think he is as eager to let this rest as you are. It was your contentious reaction to someone disagreeing with you that stuck out in my mind when Flynn was cut again, bringing me back to that article and thus your name. I simply wanted to tease you for it, but start out with the good news that he might be available: I think we can all agree that would be best.
apologies if the first comment continues to post...wasn't trying to post twice just clarify that I was talking about your stalking accusation--doesn't seem to be deleting
Stalking you? What planet do you live on? This is the first time I have ever made any comment to you. So sorry you can dish out about how we're idiots the clearly cannot take it when you are proven wrong.
This is the first time I ever mentioned this to you. It seems you have a problem taking what you dish out--you call us idiots and you don't expect anyone to rub it in your face when you're wrong? THAT'S pathetic.
The good news is that Matt Flynn should be available to back up Rodgers. The bad news is it makes it look unreasonable for people that questioned the sensibility of anyone that doubted he would be great when he has now been discarded by three teams in 18 months.
MJ, you're attempting to revive a disagreement that two months ago was laid to rest.
You've made it clear: You think not seeing Flynn throw a deep out is evidence that he won't be successful in the league. You also evaluate him on preseason performances.
I disagree and put more weight into both of his NFL starts, and believe that a lack of evidence proves nothing.
Congratulations on finding an espn analyst who agrees with you. I hope now you'll be able to get some sleep after two months worth of continuing to fume over this debate. If you don't like people disagreeing with you vehemently, then I suggest re-evaluating your hobby of sports writing. Develop some thicker skin and quit crying.
Misogynistic AND hypocritical—cowardliness as not having "a pair" while you are the one wanting to avoid the debate...makes sense since you attack my character while being unable to refute my point.
Yeah, now ESPN Insider KC Joyner explains why it's buyer beware for the "overrated" Matt Flynn—wanna guess what his "warning signs" are or is he just a hater, too? Oh, wait, facts have never been part of this equation for you, or you would have answered why it is not at least concerning that in over 100 passes including preseason, Flynn never threw an out deeper than 20 yards.
Hope the guy proves me wrong, but I just don't happen to think he will fall somewhere between Ty Detmer and Chad Pennington. Guess in your world a person is not entitled to his or her own opinion without having fundamental intelligence questioned if it does not agree with yours.
Yeah, now ESPN Insider KC Joyner explains why it's buyer beware for the "overrated" Matt Flynn—wanna guess what his "warning signs" are or is he just a hater, too? Oh, wait, facts have never been part of this equation for you, or you would have answered why it is not alarming that in over 100 passes, Flynn never threw an out deeper than 20 yards.
She's baaaa-ack! http://bleacherreport.com/articles/515690-favre-scandal-jenn-sterger-speaks-to-nfl