Loni has yet to fill out a bio.
That's irrelevant. How would any team do without their most in-form attacking presence?
And the rest of United's team have actually scored 11 goals. The average amount for a top teams squad, excluding strikers.
Is there a problem if the top scorers are midfielders? Yes, because the top scorers should be strikers. Eventually, the goals will stop coming from midfield and the strikers will have the pick up. Terry has scored more goals in the league than Torres. Is that good?
OK, I'll give you this. With Chelsea's formation, it is perfectly acceptable for the wide forwards like Hazard to score. Just look at Barcelona, Bayern, Real etc., the difference is, their frontmen actually contribute goals as well.
United and Liverpool still play the old fashioned way of having two strikers play instead of one like Chelsea and Arsenal. That's why you don't see as many goals from two former clubs as the two latter. But….Giroud scores. Yes, Ramsey is the top scorer but I guarantee Giroud will end up with that honor come May.
Please kill yourself.
You truly despise bale dont you
Wilshere > Hazard