Jay's Fans (2)
- « previous
- next »
Jay's Bio
5'8 140 (ding!) 2LT, United States Army. I found myself wanting to write about sports several times on my philosophy blog Applied Pragmatism (www.appliedpragmatism.blogspot.com), so I decided to open this account to get my thoughts down. I'm from Nebraska, but try to cover everything when I write. I will do game recaps from time to time, but I prefer to work from a broader angle. If you leave a comment I will do everything I can to get back to you and continue the conversation.
Jay's Recent Articles
Jay Writes About
- Opinion (13),
- NBA (7),
- College Baseball (6),
- Sports & Society (4),
- Nebraska Huskers Baseball (3),
- NCAA (3),
- Sports Business (3),
- Game Recap (3)
- Jay Urban has picked Why Cleveland Acquiring Shaq Is a Bad Idea as a favorite article
- Jay Urban has picked Why Cleveland Acquiring Shaq Is a Bad Idea as a favorite article
- View Jay's Activity »
The Short List What Jay thinks about sport's most pressing questions
-
Favorite Athletes
Emmitt Smith,
-
Favorite Sports Teams
STL Cardinals, KC Royals, Nebraska Cornhuskers
-
All Time Sports Moment
Nebraska winning the 1996 Fiesta Bowl, the '95 Orange Bowl was more defining, but the Fiesta Bowl game showed this youngster that execution and professionalism can defeat flash no matter how technically superior one system looks
-
Most Memorable Game Attended
2002 Huskers vs. Colorado. The first time I saw the Huskers lose in person
-
Most Unbreakable Sports Record
stolen bases,,, nobody does that anymore
-
Ruth or Mays?
Mays
-
Unitas or Montana?
Montana,,, that's like asking Michael Jordan or Oscar Robertson,,, their might be a discussion,,, if anyone could remember the other guy
-
Pele or Maradona?
Who cares?
-
Pac 10, Big 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC, or Big East?
Big 12 top to bottom, from football, to baseball, to basketball, to track.


Robert38 articles
bob53 articles




Bulletin Board (12) Post a note »
« previous | next »
5 months ago
Jay,
Thanks very much for your feedback. I sincerely appreciate anything constructive.
Andrew
11 months ago
Thanks for the help. I have a knack of throwing in irrelevant things into my articles and not explaining them that well. Take a look at my other articles if you get the chance.
12 months ago
Thank you for the feedback and the tip. I always welcome advice! I'll be sure to put it to good use. Thanks again!
about 1 year ago
Jay, I remember the other guy.
about 1 year ago
thanks for the editing...much appreciated...GBR
about 1 year ago
When I did my show at Rider, I actually never got a chance to bring the baseball team on the show as guests. Their season always conflicted with my show time.
about 1 year ago
Thanks for the edits and the feedback. I usually stick to news pieces where something is summarized and facts are presented, so I'm a little new to writing my opinion into an article, which is probably why it was a little hard to find my true side in the story.
about 1 year ago
Jay, I'm not working in firefox today so here's some editor's feedback.
Nice article! I tweaked your headline and teaser and also made some minor stylistic changes. Make sure everything checks out to your liking—keep up the great work!
about 1 year ago
Good to see a Soldier in here Jay, from a Vet. Thanks for the service my friend. I like the articles. Looking forward to more as well.
about 1 year ago
The next time I want you to edit on of my articles I will ask you.
about 1 year ago
Jay,
Dude seriously I did not try to disrespect you (which I apparently did) but the going and changing every word or sentence in my story crap was a little over the top. I got no problems with you reading my articles and posting comments. Do not care if you disagree with me but just leave it at comments agreeing and dis agreeing with me.
about 1 year ago
And I agree with you, to a degree. I listen to ESPN Radio everyday. However, the point is reversed. They already have this in-depth analysis on the radio, on ESPNews, on First Take. Now they want to bring the same information to another channel. They're increasing the breadth of information and not the depth.
« previous | next »