Bleacher Report - Articles by Chris Domschke

Leaping Lions: A New Logo in Detroit

Chris Domschke — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:31:00 -0400

Leaping Lions: A New Logo in Detroit

In response to their 0-16 season, the Detroit Lions have decided to have a new look for the franchise.

After seeing how the Arizona Cardinals were able to turn things around with a new logo, the Lions have decided to follow suit. The 2009 Detroit Lions will take the field with this as their new logo:But this wasn't the first choice of the head honchos in Motor City. Other logos were presented at Lion HQ that were ultimately turned down for one reason or another. I have been given access to these images.
Your 2009 Detroit Lions?

New Coach in Town: Arizona's Coaching Search Almost Over

Chris Domschke — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:38:49 -0400

Final Stretch: Arizona's Coaching Search

Welcome back to the carousel that is the Arizona Basketball Coach Search. The newest Doc Randi intel is in, but first let's look at how we got here.

October: Lute Olson retires, Russ Pennell is named the interim head coach

November: Michigan State's Tom Izzo, through the typical back door channels, tells friends of friends of colleagues, who happen to be of mutual acquaintance with Jim Livengood, that he might be interested in learning a little bit more about the open Arizona Head coaching position.

December: Jim Livengood begins his search, speaks with C.M. Newton at the U of A vs. Kansas game up in Phoenix. As we all know, Livengood has never been a plan B guy in his coaching searches. He knows who he wants and goes after only them. Reggie Theus announces his interest in the coaching vacancy. Livengood doesn't listen.

January: Rick Pitino's name starts coming up in small sections of possible coaching replacements. From the Doc Randi intel, it is at this point that his interest begins heating up like an Arizona summer.

February: Rick Pitino rumors spiral up to the top. It appears that he is fast becoming the top target. Despite Arizona's seven-game win streak, Russ Pennel is not being considered at all for the job, and won't be.

March: Livengood's list is two candidates long—Pitino and John Calipari, both of whom are in the Sweet 16. Calipari's Memphis team loses its Sweet 16 matchup and is overheard saying that Arizona gave him a blank check. Again, the Doc Randi intel says that Calipari and Livengood were approaching an understanding on details.

March 27: Kentucky fires coach Billy Gillespie. Arizona fans take a heaving gulp knowing that there was competition for top coaches, then gets taken apart by Pitino.

March 30: My cell phone is dinging off the hook. First, Pitino is almost locked up. Ten minutes later I get a text saying Pitino has cooled significantly. John Calipari is the leading candidate for the new Kentucky opening for a ridiculous sum of money. With their contract offer on the table, it seems Kentucky killed Arizona's top two choices by chasing Cal with a truckload of money.

March 31: I receive the following texts:
6:30 PM - "My buddy just called and told me he thinks we'll have a coach (no specifics) in the next 24-48 hours."
10:30 PM - "Press Conference sometime between tomorrow afternoon and Friday morning. Izzo out, Pitino less than five percent chance."
10:35 PM - "FWIW (for what it's worth) I'm hearing it's either (Gonzaga's Mark) Few or (Oklahoma's Jeff) Capel...no strong evidence though, just general feelings....supposedly (Jim Livengood) was in El Paso meeting with Capel yesterday morning."

At this point, I turned my phone off so as not to wake the little one.

April 1: "Add Bruce Pearl to the list, we are looking at a top three of Capel, Few, and Pearl at this moment. The deal is done and the coach is in town."

With the announcement that Calipari will take over this afternoon in Kentucky, I don't see Livengood holding his presser today. So Cats fans, in my estimation, you will go to bed tonight without knowing for sure who the next Arizona Head Coach is. There is always the possibility that a name could leak before or after the Calipari presser, but chances of a formal announcement today is unlikely.

Capel is coming out of left field here (which for those of you who watch My Boys learned to true definition of last night), but Bruce Pearl and Mark Few were on my original list of believed candidates from October.

Mark Few has been my top choice since day one. He won't require a huge price tag. If he can recruit to Spokane, he can recruit to Tucson, he will still have access to all of his pipelines he's been using for recruiting. He's young, he's helped maintain the Gonzaga program that came out of nowhere in the late '90s.

There are a lot of questions marks with Few, but most of them surround his inability to make it past the Sweet 16 as a head coach. I should note that Few was the WCC Coach of the year 2001-2006, and the co-coach of the year in 2008. He has also had the conference's top player in each of the last eight years and a few All-Americans.

We know that there might be some interest there based on his comments (following the loss to Arizona) on Dec. 21 about shoveling snow for six hours upon his return to Washington from the 60+ degree December days he'd spent in Arizona.

Fans who want to continue to hold out hope for Pitino can do as they please, but it sounds like January and February was the time to get Pitino to sign a contract (which wasn't possible) because he was considering it then, but the Calipari signing might have done just enough to keep Pitino out of Livengood's reach.

The only real chance Arizona would have at Pitino would revolve around a lot of money, and a guarantee that his son, Richard Pitino, would have right of first refusal when Pitino retires. Pitino has taken a great interest in Richard's future as a coach.

So Tucsonites, with Doc Randi telling us that the next coach is in town, keep an eye out for Few, Pearl, Capel, or whomever else you think might be taking over the house that Lute built. Those of you working at hotels, airports, rental car agencies, and restaurants, keep those cell phones at the ready.

Updated Arizona's Coaching Search

Chris Domschke — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:56:27 -0400

Updated Arizona Coaching Search

Word in from my usually pretty reliable source, a.k.a. Doc Randi, says that the Arizona coaching search should be on it's last lap. While nothing is written or signed, it sounds like the decision has been made by Athletic Director Jim Livengood and there are only a few options.

1a. Rick Pitino

Why: Pitino has said recently that he loves rebuilding programs, and there isn't a better rebuilding opportunity out there than in Tucson.

While he has always been a moving man, he may be looking to settle down somewhere with son Richard, waiting in the wings a la Bobby and Pat Knight and Sean Sutton.

Arizona Tie: Rumors flood that Pitino's wife has already purchased a house in Tucson and that his youngest child, daughter Jacqueline Pitino, is planning on or has already enrolled in the U of A for next year. His 1997 Kentucky Wildcats team lost to Arizona in the National Championship.

Confirmed reports have said that friend and former AD C.M. Newton has spoken with Arizona AD Jim Livengood. Whether or not Pitino's name came up is not certain, but common sense dictates it probably did.

Why Not: Arizona probably won't be able to commit as much money to Rick as Louisville has and Louisville has been a great home for Pitino. They have embraced Pitino and his family as part of the Louisville family since day one, and host the Billy Minardi Classic each fall to honor the death of Pitino's brother in law who died in the 9/11 attacks.

1b. John Calipari

Why: He can't stay at Memphis forever. It's like an asterisk on his record.

Though he is always the top program in his conference and racks up 30 win seasons every year, people will always say it's C-USA. A move to a top conference would be a big step for Cal and his career.

Arizona Tie: One of Calipari's Top Assistant Coaches is pretty familiar with the Tucson area and the Arizona basketball program, considering he spent over a decade roaming the halls of McKale.

Josh Pastner will no doubt tell Calipari of the fans, tradition, and love of Arizona basketball. We all know Pastner is one of the best recruiters out there.

Also, Memphis was in Glendale for the last few days as was Jim Livengood. It's simply speculation that old friends Pastner and Livengood met up for a drink or dinner, and perhaps Pastner may have brought along Calipari.

Why Not: Besides the price tag, he is firmly entrenched in a perennial Second Weekend Tournament team.

Does he really want to move into a new conference with a new team? Does he want to do another rebuild like he did in Memphis when he is used to being a 1-3 seed in the tournament every year?

2. Tom Izzo

Why: Early reports put the first spotlight on Izzo, and he allegedly (whether on his own or through an intermediary) was one of the first to contact Livengood back in November.

It's much easier to recruit young red blooded males to the warm climate of Tucson over dreary East Lansing. In March girls wear bikini's to class at U of A, in East Lansing it's still snowing.

Arizona Tie: Coached former Arizona guard, Jason Terry at the 2001 Goodwill Games and many other Pac-10 players in his stints with USA Basketball.

Why Not: Izzo is a Michigan guy. He's from the upper peninsula.

He was brought up in the program under former coach Jud Heathcote and has a great amount of respect and love for Heathcote as well as the Michigan State program. He has said he doesn't plan on leaving Michigan State until at least one more National Championship.

Now this is not saying that any of these three are guaranteed to be in Tucson in the coming weeks. I will repeat that, I am NOT saying that one of these coaches IS the next coach of the Arizona Basketball program.

All three have a pretty hefty price tag. What I am saying is that I have been told that there are three, and only three people in Jim Livengood's search as of right now. If something can't be worked out there, it will expand to include Mark Few, Jamie Dixon, Jay Wright, and Anthony Grant.

I think it's safe to say that Reggie Theus, Tubby Smith, and Lon Kruger are out of the running.

Some people are thinking Anthony Grant, but with the recent news of Billy Gillespie's most likely outing from University of Kentucky, Billy Donovan will most likely be their top candidate, again.

Anthony Grant will be ready to step in at Florida. He was already planning on taking over the Florida job after Donovan's flirtation with the Orlando Magic a couple years ago. Grant has also reportedly been offered the job in Alabama and is waiting for the Florida decision before he moves up to a top conference.

The Kentucky job might seem pretty enticing to Calipari but I don't think Pitino will consider heading back to UK after their bad breakup a few years back.

Bottom line is Pitino and Calipari are Livengood's top targets.

It will take a large chunk of cash, but Livengood knows what he wants.

Does he have enough to lure these coaches away from their programs?

From what I've been told with Memphis out, conversations with Calipari should take place.

If Arizona isn't able to make it through the weekend, we could have an answer to the Arizona coaching search before the tournament is over. Of course there's the thought that if Arizona wins tonight, then both of their top targets will be done with their season.

Next week could be an interesting week for Livengood.

Arizona Wildcats Continue To Dance

Chris Domschke — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:03:55 -0400

Arizona's Chance To Continue the Dance

While the Scum Devils went home with their forked tails between their legs, Chase, Jordan, Nic, and Co. are still wearing their dancing shoes.

And no, they're not glass slippers because despite its seed, Arizona is not a Cinderella.

Good thing, since Cinderella isn't supposed to win. Every year there's a Cinderella, midnight eventually comes.

That's right, the Wildcats are among the top 16 teams in the nation. Suck it, Dookie V.

The Cats have a pair of double-digit wins under their belts and are facing their toughest test of the season when they face Louisville.

But let's face it, each one of the next game(s?) is their toughest test of the season.

This game will be a lot closer than some people are suggesting. As of right now the line is Louisville by nine.

It's a fair line. If the Cats come ready to play like they have in most of their biggest games of the season, (Kansas, Gonzaga, UCLA, Washington, Utah, Cleveland State, etc.), this will be a lot closer than nine.

If that other Cats team comes out, the one losing to ASU, Washington State, UCLA, etc., Arizona will be out of the game with five minutes left.

So how can the Cats get past the Cards from Kentucky?

Turnovers

In the first weekend of the tournament, the Wildcats have made both of their opponents turn the ball over a combined 30 times in two games, with a specifically impressive 19 turnovers against a Utah team that was averaging fewer than 14 per game all season.

The Cats' opponents turned the ball over a combined 6.5 times more than their individual opponents' averages.

Very good numbers, but can their defense keep that up?

Meanwhile, through two postseason games, the Cardinals haven't been as careful with the ball as they were all season, with 36 turnovers in two games.

That's up 8.2 turnovers per game through the first weekend.

Obviously, Louisville has a little bit more time than Cleveland State did to get ready for that Arizona Press/Trap/Zone Frankenstein Defense they've been running.

The real test for the Cardinals will be protecting the ball. If they can turn the ball over less frequently than the 18 times per game they're averaging, they should be in good shape.

But if Arizona can cause some trouble and get them off of their game, the Cats have a shot.

Home Court

Much has been made of Arizona's struggles on the road this season. They have been a completely different team when the crowd has been against them.

But Cleveland State started getting some fan support in Miami yesterday and the Vikings got back in the game, despite eventually losing to Arizona.

A show of things to come? Perhaps, but there were still plenty of Arizona fans and chants in the building.

Louisville, KY to Indianapolis, IN is a little over 100 miles and about an hour and a half away. Tucson, AZ to Indianapolis, IN is over 1700 miles and about 26 hours away.

There will be more Louisville fans in attendance, for sure.

Imagine if the game were in Phoenix. You're telling me that the building wouldn't be rocking with BEAR DOWN chants?

Well, folks from the Midwest tend to move to Arizona, not vice versa. So, while there might be some Arizona and neutral fans who start to pull for AZ, they will be outnumbered.

Getting past the fans will be the biggest test of the game for Arizona. Which leads me to...

Tempo

When the Cats come out with their asses on fire, things go well. They started fast against Cleveland State and Utah and pulled off victories in both games.

Arizona has been able to rally, hold on late, and play close. But they've also given away leads, played down to opponents, and been defeated with time on the clock.

The Wildcats need to decide the tempo of the game. They need to play Arizona basketball. If they get the early lead, they can keep the crowd out of it.

If they can keep the crowd out of it, it becomes less of a home game for Louisville.

Bench

This is just as big a factor as any other in the game. Louisville is a lot deeper than Arizona.

If this becomes a track meet, Arizona is going to lose their legs and Louisville will be nice and fresh entering the later parts of the game.

Arizona got scary against Cleveland State. The Big Three struggled in the first half, and two of the three had three fouls entering halftime. Wise and Hill finished with four, Chase and Fogg had three, and there were more than a few close calls.

At one point in the game, all three were sidelined.

That won't be good against the top team in the country. Arizona's got to play smart, both in deciding tempo and avoiding fouls.

Bottom Line

Louisville is the better team.

There is no doubt about that. They have a better record, better numbers, better depth of talent, a better coach, and more experience.

They played a tougher schedule in a tougher conference. There is no debating this.

Not even Randle can tell me that Arizona is a better team than Louisville, and he's a pretty big homer. (Happy Birthday Matt!!!)

Other Notes

Rumored Arizona coaching candidate Rick Pitino will be facing the very same Arizona Wildcats this weekend.

I would love it if, after the Cats win and Pitino and Pennell shake hands at midcourt, Pitino turns around and rips off his shirt to reveal his brand new "Property of Arizona" T-shirt hiding beneath.

I can just imagine Jerry "The King" Lawler and J.R. announcing this. It would be one of the most ridiculous moments in all of sports history.

Bleak Future? Possibly.

Arizona will most likely be losing first rounders Jordan Hill and Chase Budinger to the higher ranks, leaving Nic the Quick alone with a lot of youth, not to mention all four of Arizona's top recruits have announced their departure.

But Kyle Fogg, a.k.a Ducky, is getting better by the game, and could prove to be one of the better players in the Pac 10 over the next couple years.

Zane Johnson is primarily a three-point shooter, but it doesn't hurt having one of those on a team, and Jamelle Horne is mind blowing.

Of course, with Horne it's either good or bad.

The good being his out-of-the-gym athleticism and intensity on the court—he dunked the ball too hard to go through on Friday night.

The bad being the mental errors that have plagued him since the UAB game and his poor emotional control—he dunked the ball too hard to go through the net on Friday night.

Yes, I meant to type that twice.

Arizona is the lone Pac 10 team still allowed to play organized basketball right now. But I don't want to hear people saying it was a weak conference.

The teams may not have been as successful as in years past, but they were able to go 5-1 in the first round. (Thanks, Cal.)

Of course, the second round saw fiour of the remaining five drop their games, but two of those games were good, close games (USC by five to Michigan St. and Washington by two to Purdue).

Meanwhile, the ACC, which is constantly touted by ACC honks, homers, and Greivis Vasquez as the top conference, saw three of its seven teams lose on day one, two more dropped on day two, and saw Duke celebrate a Sweet 16 berth like they won the whole thing.

The master of bias and hypocrisy Dookie V still thinks Arizona doesn't belong in the tournament, yet says they've got a good chance to beat Louisville and that there's no surprise they beat Utah and Cleveland State

What? How can there be no surprise when you think they shouldn't be in the tournament in the first place?

Oh yeah...ASU still sucks.

Off the Bubble: Arizona Wildcats Make It 25

Chris Domschke — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:46:53 -0400

Off the Bubble and in the Tourney

Shocking as it was to hear yesterday, our beloved Arizona Wildcats Basketball team had the tourney selection Gods looking down on them yesterday afternoon.

They took into account the Cats big wins, and whatever other criteria they look at, and announced to the world that the streak is alive for another year.

The quest for 25 is complete.

Twenty-five years ago, the Wildcats made their first appearance since the 1977 Dance. Lute Olson had begun his transformation of the Wildcat Basketball program.

Over the next 23 years, he and the Cats went to four Sweet Sixteens, three Elite Eights, two Final Fours, a National Championship loss, and a National Championship win. That's 11 out of 23 where Olson's Cats made it to the field of 16 or past.

Will the streak go on past 25? Not likely as the Cats are most likely losing lottery pick Jordan Hill and a top 20 pick in Chase Budinger. Plus there isn't a whole lot of incoming freshman to step in for them, no matter who the coach may be. So what does that mean for these Cats? It's time to put an exclamation point on the streak.

The Wildcats got a pretty decent draw in the first round. Of the five seeds opponents Arizona could have faced, Purdue, Illinois, Florida State, and Utah, Utah is by far the best draw for the Cats this week.

Could the Cats have won against the other three? Absolutely.

When they are playing well, they proved they could win the big game. But when they are playing poorly, they can't even beat Washington State or Stanford.

So what will it take for the Cats to make it past the first round?

Big Game Budinger vs. Choke City Chase

Which will we see this week?

Will we see the Big Game Budinger who put up 25-points on 50 percent shooting, 43 percent from the arc, and snagged eight boards against Washington?

Or will we see the Choke City Chase that was a ghost against Arizona State last week?

More importantly, will it matter?

In some of the biggest games this year Chase has been less than amazing. In those big wins against Gonzaga and Kansas, Chase combined for 19 pts, 10 boards, 6 assists, and 5 steals.

The Cats were able to get big performances from other players and great defense.

I'm not saying he needs to be on fire, but he can't keep jacking up shots if they aren't falling. If he's shooting between 34-47 percent from the field, I'll be happy if he's doing the other things.

If he's not making the shot, then he needs to feed Wise and Hill, keep defenders from doubling up on Jordan, and make hustle plays. Chase was near nonexistent in that Kansas game, but he did have a huge ally-oop when a defender was asleep that got the crowd into the game.

We need to see the Chase that grabs boards, blocks shots, and gets the loose ball, a huge scoring night would just be an added bonus.

Big Game from a Little Guy

Nic Wise was on fire during the Cats seven game win streak, with the exception of the Washington State game where he was double covered every time he stepped inside of the arc.

Wise has had two separate seasons. In the first 16 games he scored over 20-points twice. In the last 16 games he went for 20 five times.

When Wise is on it, the Cats are a much better team. He draws defenders and can beat 70 percent of the league off of the dribble; not to mention his ridiculous acrobatic layups in the paint. In order for the Cats to advance, Nic needs to do two things.

Stay in control.

Yeah it's fun to watch Nic the Quick drive the paint, drop one of his spin moves and throw that layup off the glass. It gets me off the couch or stool every single time.

But teams are watching film. They know Nic.

They know to stay home and not fall for the dribble drop step. What that means is Nic getting blocked a lot more which leaves the Cats struggling to set up an offense with less than 14 seconds on the shot clock if they get the ball.

The other issue is his increased fouls. Wise fouled out once in the first half of the season and was in foul trouble in the second half only twice.

In the second half of the season he has been in foul trouble with two or three fouls in the first half, has fouled out twice and has been in foul trouble late in games four or five times. Most of those are charges. That's a turnover and a foul.

Control the ball.

Nic needs to keep the ball in his possession as much as possible. He needs to control the tempo and wait for things to develop. If Chase is hitting his shots, get the ball to Chase for good looks.

If Chase is cold, make sure to draw defenders away from Jordan Hill in the lane. The Cats can't afford to be settling for getting the ball to Hill at the top of the key. That's not the best way for the Cats offense to run.

Zane Johnson and Budinger on the wings and Hill on the block is the best way for the Cats offense to run. And if Nic can catch the Utes cheating towards Jordan, he needs to attack and make them respect him.

Defense

Defense will be key against the Utes. Senior guard Lawrence Borha and senior forward Shaun Green can shoot the three. They are both shooting over 40 percent from the arc, and the Cats three-point defense has not been great of recent.

Size is against the Cats again.

Jordan needs to use his big body against the 7'2" center Luke Nevill, but he will need help. Hill can not afford to get into foul trouble. He's giving up four inches and 30 lbs to the Australian big man.

The Press.

It has worked amazing in some games getting the Cats back into a game after being down or helping to extend a lead in an uptempo environment. But it can be broken, and can be broken easily.

The Cats can not rely on the press. It needs to come randomly. Sometimes after makes, sometimes after misses. Sometime they need to delay it and throw it on at half court to catch Utah sleeping.

If they get into the habit of running the press after every make, Utah will make them pay with quality passing.

Russ Pennell's Stage

It's clear that head coach Pennell will not be in Tucson next year. There are teams out there looking for new head coaches and Pennell is on a grand old stage to make an impact.

This needs to be his staff's best game.

Use the press effectively and control tempo and emotion. Pennell often waits far too long to call a timeout. Sometimes a well called timeout is all that is needed to give your guys a breather and let them clear their heads.

A four-point deficit can turn into a 12-point deficit in less than two minutes if the guys start playing over their heads.

They jack up threes to try to get back in it, miss, and don't get the long rebound and the opposing team makes an easy layup to take a six-point lead to an eight-point lead in the span of 10 seconds. Pennell can't be afraid to call the timeout BEFORE it gets out of hand.

In game adjustments.

Arizona has blown a lot of first half leads.

They have come out slow and confused in many of the second halves of this season. Look at the ASU game as a prime example.

Head coach Herb Sendek made great adjustments and came back from a small deficit to have the game firmly in hand with four minutes left.

Pennell hasn't shown a lot of great adjustments.

I feel like he goes into the half and tells his players that he loves them, they're playing well, and they just need to keep doing what they are doing and it's all going to work out.

Pennell's nice guy routine is great, and I love him for it, but what the Cats are going to need to make any kind of run is a red faced angry Pennell coming in at half and making the Cats play better.

That same emotion we've seen at countless terrible Pac-10 officials needs to come out in the locker room and the team huddle.

Bottom Line

There are a lot of things that the Cats need to do to win.

They've proven they can beat top teams. They are by far the scariest 12 seed in the tournament and have already been picked by Vegas to win the first round. And a second round matchup against Wake Forest (or Cleveland State) is also a very possible win.

Arizona very possibly could sneak into the Sweet 16 and face off against Louisville.

They need to be the same Arizona team we saw against Washington and UCLA in Tucson. They need to have the never say die attitude that was there against Houston.

They need to have the passion and fire to win.

This team could make the Sweet 16. It has been said all season. They've got a pair of first rounders and Nic Wise in their starting five. They've got the talent to win a couple tournament games. They also have the history and head cases to lose by 12 to Utah in the first round.

And for all of you who say Arizona didn't deserve to get in over St. Mary's, you know as well as I do that St. Mary's didn't deserve it. They play in a weak conference and didn't schedule any tough teams to prove their worth.

Gonzaga plays top teams for just that reason. Few know that just playing the WCC isn't enough.

The Gaels had a great season, but this isn't college football. Scheduling cupcakes doesn't get you a better postseason.

Arizona Wildcat Notes

Chris Domschke — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:03:50 -0400

Cats Notes

It has been said over and over again, by everyone, that based on the recent 1-4 record of our beloved men's basketball team, Arizona's season, fittingly so, rests in the hands of the archrival, scum of the earth, Arizona State Scum Devils.

They knocked UA out of a bowl game two years ago. UA knocked them out of a bowl game last year, and took, what some suggest, was their spot in the NCAA's last year, and now Arizona's chances at continuing the streak to 25 consecutive tournament appearances rests in the hands of James Harden, Jeff Pendergraph, and the questionable recruiting tactics of Herb Sendek.

It might just be me, but I feel like I am much more enthralled, and emotionally attached to this Arizona team. Previous teams have just been a disappointment. Underachieving teams with potential pros who wind up becoming selfish and throwing the season away.

Had Iggy stayed, Arizona would have lasted past Illinois' ridiculous comeback a few years back. Had Hot Sauce not become a 17-foot jump shot machine, Arizona probably would have fared better in his final season.

Last year's squad had potential, but a lack of leadership and coaching issues had Arizona backing their way in under KO.

So what did we expect this season?

Not much. A second choice interim coach and three good players surrounded by a bunch of sub par role players at best. They were up and down all season, including the most recent stretch of 7-0 then 1-4. But damn it's been fun hasn't it. There were no guarantees. No wins were impossible (Washington, Gonzaga, Kansas, UCLA, etc.) and no wins were guaranteed (Stanford, Washington State, UNLV, etc), and many losses were heart-breakers (A&M, Washington, ASU, ASU, et. al.).

While nothing is certain, it seems, at least on a basic level, as well as based on my previous assumptions on the Wildcats Postseason Possibilities, that Arizona has one game remaining between themselves and the Postseason.

They are in a-win-and-there-in game this week. If only the Pac-10 officials weren't going to be in attendance. Arizona is facing their toughest test of the season. On the road against the Scum Devil team that is currently holding four straight over their head.

I'm about as compelled as a fan can be with no vested interest in the game, other than years of being a fan, and thousands of dollars spent at the bookstores, Arizona Stadium, McKale, Sancet Field, oh, and the administration office.

Arizona is finally out of the scummy pollution riddled shadow of the Normies from Tempe on the football field. Let's see some emotion out there.

Screw win one for the Gipper, this is bigger than George Gipp and John Button Salmon combined. Let's win one for the streak, let's win one for tradition, let's win one for the seniors, let's win one for Papa Lute.

Hoping for a Lockout?

Chris Domschke — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:59:40 -0500

Hoping for a Lockout?

Following the last Triumphant Run by Michael, Scottie, Phil, and The Bulls, the NBA went immediately into a lockout. It was actually a temporary reprieve for Bulls fans, not having to watch the Bulls flounder immediately following the departure of their three Hall of Famers.

A short lockout shortened season was just what the doctor ordered. I saw the good in the lockout back in 1998, and I, the eternal pessimist, actually see more positives in the looming NBA lockout.

For those of you who don't read ESPN's Bill Simmons, or haven't read his latest column about the impending lockout, please take a moment and swing by the Sports Guy here.

As Simmons points out, with the economic troubles and the rising cost of player contracts, a lockout sits, like the elephant in the room, on the not so distant horizon.

According to Simmons, and many others in the know, a lockout is due for the 2011 season following the end of the CBA, the Collective Bargaining Agreement, not the league up North that Isiah shut down.

The owners know, based on the previous lockout as well as NBA players penchant for spending, that the players are going to break first. And Stern is fine with that. What could possibly be good about losing one, two, or more seasons of one of the major sports.

Well here are the Top four good things that can come of such a disaster.

5. Player Contracts

These players are making too much money. You hear it screamed from every soapbox and mountain top across the country. We'll see any combination of things that will make it tougher to sign players like Vlad Radmanovic to ridiculous contracts. Did you know he was making over $6 Mill this year?

4. Showcasing Young Talent

Football may be my favorite sport, to follow, but my favorite sport to attend is baseball. There are many reasons but a couple of the top reasons are minor league call-ups and Spring Training.

Sure, during Spring Training, and the rest of the season for that matter, you've got multi-millionaires who pull up before reaching first on a fly, guys playing the bounce instead of laying out. Essentially, there are a whole lot of Roger Dorns out there.

But when those youngsters come in, they know they have an uphill battle. The lay out for everything, sacrifice the body on every play, and run out a grounder to short every time.

Basketball has the D-League, and there's a lot of young talent in the D-League that nobody knows about. I'm not saying that the NBA isn't marketing them enough, or correctly, because Stern already has his money wrapped up in expansion plans and the WNBA, but the NBADL is there.

When that lockout happens, this time there's the D-League. It will give the fans something to watch, and Stern will definitely showcase it. It will provide "scab" players to fill the rosters, if necessary. Now I could be wrong about this, and if so I apologize, since many of the players, if not all, are tied to NBA teams, they might be affected by the lockout as well.

If that's the case than just make this a Top three, skip this one, and call me an idiot. I don't mind.

3. Better College Basketball

Look back at the NCAA Tournaments of the past. The game used to be so much better before the age rule allowed for the one and done players. Then when the age limit went up, we got to see amazing athletes playing in the Tournament, and while the Tournaments lost a little something, the product was that much better.

Why not get both?

With a lockout there won't be a need for these one-and-doners to jump to the NBA, because there won't be an NBA. Some might test the waters in Europe, some might jump on in the D-League (if that's a possibility), but others might just choose to stick around another year or two.

I have firmly entrenched myself in the belief that College Football and Basketball are better and more entertaining than their Professional Counterparts, so for me, better College Basketball, at least for a year or two, is a good thing.

2. Better NBA Product - For the Fans

Players in the NBA, for the most part, look out for themselves first and team and fans take a distant second and third respectively. Need proof, Elton Brand, Summer of '08. Ask Baron Davis about his old buddy EB, but make sure the knife-wound in his back isn't still fresh.

I'm not saying that all of the evils of the current NBA will go away, but with stricter controls on contracts, salary caps, opt out clauses, etc, players will be more likely to stick around, and teams will be able to build without taking on expiring contracts and overpaying Larry Hughes.

The Trade Deadline will matter again.

1. Better College Basketball

It's no secret that Stern wants to add on to his age requirement ruling and make one and done guys become two and done guys, and a new CBA would be the perfect place to do so.

Again, this is very beneficial to the College Basketball fans out there, namely me. Not only will we getbetter talent in the NCAA game for an extra year, but those players won't be just trying to make themselves a lottery pick.

Those guys will have an extra year in a system, making the team around them better. What Arizona fan doesn't wish that Jerryd was still in Tucson, find a USC fan that doesn't miss Mayo, who among the UCLA faithful wouldn't mind another season with Kevin Love, Texas with Durant, and Ohio State with Oden and Conley; the list goes on, and you know it.

Arizona Wildcats' Quest for 25 Still Alive

Chris Domschke — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:30:22 -0500

Arizona's Quest for 25 Still Alive

Just under a month ago, Arizona was coming off of a heartbreaker at USC and a demoralizer (and yes, I made that word up) against UCLA. Things looked bleak for the Kitty Kits. They were 11-7 and 2-4 in Pac-10 play. The following Thursday the Cats lost to in-state rival Arizona State at home, taking them to 11-8 (2-5).

Not only were there doubts about Arizona making it to their 25th straight NCAA Tournament, there were doubts they would even get invitations to other postseason play.

Following the USC and UCLA series this time, Arizona's postseason outlook is a little less bleak. While they are still a bubble team at best (most recently listed in the Last Four In according to bracketologists out there), they just took down USC and UCLA this past weekend. They are in the middle of a seven-game win streak with six Pac-10 wins.

The Cats have righted the record and now stand at 18-8 (8-5) and have moved up to fifth in the Pac-10. They are also two games back of conference leader Washington. They have matchups against three of the four teams ranked above them down the stretch and have the season split with UCLA, who is ranked fourth.

What could possibly be next for the Cats?

5-0: This would put the Cats at 23-8 (13-5) and anywhere from first to third in the Pac-10, as Washington could finish 4-1 (loss to the Cats) and thus land above the Cats, and UCLA could finish 5-1 (with a loss to the Huskies) and thus land above the Cats with a better season record overall.

This, however, is unlikely, not impossible, but the Cats' recent stretch of success can be a little misleading, as their only road wins during this stretch are against the No. 8 and 10 teams in the conference. Five percent

4-1: They'd finish up 22-9 (12-6) and could still potentially place first in the Pac-10, but it would take a lot of losing in the top part of the leader board, and frankly there aren't enough games left for that to happen. Most likely a 4-1 finish would land the Cats at third, possibly second, but most likely third. This is actually plausible, but it will take a lot of work. Three of the remaining five are not even close to being guaranteed wins. 13 percent

3-2: Cats go up and down and finish a successful 21-10 (11-7). Still in the Tournament. Depending on how teams fall ahead of them, and which teams they beat, the Cats could be third to fifth. Either way, I think they're a tournament team.

3-2 seems to be the most likely scenario. I don't see the Cats going 3-0 against ASU, Washington, and Cal, especially with the first two being on the road. Stanford and Washington State are definite opportunities for an Arizona letdown. 41 percent

2-3: Cats sit on the Bubble at 20-11 (10-8) and need USC, UCLA, or Cal to combust down the stretch in order to sit in the top half of the Pac-10. Still a high possibility. The Cats have shown a propensity to play with emotion, and let emotions take over. A loss at ASU could easily snowball into losses at Washington State and/or Washington, and Arizona would need to rally at home against Stanford and/or Cal to finish either last four in or first four out. 25 percent

1-4: Cats let down and end sub-20 wins at 19-12 (9-9). A .500 Pac-10 record leaves the Cats lucky if they're in sixth place to finish the season and would need an amazing Pac-10 Conference performance to be even in the conversation when Selection Sunday rolls around. While not a high possibility, 1-4 seems more likely than 4-1. Injuries would have to play a key part in this scenario. 16 percent

0-5: Cats crap out under the pressure, finish 18-13 (8-10) and say goodbye to any tournament chances, landing in the bottom third of the conference. Hello, NIT. 0-5 seems impossible at this stretch due to the way the Cats have been playing. While 1-4 seems more likely than 4-1, barring injury, 5-0 seems more likely than 0-5. Chase, Jordan, and Nic would will this team to at least one win. 0 percent

2009 Heisman Candidates: Top 15 Plus 5 Sleepers

Chris Domschke — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:44:19 -0500

Last year we gave you some of the earliest predictions for the 2008 Heisman candidates. So early that one of my predictions was no longer enrolled in his current school (Ryan Mallet - Michigan), Ryan Perriloux was given a decent chance, and one of the candidates was "USC QB", since both Mitch Mustain and Mark Sanchez were in a position to take the helm and both could have been considered at that point last year.

Well this year I held back as long as I could and managed to wait until after players declared for the NFL draft, but alas I couldn't wait any longer. Spring Ball is right around the corner and it's about time to start hyping next year's Bronze Stiff Arm Hopefuls. This year should be interesting as we will have two returning Heisman winners, as well as another of the finalists. Last year's top three vote getters could very well be this season's top three vote getters. I'm willing to bet that has never happened before.

So 4Real and I decided to each put a list together of 15 potential Heisman candidates as well as five possible sleepers. Sleeper being either players who A) didn't play last year, B) play at small or Non-BCS schools, C) true freshman, D) anyone else who wasn't already on anyone's radar at the end of last season.

No. 15 Noel Devine, RB - West Virginia
2008 Stats:1289 Rush Yds, 185 Receiving Yds, 1537 AP Yds, 4 TDs, 99.15 Yds P/G

Why: When I wrote this column last year I had Mountaineer faithful taking time out of mourning/bad mouthing Rich Rod and burning couches to tell me that Devine was going to win the Heisman. According to them his name had already been etched onto the Bronze Stiff Arm. 2008 didn't turn out exactly as he, or they, had planned. But Devine still has the talent that got the Mountaineer fans so amped up. His numbers are good and without Pat White being the one man show, Noel Devine is bound to get more carries, yards, and TDs. The Big East might be having a down year this year leaving room for West Virginia and Devine to put up some gaudy numbers.

Why Not: 4 TDs doesn't scream Heisman. West Virginia won't finish the season in the Top Ten, and let's be honest, players on the #22 team in the country don't typically get a lot of run when it comes time to Heisman voting. It's no coincidence that the Heisman winner has played in the National Championship Game six of the last seven years.

No. 14 Ryan Mallett, QB - Arkansas
2008 Stats: Did Not Play

Why: I thought he had it going into 2008, and 2009 is no different. I thought he was poised to make a run in the defense heavy Big Eleven and I don't think it will be any different in the SEC. Arkansas had a down year in 08 under new coach Bobby Petrino, but should be on the way up in 09. Petrino's system has been in place now over a year, and Mallett should be as familiar with it as anyone, at least on paper.

Why Not: No one knows how much rust is there, he hasn't seen game action since Lloyd Carr's last win over Florida. While the Big Eleven D is tough, the SEC is full of fast defenses. Arkansas has a lot of ground to make up in the SEC West.

No. 13 Zac Robinson, QB - Oklahoma State
2008 Stats:562 Rush Yds, 3,064 Pass Yds, 8 Rush TDs, 25 Passing TDs, 10 INTs, 235 YPG Passing, 166.84 QB Rating

Why: Oklahoma State is going to get their chance to overcome Texas Tech this year as the Red Raiders lost their QB and Top WR. They would be my pick for Big XII North champs if they were in fact in that division. Zac Robinson has had a statistically successful career for the Cowboys and has thrown for over 20 TDs in each of the last 2 seasons. Dual threat to run when necessary and has his top receiving threat, Dez Bryant returning.

Why Not: In the same conference as Colt McCoy, Sam Bradford, and others, and frankly past numbers don't compare. Could potentially be Top 5 QB in the country but won't be Top 2 in his own Conference.

No. 12 Demarco Murray, RB - Oklahoma
2008 Stats: 1,002 Rush Yds, 395 Rec. Yds, 774 Ret. Yds, 2171 AP Yds, 18 TDs, 5.6 Yds Y/C

Why: The Oklahoma offense was just shy of prolific in 2008, about 1 game shy. With a Heisman Winner at QB and a pair of 1,000 yd rushers in 2009 it looks to be no different. He's a triple threat. Four of the team's five top receivers from last year (1-3, 5) have all departed which means that there will be added pressure on the run game if Bradford and his targets can't match up. Defenses will focus on Bradford and the 50 TDs he threw last year.

Why Not: There is a second 1,000 yard rusher in the Sooner backfield and if the Bradford led aerial attack isn't the same in '09 as it was in '08, expect the Big XII defenses to crack down on the Sooner backs.

No. 11 Todd Reesing, QB - Kansas
2008 Stats: 3,880 Passing Yds, 4,104 Total Yds, 4 Rush TDs, 32 Passing TDs, 13 INTs, 298.5 YPG Passing, 148.39 QB Rating

Why: Late in 2007 when Kansas was making a run, some people suggested Reesing could be in contention for the Heisman. His 2008 rating was almost identical and yet he wasn't mentioned in any Heisman talks. The difference was that he threw for about 400 more yds in '09 he threw one less TD and six more INTs. Kansas has turned around their football program over the last few years and a lot of that falls on Reesing's shoulders. A little more accuracy in '09 and increased leadership role could have him making lists in December.

Why Not: Not Since Doug Flutie has there been a QB under 6' who won the Heisman and if Reesing is listed at 5'11" you know he can't be taller than 5'9". Like Robinson, he won't even be the best player in his conference, the Heisman will be just out of reach for his short arms, unless Kansas makes a big run.

No. 10 Golden Tate, WR - Notre Dame
2008 Stats:1,080 Rec Yds, 637 Ret. Yds, 11 Total TDs, 18.62 Y/C

Why: As a sophomore Golden Tate began to make a name for himself and the Irish. Three of his biggest games came against some in some of Notre Dame's biggest games. Including a three TD, 177 yd performance in the Hawaii Bowl. Jimmy Claussen is starting to show flashes of what was once considered the best ND QB commit since Joe Montana and Tate is his #1 Target. Monster ypc numbers, plus he takes the field for kick and punt returns. 2,300+ all purpose yard potential.

Why Not: Even as the No. 1 threat, he only barely topped the 1,000 yd mark. Notre Dame, might get extra Heisman votes when they are undeserved (Tim Brown) but Notre Dame has not yet made the triumphant return to greatness we were promised back in '05.

No. 9 Chris Brown, RB - Oklahoma
2008 Stats:1,220 Rush Yds, 21 Total TDs, 5.62 Y/C

Why: Oklahoma's Top Back rushed for 1,220 last year and could easily top that this year. Much of the same reasons Demarco Murray was on the list. Not the triple threat that Murray is, but will continue to be the #1 guy in the backfield. Will get extra touches since 4/5 top receivers are gone.

Why Not: Same as Murray, splitting the load, extra defensive focus.

No. 8 Evan Royster, RB - Penn State
2008 Stats:1,236 Rush Yds, 160 Rec. Yds, 12 TDs, 6.47 Y/C

Why: Look at those numbers, in the Big XII he would be a top back, in the Big Eleven where final scores like to hang out below 20, those numbers are even more impressive. A 6.47 Yards per Carry in the Big Eleven is nothing to shake a stick at. Penn State looks to come back in '09 just as strong as they did in '08. If late season letdowns can be avoided the Nittany Lions might have a shot at the National Championship and that will land squarely on Royster's shoulders.

Why Not: The Big Eleven is getting knocked down more and more in everyone's eyes and some voters might see numbers in the Big Eleven as being less significant than in other conferences. Penn State might win the Big Eleven again this year, but voters are getting sick of the Big Eleven no shows in bowl games and even a perfect season might see them on the outside looking in.

No. 7 Dez Bryant, WR - Oklahoma State
2008 Stats:1,480 Rec. Yds, 405 Ret. Yds, 21 Total TDs.

Why: He's a scoring machine and Zac Robinson's (#13) Top Receiving Threat. Another triple threat guy who is capable of peaking over 2300 yards of all purpose yardage.

Why Not: Just like Robinson he's going to eventually get over looked by another receiver, running back, or quarterback in the Big XII. The Heisman voters look at numbers, and the Big XII is so inflated that even a 1,500 yd and 23 TD season will most likely get over looked unless the Cowboys are in the National Championship.

No. 6 Jacquizz Rodgers, RB - Oregon State
2008 Stats: 1,253 Rush yds, 247 Rec. yds, 12 Total TDs, 113.91 Y/G

Why: Everyone loves the little guy and, at 5'7" it doesn't get much smaller. If Oregon State is still in the national spotlight come December that means that another upset over USC is probable. Voters will take into account Rodgers' 186 yd game against USC in '08 even if it is the '09 award because it was that remarkable. His adjusted Y/G (not including his early exit from the Arizona game) puts him at over 123 Y/G. It will be interesting to see how much his game improves from year 1 to year 2.

Why Not: He's on every radar in the country ever since the USC game. While he eats up yardage he has a problem converting those into long TD runs. His yards per carry is just under five. He's effectively useless inside of the Red Zone because of his size which means he's missing out on anywhere between 7-15 TD's next season.

No. 5 Terrelle Pryor, QB - Ohio State
2008 Stats:631 Rush Yds, 1,311 Passing Yds, 6 Rush Tds, 12 Passing TDs, 4 INTs, 1 Receiving TD, 145.62 QB Rating

Why: He started 2008 as a gimmick the vest would use to mix things up. He ended up unseating incumbent starter Todd Boeckman who had 2 National Championship appearances under his belt. He finished last season with 100.8 Y/G Passing. Way too low for a Heisman QB. Then again, while he appeared in all 13 games, he was splitting time in 8 games, and only the starter for 10. Those numbers will increase. Plus he's a 6'6" monster who's got wheels. Could tear apart the Big Eleven next year worse than everyone has in BCS games recently. If the Ohio State we saw in the Fiesta Bowl takes the field next year, they should be a lock for the Big Eleven Championship and in BCS contention.

Why Not: He still needs to prove he can be a pass first quarterback and that he can sit in the pocket to find the open man instead of running first. It's going to mean Ohio State has to get back to being the Ohio State of old, and not the one who lays down in big games. BCS voters are still sour on the Big Eleven.

No. 4 Jahvid Best, RB - California
2008 Stats:1,580 Rush Yds, 246 Rec Yds, 2,247 AP Yds, 16 Total TDs, 131.7 Rush Y/G, 8.14 Y/C

Why: Best was by far the Top RB in the country in 2008 in my opinion (sorry Shonn) and will be coming out trying to prove something in '09. He had 4 games with over 185 Yds Rushing. Cal's QB situation is unclear, and is likely to change at least once during the season. This means that the Running Game is key to Cal's success. If Best has a good season, the Bears will have a good season. He is the heart and soul of the team, could reach 2,500+ All Purpose Yards if he stays healthy.

Why Not: The Pac-10 got a lot closer recently and teams are going to be knocking each other off until they have effectively killed any chance of having more than one BCS game. Cal isn't going to beat USC. The QB instability will give Best more carries and better numbers, but ultimately will mean too many L's on the board in Berkley.

No point in going into detail over the Top Three. There's no surprise here. This is how I had it in my book from day one last season and the same will be true for this season.

No. 3 Tim Tebow, QB - Florida
No. 2 Sam Bradford, QB - Oklahoma
No. 1 Colt McCoy, QB - Texas

My 5 Sleeper Picks. Chances are these guys won't be in the final tally, but they're name might be mentioned once or twice on the ESPN Heisman Watch Page, in no particular order.

Damaris Johnson, WR - Tulsa
Austin Collie, WR - BYU
MiQuale Lewis, RB - Ball St.
Shun White, RB - Navy
Dan LeFevour, QB - Central Michigan.

Can the Arizona Wildcats Make a Punctual Postseason Push?

Chris Domschke — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:00:04 -0500

Arizona's Punctual Postseason Push?

The Wildcats season started up and down and continued that way through the first half of conference play. A few big wins (Gonzaga, San Diego State, Kansas) but more tough losses—and worse yet, 0-fer on the road—left Cat fans with a bad feeling in their gut.

It got even worse after a disappointing last second loss to USC and losing a heartbreaker to Arizona State (thanks to referee Dave Libbey), and it looked as if Arizona was going to have to choose between the NIT and the CBI Tournaments at the end of the year...if there was any interest.

But it began to turn around, and last week I went into a territory unfamiliar to Arizona fans of the last quarter century: debating what it would take out of the Cats to make it to March and play in the tourney.

At the time the Cats were red hot. They were holding on to a three-game win streak, starting with the Aubrey Coleman tap dance against Houston, which then rolled into a big win over Washington State, and an even bigger win over Washington to put the Cats at 14-8 (4-5) and showing signs of life heading into the back half of Pac-10 play.

The first question at hand was whether or not the Cats could overcome their 0-6 road record on the Oregon Trail. If they couldn't, the season was over.

While watching the Oregon State game on Thursday, I told my wife two things: that that game was the biggest game of the season for Arizona, and that if there were a drinking game to take a drink every time you heard Michelle, Barack, Obama, President, White House, Inauguration, or in-law, making it to halftime would be nearly impossible.

While those rules might usually make sense while watching CNN, I don't need to hear it every time the camera lands on the Head Coach of a Division I Basketball team. (Getting off track...)

Then on Saturday while watching the Oregon game, I informed her that that game was the biggest of the season for the Cats. She looked at me with confusion. I then had to explain that each game over the next four weeks would be the most important game until the Cats were at 21 wins or mathematically eliminated.

Needless to say, she wasn't happy about what that meant for Thursdays, Saturdays, and one Sunday over the next month.

The Cats pulled through and got two much-needed road wins up in Oregon, and officially put themselves on the Bubble according to most Certified Bracketologists out there. Even interim coach Russ Pennell is liking the Cats' chances. He was spotted growing what one can only assume is a playoff beard in Oregon. This gives Arizona some very important confidence, swagger, and breathing room.

Last week I said the Cats needed to hit the 21 regular season win mark in order for me to relax. Though I have heard and read over the last 72 hours that 20 is the mark, or at least should be, I still contend that 20 wins (4-3 from this point on) will leave them at 10-8 in the Pac, and at least one win in the Pac-10 Tournament will be needed for them to have a chance—which brings us back to that 21-win pace.

What do the Cats have left?

Seven games. Four home, three away. Arizona stands in sixth place in the Pac-10 right now, and numbers 1-5 happen to take up five of the next seven games. Against those teams, Arizona is 2-5.

With the way the Cats have been playing lately, I see them being much more competitive than they were on their original California road trips, where they compiled an 0-4 record. But this time the Cats will be wearing the white jerseys and playing in front of a new youthful McKale Center audience.

When it boils down I see one thing over the last five games (@ASU, @WSU, @UW, vs. Cal, and vs. Stan): a 3-2 record.

What this means is that this Thursday is the most important game of the season for Arizona—at least until Saturday. If the Cats can get back that dumb loss they had against USC and take down their second Pac-10 No. 1 in three weeks, then they are poised to go far. One or two losses this weekend mean an uphill battle the rest of the way, backs against the wall.

How will the rest of the Pac-10 finish up?

UCLA

7-1 or 6-2; they drop one on their trip to Arizona (whether it's UA or ASU we'll have to see) and should ride this thing out through March. They make other teams play their brand of basketball; of their 23 games, only four times have teams scored over 65 against the Bruins. 7-1 seems likely.

WASH

5-2 or 4-3; they only hit the road once more and have already beaten seven of the Pac-10 teams. Could get caught looking ahead for revenge against UA and lose focus against ASU. Started conference play 6-1, but are 2-2 over their last four. ASU and USC will be looking for blood when they face the Huskies, UCLA is at the top of their game, and Arizona is playing with their backs against the wall. 4-3 seems the most likely.

ASU

4-3; they have been proven, time and time again, that they aren't as strong as they appear at first. Losses to Baylor and Washington State (at home), close calls against IUPUI and BYU, and offensive struggles (less than 70 points in seven of the last nine) show signs of possible troubles looming, plus they don't have the Oregon schools to pick on anymore.

CAL

4-3 or 3-4; they are 4-3 over their last seven, with one of those losses coming at home to Oregon State. They look to have righted the ship against the Washington schools, but face a tough test of four out of the last seven on the road, including what should be a huge weekend against the Arizona schools. 3-4 seems the most plausible based on recent struggles.

USC

5-3 or 4-4; one thing you can say about the Trojans is that they've battled this year. Ten of their games this season have been decided by five or less points, and they were a dumb Jamelle Horne foul away from another overtime game when UA visited in January.

With a most likely 3-1 or 4-0 record against the Washington and Oregon schools, their trips to hostile Arizona and the Bay Area (Cal, Stanford) should make or break their season. They hold wins over six of their remaining eight opponents. I'm leaning towards 5-3.

As much as I want to say the Cats go 5-2, it's more likely that 4-3 will be the outcome.

If it all breaks down like I think it will, the final tallies going into the Pac-10 Tournament will look like this.

UCLA: 26-5 (15-3)
WASH: 22-9 (12-6)
ASU: 22-8 (11-7)
CAL: 21-10 (10-8)
USC: 20-10 (11-7)
UA: 20-11 (10-8)

Based on this, it looks like the Cats will have to win in the second round of the Pac-10 Tournament versus. Remember, the top six teams get a first round bye, so there's a chance that it could be Arizona vs. Arizona State in the second round, giving the Sun Devils a chance to, possibly, knock the Wildcats out of the tournament.

Interesting side note: Arizona knocked ASU out of a Bowl Game in football this year, and according to some, the Cats took the Sun Devils' NCAA Basketball at-large bid last year. Plus the Sun Devils knocked the Cats out of a Bowl Game in 2006 and 2007. Maybe the pendulum is swinging and the Cats are becoming the Football power, while the Devils are becoming the Basketball power.

This rivalry is by far the most underrated in college sports. But that's another issue for another time.

Arizona Baseball Preview: Wildcats Looking for Success in Tough Pac-10

Chris Domschke — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:54:41 -0500

Arizona Baseball Preview

One of the top dogs in Pac-10 Baseball over the last few years has been, in fact, a Cat. The University of Arizona Wildcat Baseball team has been a perennial preseason prediction in most College Baseball circuits. Over the last few years the Wildcats have been tabbed in preseason polls to be amongst the top teams in the country, as well as the Pac-10.

But after a slightly disappointing 2008 season, followed by the loss of nine players to the MLB draft (11 were drafted, but SP Preston Guilmet and 3B Brad Glenn chose to return to Tucson), Arizona is set to field a group of newcomers and young veterans to Jerry Kindall Field.

Unlike in recent years, the Cats aren't looking down at the rest of the Pac-10; they are tabbed, at least at the start of the season, to be dead in the middle. The recent Pac-10 coaches' poll came out and listed the Cats as the probable fifth-place finisher. No surprise, since the Cats are once again undertaking one of the toughest schedules in College Baseball.

This year Tucson will get to see more of the nation's top programs, as head coach Andy Lopez has set the schedule with 35 home games and only 20 on the road. Twenty-one of the team's games are against teams that appeared in the playoffs last season, and six are against College World Series participants. Eight of their matchups (22 games) are against teams ranked in the Top 25 on one or more preseason polls.

The Pac-10 Coaches' rankings shake out with Arizona State on top with three first place votes, edging out UCLA, who also received three first place votes, by three points. Stanford came in third with one first place vote, while Oregon State received two first place votes and edged out Arizona by two points overall, as the Cats came in fifth with one first place vote.

If the preseason voting is any indication, it looks like this season might be an interesting one with many ups and downs in the top half of the Pac-10, as the distance between first and fifth in the Coaches' Poll is 13 points, and the distance between fifth and sixth is 14 points.

Oregon, who finished with nine total points, appears to be the consensus coaches' pick as the bottom of the Pac-10, receiving a last place vote from all nine coaches who were allowed to for Oregon, as coaches aren't allowed to vote for their own team.

The Cats' 2008 season ended in Coral Gables, FL in the Super Regional Final as the Cats dropped two out of three to the Hurricanes of Miami. Arizona had a tough draw entering last year's Tournament, playing the home team (2,000 miles away) in Ann Arbor, MI to Eastern Michigan (eight miles away), Michigan (0 miles away), and Kentucky (330 miles away), and then went on to play a virtual road game against Miami in Coral Gables, Fl. (about three miles from UM) with an overwhelming majority of Canes fans in attendance.

The Cats fought the overwhelmingly bad schedule draw well, but junior pitcher Eric Burger got off to a rocky start in Game Three. He allowed Miami's first three batters to reach base and touch 'em all, leading to three earned runs in the first.

He settled down, only allowing three more hits over the next 6.2 innings, but Arizona's bats never quite woke up, and they dropped Game Three 4-2, marking the fourth straight season the Cats were unable to make it to Omaha. It was the first time since their 2004 trip to the College World Series that they made it to the Super Regional Final.

As is usually the case, the Pac-10 is stacked this spring, as UCLA and Arizona State make the Top 25 in all five major polls (NCBWA, Baseball America, USA Today/ESPN, Collegiate Baseball, and Rivals.com), with Stanford sitting on all four except Rivals.com (despite being in the Top 15 on the other polls).

2007 National Champion Oregon State makes the Top 25 in two polls (Baseball America and Rivals.com), and USC made No. 24 on the Collegiate Baseball Poll. Of the two polls that go beyond 25 (Collegiate Baseball and NCBWA), Arizona came in at 35 and 29, Oregon State at 38 and 31, Cal at 39 (Collegiate Baseball), and USC at 33 (NCBWA).

If all preseason indications are correct, this year's Division I Baseball Tournament leading up to the College World Series could be a lot like 2005, when half of the Pac-10 made the field of 64. The Pac-10 has sent at least four members to the playoffs in each of the last five years and has had a representative in the Final in five of the last 10 years. In 1998 they actually sent both of the College World Series participants.

The Cats' season is set to open in Tucson against Sacramento State next weekend (Feb. 20-22). I encourage all Arizona sports fans to head out to Frank Sancet Stadium this season and show the Cats some love.

Season tickets for the Wildcats Baseball are the most affordable option on campus with 35 games for $66 (less than two dollars per game), and you'll get to see games against Georgia, Oklahoma State, Michigan, USC, Oregon State, and Arizona State, amongst other national baseball powers.

Arizona's Chances to Dance

Chris Domschke — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:47 -0500

Arizona's Chances to Dance

It's not secret that this year has been a disappointment for the Arizona Wildcats Men's Basketball team. They have underperformed with 2, possibly more, future NBA players on the squad. They have made countless mental errors, been out coached more than a few times, and have been the victim of a few no-calls and bad calls. Of course the latter is out of their hands, and anyone who has had a Pac-10 official at a game this season, or any season, in any sport, has undoubtedly fallen victim to poor officiating. No surprise there.

But the team came out in 2008 going through the motions. It was no secret they weren't a contender for the Pac-10 Title this year with all of the coaching turmoil, and that outside of the Big Three (Budinger, Jordan Hill, and Nic Wise) the team was too shallow to make any kind of real run in the Tourney. But we all still thought that they had a chance at continuing their ridiculous Tournament streak at least one more year.

Things seemed to have changed after the Aubrey Coleman curb check on Chase Budinger, the Arizona team rallied together. There was a fire that hadn't been there. A will to win. They came back to beat the Cougars, they beat Pac 10 leader Washington by playing like the Cats of old, putting up over 100 points for the first time I can remember (Ed. note 11/19/06 over New Mexico State) and then held their lead in a close game against Wazzu.

So with the Cats holding on to a 3 game win streak right now they are about to head up to Oregon to play the Beavers and Ducks this weekend. They beat both teams (Ducks by 5, Beavers by 17) in a home stand at the beginning of January. But the Cats are 0-6 on the road this year with a pair of 1 point losses (Texas A&M and USC). So will these new, fired up Cats finally take down a pair on the road?

The Cats are going to need to learn how to win on the road eventually if they have any shot of going to the Tourney this year. They're sitting at 14-8 (4-5) and 2-2 against AP ranked teams. Their RPI isn't nearly as strong as past years, which helped push them in as an at-large. So the question remains, what do the Cats need to do to Dance in March?

With 9 games remaining a 9-0 mark would put them at 23-8 (13-5) and in my book, unless they get completely blown out in the Pac-10 Tournament, an at-large bid will be waiting for them. The same hold true with an 8-1 mark leaving them 22-9 (12-6). It's when we reach the 7-2 mark to put them at 21-10 (11-7) when the question comes up about Pac-10 Tournament performance. I think, depending on the other Pac-10 teams, if the Cats find themselves in the Top 4 going into the Tournament, they can still get an at large even with a loss, but it would have to be a very close game to get the selection committee on their side.

If the Cats go 6-3 the rest of the way to land at 20-11 (10-8) they will need to show up in the Pac-10 Tournament. With a 10-8 Pac-10 record, chances are they will miss the play in game of the Tournament. So a win with some decent teeth to it in the second round, and a close game in the semifinals against a Pac-10 Top 4 team could get them an at large bid, but nothing is guaranteed. Beyond that the Cats need some help. Finishing 5-4 and being under 20 wins the Cats need to play in the Conference Championship game to garner any type of consideration for the Tournament, and a Conference Championship loss, might not be enough to get that at large bid, unless they stormed through the first 3 games blowing out other Pac-10 teams.

Anything less than that and the only chance the Cats have is with the Pac-10 Tournament Championship in their back pocket. Bottom line, they aren't getting an at large bid with 18 regular season wins. That leaves the $10,000 question. Can the Cats make the Tournament.

They've got 9 games remaining. Five on the road (Oregon State, Oregon, Arizona State, Washington State, and Washington) and four at home (USC, UCLA, California, and Stanford). Are there enough wins in those match-ups? The big question at hand is whether or not the Cats can overcome their inability to perform on the road and if this fun new momentum swing they have been experiencing is there for the long haul.

Based on my past predictions, I don't want to pick the games because chances are I'll get them wrong (I'm like 1-12 on predictions on this site in the last year starting with the Triumphant Tampa Bay Will Winpost before their game against the Giants in the Wild Card playoffs. Giants won and went on to win the Super Bowl.) But I will say I see the Cats winning 6 of the remaining nine which leaves the Cats needing a good showing in the Pac-10 Tournament to get an invitation to The Madness. Let's just hope that for this team, it's not too little too late.

NFL Combine: Tuitama Shafted

Chris Domschke — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:08:08 -0500

Tuitama Shafted: Left Off Combine Invite List

The NFL Combine is the best chance players have of making a last, lasting impression on NFL Scouts leading up to the NFL Draft. In some cases, the combine can take a little known player from a possible late round pick to a 1st rounder like last year's appearance of Joe Flacco.

There are 21 Quarterbacks on this year's invitee list. They are:

Jason Boltus: Junior, Hartwick (D-III)
Rhett Bomar: Senior, Sam Houston State (FCS)
Tom Brandstater: Senior, Fresno State (WAC)
Nathan Brown: Senior, Central Arkansas (FCS)
Hunter Cantwell: Senior, Louisville (Big East - BCS)
Rudy Carpenter: Senior, Arizona State (Pac 10 - BCS)
Chase Daniel: Senior, Missouri (Big XII - BCS)
Nate Davis: Junior, Ball State (MAC)
Josh Freeman: Junior, Kansas State (Big XII - BCS)
Cullen Harper: Senior, Clemson (SEC - BCS)
Graham Harrell: Senior, Texas Tech (Big XII - BCS)
Chase Holbrook: Senior, New Mexico State (WAC)
Brian Hoyer: Senior, Michigan State (Big Eleven - BCS)
Stephen McGee: Senior, Texas A & M (Big XII - BCS)
Curtis Painter: Senior, Purdue (Big Eleven - BCS)
Mike Reilly: Senior, Central Washington (D-II)
Mark Sanchez: Junior, USC (Pac 10 - BCS)
Pat White: Senior, West Virginia (Big East - BCS)
Drew Willy: Senior, Buffalo (MAC)
John Parker Wilson: Senior, Alabama (SEC - BCS)

That means, according to who ever does the picking and choosing of invitees, that they saw all of these QBs as having a better shot of being drafted than Willie T.

I, respectfully, disagree.

I am not saying Wille is better than all, or even most of the QBs up there. I am simply saying that he is better than some and at least equal to others on this list. Consider his stats:

Career: 40 GP - 9,216 yds - 67 TDs - 31 INTs - 61% Comp. %
2008: 13 GP - 3,093 yds - 23 TDs - 8 INTs - 64.9% Comp. %

Now I understand trying to be fair, but how can you send a kid from D-III to the Combine ahead of a BCS quarterback coming off of his best season? I couldn't even find stats for Boltus or Central Washington's Mike Reilly, but I'm pretty sure Willie T deserves it more. Beyond that let's look at some of the other players selected ahead of Tuitama to show off their skills in Indy.

Fresno State's Tom Brandstater.
Career: 45 GP - 6,857 yds - 47 TDs - 32 INTs - 59% Comp. %
2008: 13 GP - 2,664 yds - 18 TDs - 12 INTs - 59.6 % Comp. %

Louisville's Hunter Cantwell. Led Louisville to their first losing season since 1997 as a Senior.
Career: 27 GP - 3,912 yds - 26 TDs - 22 INTs - 58% Comp. %
2008: 12 GP - 2,493 yds - 16 TDs - 16 INTs - 58.6% Comp. %

Arizona State's Rudy Carpenter.
Career: 47 GP - 10,491 yds - 81 TDs - 35 INTs - 58% Comp. %
2008: 12 GP - 2,493 yds - 16 TDs - 9 INTs - 60.7% Comp. %

Kansas States Junior Josh Freeman.
Career: 45 GP - 8,078 yds - 44 TDs - 34 INTs - 59% Comp. %
2008: 12 GP - 2,945 yds - 20 TDs - 8 INTs - 58.6% Comp. %

Clemson's Cullen Harper who's Sr. Bowl throws were called "Wobbly and Inconsistent".
Career: 31 GP - 5,762 yds - 41 TDs - 20 INTs - 63% Comp. %
2008: 13 GP - 2,601 yds - 13 TDs - 14 INTs - 61.4% Comp. %

Michigan State's Brian Hoyer.
Career: 42 GP - 6,159 yds - 35 TDs - 23 INTs - 55% Comp. %
2008: 13 GP - 2,404 yds - 9 TDs - 9 INTs - 51% Comp. %

Texas A&M's Stephen McGee who only started 3 games his Senior Year.
Career: 39 GP - 5,475 yds - 28 TDs - 13 INTs - 60% Comp. %
2008: 6 GP - 586 yds - 2 TDs - 2 INTs - 65.9% Comp. %
2007: 13 GP - 2,311 yds - 12 TDs - 8 INTs - 58% Comp. %

Purdue's Curtis Painter.
Career: 46 GP - 11,195 yds - 67 TDs - 46 INTs - 60% Comp. %
2008: 12 GP - 2,400 yds - 13 TDs - 11 INTs - 59.9% Comp. %

Buffalo's Drew Willy.
Career: 41 GP - 8,748 yds - 52 TDs - 30 INTs - 65% Comp. %
2008: 14 GP - 3,304 yds - 25 TDs - 6 INTs - 65% Comp. %

Alabama's John Parker Wilson.
Career: 45 GP - 7,894 yds - 46 TDs - 29 INTs - 57% Comp. %
2008: 14 GP - 2,243 yds - 9 TDs - 7 INTs - 57.9% Comp. %

Tuitama is comparable to ever single one of the players above, if not better. He may lack a little mobility but he has better accuracy and arm strength than a majority of the guys up there.

His career TD:INT ratio is better than 2:1. Of the players above only 2 (Rudy Carpenter 81:35 and Cullen Harper 41:20) have a 2:1 TD:INT ratio or better. Both of whom in 2008 (16:9 and 13:14 respectively) fell short, and in the case of Harper far short, of the 2:1 ratio.

His 2008 TD:INT performance is just shy of 3:1. Only one player up there approaches those numbers, Buffalo's Drew Willy (25:6).

Of the players listed above 7 have played in more games than Tuitama (40) - Brandstater, Carpenter, Freeman, Hoyer, Painter, Willy, Wilson. But only Carpenter (47 GP) and Painter (46 GP) have more passing yds or TDs. (RC - 10,491 yds - 81 TDs, CP - 11,195 yds 67 - TDs).

Also, of the players listed above 4 had more INTs than Willie, and of the remaining 6, 3 played in less games and the other 3 (Hoyer, Willy, and Wilson) none even came close to a 2:1 TD:INT ratio that Willie had.

My point isn't that Willie is a First Rounder. My point is that he deserves to be in Indy as much as any D-III, D-II, or FCS quarterback, yet there are four ahead of him, who played against lesser competition than a FBS quarterback.

Beyond that of the rest of the FBS quarterback his numbers are equal to or greater, especially in the most recent seasons. As more pressure fell on Tuitama to lead the team as a Junior and a Senior. And as the added pressure of not going to a bowl game and not beating ASU continued to build up, Tui had his best season. Under immense pressure Tuitama put up one of the best seasons of any other quarterback from the BCS schools to the D-III directional schools. He showed his leadership and led the Wildcats to Territorial Cup and Bowl Game victories and turned 5'8" Mike Thomas into the Pac-10's All-Time Leading Receiver.

Tuitama got shafted, and as far as his mobility, ask BYU.

Broadcast Malfunction: Porn at The Super Bowl

Chris Domschke — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:01:42 -0500

Broadcast Malfunction

For those of us desert dwellers in Tucson we happen to have a few choices for TV viewing. As we are all well aware the digital transition is coming up and those who haven't switched to digital are narrowing down their choices. I recently moved and jumped on the DirectTV bandwagon. But I was debating between DirectTV and Comcast for about a week until the decision was made. It appears it was the right choice.

Apparently those in Tucson viewing the KVOA signal on DirectTV, Dish Network, Cox Cable, or Comcast HD, saw exactly what everyone else in the world saw following Larry Fitzgerald's exciting go-ahead TD late in the 4th quarter. A bunch of commercials. But those viewing the standard definition Comcast KVOA channel were shown about 10 seconds of Porn. Seriously.

Only V years ago in Super Bowl XXXVIII, viewers across the country saw .02 seconds of Janet Jackson's nipple shield covered breast during the Halftime Show during the now famous Wardrobe Malfunction. I think this might be a little worse.

As for my Super Bowl predictions I made yesterday morning, it appears that I am an idiot and was wrong (to varying levels) on each of my predictions. As per usual, don't listen to my predations, I'm pretty much always wrong. The NSFW video can be found here for now.

Was Tom Penders Right About ESPN Doctoring the Chase Budinger Video?

Chris Domschke — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:42:13 -0500

Was Penders Right?

Tom Penders' buddy at ESPN, Norby, has finally returned Penders' calls, and it turns out maybe Penders wasn't as crazy as we all thought. In a radio interview recently, Penders accused ESPN of doctoring the video and adding X-Ray vision. Here is the clip in question:

ESPN does add a spot shadow to show Aubrey looking down, which as I mentioned in a Previous Post is debatable. The intention is there nonetheless. Plus the ESPN announcer says, "He wasn't looking down at him, but it was foot on top of head" two seconds after the alleged X-Ray vision clip shown above.

We here at The Beardown actually got ahold of the video that Penders was actually talking about when he mentions the X-Ray Vision. We all assumed it was the above clip, but I guess Penders' buddy Norby sent Penders an earlier copy that does give Penders' case of ESPN doctoring the video a lot more credence. We weren't allowed to post the video, but I have obtained permission to post a screen cap:

There you have it. It appears Penders isn't as crazy as we thought. ESPN really did give Aubrey Coleman X-Ray vision in an earlier version and then took it out. Maybe he's right about Aubrey not intentionally stepping on Chase after all.

Tom Penders Is a Dirtbag: Houston Coach Defends Chase Budinger Incident

Chris Domschke — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:38:57 -0500

Tom Penders is a Dirtbag

Earlier this week Tom Penders had the gall to stand up for what Aubrey Coleman did to Chase Budinger's face last Saturday, saying that ESPN doctored the video and added the x-ray vision piece to make Aubrey look bad.

What really made Aubrey look bad was stepping on Chase Budinger's face and shoulder. That made him look much worse than adding a little x-ray vision graphic.

Whether or not Coleman looked down to Chase, there is indisputable evidence that he knew Chase was on the ground, based on the fact that he had just gotten called for a charge. He had plenty of time—four steps by my count (five if you count the one on Chase's golden locks)—to stop his forward progress, and I don't know, maybe take a step to the left or right.

But no, he chose to walk over Chase. Most players will help the guy up, even in a competitive rivalry game, or at the very least not step on his face.

In fact, Penders' account that Aubrey is looking up at the ceiling makes Coleman look even worse. It's like he's intentionally trying to make it look like an accident. No one in their right minds (other than Albert Haynesworth), knowing there was a body on the ground in front of them, would take their eyes off of the floor. Most decent people would want to make sure they avoid the person lying on the floor.

Now whether or not Coleman intentionally stepped on Budinger's face is up for debate, but he definitely meant to step, or "accidentally" step, on Budinger. In his interview with 1560 The Game, Penders claims that there is video evidence from other angles that shows Aubrey's innocence.

The only thing I can think of is that the video angles are from a different game where Coleman was called for a charge and didn't intentionally stomp the player in front of him. I'm pretty sure that no matter where the Houston cameras were placed in McKale Center, it's pretty evident that Coleman knew exactly what he was doing...

To continue his quest to overtake Coleman as College Basketball's Biggest Scumbag, Penders went on to say that he had a sports psychologist come in to view the video, and he said it was an accident.

Furthermore, as Penders continues to try to dig the hole deeper, you know you can count on God's honest truth from this psychologist, as he used to work for the Yankees.

I just sit back and wonder if this was the same psychologist who claimed that Clemens "accidentally" chucked a jagged chunk of wood at Mike Piazza back in 2000.

Hell, I'm surprised Penders didn't punctuate his radio interview asking for a public apology from Chase Budinger for almost giving Coleman an ankle sprain or for smudging his Pumas.

Top 10 Super Bowl Distractions

Chris Domschke — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:15:44 -0500

Top 10: Super Bowl Distractions

The Super Bowl is mere days away, but it appears that the Cardinals and Steelers have been well trained by their respective coaching staffs. No one is out running his mouth, the seemingly bottomless supply of strip clubs has yet to be hit by rain clouds, and nary a curfew violation has been made.

But that isn't always the case, and as we've learned in the past, though there are only four days and three nights until the Big Game, there is still plenty of time for someone to make a splash.

So without further ado, here are the Top 10 Super Bowl Distractions, in chronological order.

Super Bowl IV

On the eve of his second Super Bowl, when the AFL was trying to prove they belonged with the NFL, Len Dawson was trying to prove he was just as good as any NFL quarterback. But in the week leading up to the game, Dawson was linked to a Federal Gambling investigation. Questions and rumors were afloat.

Despite all of the distractions, Dawson walked away with Super Bowl MVP honors as the Chiefs took down the heavily favored NFL representative Minnesota Vikings.

Super Bowl VII

The 1972 Miami Dolphins had been dealing with building pressure each week. Their Opening Day starter Bob Griese was ready to play again after missing the final nine games of the regular season plus the postseason with a knee injury. Earl Morrall had proven himself capable enough to finish what Griese had started. But that wasn't the biggest distraction.

The biggest distraction was the pressure of trying to finish the perfect undefeated, untied season, trying to prove they deserved to be there (since they only beat two teams with records over .500 during the season), and redeeming themselves after the embarrassing Super Bowl VI loss to the Dallas Cowboys (24-3). Miami managed to hang on against the Redskins with a 14-7 win.

Super Bowl XX

The punky QB known as McMahon had trouble going anywhere without causing controversies and distractions, and in the weeks leading up to the Super Bowl, it was no different.

Jim McMahon managed to get associated with a quote that labeled the women of New Orleans as "sluts," which led to some boos during the game and plenty of questions leading up to Super Bowl XX. He distanced himself from the quote by saying that he would never have been awake early enough to make such statements.

He also, in response to Commissioner Pete Rozelle fining him for wearing an Adidas headband, wore headbands with handwritten ROZELLE on them, and lastly was photographed mooning helicopters.

It's safe to say that had the Bears lost the Super Bowl, equal blame would have been put on McMahon's antics and the team's R&B hit (reached No. 41 on the Billboard Charts and received a Grammy nod) the Super Bowl Shuffle. The Bears managed to triumph in one of the most lopsided Super Bowls in history.

Super Bowl XXII

"Doug, how long have you been a black Quarterback?" While that urban legend has been proved false, that doesn't mean there weren't many other questions. In the week leading up to the Super Bowl, all Redskins quarterback Doug Williams heard were questions about him being the first black quarterback to start in the Super Bowl.

Among those asked by reporters, as documented by the Washington Post's Michael Wilbon:

"Doug, do you feel like Jackie Robinson?"
"Doug, would it be easier if you were the second black Quarterback?"
"Doug, are you upset about all the questions about you being the first black Quarterback in the Super Bowl?"

And of course:

"Doug, do you think America will be rooting for or against the Redskins because of you?"

Williams went out and did Jackie Robinson, Rev. Jesse Jackson, and all of the other civil rights leaders he was compared to or asked about proud, as he threw for four TDs and took home the Super Bowl MVP.

Super Bowl XXIII

On the eve of the Super Bowl, Cincinnati Bengals fullback Stanley Wilson was found by a coach in the bathroom using cocaine. Obviously, they had to punish him, and he was left off of the Super Bowl roster. Of course, the next punishment was worse, as it was his third offense and he was subsequently banned from the NFL.

According to a report by Paul Daugherty of the Cincinnati Enquirer, Wilson would have made a difference in the game, as the turf was muddy and wet and Wilson excelled in those conditions. The Bengals lost to the Niners 20-16.

Super Bowl XXXI

The Patriots were back in the Super Bowl for the first time since being embarrassed by the Bears 11 years earlier. They were led there by Bill Parcells, who already had two rings to his credit. But Bill Parcells and team owner Robert Kraft didn't really see eye to eye, and Kraft came on board after Parcells. Because of this there was a serious rift between coach and owner.

Six days before the game, a Boston Globe story came out that linked Parcells with a job opening with the rival New York Jets. Parcells was in contact with the Jets the entire week brokering his deal, which was complicated since he was still under contract. The distraction seemed to be enough, as the Pats dropped to the Packers 35-21 and Parcells took a separate plane home from that of his team.

Super Bowl XXXIII

This was the last Super Bowl of John Elway's career. He managed to play in five during his Hall of Fame career, and everyone was wondering if this would be his last game, as many thought it would be for the 38-year-old. But we can't forget the first three Super Bowls of Elway's career—the three out of four between the years 1987 and 1990.

In Super Bowls XXI, XXII, and XXIV, the Elway and head coach Dan Reeves-led Broncos lost to their NFC counterpart, including the 55-10 drubbing in XXIV. Reeves was soon chased out of town, and he believed that the ill will was led by Elway and former QB coach Mike Shanahan. Now it was Reeves vs. Elway and Shanahan.

Plenty of the media circus focused around that matchup, and it was the talk of the week leading up to the game. That is, until Falcon DB Eugene Robinson was arrested for solicitation the night before the game and took all of the remaining headlines. Many blamed Robinson for two of Denver's biggest plays of the game, one an 80-yard TD reception and another a long Terrell Davis run that eventually led to a TD.

Super Bowl XXXVII

The Gruden Bowl. Chucky had essentially been traded by the Raiders to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers after failing to get the Raiders past the AFC Championship game. Gruden was able to take Tampa past the NFC Championship game and right into the Super Bowl in his first year. His replacement in Oakland, Bill Callahan was able to do the same.

The whole week there was talk of Gruden's knowledge of his former team and players. How much did he know? How big of an advantage did he have? Did Oakland have an advantage knowing Gruden's tendencies?

But this story disappeared in the days leading up to the game, along with Pro Bowl center Barret Robbins. Robbins, the leader of the Oakland Raiders offensive line, went missing for much of the week prior to the Super Bowl only to reappear in the hospital suffering from depression and bipolar disorder. The Pirates beat the Pirates 48-21, and Chucky got the last laugh.

Super Bowl XXXIX

In similar fashion to a previous Patriots Super Bowl, much of the distraction in the days leading up to the game focused around the coaching staff. As opposed to Bill Parcells eight years earlier, though, this conversation was about the coordinators.

Offensive "genius" Charlie Weis had already committed to head to his alma mater, Notre Dame, as the Head Coach, and many people believed, correctly, that defensive coordinator Romeo Crennel was also on his way out to take over in Cleveland as the new head coach.

The players all knew that the team was heading into a major restructuring and that this might be their last hurrah. In a case of the distraction perhaps helping out, the team rallied around their departing coaches and eked out a 24-21 win over the Philadelphia Eagles.

Super Bowl XLII

Much like the Dolphins 16 years before, the Patriots were trying to finish an undefeated, untied season. The pressure was on, but all season the Pats looked unstoppable. A few weeks earlier they had already defeated the opposing New York Giants, and everyone had as much as given the Lombardi Trophy to the team from New England.

The Patriots ownership decided to trademark 19-0 The Perfect Season. The Boston Globe had already placed the 19-0 book up for sale on Amazon.com. One small problem: They still had to beat the Giants.

Thanks to the "Helmet Catch" and Evasive Elisha, along with constant pressure from the Giant Front Four, the Pats couldn't finish what they started and finished 18-1, a trademark bought by the New York Post for $375.00.

What distractions are waiting in the wings in the next few days? Will we look back down the road and blame a Cardinal loss on Anquan Boldin's pouting during and after the NFC Championship game? Will a Steeler loss be blamed on an unknown player disappearing or getting arrested on Saturday night? Who knows.

Top 10 Super Bowl Moments: Non-Game Edition

Chris Domschke — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:57 -0500

Super Bowl Top 10: Non-Game Moments

Everyone loves the Super Bowl and has memories of the greatest plays and the top moments.

Buddy Ryan and Mike Ditka being carried off the field after Super Bowl XX, Joe Namath running off the field holding up the number one, Kevin Dyson coming up one yard short of the Championship, Hines Ward's TD catch in XL, the New England Patriots choosing to enter as a team, etc., etc., etc.

But there are other stories that come up during the Super Bowl Week. So here's my list, in chronological order, of the Top 10 Non-Game Related Football Moments I wish I could have seen in person.

Super Bowl III

Being at the Miami Touchdown Club to see Joe Namath respond to a rowdy Colts fan by stating, "We're gonna win the game. I guarantee it." Amazing enough as the Jets were 19-point underdogs. Seeing Namath and watching his confidence leading up to the game in one of the most historic guarantees in sports.

Super Bowl IV

Being in the room when Ed Sabol of NFL Films convinced Hall of Fame Kansas City Chiefs head coach Hank Stram to secretly wear a microphone during the game, opening the door for the access we see and love to this day every week.

Super Bowl VI

Being in Don Shula's office at 1:30 AM when President Richard M. Nixon called in to suggest a play that the Dolphins should run during the game. The Dolphins subsequently did call the play, and the pass was incomplete.

Super Bowl XVII

Being outside of Tampa Stadium as Howie Long and his teammates are dropped off in a cab half a mile from the stadium due to limited drop-off zones and traffic, forced to walk through the throngs of Redskin and Raider fans to get to the stadium before kickoff.

Super Bowl XX—Tie

Being in the helicopter as the Bears QB mooned photographers during practice to show off his recent injury, or being in the room as Jim McMahon had to announce he was misquoted as calling the ladies of New Orleans sluts, saying he was a late sleeper and wouldn't have been awake early enough to insult the ladies.

Super Bowl XXXIII

Being there as Falcon DB Eugene Robinson receives the Bart Starr award for High Moral Character mere hours before being arrested for soliciting an undercover police office for prostitution.

Super Bowl XXXVI

Being in the upper decks of the Superdome to see if Matt Walsh really was up there videotaping the Rams practices.

Super Bowl XXXVII

Being in the Tampa Bay game film room leading up to the Super Bowl as former Raider and (then) current Tampa Bay head coach Jon Gruden walks his players through exactly what the Raiders were planning to do, as Bill Callahan hadn't changed much of Gruden's offense from his time in Oakland.

Super Bowl XL

Being there as Jerome Bettis (who was originally from Detroit) spends an ungodly amount of money on tickets for family and friends in the Detroit area.

Super Bowl XLII

Being there as the New York Post editors obtain the trademark for 18-1 in retaliation to the New England Patriots ownership attempting to register the trademark of 19-0 leading up to the Super Bowl.

Repeating History: Montana to Rice, Part Two?

Chris Domschke — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:38:28 -0500

Montana to Rice in 2011?

Quick, name the greatest 1-2 QB/WR combo in NFL history. Studies show there's a 58 percent chance you named Hall of Famer Joe Montana and Future Hall of Famer Jerry Rice. There also is a 17 percent chance you said Manning and Harrison and a 9 percent chance you said Aikman and Irvin. The remaining 16 percent of you came up with a handful of different responses.

Well, it's just possible that Montana-to-Rice could happen again for a new generation.

Rivals.com, among other recruiting sites, lists Class of 2009 receiver Jerry Rice Jr. as being interested in, among others in the Pac-10 area, the University of Arizona. The star receiver has been gaining a lot more attention and is looking to pull in a few more offers come National Signing Day.

Arizona is recruiting the son of the great Jerry Rice and still has a few more tricks up its sleeve to get him there. Just look at those eyes and tell me they don't resemble his future Hall of Fame father's.

Rivals.com also has given us some foresight into the 2010 recruiting class, to some extent, and headlining the list of potential players interested in Tucson is Nick Montana, son of NFL Hall of Famer Joe Montana.

The younger Montana has already received an offer from Arizona, as well as Stanford and LSU, and I'm sure Notre Dame will come knocking on his door as well.

So, if the stars align, it's very possible that Montana-to-Rice could well be in the works for 2010 or 2011, after Matt Scott's 2-3 year tenure at quarterback. It is an intriguing thought.

Brett Grossman? Thomas Jones Speaks Out

Chris Domschke — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:36:46 -0500

Brett Grossman? Thomas Jones Speaks Out

Thomas Jones played three seasons in Chicago culminating in a trip to the Super Bowl. While there on a Super Bowl team, his quarterback was none other than Turnover Machine Rex Grossman. How many times did Thomas Jones, a typically quiet, soft spoken guy, say anything negative about his quarterback?

Zero

How many times did he call for Grossman's benching?

Zero

How many times did he say that Grossman was hurting the team?

Zero

So imagine my surprise of hearing the statements of the former Bear while speaking about Jet quarterback Brett Favre.

"We're a team and we win together ... but at the same time, you can't turn the ball over and expect to win,"

"The other day, the three interceptions really hurt us. I mean, that's just reality, If I were to sit here and say, 'Oh, man, it's OK,' that's not reality. ... I don't like it, I know everybody else on the team doesn't like it."

"If somebody is not playing well, they need to come out of the game,"

"You're jeopardizing the whole team because you're having a bad day. To me, that's not fair to everybody else. You're not the only one. So when you get to the wire and somebody is just giving the game up, I mean, it's just not [fair]."

Every single one of those statements could have been said a few years ago when Jones was frustrated watching Sexy Rexy throw the ball all over the place, having three INT days, but it seems that Favre's reign in New York was that much worse than Grossman's unholy time in Chicago. I'm just glad, as a Bear fan, that the Bears made the decision that they were sick of watching Grossman blow games for the Bears left and right.

Here's to an offseason without Favre flip flopping on decisions and making us wait to hear his decision, because even if he does want to come back, it doesn't sound like the Jets want him back. Two straight seasons of teams not wanting Favre to come back. It's nice to know that not only did he ruin his legacy in Green Bay, but he's gotten a lame legacy in New York as well.

Who's tarnished legacy is worse Favre's MVP and Super Bowl Champ to his new found legacy of stringing out teams, blowing big games, and turning the ball over or Millen's legacy of a good College Player, Pro Player, Super Bowl Champ, and Analyst to his nearly single handed destroying of an NFL franchise? All Millen did was make a bad team worse.

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1998-2004 Draft Classes

Chris Domschke — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:50:01 -0500

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1998-2004 Draft Classes

I'm not sure if you saw Part I of this monstrosity covering the draft classes from 1990-1997, but if you have an interest feel free to click the link above and catch up. If you're just joining us well then you are in for a treat, if you are into stats and up for friendly banter.

I recently took a look, a long look at the players who will be up for election to the Hall of Fame either currently, in the near future, and perhaps in the distant future. The players listed range from retired and eligible to those with their first Pro Bowl appearance coming this year, and even some who haven't been to Honolulu yet. And I do mean yet. Again these are players that I can see having their names mentioned either through fan or media suggestion. I do not think they all deserve, but I do think there are some who should get more attention than is most likely going to happen.

We'll pick up where we left off...

1998

Peyton Manning: Active
10 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
2003 & 2004 AP, NEA, Bert Bell MVP
2004 PFWA MVP
2004 Offensive Player of the Year
2005 Walter Payton Man of the Year
2006 Super Bowl MVP
#5 All-Time Completed Passes (3839)
#7 All-Time Passing Yds (45628)
#4 All-Time Passing TDs (333)
#2 All-Time QB Rating (94.7)
#2 All-Time Passing Yds/G (257.8)
IN - I could keep going. He might even win his third MVP Award this season and he's still got a few more solid years left in him. If Favre actually retires, again, this season, it's not unthinkable that Peyton could erase all of Favre's records in the next four or five years, and actually accomplish the feat in less seasons, and with, most likely, less interceptions.

Charles Woodson: Active
5 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
36 INTs
82 PDs
656 Total Tackles
6 INT TDs
OUT - But his last three seasons in GB have been 3 of his best seasons, a few more like that and he could possibly move to gain some considerable attention.

Fred Taylor: Active
1 Pro Bowl
#16 All-Time Rushing Yds (11271)
62 Rushing TDs
4.6 Yds/Att
7 1,000 yd. seasons
OUT - Fred Taylor has never gotten the credit he deserves, and while I don't necessarily think he is Canton-worthy, he is Canton-Conversation-Worthy, and that probably won't happen. He has silently amassed a pretty terrific career and has never averaged less than 4.6 yds/Carry during his 11 years in the NFL.

Randy Moss: Active
6 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
1998 Offensive Rookie of the Year
#15 All-Time Receptions (843)
#9 All-Time Receiving Yds (13201)
#3 All-Time Receiving TDs (135)
#6 All-Time TDs (136)
IN- But it will take a while as more deserving (perhaps not as statistically accomplished) players are elected in. His seasons in Minnesota and Oakland when he decided to quit on his teammates are a glaring obstacle for his election.

Alan Faneca: Active
8 Pro Bowls
5x First Team All-Pro
IN - He is one of the Best Lineman in the game today, or ever. Of course, that would mean electing an Offensive Lineman which the voters don't seem to enjoy doing.

Olin Kreutz: Active
6 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
OUT - Sadly to say, Olin is one of my favorites and might be one of the dirtiest players in the game, and I mean that in a good way. He's doesn't take cheap shots, no one will ever accuse him of being an eye gouger at the bottom of the pile, he just knows, and uses, all of the good little lineman tricks at his disposal.

He's been the anchor of the Bears for the last 10 years and has started the last 135 games he has appeared in since taking over the Starting Center spot at the end of his Rookie Season.

Hines Ward: Active
4 Pro Bowls
#22 All-Time Receptions (800)
72 Receiving TDs
OUT - His numbers just aren't good enough, it would take someone to look at the fact that he was able to do that in A) Run First, Run Often Pittsburgh and 2) with QBs like Kordell Stewart, Mike Tomczak, Kent Graham, Tommy Maddox, and Charlie Batch.

London Fletcher: Active
28 Sacks
14 INTs
11 Forced Fumbles
1343 Tackles
OUT - Has silently put together a very, very solid career never gaining enough recognition playing at the same time as other LBs like Ray Lewis, Brian Urlacher, etc.

Pat Tillman: Retired (Eligible since '07)
2.5 Sacks
3 INTs
3 Forced Fumbles
331 Solo Tackles
1 Silver Star
1 Purple Heart
IN - In my book he was blossoming into one of the top Safeties in the game. Take a look at his 2000 stats. Not only that but he turned down bigger contracts out of loyalty to the, of all teams, Arizona Cardinals. He was a great player and an even better man.

1999

Donovan McNabb: Active
5 Pro Bowls
194 Passing TDs
26 Rushing TDs
Too Close To Call - He's got a few more years left to pile up some more stats. At first glance he doesn't have the most impressive numbers but while he might not have as many TD passes as Favre and Manning, he also has a LOT less Turnovers. Donovan protects the ball very well with only 90 INTs in 10 seasons.

Comparing him to the "First Ballot Lock" Brett Favre, in his first 6 full seasons Favre threw for 182 TDs and 93 INTs. And Manning amassed 138 TDs/100 INTs in his first 5 seasons. It seems like Donovan's got better numbers. But Favre and Manning both have the ring that has evaded McNabb.

Edgerrin James: Active
4 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
1999 Offensive Rookie of the Year
#8 All-Time in Carries (2982)
#11 All-Time in Rushing Yds (12121)
91 TDs
Too Close to Call - Edge still has a few more seasons left in him, but it looks like he's not the #1 option in AZ and who knows who will pick him up and how much juice he's got left. If he cracks the Top Ten in Rushing Yds. he'll get some attention.

Torry Holt: Active
7 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
#11 All-Time Receptions (869)
#14 All-Time Receiving Yds (12660)
OUT - But barely, 2008 was the first time since his rookie season that he didn't break the 1100 yard mark for receiving. Based on the climate in St. Louis, I think sub 1000 yard seasons are on the horizon for Holt, which will keep him out.

Champ Bailey: Active
8 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
43 INTs
124 PDs
672 Total Tackles
OUT - Despite pretty decent numbers, the biggest thing that Champ Bailey brings to the table is the fact that QBs just don't throw in his direction anymore. That's a stat that can't be kept. He's still one of the best DB's to play the game.

Joey Porter: Active
4 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
83 Sacks
12 INTs
45 PDs
22 Forced Fumbles
565 Total Tackles
On the Fence - Before this season I would have said Out, but he had quite the resurgence in 2008 amassing 17.5 sacks and four Forced Fumbles. A couple more seasons like that and he could very well be heading to Canton

2000

Brian Urlacher: Active
6 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
2000 Defensive Rookie of the Year
2005 Defensive Player of the Year
37.5 Sacks
17 INTs
62 PDs
1062 Total Tackles
IN - Tentatively, he was having a lock of a Hall of Fame career to continue the Bears MLB tradition but the past couple seasons he has had to deal with a handful of issues that have hurt his numbers and his play.

Inconsistency on the Defensive Line hurts, terrible offenses with many turnovers keeps the D on the field longer and in such tires them out. As well as an off-season back surgery. A return to perennial Pro Bowl form will be key in getting him over the hump.

Shaun Alexander: Inactive/Unretired (Eligible 2014)
3 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
2005 Offensive Player of the Year
2005 AP, PFWA, NEA, Bert Bell MVP
9453 Rushing Yds
#7 All-Time Rushing TDs (100)
#13 All-Time Offensive TDs (112)
OUT - He would need 2009 to be a Comeback Player of the Year type season followed by a couple of Pro Bowls to get back into consideration for Canton. Between 2001-2005 he seemed like a sure thing Pro Bowler as he gained over 7500 yds in those 5 seasons with 87 rushing TDs, 98 Total.

But injuries and a depleted Seattle Offensive Line ended his production.

Tom Brady: Active
4 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
2001 Super Bowl MVP
2003 Super Bowl MVP
2007 AP, PFWA, NEA, Bert Bell MVP
2007 AP Offensive Player of the Year
#51 All-Time Passing Yds. (26446 )
#28 All-Time Passing TDs (197)
Tied #5 All-Time QB Rating (92.9)
Too Close to Call - His career path looks eerily similar to that of Shaun Alexander. With reports that Brady might not be ready for 2009 he might wind up be one of those guys who hangs out on the finalist ballot every year without making it to Canton. Three Super Bowl Wins is hard to argue against, but the numbers just aren't there, yet.

2001

LaDainian Tomlinson: Active
5 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
2006 AP, NEA, PFWA, Bert Bell MVP
2006 Offensive Player of the Year
2006 Walter Payton Man of the Year
#14 All-Time Rushing Yds (11760)
#2 All-Time Rushing TDs (126)
#4 All-Time Rushing Yds/G (92.6)
#4 All-Time in Total TDs (141)
7 Passing TDs
IN - Considering that everyone thinks he had a bad 2008 season and he managed only 1110 yds and 11 rushing TDs. He's also only got 25 fumbles in his career, 18 lost. He's been very durable and is between four to six seasons from passing Emmitt Smith for All-Time Leading rusher, barring injury.

Steve Hutchinson: Active
6 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
IN - If Lineman were well respected and represented Hutchinson would be well on his way to a Hall of Fame bust. Ask Adrian Peterson and Shaun Alexander what they think of Hutchinson. It's no coincidence that between 2001 and 2005 Shaun Alexander was gaining so many yds and TDs and that Hutchinson was his Left Guard for 2001-2005.

Drew Brees: Active
3 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
2006 Walter Payton Man of the Year
#53 All-Time in Passing Yds (26258)
#53 All-Time Passing TDs (168)
Career 63.9% Completion % (#5 All-Time)
On the Fence - He's about 3-4 years from cracking the Top Ten All-Time in Passing Yds and 4-5 years from cracking the Top Ten in TDs. If he were with a better team and had a chance at a Super Bowl ring his stock would improve.

Antonio Pierce: Active
1 Pro Bowl
7 INTs
40 PDs
7 Forced Fumbles
9 Fumble Recoveries
627 Total Tackles
OUT - For Now, his numbers don't look that great for an 8 year Vet, but then you look closer and realize the Redskins never used him. He has compiled the majority of his stats over the last 5 seasons. 2008 was a little bit of a down year, if he can turn it back on and get a few more 100+ Tackle seasons with a few more Turnovers and maybe another Super Bowl Ring, he could be considered a potential Hall of Famer.

Julius Peppers: Active
4 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
2002 Defensive Rookie of the Year
70.5 Sacks
4 INTs
41 PDs
25 Forced Fumbles
343 Tackles
OUT - Though he has been a very, very good football player and with the exception of his Sophomore Slump (7) and the 2007 oddity (2.5) he has had double digit sacks in each season. It remains to be seen if his positive drug test from his rookie season will affect the voting, but it should be noted he was busted for ephedra, a banned weight loss drug, not anabolic steroids.

Quentin Jammer: Active
13 INTs
99 PDs
4 Forced Fumbles
499 Total Tackles
OUT - see Champ Bailey. Quentin Jammer is just as good without any of the recognition.

Ed Reed: Active
5 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
2004 Defensive Player of the Year
43 INTs
91 PDs
6 Forced Fumbles
411 Total Tackles
#11 All-Time Non-Offensive TDs (11)
106 & 107 yd. INT Returns
IN - If he can keep up at this pace he will move up in the record books, he needs 10 to pass Deion Sanders, 11 to pass Darrell Green, and 15 to crack the Top Ten and seeing how he's had more than 5 in 6/7 seasons, I'd say that should be pretty soon.

Brian Westbrook: Active
2 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
66 Total TDs (#92)
10315 All-Purpose Yds
On the Fence - Considering he's averaging about 2000 All Purpose Yds/Season, a 10 year career would put him ahead of Tim Brown, 12 years and he would take over the #1 spot. That's not that far fetched, barring major injuries and missed game time, he will be in the Hall and own a few records.

2003

Carson Palmer: Active
2 Pro Bowls
#102 All-Time Completions (1380)
#115 All-Time Passing Yds (15630)
#104 All-Time Passing TDs (107)
#6 All-Time QB Rating (63.7%)
Too Close to Call - Injuries might wind up taking their toll on the former Heisman Winner. If he is able to keep up his pace he still has an outside shot at ending his career in the Top Ten to Fifteen in Passing Yds, Completions, and TDs. He has already completely re-written the Bengals record books, sorry Boomer.

Andre Johnson: Active
3 Pro Bowls
#116 All-Time Receptions (486)
#137 All-Time Receiving Yds (137)
33 TDs
Too Early - He had a major breakout season in 2008, and that's saying something for a guy going to his third Pro Bowl. A lot of his success ultimately relies on Teammates and QBs. He plays for the Texans and his QB is Matt Schaub so.....

Troy Polamalu: Active
5 Pro Bowls
1 First Team All-Pro
7 Sacks
17 INTs
61 PDs
7 Forced Fumbles
435 Total Tackles
IN - A very good player. He's already got the ring and the media and public love him, which will translate well when it comes to voting in 8-10 years.

Anquan Boldin: Active
3 Pro Bowls
2003 Offensive Rookie of the Year
#105 All-Time Receptions (502)
#129 All-Time Receiving Yds (129)
#1 All-Time Receiving Yds/G (81.2)
On the Fence - Much like Andre Johnson team will have something to do with this. Not to mention Larry Fitzgerald seems to be getting a slight majority of the catches, yds, and TDs between the two.

Lance Briggs: Active
4 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
6 Sacks
9 INTs
45 PDs
8 Forced Fumbles
6 Fumble Recoveries
4 Defensive TDs
656 Total Tackles
Too Early - My bias might be coming out here (Double Whammy Arizona Alum and Current Bear) but Lance has avoided the injury bug and has had over 100 Tackles in each of the last five seasons (out of six) and has had at least three turnovers to his credit (INT, FF, FR) in the last four seasons.

If he keeps up at this pace you could expect his numbers to be more than double his current numbers which would be staggering.

Tony Romo: Active
2 Pro Bowls
#147 All-Time Passing yds (10562)
#151 All-Time Completions (831)
#130 All-Time Passing TDs (81)
#2 All-Time QB Rating (94.7)
#4 All-Time Yds/Att (8.1)
#1 All-Time Net Yds/Att (7.39)
#7 All-Time Completion % (63.6%)
IN - I know it's crazy, but he will win a big game eventually, it's not only on Romo, though he has choked plenty. But he's already moving up in the record books after only 2.5 season. He's got great passing numbers and he has been known to scramble a little bit. I think he's got a legitimate shot at over 50,000 passing yds in his career.

Antonio Gates: Active
5 Pro Bowls
3 First Team All-Pro
5006 yds Receiving
#89 All-Time TD Receptions (51)
IN - He's on pace to shatter Tony Gonzalez's TE Records. When all is said and done, Gates should hold every single TE receiving record, and he's not a bad blocker either.

2004

Eli Manning: Active
1 Pro Bowl
#124 All-Time Passing Yds (14623)
#116 All-Time Completions (1276)
#115 Passing TDs (98)
OUT - He will put up good numbers throughout his career, he already has the Super Bowl Ring, unless he wins a few more rings (three-plus) you can't put him in the Hall. He is a good QB. In line with guys like Phil Simms.

He will probably pass Simms in the Giant Record books if he hangs around awhile. He is and has been improving over the years so it's not out of the question to think that one day he'll be on the ballot, but as of right now, I don't think so.

Larry Fitzgerald: Active
3 Pro Bowls
426 Receptions
46 Receiving TDs
On the Fence - Much like Q he will suffer for playing on the Cardinals. With the influx in recent years of more passing for offenses more receivers are putting up higher numbers and Super Bowl wins will always be an equalizer, does anyone but Matt Randle think Cardinals are ever going to win a Super Bowl?

Philip Rivers: Active
1 Pro Bowl
#146 All-Time Passing Yds (10697)
#135 All-Time Passing TDs (78)
#5 All-Time QB Rating (92.9)
Too Early - Rivers has done well in his 5 years especially considering he spent his first two on the pine behind (possible) Hall of Famer Drew Brees. Rivers is a competent safe passer and a exceptionally emotional leader. The window on San Diego is closing fast, and as long as Norvell is running things it doesn't look good for the Superchargers. A couple more years and we'll get a good read on the future of Philip.

Michael Turner: Active
1 Pro Bowl
Too Early - I could list his stats but he is a unique case of a secondary runner for the first part of his career. He played alongside and behind LaDainian Tomlinson and wasn't able to make any real name for himself. Atlanta gave him a Pro Bowl season, first of many I assume.

He was nearly unstoppable as he ran for almost 1700 yds and 17 TDs, that's over 400 yds more than in his previous four seasons combined, he also had 11 more TDs in year five than in the first four combined. If he can continue at this pace (1500/15) he could be mentioned in Hall of Fame talks and record books down the road.

By my count, that leaves 31 players who should be entering into Canton in the next 15 years, nine who need some breaks (MVP, Super Bowl, Records, etc), four who have the potential to squeak in and 32 who might get on the ballot a few times but chances are (stats, no Super Bowl, bad Team, Lineman, Special Teamer, etc) they won't be in the hall without a major public uprising.

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1990-1997 Draft Classes

Chris Domschke — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:46:10 -0500

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1990-1997 Draft Classes

The NFL Hall of Fame. Yes I am aware it's called the Pro Football Hall of Fame, but with only one non-NFL player in the Hallowed Halls of Canton, I think it's safe, though not fair, to call it the NFL Hall of Fame.

But that's another rant for another day.

I decided to take a look at players drafted between 1990-2005 and debate, myself, whether or not they belong in the Hall of Fame when their day comes. Now, I realize that there are only four to seven players inducted each year.

And yes, I realize just how hard it is to make it into the Hall, and I don't want to saturate the Hall of Fame with players who don't belong, but still I figured it was about time to look at active and recently retired players who will (or in some cases have already) be up for the vote in the near future.

Looking at the list of about 70-80 players I have in front of me, I assure you that there will be more that I suggest for entry than is feasible based on the voting procedures. These are the players that I think have a decent shot at the Hall of Fame, or ones who I personally think should garner attention though they most likely won't ever make it to the finalist ballot of 17.

A brief look at the Hall of Fame will show that, much like the Heisman, there is a substantially low ratio of non "skill" players represented in the Hall of Fame. Just like the Heisman should pretty much be issued to the top QB every year (oh wait...it already is) the Hall of Fame tends to only recognize those who put up numbers, and in a high percentage of instances of recent memory it is offensive numbers.

Thus the numbers of lineman both offense and defense, and Kickers, Linebackers, DBs, et. al. are vastly underrepresented.

And for the record, I used a mix of Pro-Football-Reference.com and NFL.com. There may be discrepancies or incomplete stats, specifically with things like Tackles, Passes Defended, etc. which were not officially kept in the past that are now. To quote PFR, "We have tackle data for all players who were active in 1994 or later. Prior to 1994, the tackle data is unofficial, inconsistently recorded from team to team, and incomplete in our database.

"Also, before 1994, some teams recorded assists while others didn't, so we have lumped tackles plus assists together in the tackles column for those years. From 1994 to 2000, tackles were not an official stat, but were recorded consistently and should be complete in our database. From 2001 to the present, tackles have been an official statistic".

And that is where I'm getting tackle data from.

The stats are, for the most part (when applicable) including the 2008 season that just ended, but some stats may be incomplete. Also, as is always the case with Pro Bowls, some players might be added to the Pro Bowl to fill in for injured/uninterested players currently on the rosters. Also, to my knowledge, the 2008 All-Pros have not yet been announced.

1990

Junior Seau: Active (For now)
12 Pro Bowls
6x First Team All-Pro
1994 Walter Payton Man of the Year
56.5 Sacks
18 INTs
11 Forced Fumbles
17 Fumble Recoveries
1835 Total Tackles
IN - Despite his connections to Spygate and the Patriots.

Emmitt Smith: Retired (Eligible 2010)
8 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
#1 All-Time Carries (4409)
#1 All-Time Rushing Yards (18,355)
#2 All-Time TDs (175)
#1 All-Time Rushing TDs (164)
IN - Despite the fact that I think he barely cracks the Top Ten of All-Time RBs and despite his seasons in Arizona.

LeRoy Butler: Retired (Eligible since '07)
4 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
13 Forced Fumbles
10 Fumble Recoveries
38 INTs
889 Total Tackles
OUT

Brian Mitchell: Retired (Eligible 2009)
1 Pro Bowl
1x First Team All-Pro
13 Punt/Kick Return TDs (#1 All-Time)
23,316 All Purpose Yds (#2 All-Time)
19,013 Kick/Punt Return Yds (#1 All-Time)
OUT - Barely, unless they open a Special Teams wing.

Shannon Sharpe: Retired (Eligible 2009)
8 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
815 catches (#2 All-Time TE)
10,060 Yds Receiving (#2 All-Time TE)
62 TDs (#3 All-Time TE)
IN - I would say definitely but the fact that his numbers drop below those of a traditional WR might keep him at bay.

Matt Stover: Active
1 Pro Bowl
1x First Team All-Pro
#5 All-Time Points Scored
#3 All-Time Field Goals Made
OUT - Though I'd vote for him.

John Randle: Retired (Eligible 2009)
7 Pro Bowls
6x First Team All-Pro
137.5 Sacks (#6 All-Time)
29 Forced Fumbles
11 Fumble Recoveries
556 Total Tackles
Too Close - He was a terror in Minnesota, but his Seattle Seasons may count against him.

1991

Brett Favre - active (for now)
10 Pro Bowls
3 First Team All-Pro
#1 in Completions, Attempts, Yards, TDs, and INTs
463 Passing TDs
14 Rushing TDs
157 Fumbles (#2 All-Time)
307 INTs
IN - Though I think he is the most overrated player in the history of the NFL, he is still one of the Top 10 QBs of All-Time hands down, but a personal Turnover:TD Ratio of 464:477 isn't really the greatest ratio. It's actually very Grossman-like.

Aeneas Williams: Retired (Eligible 2010)
8 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
55 INTs
13 Defensive TDs (#3 All-Time)
794 Total Tackles
OUT - But he makes a few appearances in the Final 17 in my book. He went to the Pro Bowl 6 times with the Cardinals, that enough is enough of an accomplishment to get my vote.

Erik Williams: Retired ( Eligible since '07)
4 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
Stats: see Emmitt Smith
OUT - One of the leaders of the offensive line that should get 75% of Emmitt Smith's credit, alas Offensive Lineman are shunned from Canton.

1992

N/A

1993

Drew Bledsoe: Retired (Eligible 2012)
4 Pro Bowls
#5 All-Time in Completions and Attempts
#13 in TDs
OUT - But Pity Points for getting replaced by two potential Hall of Famers, and a few killer blocks he threw on reverses over the years. Bonus points for "his" comedic, now defunct blog.

Willie Roaf: Retired (Eligible 2011)
11 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
189 GP/189 Starts
IN - There is no valid argument against this and any other result is absolutely ridiculous in thought.

Jerome Bettis: Retired (Eligible 2011)
6 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
1993 Offensive Rookie of the Year
2001 Walter Payton Man of the Year
#4 All-Time in Carries
#5 All-Time in Yards
#10 All-Time in Rushing TDs
IN - Maybe, it will take a few ballots.

Michael Strahan: Retired (Eligible 2013)
7 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
2001 Defensive Player of the Year
141.5 Sacks (#5 All-Time)
Twice led the League in Sacks
All-Time Single Season Sack Leader (22.5 - Thanks Brett)
IN - Popularity, coming back for the Super Bowl Season, and the Single Season record get him over the hump.

Jason Elam: Active
3 Pro Bowls
#6 All-Time in Points Scored
#5 All-Time in FGs Made
Tied for longest successful FG (63 yds) in NFL History
OUT - Sorry kickers

John Lynch: Retired (Eligible 2013)
9 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
26 INTs
16 Forced Fumbles
9 Fumble Recoveries
1058 Total Tackles
OUT - Unfortunately for one of my all-time favorites, unless the voters look at how he played, and hit, rather than the numbers in the stat column, Lynch will be on the outside looking in despite his hard nosed, hard hitting career.

Lorenzo Neal: Active
4 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
Stats: see 1999/00 Eddie George & Steve McNair, 2001/02 Corey Dillon, 2003-07 LaDainian Tomlinson
OUT - Too bad, he's one of the top FB's of All-Time, but to voters he'll just be a running Lineman.

1994

Marshall Faulk: Retired (Eligible 2011)
7 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
1994 Offensive Rookie of the Year
3x AP Offensive Player of the Year (1999, 2000, 2001)
2x Pro Football Writers MVP (2000, 2001)
2000 AP MVP
19.154 Yds from Scrimmage (#4 All-Time)
136 TDs (#5 All-Time)
IN

Isaac Bruce: Active (For Now)
4 Pro Bowls
#5 All-Time Receptions
#2 All-Time Receiving Yds
#9 All-Time Receiving TDs
IN - By the skin of his teeth, "Greatest Show on Turf" Super Bowl seals it.

Larry Allen: Retired (Eligible 2013)
11 Pro Bowls
6x First Team All-Pro
Stats: see Emmitt Smith, Erik Williams
OUT - see Erik Williams, but might make a couple Finalist ballots.

Tom Nalen: Retired (Eligible 2013)
5 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
see. 1000+ yd individual rushers in Terrell Davis (1995-1998), Olandis Gary (1999), Mike Anderson (2000 & 2005), Clinton Portis (2002/03), Reuben Droughns (2004), Tatum Bell (2006). Also in 1994, 2001, and 2007 the top 2 combined for over 1300 yds each season.
ON THE FENCE

Kurt Warner: Active (Did Not play in the Regular Season until 1998)
4 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
1999 MVP (AP, PFWA, Bert Bell)
1999 Super Bowl MVP
2001 AP MVP
#4 All-Time QB Rating
#1 All-Time Passing Yds/G
IN - Despite the fact that he missed 4 years due to being undiscovered and bagging groceries. What he's done in Arizona is enough to give him a Bronze Bust.

1995

Tony Boselli: Retired (Eligible since '07)
5 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
Started 90/91 Games
OUT - Frequent Injuries will be what stands between him and Canton. One of the All Around Good Guys in the NFL.

Steve McNair: Retired (Eligible 2013)
3 Pro Bowls
2003 AP MVP
#9 All-Time in Rushing Yds/Att
211 TDs (Rushing and Passing)
OUT - One of the pioneer dual threat hybrid QBs, injuries plagued him throughout his career playing in all 16 games only four out of 10 seasons. Often played through multiple injuries.

Warren Sapp: Retired (Eligible 2013)
7 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
1999 Defensive Player of the Year
96.5 Sacks
438 Tackles
19 Forced Fumbles
12 Fumble Recoveries
573 Total Tackles
IN - Stats don't tell the whole story of the self proclaimed QB Killa. Sapp spent most of his career getting double teamed by Offensive Lineman and freeing up teammates Derrick Brooks, Simeon Rice, John Lynch, and the rest of the Feared Bucs D to destroy opposing offenses.

Ty Law: Active
5 Pro Bowls
2x First Team All-Pro
52 INTs
7 Forced Fumbles
5 Fumble Recoveries
834 Total Tackles
7 Def. TDs
OUT

Derrick Brooks: Active
10 Pro Bowls
5x First Team All-Pro
25 INTs
24 Forced Fumbles
1715 Total Tackles
7 Def. TDs
IN

Curtis Martin: Retired (Eligible 2011)
5 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
1995 Offensive Rookie of the Year
#4 All-Time Rushing Yds. (14,101)
#12 All-Time Rushing TDs (90)
#7 All-Time yds from Scrimmage (17,430)
10/11 1,000 yd seasons
IN - But it will take a few ballots

Terrell Davis: Retired (Eligible since '07)
3 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
1996 & 1998 Offensive Player of the Year
1997 Super Bowl MVP
1998 AP & PFWA MVP
#3 All-Time in Rushing Yds/G (97.5)
OUT - Injuries will ultimately keep him out, he's not in the Top Ten in most of the highly regarded categories due to only appearing in 78 games.

1996

Simeon Rice: Inactive (unsigned, unretired, as of now eligible in 2013)
3 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
1996 Defensive Rookie of the Year
122 Sacks (#12 All-Time)
5 INTs
28 Forced Fumbles
475 Tackles
OUT - Had he not had issues with the Tampa and Denver Front Offices regarding Injuries and Playing Time he could have been a guaranteed HoFer. Second Fastest to 100 Sacks behind the Late Reggie White.

Jonathan Ogden: Retired (Eligible 2013)
11 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
Started 176/177 games
IN

Marvin Harrison: Active
8 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
#2 All-Time in Receptions (1102)
#4 All-Time in Receiving Yds (14,580)
#5 All-Time in Receiving TDs (128)
IN - Marvin, say Thank You to Peyton, and don't forget to hide the Gun.

Ray Lewis: Active
10 Pro Bowls
5x First Team All-Pro
2000 & 2003 Defensive Player of the Year
2000 Super Bowl MVP
2000 Indicted on Murder Charges (charges dropped to a lesser plea)
28 INTs
11 Forced Fumbles
15 Fumble Recoveries
1635 Total Tackles
IN - Stats don't say a lot but his reputation and image should be enough to get him over the hump.

Brian Dawkins: Active
7 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
34 INTs
97 PDs
32 Forced Fumbles
16 Fumble Recoveries
913 Tackles
OUT

Tedy Bruschi: Active
1 Pro Bowl
2005 Comeback Player of the Year (From a Stroke!)
12 INTs
44 PDs
1067 Total Tackles
OUT - Sadly enough, the Former UA Defensive Lineman is a great story and an even better player, but he's not going to the Hall despite the Rings.

Terrell Owens: Active
6 Pro Bowls
5x First Team All-Pro
#6 All-Time Receptions (951)
#5 All-Time Receiving Yds (14,122)
#2 All Time Receiving TDs (139)
#4 All Time TDs (141)
Largest Tumor in recorded history.
Real QB Killa (sorry Warren, but he takes them down in the media and psyche, you just physically harmed them)
IN - You can't argue with the numbers, though it will be fun watching as he gets passed by the first 2-5 ballots as other more media friendly candidates head into the Hall.

Zach Thomas: Active
7 Pro Bowls
5x First Team All-Pro
20.5 Sacks
17 INTs
16 Forced Fumbles
1733 Total Tackles
OUT

1997

Orlando Pace: Active
7 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
IN - ask Steven Jackson, Marshall Faulk, and Kurt Warner's Blindside

Tony Gonzalez: Active
10 Pro Bowls
4x First Team All-Pro
#9 All-Time Receptions (916)
#1 All-Time Receiving Yds for a TE (10,940)
#1 All-Time Receptions for a TE (916)
#1 All-Time TDs for a TE (76)
IN

Tiki Barber: Retired (Eligible 2012)
3 Pro Bowls
1x First Team All-Pro
#10 All-Time Yds from Scrimmage (15,632)
#11 All-Time All Purpose Yds (17,357)
OUT

Ronde Barber: Active
4 Pro Bowls
3x First Twam All-Pro
23 Sacks
37 INTs
125 PDs
11 Forced Fumbles
904 Total Tackles
12 Def/Spec. Teams TDs (#6 All-Time)
OUT

Jason Taylor: Active
6 Pro Bowls
3x First Team All-Pro
2006 Defensive Player of the Year
2007 Walter Payton Man of the Year
120.5 Sacks (#14 All-Time)
7 INTs
40 Forced Fumbles
26 Fumble Recoveries
680 Total Tackles
8 Defensive TDs
IN - Barely, a Super Bowl would push him over the top, but his Dancing with the Stars appearance might be helpful as far as public perception.

That brings us to 1998. Tomorrow I'll have '98 through 2004 or '05 I haven't really decided how recent to go. What to expect? I'll give you a hint, the first name on the list is Peyton Manning, and he gets an "IN" vote from me. What about Edgerrin? Urlacher? Vick? Peppers? Palmer? Elisha? Who knows...

Arizona-BYU Las Vegas Bowl: Predictions Vs. Reality

Chris Domschke — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:16:22 -0500

Predictions?

This was too good to pass up. While surfing yesterday I came by the FoxSports.com prediction for the Las Vegas Bowl:

I don't know just how easy it is for you to make out the highlight of that game in the screen cap, but it was Mitch Payne's fourth successful field goal attempt of the game that pushed the Cougars over the Cats in Vegas.

Harvey Unga's 111 yards on 17 carries and three TDs (error in the FoxSports graphic above since the official Whatif box score was two TDs, which makes a lot more sense) helped the Cougars secure their third consecutive Victory in Vegas.

Thank God video games don't determine the real outcome of things.

In the real world, Unga managed 40 fewer yards (71) on the same 17 carries, and Mitch Payne's foot was less the gift of Midas and more the gift of Norwood, as he went 0/2 on FG tries. His replacement, Sorensen, didn't fare much better, going 0/1.

It's also nice to know that the folks at Whatif underestimated the Wildcat Senior QB. Willie T threw for 325 yards on a 24/35 night with two TDs and zero INTs, complete with a Tebow-like eight-yard TD scamper. Compare that to the fictional numbers of Willie's CGI counterpart going 12/34 for 172 yards, two picks, and one TD.

The fictional versions also didn't account for my newfound distaste of Austin Collie, complete with his out of bounds cheap shot in the first half.

A little later today I'll have more analysis of the Cats' victory in Vegas.

An Open Letter To ESPN, Fox Sports, Versus, etc

Chris Domschke — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:57:38 -0500

If you know someone who works in the radio or television sports industry please pass this post along. If you know others who may be interested in pursuing this cause please pass this post on. This is a letter to the programmers who decide what we the sports fan watch on Saturday afternoons.

To Whom it May Concern,

We, the sports fans, have been more than pleased with the advent of more sports programming. Nothing is better than spending a Saturday, and I mean all day Saturday, than watching College Football.

We realize we have it much better than our Fathers, and their Fathers before them who did not have access to Football, Basketball, Baseball, and Hockey Packages available for purchase. I am firmly aware that I am able to view the Golf channel when I want to watch a classic Golf Tournament and that I can choose between a multitude of games on TV.

With that said, I have a concern that needs to be addressed. College Football (in my opinion and many others like me) is better than the professional brand, and that March Madness is more exciting than the NBA Finals. Why then is it almost impossible to find any coverage of College Baseball. This is an issue that needs a resolution.

With multiple ESPN channels and FSN networks that cover all major markets and regions, why am I still left searching, almost completely unsuccessfully, for College Baseball Coverage.

The 2008 season was a progressive step in College Baseball coverage. ESPN had occasional pieces covering the games. This was in large part due to the fact that ESPN Football Analyst Mark Schlereth, had a son (Daniel) playing Division I Baseball at the University of Arizona.

Unfortunately though, a large portion of this coverage was not of the games themselves but of Mark on the road with Daniel and the Wildcats. This was a great segment, one I tuned into when I saw it and scoured the ESPN homepage for vid clips. In contrast, however, that was the majority of their coverage.

The programmers at the various Media outlets can say that it's just the way it is. College Baseball doesn't garner the national media attention that other sports like football and basketball do. To that I say, how can it gain any kind of following when there is no coverage to begin with.

A good portion of avid sports fans who commit hours of their day to ESPN or Fox Sports, can probably rattle off all sorts of opinions about Plaxico Burress, Terrell Owens, and Tommy Tuberville's Mom. But that's because those are the stories that we read online and watch over and over and over again on ESPN.

Many of those fans probably hear about teams like Rice or Cal State Fullerton and think they are schools without any sports dominance due to their usual lack of appearance in the Football and Basketball Championship pictures. But both have been in Omaha 6 times over the last 10 years.

By comparison Football powerhouses like Florida, LSU, Miami, Texas, and many more have only been to the BCS Bowls 5 or less times over the same period. And in recent memory (06, 07, 08, and 09) those have held the top 10 teams.

College Baseball has what everyone is looking for. Teams don't typically schedule cupcakes since strength of schedule isn't as highly regarded. Small market teams aren't left out despite quality records. And they have the perfect playoff system in place. Not to mention the National Championships in Omaha are the draw, not the Bowl/Final Four atmosphere.

ESPN took a gamble about 5 years ago and began airing the World Series of Poker, which eventually spread from the Main Event to all of the different events. The post-season is still played, if you can find it, on TV. But where do we get the regular season updates. There is so much more to the Baseball season than Omaha.

There is no tab on the ESPN homepage that links to College Baseball coverage, and the ESPNU tab's top links are football and basketball recruiting. In fact, to find baseball coverage on the site you have to click the More link to get anything. And once there all you see about Baseball is this:

To the programmers at ESPN, Fox Sports, et al. I implore you. Cover College Baseball. At this point you would have pretty exclusive access. And Fox Sports Arizona, why not cover baseball in the Spring and pick up a few games?

Last year the only games I recall seeing were the UA vs ASU game, and in that instance there was only one of them. Can we please get some College Baseball coverage. Look what happened when MMA started getting attention. And Baseball is America's past time.

Ron Santo Misses Out Again

Chris Domschke — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:28:40 -0500

Santo Misses Out Again

For far too long former Cub Great Third Baseman and current Cub Great Announcer, Ron Santo, has missed out on the Hall of Fame. The year 2008 should have marked the end of this ridiculous error in judgment and voting.

However, it was announced this morning at Baseball's Winter Meetings that Santo has once again been blocked from his rightful place in the Hall which is long overdue. Once again, Santo has been kept from joining with Hall of Famers and former teammates Billy Williams and Ernie Banks (pictured Below with Manager Leo Durocher).

Santo has already been historically associated with other Cub Hall of Famers (Williams, Banks, and Ryne Sandeberg) for years with their numbers, the only four, retired in the Cubs long and storied history. But apparently the Veteran's Committee has decided that the Hall of Fame doesn't have room for Santo just yet.

The Veteran's Committee made the mistake in 2005 (leaving Santo out by eight votes) and in 2007 (by five votes), and received much criticism for that. Clearly, they have not learned from past mistakes. Santo has been widely regarded as the best player not in the Hall of Fame for a long time.

The anticipation and later agonizing realization of missing out on the Hall of Fame again, by 15 votes (in 2003), can be seen in the documentary This Old Cub by Ron's son Jeff Santo. It's well worth the couple of hours.

The nine-time All-Star played the majority of his career suffering quietly from type one diabetes, which has since cost him both of his legs (2001 and 2002).

He was told at the age of 18 he would live to about 25. As mentioned in his documentary, Santo monitored his diabetes based solely on how he felt as there weren't widely available means of testing oneself at the time.

There were times where he took the plate seeing double or triple due to low blood sugar. In such instances he would just focus on "the one in the middle."

Santo, winner of five Gold Gloves, was also the 1973 Lou Gehrig Award winner.

He finished his career with five seasons in the top 10 of OPS, slugging percentage, and extra base hits. He also finished in the top 10 in batting avg (three times), MVP voting (four times), OBP (seven times), runs (three times), hits (four times), HRs (seven times), RBI (eight times), and walks (nine times).

Offensively, he is most commonly compared to Carlton Fisk, Johnny Bench, Gary Carter, and Yogi Berra, all of whom are in the Hall of Fame.

Is is very disheartening to hear that Santo has once again been kept out of the Hall of Fame. No one from the post 1942 ballot received the 75 percent of votes to gain entrance to Cooperstown.

I for one have been waiting years to hear Santo's name mentioned as an inductee to Cooperstown, but will have to wait two more years for that to be potentially realized.

Santo has referred to the process as torture and has all but given up on his induction. I guess I might just have to finally agree with Ron that it may never happen. And it's a damn shame.

NCAA and Big 12 Both Need Fixing

Chris Domschke — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:54:41 -0500

Fix the Big 12—and the NCAA

Can someone please, for the love of God, explain the Big 12 to me. The Big 12 has made yet another confusing announcement. My preseason Heisman pick, Texas QB Colt McCoy, has been selected as the Big 12 Offensive Player of the Year. This means that he has been selected as the best player at any offensive position.

I know that sounds repetitive and that it shouldn't be further explained. However...

Offensive player of the year means that he is not only the best quarterback, but he is a better quarterback than the top running back is a running back (Kendall Hunter), or the top wide receiver is a wide receiver (Michael Crabtree).

But in true Big 12 fashion, the SAME voters selected McCoy as the second-best quarterback in the conference. That's right, McCoy was selected as Second Team All-Big 12 quarterback.

I'm starting to sense some repetitive voting patterns from those in the AP.

Quoting the ESPN report on this issue, "Texas Tech quarterback Graham Harrell was the only other quarterback to get a vote from the 20 voters who decided the AP's Big 12 all-conference teams. Harrell picked up four votes -- one for first team and three for second team. Thus, the race swung on whether Harrell voters picked McCoy or Bradford as their second choice.

"Three of those voters went with Bradford at second team and left McCoy off the ballot."

It looks like Texas is getting screwed over again. This time, on a more personal level.

Seems the Big 12 can't get anything right this year. The first tie-breaker should be head-to-head matchups, NOT the BCS. The BCS has already been revealed as the biggest piece of CRAP in the history of college football.

Texas should be in the Big 12 title game and have a shot at a national title because is it beat Oklahoma on a neutral field. The Longhorns lost on the road at the last second to the team that Oklahoma beat at home.

Take the BCS out of the equation.

I ,for one, hope Texas continues to get the votes over Oklahoma in the AP polls (1488 to 1480), and when it comes down to the vote after the season, they split the title (like USC did in 2003) in the system that promised us no more split titles.

Isn't this the perfect example of why we need a playoff? If Florida beats 'Bama, we'd see seven teams with one loss and a valid argument at a shot at the title. Oh, and three undefeated teams with a gripe.

I used to love college football. Now, I just wait for November and December, when we see teams getting screwed over EVERY YEAR due to the greed of the BCS, ESPN, and their supporters.

Thanks, ESPN, for promising us six more years of confusion and anti-climactic bowl seasons.

Duel in The Desert: A Conversation Between Sparky and Wilbur

Chris Domschke — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:25:50 -0500

Duel in the Desert: Part 2

With the Big Game a couple days away it's time to get motivated. As is typical with this contest there is a lot on the line.

An Arizona win can move them up in the battle for Bowl Position.

An Arizona win can also stop ASU from reaching a bowl game for the 5th consecutive year (which would be a school record).

An ASU win would put a bright spot on the season for the Devils after coming in ranked in the top 25 before dropping 6 straight.

An ASU win would also make the Devils Bowl Eligible and they might even possibly get a better bowl bid than the Cats.

Of course the most important thing on the line is bragging rights for the next 364 days.

In honor of the late Sun Devils sportswriter Bob Moran, I bring you an updated version of his original conversation between Sparky and Wilbur leading up to the clash.

"Hello Sparky, I'm glad you could stop by."

"I felt it was only right to visit you in Tucson since last time we met you came up to Tempe." Wilbur says as Sparky enters the patio at Frog n' Firkin on University Blvd. in Tucson.

Wilbur gestured at the empty seat next to him, "I took the liberty of ordering some appetizers and a pitcher of Tempe's own Kiltlifter to make you feel right at home."

"Good choice, alcohol always helps wash away the memory of bad meetings. Is it 3 in a row we've taken from the Cats. I'm always so bad with numbers." Sparky quipped.

"I believe it has been 3 in a row, but that was just a dent into the cushion we had. 44-36 with one tie if I'm not mistaken. But then again, look who I'm asking about numbers." Wilbur rebutted. "

"I can't believe we're back down here, it seems like yesterday when we ended Arizona's bowl hopes right down here in Tucson. Wait, that was last year that we ended Arizona's hopes and it was in Tempe.....It was two years ago we ended the Wildcat hopes in Tucson, where does the time go?" Sparky said with a small grin of satisfaction.

"Well, that's neither here nor there, Arizona's got a pretty good offense this year. Freshman Keola Antolin has done remarkably well. To think we were disappointed when some little brat named Bass de-committed from U of A. And now here we have Antolin with over 500 and 10 TDs yards and Grigsby averaging 5.5 per carry. We lucked out on that one."

Sparky looked surprised, "We actually wound up getting Ryan Bass to carry the ball a few times this year, 4.6 per carry."

"I thought you weren't much of a numbers guy."Wilbur returned, "Taking nothing away from Bass but the Sun Devil running game hasn't been that impressive. 7 total rushing touchdowns this year? I'm pretty sure our True Freshman backup QB and 3rd string Running Back actually combined for 7. Heck our other two backs are both in the double digits, and Antolin didn't even have a a carry against New Mexico or UCLA."

"Speaking of New Mexico, I forgot to call you, that must have been a tough break, dropping one to New Mexico...again." Sparky returned.

"That's for sure, rough weekend. But really when it all comes down to it we were on the road, our guys were a little over confident after putting up 111 points over the first two games, and we lost by 8. On the plus side our guys bounced back and won a couple games, didn't ASU drop a game to the MWC that same weekend?" Wilbur coyly responded.

"We lost a close one that week to UNLV, who I might add beat the same New Mexico team that defeated you." Sparky announced, clearly aggravated.

"Well that's all in the past anyway, and you can't really compare who beat who in that context without sounding moronic. Who do you guys have on your list of coaching candidates?" Wilbur asked in an attempt to change the subject.

"I'm sorry, I'm confused. I could have sworn it was Stoops who has been on the Hot Seat the last couple of years"

"Well, after getting the Cats to Bowl Eligible and cleaning up the mess that Mackovick left behind after destroying one of the top programs in the 90s, his seat has cooled off. But you didn't answer my question about Erickson."

"Well, I'm still a bit confused. ASU is not typically the program that gives up on a coach after one down season. I think Dennis will be in Tempe for the long haul."

"Hmmm. That's interesting. I wonder if the guys at Idaho, Wyoming, Washington State, Oregon State, and Idaho, again, thought the same thing. Oh well, I'm sure I'm just letting my imagination wonder it's not like there have been 3 NFL coaches fired during the season as well as countless other college positions opening up. I'm sure that there won't be available job opportunities galore in the coming months. Erickson will probably stay in Tempe. After all, he's only been there 2 seasons. He's only left after 1 or 2 years 4 times. You're probably right."

"Good point, but Erickson has promised to bring winning back to the Valley." Sparky responded.

"I'm sure his word is as strong as the Dennis Dome practice facility he got ASU to build." Wilbur shot back, well it's getting late and that pitcher is empty. I suppose it's time for you to head back to the hotel and wait for Saturday night."

Sparky got up and reached into his wallet but Wilbur stopped him, "Sparky, your money is no good here."

"Well thanks Wilbur I appreciate it." Sparky kindly responded.

"No, Sparky, what I meant is your money is no good here, don't you have a couple bucks or a credit card. They don't take Sun Dollars in Tucson."

Tom to Tucson: Izzo Rumored to Be Top Candidate for Arizona Job

Chris Domschke — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:23:22 -0500

BREAKING: Tom To Tucson - Izzo Top Candidate for Arizona Job

Originally Reported Nov. 14, 2008 on The Beardown.

Breaking news from McKale Center. There are current unconfirmed reports that, among others, Michigan State head coach Tom Izzo has tossed his hat in the ring for serious consideration to fill the Arizona men's basketball head coaching vacancy.

Izzo, who has been the Head Spartan for Michigan State since 1995, has often been considered a leading candidate in many job openings. Most recently his name was mentioned in the possible replacements for Tubby Smith in Kentucky after his departure in 2007. He quickly shot that rumor down. ESPN's lead college basketball guru Andy Katz has cited coach Izzo with the success of the program in East Lansing over the last decade-plus.

As opposed to when his name was in contention for the Kentucky job, sources have informed me that Izzo reached out to the AD's office in Tucson. Landing Izzo in Tucson would be a the Cats best chance at avoiding too lengthy of a rebuilding process.

Others listed in the first batch of candidates Arizona is rumored to be considering are Mark Few of Gonzaga and John Calipari from Memphis. Calipari being an interesting suggestion as former Arizona assistant Josh Pastner left Arizona for Memphis after a lengthy tenure beginning with his playing days in Tucson.

Calls to both the Arizona and Michigan State Athletic Departments were not returned.

Bring On Year 100

Chris Domschke — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:15:48 -0500

Bring on Year 100

As with most Cubfans I am the eternal pessimist. A trait that I inherited from my father (a Cubfan), and presumably his father before him (a Cubfan), and so on through the male Domschke Family History. I wasn't expecting a whole lot this year, as with every year. Sure I get excited about the Cubs season after season and get disappointed season after season.

As I so aptly described the plight of the Cubs back in July, when I wrote of the Cubfan "lump in the throat"that starts to worry us, Cubfans start worrying because they know things are going to go bad. It's a matter of how bad and where the blame might be placed.

I think I can safely say that I was right, though the Cubs turned it back around from that 6-10 slump I wrote of in early July, they still weren't as dominant as they were in May and June. And the bats once again went quiet. No surprise here, I in no way predicted a Cub appearance in the Fall Classic.

As I told many friends in the weeks leading up to and the days following James Loney's Grand Slam/Dempster's eruption, or more accurately erosion, the Cubs aren't made for a five game set. I'm not saying that they would have won in a seven game set, but losing Game One at home in a five game set pretty much says that the series is over. Where as losing Game One at home in a seven game set is much less of a death sentence.

These Cubs ('07-'08) are a streaky, streaky team. When things are going good, they are going great, and when things are going bad they get to awful really fast. They are far too emotional for a five game series. Both in 2007 and 2008 game three didn't even seem like it mattered to Cub player or many Cubfans. The series seemed over when Bill Buckner took over for Lee, Dan Uggla took over for DeRosa, Alex Gonzalez (2003 NLCS Gonzalez) took over for Theriot, and Aramis Ramirez was replaced by his error ridden Pirate Past in the Game Two loss.

That's the way it goes for the Cubs, and always has. I don't feel like posting the stats but look back at 2003's Bartman Game/The Inning. The Cubs still had a chance to win Game 7 in '03 but they were so deflated after after Bartman led to Gonzalez's botch job at short which led to the Golden Boy Prior getting shelled for eight runs.

The bats didn't show up to Arizona last year and when rookie Carlos Marmol had a rough outing in Game One (and the ensuing loss) the series ended, all emotion and momentum was gone. Thus the way it goes for the Cubs. But there is one redeeming thought for Cubfans, this was not the 100th season of Cub baseball without a World Series as people talked about all year long. It has been a rough century, but not a full century.

Now, yes "technically" the Cubs haven't won the World Series in 100 calendar years. But the key word there is calendar. True, in 1908 the Cubs won the World Series, and haven't been back since 1945. These are indelible truths and I won't argue that. But, what everyone is failing to recognize, there was no World Series in 1994.

Now the Cubs may have been out of contention by the time of the Strike, but the decision had been made much earlier that a strike was eminent. There was no World Series in 1994 ergo there was no World Series for the Cubs to lose in 1994. In June, had there not been a looming Strike, maybe those Cubs would have made a stronger push for the post-season and been in Wild Card contention by September.

Ask the Colorado Rockies about fire headed into the post-season and double digit setbacks in August meaning nothing. I, in no way am saying the Cubs would have won, I am not suggesting or giving credence to the "what if" argument in sports, especially not when looking in the rear-view mirror. All I am saying is that there was no chance for the Cubs to do it.

So I guess my point is that while it has been 100 years since the Cubs last World Series Championship, the Cubs aren't 0/100, they're only 0/99. So I guess it hasn't really been 100 missed opportunities for the Cubs and their fans.

And to really stretch it, 1994's Strike shortened season could have just restarted the clock for everyone. Maybe it was like the reset button for everyone. So Good Luck to the 2009 Cubs and Tribe as they try to break their bad luck streaks before they reach 15 seasons without a World Series win.

Arizona's Coaching Search Part II

Chris Domschke — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:10:10 -0500

Arizona's Coaching Search: Part II

Perhaps some of you out there read my first post upon hearing of Lute Olson's exit from the University of Arizona. Much of that article was done tongue in cheek. Especially considering the candidates consisted of, among others, Denise Austin, Bob Dole, and Craig T. Nelson.

But the U of A is facing a serious problem for the future. They need a new coach. And Russ Pennell, Reggie Geary, and Mike Dunlap are not nearly qualified enough to fill in for the Great Lute Olson, no offense to either. Perhaps Pennell's audition this year will buy him a long term contract stepping in Lute's shoes, but let's be honest, we all know that probably won't be the case for the former AAU Coach.

Mike Dunalp, who many thought would be replacing Lute on an interim basis this year, rejected the University's propsal on the basis that he didn't want to be the "interim" Head Coach. It seems that Jim Livengood will be spreading his search nationally and that others may be standing in the way of Pennell, Geary, or Dunlap taking over the Cats for the long haul.

So my Top 10 candidates, for reals this time, to replace Lute Olson are below. I should note that there are a couple names on this list that probably wouldn't happen, but these would be the names that I would accept leading the Kitty Cats onto the Hardwood.

Josh Pastner
Arizona Asst Coach 2001-2008
Memphis Asst Coach 2008-Present

Jamie Dixon
UCSB Asst Coach 1991-1992
Hawaii Asst Coach 1992-1994
Northern Arizona Asst Coach 1994-1998
Hawaii Asst Coach 1998-1999
Pittsburgh Asst Coach 1999-2003
Pittsburch Head Coach 2003-Present

Larry Eustachy
Miss. St. Asst Coach 1981-1986
Idaho Asst Coach 1986-1987
Utah Asst Coach 1987-1989
Ball St. Asst Coach 1989-1990
Idaho Head Coach 1990-1993
Utah St. Head Coach 1993-1998
Iowa St. Head Coach 1998-2003
Southern Miss Head Coach 2004-Present
Southern Miss HC - Leave of Absence 2008-2009

Lorenzo Romar
UCLA Asst Coach 1998-1996
Pepperdine Head Coach 1996-1999
Saint Louis Head Coach 1999-2002
Washington Head Coach 2002-Present

Tony Bennett
Wisconsin Asst Coach 1999-2003
Washington State Asst Coach 2003-2006
Washington State Head Coach 2006-Present

Keno Davis
Iowa Asst Coach 1991-1995
Southern Indiana Asst Coach 1995-1997
Southeast Mizz Asst Coach 1997-2003
Drake Asst Coach 2003-2007
Drake Head Coach 2007-2008
Providence Head Coach 2008-Present

Mark Few
Gonzaga Asst Coach 1989-1999
Gonzaga Head Coach 1999-Present

Lon Kruger
Pitt St. Asst Coach 1976-1977
Kansas St. Asst Coach 1977-1982
UTPA Head Coach 1982-1986
Kansas St. Head Coach 1986-1990
Florida Head Coach 1990-1996
Illinois Head Coach 1996-2000
Atlanta Hawks Head Coach 2000-2003
New York Knicks Asst Coach 2003-2004
UNLV Head Coach 2004-Present

Bob McKillop
Davidson Asst Coach 1978-1979
Davidson Head Coach 1989-Present

Jay Wright
Rochester Asst Coach 1984-1986
Drexel Asst Coach 1986-1987
Villanova Asst Coach 1987-1992
UNLV Asst Coach 1992-1994
Hofstra Head Cosch 1994-2001
Villanova Head Coach 2001-Present

All of these guys are under 60 (the oldest being Bob McKillop at 58) and they all have experience at successful programs. All but Josh Pastner have Head Coaching experience, and what Pastner lacks in head coaching experience (at the collegiate level) he makes up for in recruiting ability. Often considered one of the top recruiters in the game and specifically in the West and Southwest areas.

A Coach like Few or Dixon should jump at the opportunity to coach, not only at a Big level school, but a Basketball powerhouse none the less. Either of those two, Pastner, Wright, or Bennett would be able to lock in for a long time (26 years+) as they are all 46 or under. Look at the track records of some of these guys, specifically Few and Wright turning around semi-non-existant/failing programs like Gonzaga and Villanova and becoming successful. And Thought Eustachy would fit in great in Tucson (we do love our Natty Light) My money is on....

....Mark Few as the next University of Arizona Head Basketball Coach. He has to be getting sick of beating up on the rest of the WCC and want to measure himself against the likes of Ben Howland and UCLA rather than the likes of Tom Asbury and Pepperdine. I know he has been contacted, every single offseason by teams looking for a new coach and yet he stays in Washington...or wherever in the Pacific Northwest Gonzaga is located.

But Arizona is a different opportunity, especially being able to jump in (presumably) a full year after the official exit of Lute Olson and really 2 years since he coached in Tucson, making his shadow a little less grand.

Bleacher Report - Articles by Chris Domschke

Leaping Lions: A New Logo in Detroit

New Coach in Town: Arizona's Coaching Search Almost Over

Updated Arizona's Coaching Search

Arizona Wildcats Continue To Dance

Off the Bubble: Arizona Wildcats Make It 25

Arizona Wildcat Notes

Hoping for a Lockout?

Arizona Wildcats' Quest for 25 Still Alive

2009 Heisman Candidates: Top 15 Plus 5 Sleepers

Can the Arizona Wildcats Make a Punctual Postseason Push?

Arizona Baseball Preview: Wildcats Looking for Success in Tough Pac-10

Arizona's Chances to Dance

NFL Combine: Tuitama Shafted

Broadcast Malfunction: Porn at The Super Bowl

Was Tom Penders Right About ESPN Doctoring the Chase Budinger Video?

Tom Penders Is a Dirtbag: Houston Coach Defends Chase Budinger Incident

Top 10 Super Bowl Distractions

Top 10 Super Bowl Moments: Non-Game Edition

Repeating History: Montana to Rice, Part Two?

Brett Grossman? Thomas Jones Speaks Out

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1998-2004 Draft Classes

NFL Hall of Fame Debates: 1990-1997 Draft Classes

Arizona-BYU Las Vegas Bowl: Predictions Vs. Reality

An Open Letter To ESPN, Fox Sports, Versus, etc

Ron Santo Misses Out Again

NCAA and Big 12 Both Need Fixing

Duel in The Desert: A Conversation Between Sparky and Wilbur

Tom to Tucson: Izzo Rumored to Be Top Candidate for Arizona Job

Bring On Year 100

Arizona's Coaching Search Part II

BearDown Shop