Ben Elliott

Ben Elliott

  •  
     
    Generating profile stats...

About

Ben has yet to fill out a bio.

Bulletin Board

Default-user-icon-comment
or to post this comment
  • Mista Amazing posted 517 days ago

    Mista Amazing

    Hey man!! Do you think the Big East will continue it's success?? I think Temple and Memphis are fine teams, plus Memphis has a great recruiting class this time.

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    Yeah that is true. I just hate to see players affected, because of health(Wade and Duncan). Even being #1 on the Spurs, Pop never lets them have too much fun LOL.

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    Also thanks for having a "Discussion" with me and not an argument lol. Feel free to post your response to my page so i'll know when you do respond. It's hard to find other sports fans willing to discuss, and not respond with hostility.

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    This is true, but within the Spurs system stats are always well below what they would truly be if these players had been "THE MAN" on a different team. What i mean is that right now Parker entering his prime, and Wade's decline and health are the reasons that i say he is better "Right Now". Wade was better, just not now.

    It's like putting the Lakers above the Heat in the Power Rankings, because of what they have done. The Heat are better now, and Parker is better now.

    You know how much the Spurs system diminishes individual stats. Parker is a 20 PPG 8 ASST and 3 RB's per game guy. On another team where he would be the main guy, that would probably be 25 11 and 5. There is a reason that Duncan has one of the highest PER's, but only averages under 20 PPG and under 10 rebounds. Regardless though it is a system that works for them.

  • Ben Elliott posted 521 days ago

    Ben Elliott

    I still think Wade is better than Parker. His usage is down due to the arrival of Bosh and LeBron, and he's not 100% healthy. I think if you put a healthy Wade on a team where he's the number 1 option, he'll put up far better numbers than Parker.

    Also, the Spurs are better. Maybe not at the top 3 spots, but after that it's no contest.

    Duncan won the first two championships for Parker, and he's the best PF of all-time, so don't act like he led the team to all three rings.

    Shaq was at the end of his prime when he won with Wade, and that was Wade's team.

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    Parker rings are 3* Stupid key board trying to give Parker Duncan's credit LOL

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    I also so see what teams you like. There is nothing wrong about supporting your team, but it is wrong to be a hypocrite. You see my picture? I see what team you support. The least you could have done is given me a reason that Wade is better. Rings Wade 2 Parker 4. Finals MVP's Wade 1 Parker 1. Are you going to argue that Parker had a better team? Team mates like Shaq, LEBRON, and Chris Bosh do not seem worse. Playing next to a player compared to "HIS AIRNESS", i might put up 10 a game. lol

  • Samuel S. posted 521 days ago

    Samuel S.

    A response to a comment you made:


    Yeah right now Parker is playing better and is better than Wade. I may be a Spurs fan, but i give credit where credit is due. He's not close to Lebron or Durant, even though the Spurs have the best record in the league, but Parker will always be underrated. Blake Griffin over Parker? I rest my case. Please watch the game more. Not just Nationally televised games and you will see how much better he is than Wade. Better shooter, passer, floor general,they are even in the clutch, and finisher at the basket (Not just about dunking). I will admit that Wade was a beast, but having Lebron and Bosh to pass to and take some attention away certainly does help. Who gets double teamed on the Spurs? Green? LOL! It's time to acknowledge Parker for the TRUE superstar that he is. Wade's time is winding down, just like Duncan's...