<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Bleacher Report - Articles by Kyle Houser</title>
    <link>http://bleacherreport.com/</link>
    <description>Bleacher Report - The open source sports network</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Under the Radar: Green Bay Packers' Impact Rookies</title>
      <author>Kyle Houser</author>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;After looking at the &lt;a href="/green-bay-packers"&gt;Packers&lt;/a&gt;' 2008 NFL Draft, there are a few names that instantly jump out. Probably the two most recognizable, for those that follow the draft, were the top two picks: wide receiver Jordy Nelson and quarterback Brian Brohm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following closely behind are other top picks in tight end Jermichael Finley, quarterback Matt Flynn, and cornerback Pat Lee. These names are those that Packer fans will come to know over the next few years; that is, if they don't know already.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, these standout players will not see the immediate game time that later picks will be seeing. Nelson might squeak into the No. 4 receiver spot or split time as a return man, and unless Rodgers gets hurt, Brohm will not be seeing playing time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flynn is moving up to challenge Brohm, which makes it less likely for either of them to have huge contributions outside of being holders. Finley is second to a solid starter in Donald Lee, and Pat Lee can fall to the fifth cornerback on the roster, if Will Blackmon stays healthy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So who does that leave as immediate impact rookies?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probably the best under-the-radar pick is that of new long snapper, J.J. Jansen. Since Rob Davis retired, he has been handed the starting job as the team's long snapper, so there is no doubt that he will have an impact on the team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The next level of impact player would include a few more names, mostly because they aren't guaranteed any starting time. Josh Sitton is fighting for a starting job on the offensive line, and linebacker Danny Lasanah will probably get his share of time with the special teams.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Along with those two comes defensive end Jeremy Thompson. The loss of Corey Williams might cause end Cullen Jenkins to take more snaps as a tackle, thus freeing up space for Thompson in a defensive line that likes to rotate players to outlast offenses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What it all comes down to is that, unless they find a niche on special teams, most of the rookies outside of Thompson and Sitton probably won't get a whole lot of playing time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:09:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/49597-under-the-radar-green-bay-packers-impact-rookies</link>
      <guid>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/49597-under-the-radar-green-bay-packers-impact-rookies</guid>
      <comments>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/49597-under-the-radar-green-bay-packers-impact-rookies</comments>
      <category>Football</category>
      <category>NFL</category>
      <category>Green Bay Packers</category>
      <category>Opinion</category>
      <category>Madison</category>
      <category>Milwaukee</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ryan Grant: Thousand Yards or Bust?</title>
      <author>Kyle Houser</author>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Not too long ago, &lt;a href="/green-bay-packers"&gt;Green Bay&lt;/a&gt; management was trying to sign Ryan Grant for pennies! The same Ryan Grant who almost rushed for 1,000 yards averaging fewer than 13 carries per game in the 15 games he played. Logically, any Green Bay fan would think management was crazy for trying to give the man the league minimum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After seeing the deal they actually got him to sign, I'm starting to think the league minimum was a better idea. Not to say he wasn't great last year, because he absolutely was. However, unlike last year, every team will plan for him to get the ball. That might not seem like that big of a deal, but when the contract in question is for four years and a possible $30 million, then the question becomes more pressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More of a question will be his production when he is getting the ball more, which he inevitably will now that there is a first-year starter at quarterback. Can he truly handle 20 or 30 carries per game? Logic shows the plethora of talent on the offense will keep defenses guessing. That being said, if Grant starts all 16 regular-season contests and averages 15-to-20 carries per game, there is no reason why he will fall short of 1,100 yards this season. Of course, those numbers are assuming last year's 5.1-yards-per-carry average drop to about 4.0 this coming season.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Final prediction on Grant: Starts all 16 games, finishes season with 1,120 yards and 10 touchdowns.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:04:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/48303-ryan-grant-thousand-yards-or-bust</link>
      <guid>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/48303-ryan-grant-thousand-yards-or-bust</guid>
      <comments>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/48303-ryan-grant-thousand-yards-or-bust</comments>
      <category>Football</category>
      <category>NFL</category>
      <category>NFC North</category>
      <category>Green Bay Packers</category>
      <category>Ryan Grant</category>
      <category>Preview/Prediction</category>
      <category>Madison</category>
      <category>Milwaukee</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
