I just read your article about CM punk and how you say people don't want long title reigns, however i find that too be false, i think that people want CM punks title reign too end because of the poor booking his had, the whole wrestlemania period he was an after thought he wasn't the main wrestler which he should of been booked to be, instead it was rock, cena, hhh and undertakes, even with the period after that the main focus was with john cena and lesnar feud, after his heel turn he has been booked to look very weak especially now with his ryback feud.
In your article you say people and the IWC don't want title reigns over 6 months this isn't true just look at TNA and what they have done with Bobby Roode, it just shows that good booking does keep the fans interested and liking the title holder, he was booked very strong and everyone believed the guy is a true maineventer, most people enjoyed his reign from start to finish, he had a reign of 9 months, during this time most people enjoyed it, and few people were arguing about it and few wanted him to lose the title, and when he did every accepted it and thought he lost the title to the right person being aries.
It shows that people want long reigns but they need good booking to keep the fans interested in the reigns.