Bleacher Report - Articles by Ramone Brown

What Will It Take for Al Davis To See the Signs?

Ramone Brown — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:59:37 -0500

It is official: the Raider Nation is the most dysfunctional team and fan base in the NFL.

Even with our lowly three wins we are worse off than the Browns, Redskins, Chiefs, Lions, Buccaneers and the Rams.

Despite the fact that all those teams have worse records than the Raiders they haven't reached the point the Raiders have. Its so bad in Raider-Nation fans took it upon themselves to start and sign a petition against Al Davis called http://messagetoal.com/ .

They currently have a billboard (seen above) on I-880 less than a mile from the Oakland Alameda Coliseum, 30,000+ signatures and thousands in donations. The petition reads:

We kindly ask for Mr. Allen Davis to remove himself as general manager of the Oakland Raiders Organization.

We ask for a new General Manager to be hired with previous experience and success in the NFL.

We ask for a new, Super Bowl Caliber Head Coach/Director of Football Operations to be hired replacing Tom Cable. Suggestions include Bill Cowher and Jon Gruden; or any other coach with similar credentials.

We ask the Owner and new regime to give the new Coach substantial power in hiring Assistants, installing football philosophies and most roster decisions.

It is very apparent that change needs to happen in Oakland, and Al Davis is ultimately the only one who can bring such change to the Raiders. And its not just the fans who have been trying to get this across to Al.

The players have also made comments to try and get the message across:

Justin Fargas and much of the offensive line have made comments criticizing the offensive playcalling for not sticking to the run and/or giving up on it too early.

Sam Williams, the Raiders current starting strong-side linebacker, openly said that Tom Cable is a joke to half the locker room and everyone outside the Raiders organization.

Nnamdi Asomugha, the Raiders best defender (best player period), has been criticizing the defensive playcalling all year and recently went in-depth about how the defense is too simple.

Jeff Garcia, former Raider backup QB, commented that the Raiders were putting too much responsibility on Russell and that too many players were just there to collect checks.

It has all been said, but is Al Davis even listening and does he care?

So based on the players' and fans' comments, here are 10 things Al Davis needs to do to change the Raiders.

1. The first thing the Raiders need to do is listen to Rich Gannon who said, "The only thing left to do is to blow up the building and start over from scratch."

Screw that continuity bullshit, time to start over.

2. Then Al Davis needs to hire a GM, or atleast a Co-GM to help him with decision making.

Al Davis has a definite eye for player talent; otherwise no way he could have picked up Trevor Scott and Chaz Schilens in the sixth and seventh rounds. But as of late, his eye for NFL coaches has been less than spectacular. Al Davis needs to find someone to help him bring quality coaches.

3. The offensive play-calling is horrible. Why? because the Raiders do not even have an offensive coordinator on the payroll.

This needs to be fixed and the Raiders must hire a qualified play-caller, rather than allow Tom Cable to hold two full time jobs (head coach and offensive coordinator), neither of which he is very good at.

4. Sorry Cable fans, but if the Sam Williams comment holds any water, Cable has to go. A head coach needs all his players behind him and if half the team already thinks he is a joke, then he is a lost cause. Tom Cable must go.

The Raiders need to find a head coach with former success at the NFL level. Unlike Tom Cable who is new to being a head coach at the NFL level and was a horrible college head coach.

5. Was Nnamdi calling out the defensive coaching staff or Al Davis who is known for meddling with the defense and his basic press-man-coverage with a four-man rush? Either way something needs to change here.

Either the Raiders need to find a coaching staff who will call a more diverse defense or the current staff needs to mix it up without interference from Al Davis.

6. Pick up a real nose tackle. Just because you play Gerrard Warren at nose tackle doesn't mean he is a real nose tackle. In fact the Raiders haven't had a real nose tackle since Ted Washington in 2005.

This glaring hole has been ignored by the Raiders for years. Now is the time to finally address the biggest weakness in the defense.

7. Find players who want to win. Jeff Garcia said we have too many players just collecting paychecks. And Gary Russell said the Raiders have more talent the the Super Bowl champion Steelers.

The only difference between the Raiders and Steelers are the Steelers have players who would put their bodies on the line every play.

The Raiders need to cut everyone who is just here to collect checks and find more players like: Justin Fargas, Tyvon Branch, Trevor Scott, and Gary Russell.

8. Bring in a veteran QB to compete for the starting job. This season Garcia was brought in solely as a mentor and that didn't work out too well. The Raiders need to bring in a capable QB who can compete for the starting job and truly wants it.

One who can mentor Russell from the field not the sideline. Viable QBs who are currently on a contract year include:Jason Campbell, David Carr, Daunte Culpepper, Tarvaris Jackson, Kyle Orton, Chad Pennington, and Troy Smith.

9. Fix the O-line. Mario Henderson and Robert Gallery are good. Samson Satele is...Ehh. And Cooper Carlisle Cornell Green are horrible. The right side of the line is a constant source of penalties (holding from Carlisle and false starts from Green) and QB pressure.

Something needs to be done to shore up the right side of the line: Either through free agency, a trade, the draft, or players already on the roster like Erik Pears, Langston Walker, or Khalif Barnes.

10. Bring in a veteran receiver to help mentor the receivers and teach them how to get open in the NFL and hold onto the ball. Sure our receivers are young fast and have tremendous potential but the flat out can't catch.

Viable WRs on a contract year include: Steve Breaston, Isaac Bruce, Chris Chambers, Vincent Jackson, Brandon Marshall, Mushin Muhammad, and Terrell Owens.

Is Raiders DT Tommy Kelly Earning His Paycheck? Or Stealing Al Davis's Money?

Ramone Brown — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:03:08 -0500

Tommy Kelly has been a center of controversy ever since he signed a seven-year $50.5 million contract prior to the 2008 season. The Raiders had hopes of him replacing the over-hyped, over-paid and over the hill Warren Sapp.

At the time that was the largest contract ever given to a defensive tackle. Which has since then been surpassed by Albert Haynesworth's seven-year $100 million deal including $41 million in guaranteed money.

Kelly has been the victim of finger pointing and blame as fans and critics often place him at the center of the Raiders' struggles against the run.

Is Tommy Kelly just another over-paid walrus in the middle of the Raiders defense, like Warren Sapp and Terdel Sands were? Or are we as fans being too hard on him?

Take a look at the numbers and the answer will be more clear. Last year Kelly ranked sixth in tackles behind the likes of Pat Williams, Kevin Williams, Vince Wilfork, Shaun Rogers and Demato Peko. He also ranked eighth in sacks and deflected two passes.

And this year, despite that Tommy Kelly seems to be the main concern of opposing offenses as they constantly throw double teams at him, he is leading all NFL DTs in tackles this year with 46, though he does only have one sack.

So if Tommy Kelly is so good then why do so many people point fingers at him and why is the run defense so bad?

The reason Kelly receives so much blame against the run game is simply because people don't understand what his job is, or the difference between the two DT positions.

Tommy Kelly plays the three technique in this position he lines up on the outside shoulder of the weak-side guard. His job is to penetrate and shoot the B-gap. His job is to hold his gap and disrupt the backfield. Kelly is doing an excellent job at what his position asks.

Then there is the nose-tackle. They line up either in a zero- or one-technique, either head up or on the strong-side shoulder of the center. This is usually the biggest, strongest player on the defense. They are responsible for clogging the middle, holding the A-gap, and commanding double teams.

This is where the true problems lie. The Raiders do not have a true nose-tackle. Gerrard Warren, Desmond Bryant, Richard Seymour, and William Joseph have all taken snaps at nose-tackle this season. But they are all better suited to play the three-technique and in an ideal world they would be backing up Tommy Kelly and rotating in at the three-technique.

The Raiders don't have a player big enough or strong enough to play the nose tackle position. Right now this is the biggest hole on the Raiders defense. And filling it would improve every position on the Raiders defense.

In order for the Raiders defense to truly be formidable they need to find Tommy Kelly a partner in crime in a true nose-tackle. This coming offseason there will be a few options via free agency, draft and trade. Here are some of those options: Vince Wilfork (FA), Tank Tyler (FA), Justin Bannan (FA), Casey Hampton (FA), Aubrayo Franklin (FA), Terrence Cody (draft), Dan Williams (draft), Shaun Rogers (trade).

If the defense doesn't pick up one of these big men in the middle the defense will continue to struggle against the run and people will continue to blindly point fingers at Tommy Kelly.

Are Thomas Howard's Days in Oakland Numbered?

Ramone Brown — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:58:57 -0500

Thomas Howard is a clear fan favorite for the Oakland Raiders, and many consider him the Raiders second-best defender behind Nnamdi Asomugha.

But his future with the team has come into question. Though Howard has been stout in coverage, some would suggest he is riding the hype of his 2007 season when he had six interceptions, two of which were returned for touchdowns of 44 and 66 yards. But since then he has been rather quiet with one interception in the last 29 games.

Not only that but Howard has received criticism for his run support and inability to shed blockers.

Funny, fellow Raider linebacker Kirk Morrison has received the same criticism.

To make matters worse, the former "star" weak-side linebacker has been replaced by second-year player Trevor Scott. Scott had an impressive game with five tackles including two sacks and three tackles behind the line of scrimmage.

In the same game, Howard saw little playing time backing up starting strong-side linebacker Sam Williams.

Tom Cable has said that Trevor Scott will start again against Pittsburgh.

Scott's skill-set is nearly opposite of Howard. With experience playing defensive end, he is stronger against the run and better able to shed blocks. His only downfall is his lack of experience in pass coverage.

All this can only mean one of two things for Howard. Either he is being replaced, or he has a position move in his future.

Howard is currently in a contract year, and if the Raiders don't resign him, he will become a free agent. Being demoted as a starter may be a tell-tale sign that the Raiders have already made a decision on Howard. It is a clear possibility that he may not be wearing silver and black next year.

Raiders middle linebacker Morrison is also on a contract year, and the Raiders may have to make a decision between resigning one of the two.

If you had to make a decision between either signing Kirk Morrison or Thomas Howard, who would you pick?

The second possibility is a position change, likely to the strong side. Williams has received a lot of criticism from fans, mainly for being one of Al Davis's scholarship players for his impressive measurables and combination of speed and size.

But next year, competition for the starting strong-side linebacker position will be stiff with both Ricky Brown and Jon Alston returning from injury. With that, Howard's chances of returning to the silver and black are even more diminished.

Don't be surprised if he is gone next year. His days in Oakland may be numbered.

Why Charlie Frye Won't See the Field In Oakland

Ramone Brown — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:53:42 -0500

There is clearly a production problem with the QB position in Oakland. First JaMarcus Russell completely bombed the first half of the season with a 51.6 completion rate and nine interceptions this season.

He was then replaced by Bruce Gradkowski who gave us very similar results mis-firing just as badly with a 52.2 completion rate, three INTs, and three fumbles this season. Aside from the 0.6 percent completion rate improvement, Gradkowski's performance is nearly identical to Russell's. Gradkowski over-threw receives, mis-read defense, and was unable to recognize open receivers.

With results like that many are calling for the Raiders third QB Charlie Frye. And it isn't completely un- warranted as Frye has the highest career completion rate of the three Raider QBs: Gradkowski 52.8, Russell 51.6, and Frye 62.0. With Frye's completion percentage exceeding the other two QBs by 10 percent it is a wonder why he hasn't seen the field. Frye not only has the higher completion rate, but has more career yards than Gradkowski, and the most NFL experience.

The reason Frye hasn't seen the field is because favorites are being played with the QBs in Oakland.

First off, Bruce Gradkowski. He was coached by Raiders QB coach Hackett while in Tampa, and Hackett was the one who pushed for the Raiders to bring in both Gradkowski and Jeff Garcia, Hacketts two former pupils. Because of there past in Tampa Bay it is clear that Hackett favors Gradkowski.

Then there is JaMarcus Russell. To fully understand this you have to go back to accusations made that Al Davis is racist. A Tim Brown quote was mis-understood where he basically said Al Davis doesn't like black players from Notre Dame because they rely on their education or smarts rather than pure physical ability.

No way am I saying that Davis is racist. What I am saying is he prefers black athletes who rely on their physical abilities over there brains.

Clearly JaMarcus Russell fits well into what Al Davis wants in his black athletes. Russell is one of, if not the, strongest armed QBs the NFL has seen. Also when Russell was drafted he was very athletic for his size, and fit perfectly in the Al Davis height-weight-speed mold.

Not only that, but Russell isn't seen as the most mentally gifted QB in the league as many have questioned his intelligence.

A QB who made it through college purely on physical ability, and isn't a big thinker. If the Tim Brown quote is true what else would Al Davis want in a QB.

Then there is Charlie Frye. Barring injury he likely won't see any action this year simply because the other two QBs are favored. The only thing he has going for him is being Al Davis's second favorite QB as Davis granted Frye an audience prior to signing him.

Do the Oakland Raiders Have the Next Great Safety Tandem?

Ramone Brown — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:28:57 -0500

In the NFL great safeties are a luxury and teams with two great safeties are few and far between. Great safetie tandems are a QB's worst nightmare...Well, maybe second worst behind the second coming of Lawrence Taylor.

Great safety play usually dictates dominant defensive play. Last year the three teams with the most productive safeties were Tennessee (11 INTs and 153 tackles), Baltimore (10 INTs 110 tackles) and Pittsburgh (8 INTs 160 tackles). All three boasted top defenses in 2008 and combined for a 36-12 record.

With names like Troy Palamalu, Ed Reed, and Michael Griffin the play of the safeties undoubtedly had something to do with these teams' success.

Last year Raiders strong-safety Gibril Wilson led all safeties with 129 tackles and he now leads the Miami Dolphins in tackles. Many fans think that letting him go was a mistake. But don't worry his replacement is doing just fine.

Currently the Raiders second year strong-safety Tyvon Branch is on pace to match Gibril Wilson's 2008 total tackles. After only ten games Branch has 81 tackles under his belt this season, as well as two forced fumbles and a sack.

If the Raiders were to eventually develop a dominant safety tandem, Branch would be the center- piece. He had ridiculous combine numbers including the second fastest 40 time in the 2008 combine behind Tennessee's Chris Johnson. Branch also has experience returning kicks as well as playing both safety positions and corner.

So who will be Tyvon Branch's side-kick and partner in crime in the Raiders safety tandem? Right now it's between hard-hitting rookie Michael Mitchell, fourth year player Michael Huff, while current starting FS Hiram Eugene would be the under-dog.

Right now Michael Huff who seems to be resurecting his career and shedding the title of "bust" is leading the pack. So far in ten games backing up Hiram Eugene he has 39 tackles and three INTs and nine passes defended. Though he is very solid in pass coverage his only downfall is his lack of tackling ability, hence why Eugene starts over him. If he can develop his tackling he has the potential to be great.

Next is controversial second round draft pick Michael Mitchell. So far this year he has been hampered by injuries and used sparingly making most of his tackles on special teams.

So far this year he has only been used in sure running situations and in the Raiders wolverine package, which is a nickel package that uses a third safety near the line of scrimmage. The rookie still has a few questions surrounding him before we can proclaim him as the next Jack Tatum. Like is he durable enough for the NFL and can he keep up in coverage.

Then there's the Raiders starting free-safety Hiram Eugene. Though he doesn't have Huffs flashy speed and skills or Mitchell's hard-hitting when he is on the field he seems to get the job done. Though he is the most experienced of the bunch, in my opinion he has the least potential based on lack of pure physical ability. Also at 29, he is the oldest safety on the Raiders roster.

Which of these players, if any, has the potential to be part of the next great safety tandem on the Raiders. I would like to know what you think Raider Nation.

Oakland's JaMarcus Russell Is an "Extremely Good" Quarterback

Ramone Brown — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:55:43 -0500

Yes that's right, I said it. JaMarcus Russell is extremely good. Don't believe me? Want proof? Well I could show you an overhead slide-show presentation...or you could just ask Chad Ochocinco .

According to Ochocinco, Russell is the last person we should be blaming for the Raiders' offensive struggles.

"Man, JaMarcus is extremely good," Ochocinco said in a conference call Monday morning. "You have to remember a quarterback can only be as good as his supporting cast. Case closed. Always will be."

"You take a Tom Brady or a Peyton Manning; you take them out of their supporting casts, you take them out of the elements they're in now, and you put them in JaMarcus' situation; do you think it would be that much better? I'm just asking. Realistically."

But really, what is a QB to do? His receivers suck, most of his o-line can't block, Tom Cable is terrible at calling an offense and there isn't even an offensive coordinator on the coaching staff.

His receivers can't catch, run the right routes, or get open. Do you disagree? When two receivers run into each other at full speed it can only mean one of two things: Either they are running the wrong routes, or the guy calling the plays has a sick sense of humor.

The o-line sucks, aside from Henderson and Gallery. Too bad an o-line consists of five players not two. Satele is often over-powered by bigger line-men, Carlisel can't make a block without holding and Green can't remember the snap count. Russell has no time and has been sacked in less than 2.5 seconds on many occasions.

Then there's the coaching, which is horrible. It's the coach's job to properly prepare the team for its next opponent. There has only been one game which I would say we were prepared for offensively: week one against the Chargers.

Then there's the play-calling. If the Raiders' offensive play selection doesn't leave you scratching your head asking, "WHY?", you must not be watching the same games I am. The Raiders seem to come out passing nearly every game. Then when they have success on the ground they stop running. Funny thing is the run game is the Raiders' strength but you wouldn't know it from the play-calling.

Bottom line is, Russell is not as bad as he's made out to be. If you put new rims on a piece of shit car, guess what? You're still driving a piece of shit car. Whoever the Raiders put at QB will have the same results as Russell.

If you want proof, look at Gradkowski: 44.2 QB rating, no TDs, 2 INTs, a lost fumble and nothing to brag about aside from an 11.3 yard per carry average.

Russell is hands down better than Gradkowski, and better than Frye, if and until it is proven otherwise.

Here are some more quotes by Ochocinco regarding the Raiders:

"I don't know man, I don't know. Dude, watching the Raiders on defense that front line is awesome, the corners are awesome. I can't for the life of me understand how they are not winning. I don't get it. Because what I see on film, the record does not show. Because they look a lot better than their record shows so I'm not understanding what's going on."

"I will never play for the Bengals again, and you can take that to the bank"

"Oh, man, I'm just coming to give the Black Hole the best show they've ever seen. I'm not sure if they've really had much to look forward to this year but, man, we're coming to town. It will for damned sure be a circus."

By the way, don't forget to vote JaMarcus Russell into the Pro-Bowl: http://vote4jamarcus.com/.

Raiders Bench Russell and Prove Coaching Is the Problem

Ramone Brown — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:13:21 -0400

It finally happened, what many Raider fans have been calling for for weeks. The Raiders benched JaMarcus Russell for Bruce Gradkowski. But it wouldn't make a bit of a difference. As Gradkowski's play resulted in: Four three-and-outs, one fumble, a failed fourth-and-goal attempt, three near interceptions, zero points, and a tired defense.

I don't blame Gradkowski for his performance, nor do I blame Russell for his. I blame the offensive coaching staff, and playcalling.

When Gradkowski came in his first drive was a three-and-out, but he wasn't helped at all by the play-calling as Tom Cable called five pass plays in a row, none of which resulted in a completion.

With the run game appearing to be the strength of the team, why go away from it? In his first five carries Justin Fargas had 62 yards. Yet despite his early success on the ground, and the fact that the Jets were missing their all-pro run stuffing Nose-tackle, the Raiders gave up on Justin Fargas who finished the game with only eight carries.

Including two QB rushes, the Raiders totaled less than 20 rushing attempts as the Jets Top-Two rushers each had more carries than the whole Raider team.

Even with the early deficit you cannot give up on the run. The running game was the only thing the Raiders had going for them, their only chance to score and sticking with the run also would have at least helped keep the score respectable.

Though it is not yet clear whether, or not Tom Cable can be a head coach in the NFL, it is clear that he has no business calling plays. The Raiders are desperately in need of an offensive coordinator, and may even need to revamp the offensive coaching staff as a whole.

You can't blame Russell, or Gradkowski for dropped passes and the constant pressure they saw from the Jets defense. But you can blame the coaches for lack of discipline on the o-line, from the receivers, and even at the QB position.

The coaches are responsible for making sure the line can pick up a blitz, the receivers can catch, and the QBs can read a defense.

Based on Gradkowski's performance he reads defenses just as bad as JaMarcus Russell. He failed to recognize open receivers, nearly threw three interceptions, and didn't even seem to be looking down field. Aside from a pass to his tight-end all off his completions were either check-downs, or quick slants to Murphy against a prevent defense.

You can't blame both Russell and Gradkowski for their inabilities to get the job done with the ball in their hands. You have to blame the coaching staff. Isn't it Paul Hacketts job to make sure his QBs can read defenses, find open receivers, and make accurate throws.

By giving up on the run and passing on first downs you not only take away your biggest threat in the running game. But if the pass is incomplete it limits what you can do on second down to passing again. That results in increased pass rush by a defense who is ready for the pass, which leads to more struggles through the air.

Establishing the running run game can only help the pass game, quiting on a run game that is working will only hurt the passing game. For this I blame Tom Cable and the play-calling.

How do you expect the QBs to make completions when the receivers can't catch or get open. For this I blame the receivers coach and Al Davis for not bringing in a veteran receiver.

Bottom line is the Raiders biggest hole is in the offensive coaching staff

Could Langston Walker Be the Answer at Right Tackle for the Oakland Raiders?

Ramone Brown — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:24:12 -0400

The right tackle position has been a cause of concern headaches and stress for many Raider fans. It has been a steady source of false-starts, holding call, QB hurries and numerous other problems.

This off-season many of us were under the impression that the loser in the battle to start at left tackle, Between Khalif Barnes and Mario Henderson, would become the new right tackle. But we were wrong and ended up with the often flagged Cornel Green again.

To not completely throw Green under the bus, though he has had trouble pass protecting, when he isn't being flagged for early movement he is very powerful in the run game.

Now with Green injured and Erik Pears playing the position Langston Walker getting a look isn't that big of a stretch.

So who is Langston Walker?

First let me start off by saying he is a behemoth of a man with tremendous strength and size standing at 6'8'' 366. Listed at 366 on the Raiders roster he is the heaviest play on the roster ahead of Khalif Barnes and Gerrard Warren both listed at 325. For tallest Raider he is a front runner as Erik Pears is also listed at 6'8'', to compare Mario Henderson and Robert Gallery are both listed at 6'7''.

Walker was drafted in the second round by the Raiders in 2002. He fits perfectly within two of the three criterias Al Davis alledgedly uses for drafting: Height, speed, and weight. But at the 2002 combine he did run a less than stellar 5.2 forty time, but hey he is a big guy.

Aside from our kickers Walker is the only player on the Raiders roster who played in the Raiders last Super Bowl.

He remained with the Raiders through the length of his contract then went to Buffalo via free-agency in 2007. Where he started all 32 games through 2007 and 2008.

In his seven years in the league he has played 98 games starting in 65 of them.

In 2009 Walker was moved to left tackle where he failed to hold down the starting role. The Bills failed to trade him, likely due to his huge contract, so he was released.

Now he is back on the Raiders.

Though don't get me wrong, he is not a sure thing and he does have his negatives as well.

For a positive he is a complete bull in the run game, but that is also Cornel Green's strength.

The knock on Walker is some believe he may just be too big to play in a zone blocking scheme. As it calls for more athletic line-men who are able to help on double teams then peel off to the second level and block line-backers.

At 6'8'' 365 many question whether Walker can be that athletic.

But one things for sure, if he can be that athletic I would rather have him than someone who frequently forgets the snap count.

And if he can be a solid blocker in the passing game there is no reason he shouldn't be playing

Only time will tell will Walker be a bulldozer paving the way for Raider running-backs like Justin Fargas or will he be nothing more than another forgettable free agent signing?

Richard Seymour: "Mark My Words The Raiders Will Be In The Playoffs"

Ramone Brown — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:42:13 -0400

"You can mark it down, the Raiders will be in the playoffs in 2009."

Those are some bold words from a bold man. Especially considering the Raiders are currently standing at 2-4, a half game out of second place in the division.

Words like that are usually only used by blindly faithful homers and when talking about the Raiders distant past. But when they come from a player, namely one who is supposed to be unhappy about being in Oakland, they mean a lot.

But this isn't the first time Richard Seymour has made a prediction:"I will be the guy on top of the QB."

And sure enough in the following game Phillip Rivers was flat on his back looking up at Richard Seymour numerous times, including two sacks and multiple knock-downs.

I'm not claiming Seymour is the next Mrs. Cleo, as he is only one for one in his predictions. But it does make you think.

How unhappy could Seymour really be in Oakland if he is making playoff predictions? And realistically what are the Raiders chances at the playoffs?

In reality I don't see the Raiders wining the division as the Broncos have been strong out of the gate and currently hold a four game lead.

Barring a huge mid-season team collapse that would put last years mid-season team collapse to shame, there is no way the Broncos don't win the division. Expecting another collapse by Denver will likely only give false hope to this year's team. The 2009 Broncos are completely different than their predecessors as there are less than a dozen relevant returners from last years team.

So the Raiders would have to settle for a wild-card spot. As it stands right now the wild-card would go to 4-2 Pittsburgh and the 3-3 NYJ Jets. But a lot can change in the next ten weeks especially considering the Raiders play the Jets, who happen to be on a three game slide, this Sunday.

Bottom line is it is too early to count out any team this early in the season. Well maybe you can count the Browns, but that is a different story.

Is Richard Seymour able to see into the future or has he just been drinking too much Raider kool-aid. Well we will see soon enough.

Justin Fargas: Heart Of Raiders Offense.

Ramone Brown — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:26:29 -0400

Yes, I said it Justin Fargas is the heart and soul of the Raiders offense. He leads by example with determination and intensity.

What was it that helped the Raiders offense to there 1st 300 plus yard game since playing the Chargers in the Monday Night opener? It wasn't some young talented player who just joined the Raiders or anything new at all. It is something that the Raiders have had for years. The relentless running style of Justin Fargas.

During the off-season alot of fans debated whether we should start Darren Mcadden or Michael Bush.

What about Justin Fargas?

After Sundays performance against the Eagles all I have to say is: Darren who? Michael who?

Right now I want Justin Fargas. Not only has Fargas earned the right to carry the load by being the only Raider runner with a 1000+ yard season and two "Commitment to Excellence Awards." But he has just shown us why he still deserves to carry the load with his recent performance and determination.

What better way to establish dominance and inspire an offense than by watching defenders slow to get up or hobbling to the sideline after being involved in a Justin Fargas collision.

Fargas doesn't even need the ball to punish defenders as apparent by the brutal block he put on Victor Abiamiri in a blitz pickup. Victor didn't return to the game and the block allowed Russell to get the ball to Gary Russell for a first down.

Prior to that Fargas's brutal running style resulted in Asante Samuel leaving the game after attempting to tackle Fargas on an 11 yard swing pass.

Not only did Fargas show his worth with hard running but he quieted his critics not only running inside but succeeding outside as well. When the o-line can seal the edge for Fargas to get outside expect a long day and plenty of aspirin for apposing DBs.

Justin Fargas is the Raiders best running back. Who cares if he isn't the biggest or the fastest he is the best because his effort and determination are un-matched.

The Oakland Raiders Overcome Adversity With Diversity

Ramone Brown — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:02:00 -0400

In the victory over the Eagles the Raiders mixed it up a lot on both offense and defense. Especially on defense, so much to the point that I almost didn't recognize them.

Let's take a look at how the Raiders showed diversity in the gameplan starting with the defense.

Usually watching the Raiders defense is pretty predictable: 90 percent of the game will be man to man, there will be a four man rush, and Nnamdi will shut down the receiver on the left side of the field.

But that is nothing like the defense we saw from the Raiders against the Eagles. For one, Nnamdi was taken out early with an injury after being poked in the eye and missed the whole second half.

Normally the Raiders blitz less than any other team in the NFL. Sunday, the Raider defense resembled the Eagles blitz happy scheme.

The Raiders only run man defense? Yeah right. That was the most zone coverage I've seen from the Raiders since, well, the preseason.

You think they only run a four man front with a four man rush? Well think again. On passing downs they showed three man and even two man fronts.

Also we got a good look at the wolverine package: a nickel formation where a third safety comes in near the line of scrimmage.

And yes they blitzed out of the wolverine. Michael Huff came free forcing an errant pass by McNabb which resulted in a big 3rd down incompletion.

On a few occasions the Raiders even dropped defensive tackles into coverage.

How did this help the Raider win? It obviously confused Donavon McNabb as apparent by his sub 50 percent completion rate. As well as bringing a lot of pressure, as apparent by the six sacks, by four different defenders and tackles behind the line of scrimmage.

The added pressure from the diverse scheme the Raiders implemented even made Stanford Routt a legitimate defender in Nnamdi's absence.

But the defense wasn't the only one who showed diversity. Though the play of the offense didn't quite match up to the defense they did mix it up quite a bit.

For example the Raiders and JaMarcus Russell were able to spread the ball around very well, as JaMarcus targeted seven different receivers for completions. This included new off-season acquisition Gary Russell who had five receptions for 55 yards, including a late first down allowing the Raiders to milk the final two minutes of the game by taking knees.

Also the Raiders rushing attack featured four ball carriers for around 120 yards. Including a heavy dose of hard running by Justin Fargas who was able to succeed both inside and outside the tackles.

The Raiders balanced attack and success on the ground was able to set up the play-action which undoubtedly was a key to the Raiders success.

The Raiders also showed a lot of different looks on offense. They showed us two tight-end sets, with and without a FB. As well as multiple receiver sets where Russell was able to do well both behind center and in shot-gun. We even saw an empty backfield.

The Raiders also called plays to get the receivers, who have struggled thus far, more involved in the game. Including a reverse and a few bubble screens.

I would like to see the Raiders continue this and mix it up even more on offense. Maybe throw in the wildcat, an HB pass or even a flea-flicker.

The victory over the Eagles was definitely a big step for JaMarcus Russell and the Raiders. Lets hope they continue to move in the right direction.

Who Said Michael Vick Wouldn't Get a Warm Reception in Oakland?

Ramone Brown — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:02:10 -0400

Yes that is right this picture was taken in Oakland, not the city of brotherly love. Just miles away from San Francisco and Berkley and all their avid protesting hippie liberals.

Despite expectations of dog lovers being in full force to protest Vick and an article entitled "Vick won't get a warm welcome in Oakland " reports suggested their numbers were less than 25. And Vick was only heckled by the crowd once. After being tackled for a four yard loss the crowd taunted him by imitating dog barks. But what do you expect he plays for the opposing team.

With his arrival in Oakland, Vick received what I would call a very warm welcome from numerous Raiders including JaMarcus Russell who admitted to being a huge Vick fan and fully supporting his return. And Tom Cable: Who coached on the Atlanta coaching staff while Vick was there.

A highlight for Sundays pre-game festivities was supposed to be Donavan McNabb seeking out Russell and showing him his support, yet it was over-shadowed by Michael Vick.

Before the game many Raiders showed their support for Vick sharing words and hugs with the fleet footed once convicted QB. Raider line-backer Kirk Morrison even gave give a mid play hug to end a reverse short of the line of scrimmage.

The Michael Vick hug fest in Oakland was downright creepy. I really hope my Raiders got the whole hugging thing out of their system. I want my team to be seen as tough, not the sensitive hugging type.

If opposing players who are about to go to battle can show support to Vick, why can't the protesters?

Unlike Their Defense, the Oakland Raiders' Offense Has No Leaders

Ramone Brown — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:19:50 -0400

Some have suggested that the Raiders are lacking leadership and don't have a single leader on the whole team.

I would argue otherwise; the Raiders have a fair share of leaders: Nnamdi Asomugha, Greg Ellis, Richard Seymour and even Gerard Warren. Unfortunately, there isn't a single leader on the offensive side of the ball, so defenders have to do their best to fill the missing holes.

During the first day of training camp, Nnamdi picked off a pass to Darrius Heyward-Bey. Nnamdi then proceded to coach the young receiver up, telling him what he did wrong and what he needs to do so defenders can't read him. That is pure leadership right there.

The only problem is, that's not Nnamdi's job. A veteran receiver or a coach should have been doing that.

I don't want to throw Sanjay Lal under the bus yet, as I have no reason to aside from numerous dropped passes. Also with the youth at receiver, Sanjay has been giving a very tough task.

The Raiders are desperately in need of a vocal leader on offense, not only from the QB but from the coaching staff, receivers, whatever, anything will do.

In a recent interview former Raider Jared Cooper suggested that after Russell comes off the field, no one says a word to him: not coaches, not players, no one. He rarely goes over plays with Cable or talks to his recievers.

This is only partially true. After three and outs during punts, defenders often come to Russell's side. Nnamdi Asomugha, Gerard Warren, Greg Ellis, Richard Seymour, as well as other defenders have all been in Russell's ear after three and outs.

Last week, Gerard Warren seemed to have a lot to say to Russell on the sideline. I don't know if he was giving him constructive criticism, trying to rally his spirit or chewing him out but he showed alot of fire.

Why are the only players trying to rally Russell players who play on the other side of the ball? Easy: there are no leaders on the offense because the youth movement has back-fired leaving the offense completely void of veteran leadership.

The closest thing the offense has to a leader is Robert Gallery and Justin Fargas. Cornel Green and Cooper Carlisle are the only players on the offense over the age of 30 and they are both injured.

The offense can't continue to look to the defense for leadership. They need to find it within themselves. Someone needs to step up a coach, the QB, Zack Miller, someone.

But this gets put on JaMarcus Russell also. Leadership and communication is a two-way street. Not only do players and coaches not talk to Russell, but Russell doesn't appear to make an attempt to engage his team-mates or coaches. Like Jeff Garcia said, he isn't a leader.

Look at all of the top offenses. Romo is always side by side with a coach or Jason Witten. Manning and Brady always immediately are going over plays with coaches and nearly every succesful QB-to-receiver tandem are in constant communication. Russell and whoever else: not so much.

But don't get me wrong: I am not pinning this on the Raiders' big-armed QB, either. Like I said, it is a two-way street. Not only does JaMarcus Russell need need to step up and engage his rookie receivers (and give his linemen an earfull when they miss a block). but the coaches and receivers need to step up and engage Russell.

You cannot blame the recievers for not talking to Russell, as they are all rookies or close to it. But between Russell and Cable, there is a problem.

Do you blame Cable for not talking to Russell or Russell for not talking to Cable? Well, you have to blame both; it needs to be a mutual relationship.

Everyone on the offense needs to step up both on the field and off. Cable needs to make a better effort to talk to Russell on the sideline and Russell needs to go to Cable. The receivers need to comunicate with their QB, tell him what they see and what they think may work.

Without more communication, this team will not improve.

Oakland Raiders Are Being Held Back By Colossal Egos

Ramone Brown — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:06:50 -0400

Yes, despite a 1-4 record and six-going-on-seven years of losing, there are still some very big egos in Oakland.

Though some have suggested otherwise, confidence is about the only thing JaMarcus Russell has going for him. His ego has him so delusional that he is unfazed by losses and is actually happy with his play.

Tom Cable apparently thinks he is above the law and won't give up his play-calling responsibility no matter how unqualified he is or how bad he is at it.

But these egos are actually dwarfed by the biggest ego in Oakland.

No, I'm not talking about Stephen Jackson of the Oakland Warriors. I'm talking about Al Davis, owner of the Oakland Raiders.

Al Davis' ego has done a lot to get in the way of running a successful organization.

The main way his ego gets in the way is he is unwilling to let a coach become bigger than himself. This is why he only hires no-name yes men who are willing to follow him blindly and coach the team the Al Davis way.

Look at the coaches the Raiders have hired: Lane Kiffin, a young nobody who never coached at the NFL level. Tom Cable, a fat nobody with an anger problem. Bill Callahan, who didn't make a single major roster change and ran an already established offense in his Super Bowl run. And the list goes on and on.

Some would argue the Raiders have hired big-name coaches like Gruden and Madden. But these guys were nobodies before they were Raiders. Al Davis made both of them and he hates the fact that he made them bigger than himself. I'm sure Davis was furious when EA made "Madden NFL Football" rather than "Al Davis NFL Football.

So far, Al Davis' ego has gotten in the way of the team's success a few times.

First it stopped us from attaining Chris McAlister. Chris was so confident he would become a Raider he told reporters he would be signed on Sept 15th. Though he didn't actually say it to the Raiders, his projected sign date suggested he would be signed by one of the four team teams who played in the opening Monday night double header. In addition, a mutual friend of Jarrod Cooper and McAlister spread the word he was going to Oakland.

So why are Raider fans still calling for Stanford Routt's head every week and why is McAlister still teamless?

Likely because Jared Cooper had some harsh words for two of Al Davis' scholarship players, Routt and Michael Huff.

As of late, Davis has been known for keeping scholarship players, players who others consider busts, because he sees something in them that no one else does.

Rather than let his two prize track stars be insulted, Davis likely stopped the McAlister signing to spite Cooper and hurt his credibility.

Then there's Sam Williams. After years of failing to live up to expectations, why is he still on this team? More importantly, after his words regarding coach Cable, where he said Cable is a joke to half the team and everyone outside of the locker room.

Why hasn't he been punished at all? If he would have said this on any other team, he would be looking for a new job. Either because what he said is the truth or because he is another one of Al Davis' scholarship players. I would say a little bit of both, Williams is a scholarship player and Tom Cable is a joke, and everyone knows it.

Right now you can say Al Davis is the problem and blame him for this. But the bottom line is not only is he responsible for this, but he is the only one who can fix it. In order for the Raiders to finally turn around, Al Davis needs to swallow his pride, leave his ego at the door, realize he is no longer the man in the picture above, and hire a real coach.

Someone big enough to be the face of the franchise, someone to hold players accountable for their performance, somebody who we have at least heard of this time, please.

What Would It Take To Bring Jon Gruden Back To The Oakland Raiders?

Ramone Brown — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:26:27 -0400

Some people tend to act like fixing the Raiders problems are simple. Just bench Russell and higher Gruden and we will be fine...right?

Unfortunately, its not quite that simple. Whose to say Gruden would even be willing to coach for the Raiders and deal with Al Davis again. Sure, there are a few things that suggest he would want to come back to the Raiders, but there is actually a lot that suggests he wouldn't.

Bringing in Gruden will be no easy task, and in order for it to happen a few key things need to happen. Here are a few things that need to happen in order to bring Gruden back to Oakland.

First we need a good word from Paul Hackett.

Hackett and Gruden worked together the last few years in Tampa. Likely the two are still in contact with each other and Hackett's opinion will carry a lot of weight in whether or not Gruden would even consider coming to Oakland.

So in order to get Gruden we need to keep Hackett happy. Maybe promote him to offensive coordinator or play-caller when Cable gets suspended or give his love child Bruce Gradkowski a shot at leading the offense.

Then we need full fan support.

In order for Gruden to come back it needs to be known that we miss him and he is still welcome and wanted in Oakland. Also, the fans need to convince Al Davis that the best option for the franchise is Jon Gruden. Because ultimately the future of the franchise and whether or not the Raiders even ask Gruden to come back is all up to Al Davis.

Lastly, Al Davis must agree to have minimal interference with the team.

If Gruden can't be convinced he will have full control over the team, then no way in hell he comes back. And sorry Al Davis, no verbal agreements or loopholes this time. You must create a contract in which you clearly state you will give Gruden and his staff full control.

This is the hardest part. Will Al Davis finally come to his senses and realize it is time for someone other than him to run his franchise and finally turn the keys over to someone else?

Well, though unlikely, I am still a wishful thinker. What's to say it won't happen one day?

Roger Goodell Please Do Raider-Nation a Favor: Suspend Tom Cable Now

Ramone Brown — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:41:56 -0400

Ok, we all know what's going to happen: Everyone in the world knows that Tom Cable is guilty and facing jail time for assault and obstruction of justice for lying to the police.

Sure, even Roger Goodell knows this. Hanson and his lawyer have been active lately, publicly speaking and telling everyone what happened. And all Cable has done is lie and deny everything.

You've suspended others with less proof against them. For example, "Pac-Man" Jones hasn't been convicted of anything, yet you suspended him. Please don't hold Cable to a double-standard just because he is an authority figure and a head coach.

Just do Raider-nation a favor and suspend him now. You owe us at least that. After all, we buy NFL merchandise.

Who knows, maybe the Raiders actually have a capable playcaller on the team.

By not suspending him, you are just postponing the inevitable and making Raider fans suffer even more. There's a good chance if you don't do it by our Week Nine bye, Al Davis will beat you to it and fire him.

Oakland Raiders: Did Paul Hackett Even Try With JaMarcus Russell?

Ramone Brown — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:18:15 -0400

JaMarcus Russell is starting his third year in the NFL and second year as a starter, yet, in his third year he seemed to have regressed to the ability of a sloppy rookie.

His footwork his ugly as ever. His accuracy is often off and too many passes are too high for receivers. His pocket presence is horrible as he often locks on to receivers and looks unaware of the pass rush as if he actually expects his make-shift offensive line to do there job.

So aside from Russell, who is to blame for this? How about the QB coach? Is it not Paul Hackett'd job to coach footwork, accuracy, and pocket presence?

With Russell's footwork accuracy and pocket presence looking even worse than last year, I doubt Hackett even tried to coach Russell.

And why would he? He already had two of his own guys on the roster. Both Bruce Gradkowski and Jeff Garcia spent the last few years under Hackett's mentorship.

What I'm suggesting is Hackett had his ulterior motives from the beginning and never cared about Russell's development enough to properly coach him. He had and wanted his old No. 1 and 2 QBs—Garcia and Gradkowski.

Hackett's plan would have worked perfectly, except Al Davis saw what was happening and like he always does—intervened with his team.

To counter Hackett's plan, Al Davis signed Charlie Frye and released Jeff Garcia. Frye actually spoke personally with Al Davis prior to his signing, which is very rare even with proven veterans.

JaMarcus Russell's struggles are the result of two stubborn old men who can't agree on the direction of this team.

Had Hackett actually done his job this offseason and coached JaMarcus Russell, he would not be the worst QB in the NFL. Had Davis just let Hackett's plan play out, we would still have Garcia, and Russell would be the No. 3 behind Gradkowski.

So, who is right in this situation? Conventional wisdom would say both are in the wrong. But, this is still Al Davis's team and what Al says goes.

So in my opinion, the blame for this big mess falls all on the coaching staff. Not Al Davis, not JaMarcus Russell, but the coaches.

JaMarcus Russell Is Not the Problem in Oakland

Ramone Brown — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:46:37 -0400

Lately, it has become obvious that the Raiders have big problems. Many people are placing that blame squarely on the Raiders' big-armed QB JaMarcus Russell, but I gotta disagree. I would put that blame elsewhere, mainly on the coaching staff.

I've sat back and watched while other fans claim that we have the best passing-oriented coaching staff in all of football in Paul Hacket and Ted Tollner.

Some claim Hacket is some sort of genius guru quarterback coach responsible for developing the likes of Joe Montana, Steve Young, Rich Gannon, and Jeff Garcia. And some say Tollner is an offensive mastermind.

Well, if you believe that last two sentences, then it is time for you to put down the kool-aid and take off the black-and-silver glasses.

And if you do believe that, please explain to me how JaMarcus Russell has regressed under their coaching.

I will tell you how their credentials are grossly overrated.

Hackett, in reality, had nothing to do with the development of those four players.

He coached Montana for three years in the middle of his career when he was already good. As a QB, who wouldn't have looked good coaching Montana?

Steve Young...Sorry to break it to you, but while Hackett coached for the 49ers, Young wasn't even on the team; he was in Tampa Bay.

Rich Gannon...Is that some sort of a joke? Gannon never even passed for 2000 yards under Hackett. Gannon also had better years both before and after the years Hackett coached at Kansas City, 93-97. If anything, Gannon, like Russell, regressed under Hackett only to later succeed in his absence.

Jeff Garcia...What? Another joke? By the time Hackett got to Garcia he was already a good QB, and if anything, he was on the downside of his career. And Hackett worked with him for two years, in which he barely passed for 5000 yards.

Then there's Ted Tollner.

If anything, he is a has-been. He hasn't coached for a relevant offense since the mid-'90s. Most recently, he was an offensive coordinator for the Detroit Lions, only to be demoted midseason to tight end coach. And over the last few years he's been an assistant offensive coach with the 49ers.

Yes, that's right, not offensive coordinator but assistant offensive coach for a team that's been nearly as bad as the Raiders the last few years. Pretty much irrelevant.

Then there's Coach Tom Cable. I've said it before, he is a good motivator and had the team behind him. But look at his credentials; he was a good O-line coach in the NFL, but before that, he was a horrible head coach at the college level.

Why would you expect him to do any better in the NFL?

As an O-line coach, he was part of a coaching offensive coaching staff that led the league in rushing. But c'mon. How hard is it to do that when your QB rushes for 1200 yards?

Cable may be a good head coach, but he's a horrible playcaller. A few Raiders have even openly criticized his playcalling, including Justin Fargas, Nnamdi Asomugha, and Sam Williams

With all the talent the Raiders have accumulated over the years, there is no reason they should be getting blown out for two weeks in a row.

As for JaMarcus Russell, many have questioned his work ethic, but that is not the problem.

Both Keith Davis and Jeff Garcia have said he's a workout warrior who can out-play anyone on the practice field.

You don't get called a workout warrior by two players who openly oppose you starting without putting in the work.

The thing that Garcia and Davis questioned was Russell's experience and ability to lead an NFL team. Garcia also said too much responsibility is being placed upon Russell.

If you know you have young, inexperienced players in the passing game at both QB and WR, why give up on the running game so early?

I admit I am taking a side and defending Russell. But if he truly isn't capable of performing at an NFL level, then the coaching staff should have made that assessment months ago.

Same with the wide receivers. They are really the best players on the field. But if not, then it's the Raider coaching staff who has failed; not JaMarcus Russell and his receivers.

Oakland Raiders: The Houston Texans May Be Just What The Docter Ordered

Ramone Brown — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:44:39 -0400

After coming off a disappointing performance and a loss to the Denver Broncos the Raiders are struggling especially on the offensive side of the ball.

But what better way for a struggling team to come back from a loss. This week the Raiders are playing a team who appears to be struggling more especially defensively.

The Houston Texans are giving up a league worst 436.3 yards per game as well as a third worst 86 points in three games.

What offense wouldn't be anxious to go up against that. The Raider running backs better be as the Texans have the worst rushing defense in the league giving up over 200 yards per game on the ground.

What better way for a struggling QB and offense to build some confidence than by playing the worst defense in the league.

If the Raiders offense, namely JaMarcus Russell, can't rebound and find some swagger against this struggling defense then they have serious problems. And that would mean it is time to make some serious changes and bench the Raider QB.

The Texans are actually also ranked 30th in rushing offense and the only thing they have going for them is the passing game ranked 9th. This plays right into the Raiders strengths as pass-rush and pass defense are two of the Raiders strengths.

This week four match-up is a great opportunity for the Raiders to get back to .500 build some confidence and quiet a few doubters. If they don't then the season will likely turn for the worst as losses begin to pile up.

The AFC West: How Big of a Mess Is It?

Ramone Brown — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:47:33 -0400

It has now become very apparent that my Raiders have quite a few problems. But I've decided if I'm going to bash my own team I might as well bash the rest of the division.

Here's my best shot at bringing down all the teams in the division with my Raiders.

So lets start off with my Raiders of course.

Aside from the Monday Night opener, the Raiders look horrible.

Not only that, but based on this season's performances thus far the Raiders' last three first round draft picks look like busts. JaMarcus Russell can barely hit the broad side of a barn and the only players he can occasionally hit in stride are Zach Miller and defensive backs.

Darren McFumble...I mean McFadden not only has the lowest yards per carry of the three Raider running backs but he averages a fumble about once every 10 carries. Definitely not living up to the hype.

And then there's Darius Heyward-Bey. He can run very fast but that's about it. So far this season he has one reception and two interceptions while he was being targeted.

To make things stranger the first round draft pick from four drafts ago, Michael Huff, who we were all convinced was a bust is now playing like a man on fire with four take-aways.

And then there's Tom Cable.

Well he motivated the team and got them to buy into the "team first" and "53 men committed to one purpose" philosophy, blah blah blah.

But motivation and hope can only get you so far. Try hoping in one hand and shitting in the other and see which one fills up faster.

Unless Tom Cable can learn how to call an offense or finds someone who can, all that motivation will turn into false hope as team morale drops.

Now onto the Chiefs.

Well the Chiefs aren't just bad. They are horrible. And at 0-3 I would be surprised if they can match last years win total of two.

They are actually so bad that despite playing against the worst QB performance I have ever seen, the Chiefs failed to come up with a win or even a single interception.

The Chiefs also have three backup QBs and have already fired an offensive coordinator this preseason. Plus, they traded away possibly the best tight end in NFL history and their biggest offensive weapon.

Then there's the consensus Super Bowl favorite of the last three years—the Chargers.

As of right now I would put them in second in the division but with the Raiders and Chiefs not far behind. And with the Chargers roster beginning to look like an ER, I wouldn't be surprised if if they end up in third or even fourth in the division.

Despite being the most over-hyped team in the NFL three years running, the Chargers were dominated in nearly ever facet of the game by the Raiders. Funny, the Broncos did the same to the Raiders.

But in the end the Chargers were able barely skate by with a win. No thanks to some questionable officiating and a lead changing touchdown drive leaving 28 seconds on the clock.

Also in reality the Chargers have yet to defeat a quality team. Raiders are 1-2, and the Dolphins are 0-3.

Wow I just had deja vu.

Now, finally, onto the AFC west leading Denver Broncos. Or should I say AFC worst. Yes congratulations Broncos fans, your team is in the lead of the worst division in the NFL.

Oh wait, sorry. As a Raider fan I am not allowed to refer to them as Broncos.

Guess what horse riders? Despite being 3-0, every power ranking list to come out this week will still list the Chargers above your donkeys.

And of course you guys already know why. You have yet to even play a good team. You barely beat the Bengals. The Browns, despite scoring 20 against Minnesota, have still scored only one offensive TD in the last 36 quarters.

Notice how in the last week that 32 rose to 36. The Browns are horrible, and next week it will probably rise again to 40 quarters.

Then you played the Raiders. Well as you've read, the Raiders aren't very good. Not to mention prior to this loss most NFL power rankings had the Raiders somewhere between 25 and 29.

Oakland Raiders: Which Starters Need To Be Demoted... NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ramone Brown — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:12:37 -0400

Three weeks into the season, it is now obvious that the Raiders have some problems.

It has also become aparent that some of the Raiders starters have not shown to be worthy of carrying a starting job.

It would seem that some players are put in the starting line-up based on there draft status. Here's a look at some Raiders who I think need to be demoted, at least until they can prove they are capable of starting.

Darren McFadden

I don't care how much potential he has or that he is a "home-run" threat every time he touches the ball.

He isn't producing.

Through three starts he is yet to crack four yards per carry. Against the Broncos he had 12 carries for 45 yards, 3.8 yards per carry. Take away his longest run of the night of fifteen yards, and his average was less than three yards per carry.

Not only that, but in three games with 41 carries he has four fumbles. That is completely unaceptable and comes out to more than one fumble every 11 carries.

Another knock on McFadden is he goes down way to easily, often at the first sight of contact. Personally I am tired of seeing McFadden met at or near the line of scrimmage, only to be stopped dead in his tracks.

McFadden's lackluster performance has me missing Justin Fargas. Sure, he sometimes ran into his own players, but he knows how to deliver the blow to a defender rather than take it.

I don't care who becomes a starter in place of McFadden. Both Fargas and Bush at least put up a fight when met by a defender. Also, out of the three Raider running-backs McFadden has the lowest yard per carry.

Darius Heyward-Bey

Some have suggested that the only reason he starts is because of his 1st round draft status, and I gotta agree.

In three starts he has one reception. Compare that to fourth round pick Louis Murphy who has eight receptions, and you may wonder why this guy was even drafted at all.

I would take a lot of Raider recievers over him right now. Give me Johnnie Lee Higgins, Chaz Schilens, and I'll even take a gimpy Javon Walker right now.

Jonathan Holland

He was recently promoted from the practice sqaud, but in doing so we lost a casualty in Louis Rankin who had to be cut in order to make room.

As a kick returner he was nonexistent, and aside from a 31 yard return late in the game, he failed to make it to even the 20 yard line on all of his attempts.

Unless this guy can displace Stanford Routt, he needs to be sent back from where he came.

JaMarcus Russell

Some would consider him a lone weak point in the team.

And he has looked pretty bad.

If he doesn't show vast improvement soon, the Raiders will need to cut their losses and at least bench him.

The Browns recently benched QB Brady Quinn. Is it time for the Raiders to follow their lead?

Stanford Routt

Stanford Routt actually was a track star in college, but his speed hasn't helped as he has been targeted by opposing offenses, giving up two TDs in three games.

Seeing this trend, the Raiders decided to keep him on the bench and try to cover recievers with linebackers rather than Routt in some occasions.

Unfortunately the result was the same.

Tom Cable

Tom Cable says he is going to put the best players on the field.

I don't mean to call him a liar but he has failed to do so. Some have suggested that Tom Cable is just a puppet of Al Davis and is starting some of the aforementioned players because he was told to.

Whether or not this is true or not I do not know. But if it is, the only advice I have for Tom Cable is grow a sack and do what is best for the team.

Just win baby.

Another problem I have with Tom Cable is he not only is the head coach but the playcaller because he doesn't have an offensive coordinator. And his playcalling hasn't been very good.

Oakland Raiders to Start Michael Huff Against the Broncos; Should We Be Worried?

Ramone Brown — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:31:44 -0400

Last season many Raider fans were calling Michael Huff a bust. And this offseason those same fans were calling for him to be cut from the roster.

Now, after coming into week three of the season, Huff has three interceptions, a fumble recovery, and a few tackles. A lot of those fans who were calling him a bust seem to have a short memory as they seem to have fallen in love with him.

With our short memories, a lot of us Raider fans have forgotten why we were calling Michael Huff a bust. No one ever questioned his coverage skills as he consistently shut down some of the best tight-ends in the league. The reason we were all calling for Michael Huff's head was because he is a horrible tackler.

This Sunday Michael Huff is set to start against the Denver Broncos. Let's hope he doesn't remind us why we all called him a bust.

Michael Huff at free-safety is the last line of defense. So far at FS Hiram Eugene has seven tackles and a pass he jarred loose with a big hit on a receiver. Had Huff been in the same positions would he have made those tackles or would the plays have resulted in long runs?

To answer your question, the Michael Huff of the past would not have made all of those tackles. The Michael Huff of 2009, who knows but we will likely find out soon. Let's hope that Michael Huff has improved his tackling skills like the rest of the defense has.

One dis-heartening fact is that until this week Huff's play has been limited to passing downs. That suggests one of two things. Either his tackling skill is still suspect and the Raiders weren't willing to risk him in run support. Or, like Jarrod Cooper suggested, Michael Huff is still in Al Davis' dog house.

In case Huff isn't a viable option on running downs Tom Cable has a plan in place. According to Cable Michael Huff will be spelled with a combination of John Bowie and Michael Mitchell.

So what do you think? Is Michael Huff a liability and a cause of concern for the Raiders or just a cause of concern for apposing offenses?

Is Darren Sproles the Next LT?... Not Even Close

Ramone Brown — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:10:50 -0400

With the uncharacteristic recent performance and injuries from LaDainian Tomlinson, as well as his fall from greatness possibly looming, some of the more optimistic Charger fans have actually suggested that Darren Sproles could be the next great running back, or the next LT.

Some have even suggested that Darren Sproles, not LaDainian Tomlinson, is the best running back on the team.

That is a bit of a knee slapper there. In reality Sproles doesn't even compare to Tomlinson in his prime let alone Tomlinson at 30.

Sproles is not capable of being an every down back and if anything he compares to the likes of Reggie Bush, Darren McFadden and Leon Wahington.

Aside from a little speed and agility Sproles has nothing on Tomlinson, who is bigger, better, and stronger than the small fry running back.

In order to be an every-down back, the running back not only needs to be able to catch the ball and run both inside and outside the tackles. But one needs to be able to pass block and help protect his qaurterback.

Though this is a skill often over-looked in running backs Tomlinson is an effective blocker. Darren Sproiles on the other hand, listed at 5'6'' 185 not so much.

Then there's power running which Sproles lacks. Sure, on one hand you can't tackle what you can't catch. But what about running in between the tackles? Sproles is likely to be stopped dead in his tracks when met by a defender.

Tomlinson, he not only can run around you but through you. When he's met at the line of scrimmage, he will lower a shoulder and try to go through you. He also often fights for extra yardage and almost always is falling forward for extra real estate.

Then there's versatility. Sure Sproiles can hurt you on special teams, but that has nothing to do with being a better running back. Have you ever seen Darren Sproles run throw and recieve a touchdown in one game?...I didn't think so.

Which ever way you look at it, LaDainian Tomlinson not Darren Sproles is the best running back the Chargers have.

Do the 2009 San Francisco 49ers Remind Anyone Else of the 2000 Baltimore Ravens?

Ramone Brown — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:54:28 -0400

Yes I said it. This year's 49ers squad looks very reminiscent of the 2000 Super-Bowl Champion Ravens.

But let me say this I am not making a prediction here. I am not predicting the 49ers to go 12-4 or win the Super Bowl. All I'm doing is comparing two teams who seem to have a lot of parallels.

Both teams boast dominate defenses and snore-fest offenses that heavily rely on the running game and clock management.

Lets take a look at some key positions the two teams had in common starting with the offense

Quarterbacks

Neither teams QBs are spectacular the Ravens had Trent Dilfer who is the consensus worst QB to ever win the Super Bowl but was a great game manager. The 49ers have Shaun Hill who few have heard of. I would call Shaun Hill a game manager. Currently the 49ers are in a tie at 20th in passing yards

Running Backs

Both teams had very impressive half backs. The Ravens had Jamal Lewis coming into his prime. And the 49ers have another big punishing work horse in Frank Gore, who has been very impressive thus far this season leading the 49ers to a ninth ranked rushing offense.

Tight End

The Ravens had one of the best in the Game in Shannon Sharpe. The 49ers have Vernon Davis. Though his numbers are little to brag about thus far he is a physical freak and can be very dangerous at the tight end position.

Now onto the defenses. Both teams have scary good defenses and both teams are led by the best linebacker of there respective times. Also both teams ran a base 3-4. Let's take a look at some key players on each defense.

Middle Linebacker

Well the Ravens had the best linebacker of the time and possibly the best ever, Ray Lewis. The 49ers have the best linebacker of now Patrick Willis

Defensive Backs

The 2000 Ravens also had one of the best secondaries of the time. They had Chris McAlsiter in his prime and a seasoned Rod Woodson who is now in the Hall of Fame.

The 49ers currently have a very solid corner in Nate Clements as well as some young corners and safeties coming into their own.

So what do you think are the 2009 49ers a reincarnation of the 2000 Ravens?

The Oakland Raiders Need To Unleash Darren McFadden

Ramone Brown — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:08:04 -0400

There is no question that Darren McFadden is a talented back and home run hitter. Some fans have even claimed he should be on the field every offensive play receiving an obscene number of touches and be the focal point of the offense.

I've actually argued otherwise claiming that Michael Bush is the more complete back.

But here I am going to propose something else.

Why not play Darren McFadden on special teams.

With Justin Fargas returning from an injured hamstring keeping the three running backs happy is going to become much harder. If you really believe McFadden should receive as many touches as possible then him on kick return or punt return makes a lot of sense considering he along with Felix Jones were a special team juggernaut at Arkansas.

Many fans seem to have a man crush on McFadden and take offense if you say he is injury prone and isn't durable enough to be a starting running back in the NFL. If McFadden truly is durable then there is no harm in putting him in on special teams.

This week we may see McFadden on punt return. Hiram Eugene who fair caught punts for an injured Johnnie Lee Higgins is injured and out for Sunday's matchup. Higgins is probable for the game with an injured shoulder. Tom Cable recently said if neither Higgins or Eugene can go McFadden will return punts with orders to fair catch everything.

Come on Cable. That's like buying a brand new sports car keeping it in the garage and babying the throttle whenever you drive it. Who does that? Well I guess some people do that, but your brand new sports care is now a year old, time to drive it like it was meant to be driven.

Why not put McFadden back there with orders to do what he does best, rather than fair catching everything?

Or even better if Higgins is good to go why not put McFadden on kick return?

The Raiders have been missing a certain spark this season and I think that spark is in the return game. Big returns not only set the offense with better field position but they can be huge momentum changers especially at home bringing the crowd into the game.

But don't get me wrong special teams is not the only way to unleash Darren McFadden on unsuspecting defenses put him out at slot, put him in motion and run him in the wild-cat.

Yes the wild-cat that is my next proposal for unleashing Darren McFadden.

He not only played special teams in college but he ran the wild-cat(or wild-hog) like no other.

Last week the Dolphins ran about a dozen plays out of the formation and averaged over nine yards per play. Granted they were playing the Colts who aren't known for defense but still over nine yards per play is very impressive.

The Raiders in the wild-cat can be very dangerous considering both McFadden and Michael Bush are capable of throwing the football. Likely better than JaMarcus did week two.

It may not necessarily be a bad thing to take the ball out of the hands of struggling QB JaMarcus Russells and into the hands of some of our best playmakers Michael Bush and Darren McFadden.

The Raiders need every advantage they can get and this would take teams by surprise and keep defenses off balance. Likely the only team in the division who would be prepared for the wild-cat is San Diego. And this weekend we will get a look at how they fair against the "gimmicky" offense as they sqaure off against the Dolphins.

Come on coach Cable its time to stop babying your star runner and unleash him on an unsuspecting opponent, preferably the Denver Broncos this Sunday.

Raiders-Broncos: 15 Concerns For The Oakland Raiders

Ramone Brown — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:29:41 -0400

This week the Raiders are facing the hated division rival Denver Broncos. Aside from the final outcome of the game there are alot of things to be concerned about: From how certain players have performed so far this season. To how injuries will affect the team. To how off field issues may distract the team. Heres a look at fifteen things I am concerned about.

Begin Slideshow

Tom Cable: Is He the Reason For Russell's Struggles?

Ramone Brown — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:35:31 -0400

Yes, that is right I am calling out Tom Cable not JaMarcus Russell for the struggles in the Raiders passing game.

But before you call me a hater know this. I am not questioning his ability as a head coach. He is a good head coach and a great team motivator. His ability as a team motivator is evident in how he turned the team around last year and got the team to believe in the team first "53 men committed to one purpose" mentality.

The Problem is Tom Cable has implemented a flawed offensive coaching staff. Lets take a look: There's Head Coach Tom Cable, QB Coach Paul Hackett, Passing Game Coordinator Ted Tollner, and then all the position coaches.

But wait somethings missing? Whose calling the plays, wheres the offensive coordinator?

Well, Tom Cable is calling the plays and his playcalling is suspect. And as a new-comer to the head coaching world he is asking way to much of himself setting himself up for failure. Cable is very hands on with the team especially the o-line as he is the teams former o-line coach. Throw in playcalling(that should be done by the offensive coordinator) and a few distractions: Randy Hanson, Lane Kiffin, Warren Sapp. And whatever other distractions can be thrown at the team and Tom Cable has bitten of more than he can chew.

As a play-caller Cable is at times a huge risk taker often taking unnecessary chances. His play calling also tends to get streaky often becoming pass-happy at any sign of success through the air. This is likely due to the fact that two of the Raiders most prominent offensive coaches are Ted Tollner and Paul Hackett are in his ear about the passing game as well as the pressure to develop Russell into a productive QB.

Lets take a look at some of Cables suspect playcalling. First the positive then the negative.

Last year in the victory over the Jets on 4th down we line up to punt. Rather than the expected, the ball is snapped directly to up back and linebacker Jon Alston who runs for a 1st down.

This years Monday night opener against the Chargers. 4th and long your QB just left the game with an injury what does he do. Rather than punt he puts his young QB back in the game fortunately Russell threw a perfect pass for a TD over the Charger defense.

Now the bad.

Last year against the Chiefs. 4th and long the Raiders are going for a field goal. Rather than kick it the ball is snapped to Lechlar who laterals it to Janakowski who drops the ball.

First off that's three points you could have had. Second It put the Chiefs in a great position to score. Thirdly, I know the Raiders like to draft track stars but I don't think the kicker fits that stereotype. I doubt he would have toasted the Chiefs for a first down.

He has had other questionable play calls but the thing to remember is when these calls succeed he looks like a genius when they fail he looks like one of the three stooges.

Then theres the Chiefs game this year. Knowing he had a struggling young QB and an outstanding running game Cable came out throwing against the Chiefs. This often set the Raiders up with 2nd-and10 which resulted in third downs which had to be converted through the air. Setting up multiple three and outs through bad playcalling.

Another noteable is out of all of the leagues top offenses the only team whose head coach calls plays is San Diego's Norv Turner.

The Raiders have the talent to be atop the division but they will continue to struggle without a quality playcaller and offensive coordinator. I like Tom Cable as a head coach but he needs to relinquish his playcalling duties in favor of someone more qualified.

Oakland Raiders: Same Old Defensive Scheme, New Attitude

Ramone Brown — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:13:43 -0400

It has been said that the Raiders defense is too simple and can't be effective in modern football. Some have even suggested that Al Davis' meddling has kept the Raider defense in the stone age, essentially keeping the team from competing.

This offseason, with the firing of Rob Ryan and the addition of John Marshall, a lot of fans were hoping for a brand new defensive scheme.

Sorry to break it to you, but we're still running the exact same defense we ran last year, as well as the last six years under Rob Ryan.

Yes, it's the exact same defense we have all dreaded watching for years. Yes, the same sorry-ass defense.

But the problem with the defense was never the scheme. The problem was discipline, effort, execution, and attitude.

Not only is it the same defense of the last six years, but it is the same defense that dominated in the '70s, the same defense that brought us to the playoffs around the turn of the century, and the same defense that guided us to the 2002 Super Bowl.

It's also the same defense that man-handled the Chargers and beat the Chiefs this year.

Breaking Down the Raiders Defense

The Raiders defense is pretty simple on paper. Here's how I understand it from what I've seen.

Typically the Raiders run a basic cover-one man scheme with a deep free safety. They have pretty simple rules in pass coverage.

The FS is usually the last line of defense and is the only player who regularly has a zone-type assignment: He reads the QB's eyes, keeping the play in front of him, and breaks on the ball.

The strong safety is on one-on-one coverage with the tight end and often plays in-the-box for run support.

Corners are locked in man coverage with the receivers and are often very physical at the line of scrimmage with press coverage.

The middle linebacker is one-on-one with the fullback, while the outside linebackers are responsible for the halfback.

The last one may sound a little confusing, but it is very simple.

Take Thomas Howard, who plays the weak side. If the halfback comes his way, he locks up in man coverage. If the halfback goes away from Howard, he is free to roam the middle and spy the QB or defend crossing routes or even a delayed blitz.

The strong-side linebacker does the exact same thing.

With that being said, there is plenty of room for added wrinkles to make the defense less predictable: blitzes, two deep safeties, or switching up coverage responsibility.

Changes in coverage assignments can allow for the SS to cover over the top like an FS. Or simply put a safety on a running back, a linebacker on a tight-end, and much more.

So What Have the Raiders Done To Improve Defensively?

First, the most notable thing the Raiders did to improve on defense is add quality depth to the defensive line.

Last year, the Raiders started the season with three active defensive tackles: Tommy Kelly, Gerrard Warren, and Terdell Sands.

There was neither quality nor depth there.

This year, the Raiders added veterans DE Greg Ellis and DE/DT Richard Seymour, as well as rookie DT Desmond Bryant and DE Matt Shaughnessy.

One notable fact is that all eight of the Raiders' active defensive linemen have seen action in the Raiders' first two games. This is important because it shows quality depth and a strong rotation. A strong rotation keeps defenders fresh and consistent pressure on the QB.

It's especially important in games like the one the Raiders had against the Chiefs in which the opposing team's offense holds the ball for 40 minutes of the game.

Pressure by the D-line also tends to make the rest of the defense look better. A perfect example of that is Michael Huff, who seems to be resurrecting his career with three INTs and a fumble recovery over the first two games.

The next thing the Raiders did was make the game simpler and bring it back to the basics.

A lot of football fans and even Raider fans (cough David Xaviel, cough cough) tend to over-think things. But in reality, it is a very simple game and essentially is 11 one-on-one battles.

In order for a receiver to catch a pass against our defense, they first have to beat the man in front of them.

If the guys on the D-line beat the guy in front of them, runs will come up short and the opposing QB won't have time to make reads.

It's simple.

Marshall made the game simple by focusing on fundamentals and effort. The newly inspired defense and improved tackling shows that it worked.

The last thing the Raiders did to improve was change the team attitude. This started late last season under Tom Cable.

And they added to it by bringing in charismatic veterans like Seymour and Ellis.

"I'll be the guy on top off the QB," said Seymour in his first press conference and interview as a Raider.

Does that not scream Raider attitude?

He delivered with two sacks on Phillip Rivers.

If the whole team begins to buy into the new Raider attitude, it will mean big things for the team. Michael Huff seems to be buying into it and look what it did for him.

Oakland Raiders and Kansas City Chiefs Rivalry and Connections

Ramone Brown — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:00:30 -0400

This week the Raiders face another hated division rival in the Kansas City Chiefs. But aside from being division rivals there are a lot of other connections between the two teams. Here's a look at some connections the current Chiefs and Raiders share.

Chris Johnson: Not good enough for the Chiefs

The Chiefs were one of a handful of teams who gave up on Chris Johnson as he played there on the practice sqaud in 2006 only to be released he was signed by the Raiders shortly after. He's worked out pretty well for the Raiders though. No doubt Johnson wants to show the Chiefs they made a mistake in releasing him.

Richard Seymour and Matt Cassell

These guys know who each other are for sure. As they both played last year for the Patriots. Currently Cassel playing is said to be a game-time decision but if he does play look for the two to get reacquainted on the field, preferably after a big hit. I'm sure Chief GM Scott Pioli Knows a thing or two about Seymour also.

JaMarcus Russell to Dwayne Bowe

If you are an LSU fan then you've definitely heard that before. In college at LSU Dwayne Bowe was JaMarcus Russell's favorite receiver. Some would even say Russell made Bowe or vice versa. Bowe recently shared his opinion on Russell in an interview and the two are likely to exchange words at the game, friendly or otherwise.

Actually the Chiefs last three first round draft picks all played with JaMarcus Russell: Dwayne Bowe, Glen Dorsey and Tyson Jackson. I'm sure the two big d-linemen are looking forward to a chance to get reacquainted with there former QB.

Thomas Howard a Chief?

Yes in 1987 and 1988 Thomas Howard was a Chief. Now his son by the same name is playing for the Raiders as one of the top defenders on the team. I wonder his dad feels about that.

Paul Hacket

Raiders QB coach Paul Hackett was the Chiefs offensive coordinator for five years from '93-'97.

Brothers of Football operation

Tom Caracciolo and Pete Caracciolo. The first is the football operation assistant for the Chiefs the second is the manager for the Raiders. I wonder how friendly there family get togethers are.

How many former Raider fans are on the Chiefs.

Safety Jarrod Page, QB Matt Guitterez, and tackle Ryan Callaghan are all former Bay Area natives. At least one is a Raider fan

Mentionable players who played and/or coached for both teams in the past

-Rich Gannon. Started for the Chiefs in the late '90s then was signed by the Raiders in '99. In 2001 he was voted NFL MVP.

-The Chiefs drafted DT Terdel Sands—enough said.

-Andre Rison. He had a long career with the Chiefs before being cut in 2000 shortly after he was signed by the Raiders. Then he disappeared.

-Marcus Allen. A Raider great who helped the Raiders in a Super-Bowl win. Marcus signed with the Chiefs late in his career and reportedly asked to be inducted into the Hall of Fame as a Chief due to a feud with Al Davis.

-Albert Lewis and Harvey Williams started there careers as Chiefs but eventually were traded to the Raiders

-Former Chiefs defensive coordinator and head coach was also the defensive coordinator for the Raiders.

-Napeleum Harris was drafted by the Raiders and eventually was phased out for Kirk Morrison. Harris would later be signed by the Chiefs.

-Tom Florez who led the Raiders to two Super-Bowls was also a backup QB on the 1969 Super-Bowl Chiefs

-Raider running back Bo Jackson played baseball for the Kansas City Royals.

Raider Trash Talk in Full Swing

Ramone Brown — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:08:20 -0400

This week, trash talk by or towards the Raiders is rampant—and no, I'm not talking about the fans, though I gotta admit we are getting the job done.

In addition to fans talking big game, this week includes NFL players calling each other out, as well as the media taking their shots.

Here's a look at some trash talk the Raiders were recently involved in.

Javon Walker calls out the Chargers WRs

"I felt good last week, I felt I could play," Walker said. "I think that is just something where decisions are made and there are certain decisions you can't control."

"For me, myself, I have been practicing hard. It's nothing I have been doing in practice. I actually gave the defense a hell of a look compared to what the San Diego receivers gave them. I am looking at the game, looking at those receivers, and the defenders got a better look from me."

That's right, Vincent Jackson, Chris Chambers, and whoever else—Javon says you ain't sh*t. Him and his gimp knee gave the Raiders a better look than you did.

Dwayne Bowe Calls out Nnamdi Asomugha

"We're going to go at him," Dwayne Bowe told Oakland reporters this week. "Every game, he doesn’t show you the same thing every week. You could practice what he did this week, but when we play him Sunday he could have a whole different scheme, that’s what I learned about him."

"You never know what you’re going to get going against him. But as long as you know your role, you’ll be okay."

Well, maybe the Chiefs saw something last week against the Chargers. Nnamdi seemed "mortal" in his coverage efforts, giving up a handful of receptions and a touchdown.

That is a bit of a shocker, considering Nnamdi only gave up 28 total receptions all last year. That's an average of fewer than two a game.

Sappapotamus opens his mouth again

No, it's not feeding time again. The overblown loudmouth decided to take another shot at his former team. But hey, this time the Raiders weren't alone—he took shots at a few other teams, too.

Here are some of Warren Sapp's comments after the Monday night game.

"Oakland plays worse when they have confidence,” Sapp said. “Oakland plays worse when they feel good about themselves."

"I tell you what. I look at the NFL and I look at one thing—it's unforgiving. As you look across the league, there's a certain amount of teams that this season is over before it ever begins. And we're talking about Detroit, St. Louis, Kansas City, Cleveland, Oakland."

"Those five right there, write 'em off. You're talking about blackouts? Be happy that you got a blackout. Maybe they'll beam a game that means something to you."

So according to Sapp, our season is over, huh? Tell that to the Chargers, who narrowly escaped defeat Monday night, or the fans of the five teams mentioned. Even Sapp should still know anything can happen on any given Sunday.

Jarrod Cooper disses Michael Huff and Stanford Routt

Yes, another former Raider, this time taking shots at an individual on the team. Cooper is a former Raider safety and special teams standout who represents the Raiders for Comcast. Cooper says he has learned from a mutual friend that Chris McAlister will likely be a Raider within a week and may even play against KC.

“Al Davis does not like Michael Huff...they’re playing him out of position. To get rid of Michael Huff, Al Davis would not mind. That may be one of the moves that brings Chris McAlister here.”

As for Routt, Cooper added, “I love Stanford Routt, but you’re pretty much good for nothing when it comes to covering people.”

Tom Cable and Al Davis went on to deny any knowledge of McAlister coming aboard.

That was some good stuff, especially the Stanford Routt line.

Richard Seymour calls out whoever gets in his way

"I'll be the guy on top of the quarterback."

You thought he was just talking about Week One. You, my friend, are mistaken. Seymour can only improve upon his Week One effort against the Chargers.

He had one game to practice with the team and still performed well. He will continue to be a hassle for opposing QBs and offenses for a good deal longer.

Experts call out Vegas

By many accounts, this is supposed to be a close game. Vegas odds have the Chiefs as three-point favorites. But six of eight ESPN "experts" have the Raiders winning the game.

I say let's prove them all wrong by making it a blowout in the Raiders' favor.