Bleacher Report - Articles by Alan Bass

A Bleacher Report Farewell

Alan Bass — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:03:31 -0400

I have been writing for Bleacher Report for a year-and-a-half now, with over 415 articles written, 230,000 article reads and more stats that I can spew out, like I’ve been doing ever since I started writing.

I’ve had my share of popular articles and hardcore controversy. I’ve had articles that have seemed to kill my reputation and others that have unfairly bolstered it. But overall, I’ve had a pretty good time here on Bleacher Report.

There have been people that have attempted to drive me off of Bleacher Report with nasty comments; there have been some that have tried to keep me on here with encouraging words. There are writers who I have had hundreds of (civilized) arguments over sports with and others who seem to run their mouths like they’re a multi-million dollar receiver for the Bills.

But nonetheless, after many months of deliberating in my head and with other Bleacher Creatures, I have decided to bid farewell to Bleacher Report.

I do this for a number of reasons. The weak, wussy reason is as follows: with my prior commitments to Pro Hockey News, Inside Hockey and most importantly The Hockey News magazine, I have very little time, in addition to that thing called “school,” which is (supposed to be) my priority.

Okay, I kid, school is the priority.

But the true reason is my firm belief that Bleacher Report is slowly heading down the tube; and being part of the “movement” that helped it to become as popular as it was in its prime, I want no part of the collapse of this “Open Source Sports Network.”

When I joined in April 2008, Bleacher Report was a small, but promising site. Like most people, I found it off a Facebook ad and after writing for a couple weeks, I realized how much I loved it.

The site quickly became huge, with phenomenal writers like Lisa Horne, Babytate, Bryan Thiel and hundreds of others. These writers reinforced my belief that writing was the greatest thing in the world.

However, it quickly became infested with people who seem to not know the difference between a blue line and a clothes line; an end zone and a parking zone; a basketball net and a fishing net…okay, you get the point.

Finally, the tipping point for me was this excerpt I read from a member of the Bleacher Report front office in an email exchange this summer, regarding the downhill trend of the site:

“It's the nature of the beast. The bigger we get, the tougher it will be to have a personal touch between management and each individual writer…that's where our focus lies: gaining more partnerships…and more visibility.”

I know it was not meant in this way, but the way it sounds is exactly what many, including myself, feel about this website; the founders of the site who were once so intent on making sure their customers were happy, are now concentrating more on making quick, easy money than keeping their audience’s attention.

Now I’m not stupid, I know that people need to make money and want to make a lot of it; I’m one of those people.

But the phrase “the customer’s always right” is true in this situation. No one is paying to write for Bleacher Report, true. But whether we’re paying or not, if no one is writing for the site, Bleacher Report does not make money. This will happen within a year, I promise. People will leave the site, seeing what both I and Chris Difrancesco see in it.

I do owe a great deal of gratitude to Bleacher Report. Without them, I would not have a gig with the top-selling hockey publication in the world and I would not even begin to imagine the opportunities currently staring me in the face in the hockey world.

But I leave them with a sour taste in my mouth—a taste that says, “we really couldn’t care less about what you do.” As a Community Leader, I feel disrespected, hurt and that we should be treated better than that.

So in my “resignation” from Bleacher Report, I leave a void in the Philadelphia Flyers community, one that I suggest to be filled by Tom Dougherty. As for the void in the NHL Community Leadership, I suggest the site does not make a replacement; three CLs is more than enough.

I received a wonderful note from an editor recently; one that I hope sums up my writing for the site:

“This was really a great read - by far the best article I've edited today. A real pleasure for me, even though (like most of the country) I don't watch hockey. Your piece was concise but still included good analysis and statistics to back up your ideas.”

This editor received the point I was hoping to drive to my readers; hockey is a sport. It is alive and thriving, though not as much as we hope. My goal in writing about hockey is to create more fans and in that sense, I believe I have succeeded. If just one person has gone from a “what is hockey” person to an “I watch all 82 games” person, then my year-plus on this site has been far from failure.

I have many people to thank for my writing career, which is far from over (I will still be writing for The Hockey News and other hockey outlets). First and foremost, I want to thank Ken Armer and Bryan Thiel, the two NHL CLs when I joined the site. Ken and BT recognized the potential in my writing and strove to pull the talent out of me. Thanks also to Derek Harmsworth, my other co-CL and other members of the NHL community that I “grew up” with.

I want to thank Chris Difrancesco, my great friend, of whom I met accidentally my first time in the Flyers press box. You have made me a better writer, whether you realize it or not and you give me something to strive towards (since you have a paying job and I don’t).

Kevin Greenstein of InsideHockey.com and Brian Jennings and Lou Lafrado of ProHockeyNews.com also deserve my thanks, as they allowed me to write for their site and continue to give me the opportunity.

Lastly, I want to thank Jason Kay, editor-in-chief of The Hockey News and all of my fellow peers at THN. I’ve learned more in my time working for you guys than I have the other 18 years of my life. You made me realize that work can be fun and you taught me volumes about the hockey world, the writing world and more. My entire career, however it turns out, is in debt to you all.

I would also like to thank my 219 fans on Bleacher Report and thousands of others who have continued to read my articles. My writing would be nothing without your support. I implore you to continue reading my work on my other websites.

To everyone else, please feel free to email me at BergHockey24@gmail.com, as I will not be returning to the site to answer comments like I normally do. Also, check out the new site I am writing for, www.Hockey54.com, “The Face of the Game™.”

Best of luck to everyone in their future endeavors, whether writing or non-writing. I look forward to seeing you all in the future.

Alan Bass

Special Features Writer

The Hockey News

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Atlantic Division

Alan Bass — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:14:17 -0400

Philadelphia Flyers

Plus:

1. Offensive Depth: Despite losing Mike Knuble and Joffrey Lupul, the Flyers gained a full season (hopefully) of Danny Briere and Claude Giroux. The statistics should equal out, if not surpass, the production of the departed Flyers.

2. Top three defenders: The Flyers have the best top three defense corps in the Eastern Conference. Just think of the look on Alex Ovechkin’s face when he found out that he’ll have to get past Chris Pronger, Kimmo Timonen, and Braydon Coburn at least six times a year.

Minus:

1. Questions in net: I don’t doubt Ray Emery’s behavior, but I do doubt whether he will be able to adjust back to the North American game in the time that the Flyers need. It cannot take Emery three months to get in the swing of things, because in the toughest division in the East, the Flyers will crash and burn. If he plays like he did in Ottawa in 2006-07, the Flyers will (pardon the pun) fly.

2. Defensive depth: After Coburn, the Flyers’ defense drops off. Matt Carle may come-to this season, but Ryan Parent, Randy Jones, and Ole-Kristian Tollefsen still have to prove themselves. One of them may still be moved, with the Flyers being over the cap and all.

Analysis:

The Philadelphia Flyers are going to win the Atlantic Division. It won’t be by much, but they will just barely squeeze it out. With some of the best depth in the league offensively and two top defenders on their back end, they look to be poised for success.

Their success, however, will be determined by Emery’s play in net. As previously stated, if he plays to his potential, the Flyers will easily beat out the Devils and Penguins.

Prediction: first in Atlantic, third in East.

New York Rangers

Plus:

1. Vezina-worthy goaltending: Many call Henrik Lundqvist the most overrated goalie in the league. I strongly disagree. If you watch him often, you will see that he is the real deal. However, he has been forever plagued by the weak defense in front of him. Look for King Henrik to continue his solid play in net.

2. Potential for offensive success: With Chris Drury, Marian Gaborik, Brandon Dubinsky, Artem Anisimov, and more, the Rangers do have the potential. But of course, it never does seem to pan out, does it?

Minus:

1. No defense: When your top defender is Marc Staal, you know there’s a problem. Staal is a great defenseman, without a doubt, but he is not yet a number one NHL defenseman. An overpaid Wade Redden, Michal Rozsival, and Dan Girardi round out this terrible defensive unit.

2. No depth: After the first line, who will score on Broadway? Enver Lisin? Chris Higgins? Ales Kotalik?

Analysis:

Rangers fans may not want to hear it, but their team isn’t going to do anything this year. The Hockey News is predicting them to finish 13th, but I won’t go that far. Just outside the playoffs is where they are going to finish.

There is no secondary scoring (or primary scoring, for that matter) and after Gaborik gets injured in the third game, there is no replacement for him.

Prediction: fourth in Atlantic, ninth in East.

New Jersey Devils

Plus:

1. They’re the Devils: They always find a way to win, right?

2. Martin Brodeur: Arguably the best of all-time is still in net, rested up and stronger than ever.

Minus:

1. Offensive depth: Zach Parise, Travis Zajac, and Patrick Elias. That’s the extent of the offense in Newark. Guys like Brendan Shanahan may also contribute, but the Devils are not going to be scoring much more than last year, if at all.

2. Adjusting to the trap: Jacques Lemaire’s trap worked in the nineties for the Devils when their defensive corps could handle it. But how will it rate when the top defender is Paul Martin? Martin is a good defenseman, but can he handle the tedious execution of the trap for 82 games plus some playoff contests

Analysis:

The Devils won’t do much worse than last year. In fact, they might even win the division. However, don’t expect them to go further than the first round in the playoffs. Teams will find a way to beat Jersey and send them packing. There are numerous weaknesses on the roster and teams will pick the Devils apart come crunch time.

Prediction: second in Atlantic, fourth in East.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Plus:

1. Two superstars: Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby, as everyone knows, are two of the best players in the game. Now they are Stanley Cup champions. Doesn’t get much better than that.

2. Coaching: If he had been there for about 20 more games, Dan Bylsma may have won the Jack Adams last season. Unfortunately, he came way too late to be nominated for the award. Nonetheless, he is the best coach Pittsburgh has had in years and it showed down the stretch when Pittsburgh was more prepared than its opponents almost every game (see: Stanley Cup Final, Game Seven).

Minus:

1. Stanley Cup hangover: True, everyone thought this would happen last season. But after two straight years of making the final, can they really keep up the pace, especially with such dominant up-and-coming teams in the conference?

2. Loss of depth: After losing Hal Gill, Rob Scuderi, and others, the Penguins lost the depth that they barely had last year. Max Talbot doesn’t perform in the season, only in the playoffs, while others on the roster have yet to prove themselves.

Analysis:

The Penguins will make the playoffs easily, once again. However, with fatigue, lack of depth, and the presence of stronger teams around them, they will not enjoy the same success as last year and most certainly will not be challenging for a repeat. The Penguins are not done; they will win another Cup in the next four years. But count on 2009-10 being a rest year for the organization.

Prediction: third in Atlantic, fifth in East.

New York Islanders

Plus:

1. Johnny T: Ever seen this guy play? If not, make sure you turn on a lot of Isles games, like the rest of the country will be.

2. New fan excitement: See Plus No. 1. And this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5InHleCOI0

Minus:

1. No depth: Come on, do I really need to explain this one?

2. No team: This, too

Analysis:

Okay, so it’s going to be a while before the Islanders are back on top of the league. But after drafting Taylor Hall in the 2010 draft (you can count on that), the Islanders will be on their way. Plus, they need to sign and develop some people who can actually play hockey. Isles fans, it is indeed time to get excited. But don’t crank up the expectations just yet.

Prediction: fifth in Atlantic, 15th in East.

Alan Bass is a writer for The Hockey News and THN.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Southeast Division

Alan Bass — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:07:47 -0400

Washington Capitals

Plus:

1. Semyon Varlamov: The young goalie who had his coming out party in the ’09 postseason will be starting in net for the first time in the regular season. Will he respond the same way in an 82-game regular season as he did in a shortened playoff run? I think so. Key stat: Varlamov had a .918 save percentage and a 2.53 GAA in the Caps’ playoff run.

2. Ovie and the Caps: Consistently a powerful team in the new NHL, Ovechkin leads this talented team that will simply dominate the weakest division in the NHL (yeah, I said it). Key stat: Ovechkin was tied for the league lead in playoff points per game in 2008-09.

Minus:

1. Depth: The Caps are missing depth. That is clear, as they were beaten by a Pittsburgh team that was simply built for playoff hockey; talent mixed with grit. Washington lost Donald Brashear and they don’t have much talent past the first-and-a-half lines. If they want to succeed in the postseason, they need to continue to make some moves.

2. Offseason moves: True, they signed Mike Knuble, a reliable player who can create traffic in front of the net. But will signing him and Brendan Morrison to contracts really help the depth that they crave and replace Sergei Fedorov who bolted to Russia?

Analysis: Washington is a “victim” of playing in an extremely weak division. By reigning atop the Southeast Division, they are inflating their point total and making it seem like they are better than they truly are. Don’t get me wrong, they are incredibly talented. But not so incredible that they are actually the best team in the Eastern Conference. They will finish up there because of their schedule.

Prediction: 1st in Southeast, 1st in East.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Plus:

1. Offseason moves: Signing Mattias Ohlund and drafting Victor Hedman were two very good moves by the Lightning. The decision not to trade Vincent Lecavalier will also help Tampa Bay in the long run. Even if they decide to move him this year (at the deadline, perhaps), they will garner more in return from a team desperately in need of a superstar to help them in their playoff run. Key stat: Tampa Bay dished out six contracts this summer worth a combined $36.475 million over 15 years.

2. Defense: With Ohlund, Hedman, Meszaros and Ranger on defense, they are not so much the best team in the East on the blueline, but they have some talent. This year will be a training/learning year for Hedman so he can adjust to the NHL game, but look for him and Ohlund to be paired together for a good few years. Key stat: Last year’s top five Tampa Bay D-men (statistically) had a combined minus-21 rating—hardly a bad stat for a 14th place team.

Minus:

1. Goaltending: Mike Smith is not a starting NHL goalie. It is that simple. Antero Niittymaki hasn’t been good for years. This is simple, too. Tampa’s goaltending has been flat ever since Nikolai Khabibulin left a few years ago. They need to fix it now.

2. Coaching: I personally do not believe Rick Tocchet is the person to lead an NHL team. True, he got Steven Stamkos rolling after Barry Melrose left, but come on, now. Any competent coach could make Stamkos successful. Hence the reason he struggled under Melrose.

Analysis: A team that could surprise a lot of people, they’re defense is much improved. However, I’m still not sold on this team. I believe they will fight for a playoff spot until late-March when they are mathematically eliminated. They are in an easy division, but a tough conference (and league for that matter). Even with Lecavalier and St. Louis, this team is missing tons of players to revert to the contenders they were in the pre-lockout days.

Prediction: 3rd in Southeast, 11th in East.

Carolina Hurricanes

Plus:

1. Return of Paul Maurice: Maurice is a great coach. Underappreciated in Toronto, Maurice’s return to his former team was timed perfectly as he led them to the conference finals before being swept by a team that was simply better. Maurice is the man to lead the Canes, although they are running short on talent as of recent. Key stat: Contrary to popular belief, Maurice’s best season came with the Maple Leafs in 2006-07 when he recorded 40 wins and 91 points.

2. Keeping the core: The core of the Stanley Cup Champions in 2006 is still there. The supporting cast is not. Key stat: 14 members of the 2006 championship team are still regulars on the Hurricanes’ squad.

Minus:

1. Weaknesses all around: There is no depth on defense, little depth on offense and they lack a bona fide backup goalie. Leighton has the potential to be good, but cannot be counted on to relieve Cam Ward for 20 games per season. On defense, Joni Pitkanen still has much room to improve and the depth isn’t too pretty. On the other side of the ice, the top players of Eric Staal, Ray Whitney, Matt Cullen and Scott Walker remain, but other than those players (and an aging Rod Brind’Amour), there isn’t much going on.

2. Depth: See minus-1.

Analysis: I can absolutely see Carolina making the playoffs, but it’s not going to happen easily. If anything, it will happen on the last day or two of the regular season. They have a strong, reliable goalie in Cam Ward, but their offense is weak and their defense is even weaker. I do not see the motivation of a new coach running through an entire season. Expect the Canes to start the season hot and then slow down as we get into the New Year.

Prediction: 2nd in Southeast, 8th in East.

Florida Panthers

Plus:

1. Goaltending: Vokoun and Clemmensen will be a solid goaltending tandem. Expect Clammer to get at least 25-30 starts this season and play well in them. Vokoun should continue to succeed in Florida and put up respectable numbers. Key stat: Vokoun had a .926 save percentage last year…perhaps the quietest great save percentage in the NHL.

2. Young guys: They have some good potential in the locker room with Frolik, Booth, Weiss, Leopold, etc. True, they all need to start stepping up, but the talent is there. Key stat: The Panthers have six players who are 24 and under.

Minus:

1. Replacing Jay-Bo: I’m the first one to say that Bouwmeester is overrated. But Jordan Leopold is still not a good replacement for him. Losing Nick Boynton was also no help, as the Panthers’ blueline is looking meek.

2. Front Office Craziness: Who is the GM? No one really knows. Rick Dudley is running the front office at the moment, but no one is officially the head of this team. Can anyone say stability?

Analysis: The Panthers have a ray of hope; there is a light at the end of the tunnel. However, that light is slowly turning into darkness. Okay, enough with the metaphors. This team has some potential and young talent that could propel them into a playoff spot, but neither I nor anyone else see that happening this year. With bumpiness in the front office and a lack of defense on the blueline, don’t expect the Cats to be attacking anyone too much this season.

Prediction: 4th in Southeast, 12th in East.

Atlanta Thrashers

Plus:

1. Young guys: Drafting Evander Kane was a big move for the organization and one that will pay off in a few years. This man is a mini-Jarome Iginla. Same talent, same attitude, similar stats. Kovalchuk is still young, Zach Bogosian is young and other prospects are starting to crack the lineup. Key stat: The average age of the Atlanta roster is 26.7.

2. Return from injury: Zach Bogosian is an unbelievable defender. Returning to healthy status, he will be a huge part of this team. Key stat: Bogosian had 19 points in 47 in an injury-derailed rookie season.

Minus:

1. No support for Kovie: The Thrashers are missing depth and rather than trying to fix it, they are concentrating on signing whoever they can get to convince Kovalchuk to stay. They should be aiming for some depth players that can support the top ones. Kovalchuk is a smart guy. He doesn’t need another aging veteran around him. If the team has the potential to be successful, he will see it and stay.

2. KKK: Kane, Kozlov, Kovalchuk. Great line. Horrible name. I don’t think “Little Black Russian” works either, honestly.

Analysis: The Thrashers are going to be bottom feeders for the season, once again, but don’t worry fans. All three of you.

Sorry, that was cruel. Anyway, there is some good potential on this team and down in the farm, but that potential may not turn into talent for another two or three years. In the meantime, the Thrashers must develop their prospects and hope like hell that Kovalchuk decides to re-sign and stay in Atlanta by the end of the season.

Prediction: 5th in Southeast, 14th in East.

Alan Bass is a writer and reporter for TheHockeyNews.com and The Hockey News magazine. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Northeast Division

Alan Bass — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:33:47 -0400

Boston Bruins

Plus:

1. Offensive Depth: With impact players on their first, second, and third lines, the B’s are one of the deepest offensive teams in the league. Devoid of superstars up front, the Bruins are able to make up for it by having numerous scoring lines.

Key stat: The Bruins had seven players with 20-plus goals.

2. Coaching: One of the best coaches in the league in Jack Adams Trophy winner Claude Julien returns behind the Boston bench for the third year. With Julien running the show, expect the Bruins to be competitive every night.

Key stat: Claude Julien averages more than 100 points per season in his last four full seasons behind an NHL bench.

Minus:

1. No cap space: This doesn’t always prove to be a problem, but around the trade deadline it may and if numerous injuries occur, calling up players may cause a financial problem (just ask the Philadelphia Flyers about that!).

2. Defensive depth: After losing Steve Montador, the Bruins’ top six are not looking too good. True, they have reigning Norris Trophy winner Zdeno Chara, but other than Dennis Wideman and Andrew Ference, there is not much talent back there. Will they be able to stop opposing teams with offensive depth?

Analysis:

Boston is arguably the top sports city in North America right now; what with the Patriots continuing to be competitive, the Celtics coming off an NBA championship a couple years ago, the Red Sox constantly playing good baseball and now the Bruins playing some of their best hockey in decades.

The Bruins did not change much over the summer, other than losing Montador and backup goalie Manny Fernandez and acquiring Steve Begin up front and Dany Sabourin in the backend. Nonetheless, they are still one of the best teams in the league and will continue to challenge for the Eastern Conference crown.

Prediction: First in Northeast, second in East.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Plus:

1. Defense: The Leafs have (facetious statement warning) one of the best defensive teams in the league on paper. With Tomas Kaberle (as of right now), Francois Beauchemin, Mike Komisarek, Garnet Exelby and Luke Schenn, their top five are going to be able to shut down many teams and steal some wins for the Blue and White.

Key stat: Schenn, Exelby, and Komisarek had a combined 548 hits last season.

2. Grit: With the signings of Beauchemin, Komisarek, Colton Orr, and the trading for Luke Schenn, the Leafs seriously "Burke-ified" their team. Burkie’s teams are known for their physical play mixed with skill and talent. Well, the Leafs don’t have the latter, but anyone who comes to the ACC will surely be in for a scare. As the Toronto Sun headlined, "The Bay Street Bullies" are now in town.

Key stat: Toronto’s new players had a combined 449 penalty minutes in '08-'09.

Minus:

1. Offensive depth: It’s no secret, the Leafs struggle to score. They have very little talent up front and even fewer prospects than most teams in the league. Trading for Phil Kessel and drafting Nazem Kadri were good starts, but Kadri will not be in the league for another year or two, and Kessel is not a one-man show. For now, Toronto will have to deal with some low-scoring games.

2. Goaltending questions: I have no doubts that Vesa Toskala can be an NHL starter. But on a weak team, he is not the guy to bail his teammates out every night. Even rookie Swede Jonas Gustavsson will not be able to do much to help out, as he will simply be learning the American game.

Analysis:

The Maple Leafs are well on their way to becoming a competitive team. They have a core on defense and a young, promising goaltender with a few years to reach his potential. The Leafs will still not be making the playoffs this season, but the Toronto faithful still have a lot to cheer about.

For one, that their team will be beating the crap out of anyone that drives into the Air Canada Centre. If I may say: sweet.

Prediction: Fourth in Northeast, 10th in East.

Buffalo Sabres

Plus:

1. Age before beauty: Buffalo's offense is led by Thomas Vanek, Derek Roy, and Jason Pominville; three young players who have great potential and unbelievable talent. When playing to their full potentials, this line could put up more than 250 points. True, a bit of a stretch, but anything can happen.

Key stat: All six of Buffalo’s top scoring forwards from '08-'09 are 29 and under.

2. Coaching: Lindy Ruff is the longest current serving coach in the NHL and for good reason. He has great talent and is constantly able to keep his teams competitive, specifically the Buffalo Sabres. Despite missing the playoffs the last two seasons, the Sabres had far from terrible years.

Key stat: Ruff has put up at least 90 points in his last four years behind the bench.

Minus:

1. Defense is down: Let's be honest, a top pairing of Henrik Tallinder and Craig Rivet won't be scaring anyone. The Sabres are short on defense and could be in for some high-scoring contests as a result.

2. Injury bug: Star goaltender Ryan Miller was subject to the injury bug last season and therefore was unable to help his team out as much as he'd hoped. Can he stay healthy this season?

Analysis:

The Sabres have still not gotten over losing Chris Drury, Danny Briere, and Brian Campbell. They lost Jaroslav Spacek this summer and "replaced" him with Joe DiPenta. Hardly an equal value.

Nonetheless, the Sabres have a great goaltender and some good offense that could and probably will leap them into the playoffs this season. Lindy Ruff will be able to guide this team back to where they belong.

Prediction: Second in Northeast, sixth in East.

Ottawa Senators

Plus:

1. Alexei Kovalev: Despite mixed reactions, this is indeed a great signing for the Senators, who may be losing Dany Heatley (or just simply need help on offense). Kovalev brings depth to a team that has been a one-line team for years.

Key stat: Kovalev has hit 65 points three of the last four years.

2. Offense: As previously stated, this team has one of the best top lines in hockey. That is, if Heatley is on it. Alfredsson, Spezza, and Heatley had an "off-year" (by their standards) last season, but will most likely bounce back and continue to produce regularly.

Key stat: Alfredsson was the only one of the "big three" who had a positive plus/minus last year.

Minus:

1. Dany Heatley: Will the gains of Cheechoo and Michalek offset the loss of Dany Heatley, the franchise's leading goal scorer?

2. Goaltending: Can Pascal Leclaire really lead this team? Brian Elliot sure isn’t going to be winning many games (he is not ready to be a bona fide NHL starter yet), but he could do well playing 20-25 games in a backup role.

Analysis:

The Sens are in trouble. They have some pieces in place, but altogether, their team is extremely weak. Do not expect them to even challenge for a playoff spot. They made almost no moves this summer and their roster reflects it.

Prediction: Fifth in Northeast, 13th in East.

Montreal Canadiens

Plus:

1. New Look: The Habs have a brand new team, fresh with newcomers such as Scott Gomez, Brian Gionta, Mike Cammalleri, and more. They may have lost some defense in the process, but they gained some of it back by signing Hal Gill and Jaroslav Spacek.

The Habs are arguably more talented than they were at the start of last season and could show for it in the standings.

2. No pressure: All throughout the '08-'09 season, talks were of the Centennial and the fact that the Habs have won a Cup in every decade except this one. Well, that is all behind us, so the Canadiens can focus on one thing: winning.

Key stat: This season is the 100th season that the Habs will play (the 101st year of existence, though).

Minus:

1. Chemistry: With so many new faces, how will the Canadiens be able to gel with one another and become a team, as opposed to a bunch of players? Perhaps they will be able to, but it may take longer than expected and at that point, it may be too late.

2. Jacques Martin: I don’t doubt that Martin is a great defensive coach. But how can you expect a team lacking grit and enforcers to play Martin's defensive trap? I'll give it a good three weeks before he realizes it won’t work.

Analysis:

The Canadiens have a great team on paper and they may even perform well enough to challenge for home-ice in the first round of the playoffs. Expect them to make the playoffs, but don’t expect them to go too far.

They are the furthest thing from a playoff team in terms of the team style of play. Any rough team will be able to dominate the Habs from start to finish (see Maple Leafs, Toronto).

Use that as a guideline: if the Leafs win the season series against the Habs and still have a terrible season, you’ll know that the Habs aren’t going anywhere.

Prediction: third in Northeast, seventh in East.

Alan Bass is a writer and reporter for The Hockey News magazine and TheHockeyNews.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Central Division

Alan Bass — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:42:36 -0400

Chicago Blackhawks

Plus

1. Offseason moves: By signing Marian Hossa and being able to keep Versteeg and the rest of the RFA's (despite the horrible screw ups of the team), the Chicago Blackhawks secured their chances at a Central Division crown for the first time in ages. If there is any team that has the talent to dethrone the Detroit Red Wings, it's the 'Hawks, who have finally come back to life. Key stat: The Hawks gave out $107.48 million in contract money this offseason.

2. Talent: Continuing to improve, Chicago has one of the best teams in the NHL and will only get better. They have the best chance to dethrone the Red Wings’ stranglehold of the Central Division and challenge for the Stanley Cup.

Minus

1. Goaltending: Cristobal Huet is a capable goaltender, but Nikolai Khabibulin was the big name in 2008-09. Can Huet pickup the slack and carry this team on his shoulders?

2. Organization problems: Whatever the deal with Dale Tallon, the RFA screw ups, Patrick Kane antics, and the "truth" that Martin Havlat keeps talking about, it better not get in the way of the on-ice product. Because if it does, then Chicago’s fans that just rejoined the team last season will disappear like a cheese steak in the Wachovia Center.

Analysis

If Chicago’s goaltending holds up, they are my pick to win the Stanley Cup. However, I am unsure if it will and think that it could ultimately lead to their downfall in the playoffs.

Nonetheless, they have an unbelievably talented team this season and every Blackhawks fan should start believing. This could be the year the curse is broken. To all the non-'Hawks fans, come see the Chicago team that has actually won a championship in the past 101 years.

Prediction: Second in Central Division, fourth in Western Conference.

St. Louis Blues

Plus

1. Potential: There are tons of young players on the roster, which will turn out well for St. Louis. With guys like T.J. Oshie, Patrik Berglund, David Backes, Brad Boyes, etc, the team will continue to improve.

2. Returns from injury: There were numerous injuries last season for the Blues and although that isn’t the only reason they made the playoffs, it contributed to the cause. The Blues will start the season healthy (like every other team) and should have some success as the season gets underway.

Minus

1. Inexperience: The majority of their team is extremely young, which is a good thing. But every team needs a bit of experience, which the Blues do not have. Only four players are over 30-years-old.

2. Goaltending: Chris Mason and Ty Conklin are both great backup goalies, but can either of them lead a team again, especially one that is so close to making the playoffs? Conklin played well in Detroit last year, but St. Louis does not have the defense that the Wings do. Yes, Chris Mason had an unbelievable year last season, but he is getting up there in years.

Analysis

It will be another year of close calls for the Blues, who will ultimately finish out of the playoff race. It will be a good year, development-wise, though, as the Blues continue to bring their prospects into the NHL to test the pro-waters. The expectations should not get too high, though, despite their barely playoff qualification last season.

Prediction: Fourth in Central Division, ninth in Western Conference.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Plus

1. Cap room: According to NHLSCAP.com, the Blue Jackets have almost $12 million in cap space (that is the "key stat", by the way). With that much money available and with Scott Howson allowed to spend it, Columbus can make some moves during the remainder of the offseason and throughout the regular season to improve the team and qualify for the postseason again.

2. A year to grow: The Jackets have some of the best young talent in the league with Brassard, Filatov, Mason, etc. With a year of pro experience under their belts, they will be even more improved this season. How much better can Mason get?

Key stat: The Jackets have just three players on their roster over age 30.

Minus

1. Toughest Western Division: See Nashville Predators.

2. Sophomore slumps: Looking at a year to grow, just take the opposite. Could it happen?

Analysis

A second-straight playoff berth is in the works in Ohio. The team has been put together extremely well and coach Ken Hitchcock has done a great job of coaching and leading this team to the Promised Land.

Prediction: Third in Central Division, seventh in Western Conference.

Detroit Red Wings

Plus

1. Being the Red Wings: They’re just that good. No one expects them to stop anytime soon.

Key stat: They’ve won a ton of Stanley Cups. Duh.

2. Best personnel in hockey: Ken Holland is the best GM in the league and Jim Devellano has enough experience and success to share with all 30 teams. Mike Babcock is one of the top coaches in the NHL, while Jim Nill, Hakan Andersson, and their incredible scouting staffs continue to develop players like it’s their job. Oh, wait...

Key stat: See stat above.

Minus

1. Offseason moves: The Red Wings decided to replace Jiri Hudler, Tomas Kopecky, Ty Conklin, and Marian Hossa with some prospects. Is that a good move? Well, based on their track record, I wouldn’t worry too much. But can Justin Abdelkader, Darren Helm, and Jonathan Ericsson make up for the star talent they lost?

2. Chris Osgood: Every year we discuss this and every year he proves his detractors wrong. He can still play the game and he even outplayed Marc-Andre Fleury in the Stanley Cup Finals last season (his team sure didn’t, though). Nonetheless, he may not have the same support that he’s had in the past and asking an older goalie to step up his game may not work out as they plan.

Analysis

The Wings will continue to dominate this league, although it may not end with a Stanley Cup. They continue to be successful, but they lost too many pieces this year to challenge some other up and coming teams. Another Central Division crown will be considered a success in my mind for them, but I’m sure Holland wouldn’t agree.

Prediction: First in Central Division, third in Western Conference.

Nashville Predators

Plus

1. Barry Trotz: Still one of the top-five coaches in the league in my opinion, he continues to keep his teams competitive even though the talent is clearly not there.

Key stat: Last year was the first time since the 2002-03 season that the Predators did not make the playoffs.

2. Potential: They indeed have young talent on their roster, including Ryan Ellis, in my opinion the best Canadian defenseman in the 2009 NHL Entry Draft. Ellis will up their production from the back end and will be able to contribute for more than a decade.

Key stat: Ellis had 89 points in 57 games for the Windsor Spitfires last season.

Minus

1. Tough division: The Central Division is the toughest division in the Western Conference and arguably the toughest in the league. No team is a sure bet to miss the playoffs, although, you can probably assume which teams won’t make it. Nonetheless, Nashville’s point totals will continue to decrease as teams like Detroit, Columbus and Chicago continue to improve.

2. Finances: No one quite knows how the Predators are doing as far as finances go. We can assume they are in the red, but is it by enough to stunt the growth of the team? If David Poile cannot spend money to improve the team, then he is no better than the Coyotes (both of which were attempted to be bought by Balsillie, FYI).

Analysis

The Predators still have a long way to go if they want to return to the playoffs. They have some pieces in place, but they will not return to postseason glory at least until Chet Pickard becomes a bona fide NHL starter. This team needs to take it easy and not stress too much if they begin to lose some games. If they can remain calm, then the season will go that much better for them.

Prediction: Fifth in Central Divison, 13th in Western Conference.

Alan Bass is a writer and reporter for The Hockey News magazine and TheHockeyNews.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Northwest Division

Alan Bass — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:42:25 -0400

Calgary Flames

Plus:

1. Coaching: Although I still think it is a really a-hole move by Brent Sutter to leave New Jersey in the midst of a contract to coach Calgary, brother Darryl could not have chosen a better candidate. With two World Junior Championships and some quality seasons in Newark, Brent Sutter has shown he is a quality coach who can lead an NHL team to the postseason.

2. Improvement: Although they lost Mike Cammalleri and Jordan Leopold, the Flames were able to bring in Jay Bouwmeester. With prospect Mikael Backlund coming into the NHL this season, he may be able to learn some strings (and eventually take his place). All together, the Flames may have actually improved, contrary to popular belief.

Minus:

1. Management: By this I don’t mean that Darryl Sutter is a bad GM. I just have this feeling that having a brother/brother GM/coach combo will turn into disaster. If Brent screws up, will Darryl be able to be honest with him and fire him? Or will the “family” thing kick in and prevent it from happening?

2. Soft goaltending: Miikka Kiprusoff is a great goalie, but not as great as people make him out to be. He is a bit overrated and constantly has slow starts; he never hits his strides until mid-November and at that point the Flames may be 20 points back.

Analysis:

Prediction: 1st in Northwest, 2nd in West.

Minnesota Wild

Plus:

1. New look staff: Motivation. The key to this is motivation. With a brand new coach and GM, the team will have a new look and perhaps be able to drive themselves to victory.

2. Goaltending: With Niklas Backstrom and Josh Harding, the Wild boast one of the best goaltending tandems in the league. Backstrom, a Vezina Trophy nominee, is one of the top netminders in the league. Harding is an incredible young goalie who is a phenomenal backup. Key stat: Minnesota’s goalies had a combined .924 save percentage last season.

Minus:

1. Losing skill: After losing Gaborik, the Wild only were able to sign Martin Havlat. Although Havlat is a great player, the Wild need improvement and Havlat is not a one man show.

2. Lack of prospects: The Wild passed on Jordan Schroeder to take hometown boy Nick Leddy, a defenseman who may never be more than a top-four NHL D-man. The Wild lack talent in their farm system and desperately need to beef up in that category if they hope to have a future.

Analysis:

Prediction: 4th in Northwest, 12th in West.

Edmonton Oilers

Plus:

1. Youthful talent: There isn’t much more the Oilers can do other than wait for their prospects to develop. It’s better to have a few bad years and have home-grown talent on the roster as opposed to signing big name free agents who wind up hurting the team. The Oil will be fine in another year or two.

2. Goaltending: Nikolai Khabibulin is a great goaltender and should be able to backstop Edmonton to one of the final playoff spots in a competitive Western Conference. Along with the young talent coming out, the Oilers are almost set for the next few years. Much more development is needed, though.

Minus:

1. Coaching: Does Pat Quinn still have it?

2. Defense: They have a weakness of depth on the backend.

Analysis: Jordan Eberle is the best prospect the Oilers have and he should very well be a second line winger for his career. It may take him a bit to get used to the NHL game, but he has the talent to succeed in the big league. Along with the other young guys and great goaltending from Khabibulin, the Oilers may perform better than expected. However, give them another few years before they’re any good.

Prediction: 3rd in Northwest, 11th West.

Vancouver Canucks

Plus:

1. Sedins coming to town…again: Finally signing the Sedin twins at the last second was a life-saver for Mike Gillis, whose job many said was at stake. By keeping the Swedish twins (calling them that is very disturbing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6tBr6PMkBY), he prevented the Canucks from losing 164 points of offense, which would not have been replaced by anyone on the roster.

2. Goaltending: Two words: Roberto Luongo.

Minus:

1. Defense?: Letting Mattias Ohlund go was not ideal, however it seemed he was ready to move on. The money being thrown at him by Tampa Bay, plus the opportunity to mentor Victor Hedman is one that few would pass up. Christian Ehrhoff, Mathieu Schneider and Brad Lukowich were great pickups that should really help the team, but many are still not sold on the Nucks’ defense; there are too many top-four defenders and no top defenders.

2. Offensive depth: Other than the Sedins and some talent here and there, the Canucks are weak on their third and fourth lines. The easiest way a team can beat the Canucks is to shut down the Sedins. There is almost no one left to score, otherwise.

Analysis: Other than signing the Sedins, Gillis did very little to improve the team. The Canucks didn’t make it past the second round for the eighth time in their last eight playoff appearances. With an All-Star goalie in net and two of the best players in the league on offense, that is inexcusable. Normally I would mention that the Canucks have to advance past the second round or they’re management is in trouble, but we all know that’s not going to happen. And for all you nay-sayers, I give you three pieces of evidence: Detroit Red Wings, Chicago Blackhawks and Vancouver’s defense.

Prediction: 2nd in Northwest, 6th in West.

Colorado Avalanche

Plus:

1. Development: Trading away Ryan Smyth for Kyle Quincey and Tom Preissing (and a draft pick) was a great move by the Avs management. Two young, capable defenders to boost the team was a perfect step to take in rebuilding this horribly disheveled team.

2. Matt Duchene: Matt Duchene, the third overall pick in this year’s draft, is ready for the NHL. He has a free year to develop on a team that is poised to be in the running for the Taylor Hall sweepstakes, without fear of making a mistake that ruins the season. It’s the best thing a young player can do. Have the confidence to develop his skills without fears of getting berated by the management.

Minus:

1. Talent: The team is so screwed this season. Get your popcorn, kiddies.

2. Coaching: Is Joe Sacco really an NHL-ready coach? I have my doubts, but I’ll trust the NHL executives on this one. For now.

Analysis: Sakic’s retirement leaves a huge hole in the team, both talent-wise and leadership-wise. People point to Paul Stastny to replace Sakic, but Stastny will never be as good as Sakic was. Not to say he can’t produce, but Sakic is a one-of-a-kind player whose absence will leave a sour taste in the team’s collective mouth. Look for a terrible season, but one that can be used to develop farm players.

Prediction: 5th in Northwest, 14th in West.

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers’ section, and a writer for TheHockeyNews.com, Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-10 Preview: Pacific Division

Alan Bass — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:33:05 -0400

Anaheim Ducks

Plus:

1. Grit mixed with talent: The Ducks are still the same basic team they were when they won the Cup in 2007, minus a few guys, and Getzlaf and Perry are much better now. They signed Saku Koivu this summer, a great move to bring in some veteran play and leadership, and brought in former draft pick Joffrey Lupul, who will be able to put up at least 20 goals. They showed in the ’09 playoffs why they won the Cup a few years ago and are looking to have a more successful regular season than their last campaign. Key stat: Anaheim’s top three players, statistically in ’08-09 had a combined 222 points and 300 PIM.

2. Return on Chris Pronger: I’ve been the biggest advocate of the Ducks’ return on the Pronger trade. It may not pay off this season, but it will surely pay off in the next five years. Getting Luca Sbisa (a future top-four defenseman), Lupul, and two first-rounders (both of which will most likely be in the top 25) was a great deal for an aging Chris Pronger. If the Ducks draft well enough, they will be able to shove the trade in the Flyers’ face in a few years. Key stat: Joffrey Lupul was in the top 60 among forwards for goals last year with 25.

Minus:

1. Must win now: Much of their team is getting older and with the salary cap most likely not going up anytime soon, the Ducks may lose many key members of their squad. Therefore, they need to win now. They can’t wait a couple years and expect to get better. This is the best they are going to be for the next few seasons and they need to show the hockey world they can win again.

2. Lack of prospects: The Ducks’ best prospect is Jake Gardiner, a defenseman who is not going to so much be the best player on their team. He may contribute a fair amount on both sides of the puck, but when your best prospect is a future top-four D-man at best, it’s not very impressive.

Analysis: The Duckies have a great team and are poised to have another great season, especially if they have to face the Sharks again in the postseason. They have a very similar team to the one that won the Cup in ’07 and it’s hard to believe that they won’t be able to contend once again.

Prediction: 2nd in Pacific, 5th in West.

Dallas Stars

Plus:

1. Return from injuries: With so many players injured last season, the Stars couldn’t expect to go anywhere. Now with Scott Glennie preparing to jump to the NHL in a couple seasons, captain Brenden Morrow returning, and goaltender Marty Turco hopefully back to his normal self, the Stars can look to do some serious damage in the West. Key stat: The Stars lost 372 man games to injury last season, fifth in the league.

2. Mixture of young and old: On the veteran side, you have Mike Modano, Brenden Morrow, Stephane Robidas, Jere Lehtinen, and Marty Turco. On the young side, you have Loui Eriksson, James Neal, Fabian Brunnstrom, Trevor Daly and Tom Wandell. The Stars are looking good. Key stat: The Stars have 17 under-30 players and seven 30-and-over players—a good ratio.

Minus:

1. Defensive depth: Other than Robidas, the Stars do not have any star defensemen. They have some okay talent in Niskanen, Daley, Fistric and Grossman, but none of those will be winning games for you anytime soon. Dallas needs to give their star goalie a bit of a break if they want to win. No goalie (unless your name rhymes with Smarty Frodeur) can win games by himself.

2. Goaltending questions: Good segue, huh? Marty Turco has been extremely shaky in recent years (forgetting the injury-plagued 2008-09 campaign). He is still doing well, but not nearly as well as he could be. He has much more potential (strange word to describe a 30-some year old goalie) and needs to show that he can put up great numbers. A team can’t win without a solid goalie in net.

Analysis: After a terrible season last year where the majority of the team was injured, the Stars made some nifty moves and are ready to compete again. They have some good talent on their team and look like they’re capable of making the playoffs. How far they go in the postseason, however, is anyone’s guess.

Prediction: 3rd in Pacific, 8th in West.

San Jose Sharks

Plus:

1. Talent: Still one of the best teams in the league, the Sharks have yet to prove that they can not succeed in the regular season. We all know they can succeed in the regular season. They’ve shown it every year since the lockout. Key stat: The Sharks have had at least 99 points every year since the lockout.

2. Division: They are in arguably the weakest division in the Western Conference and will have an inflated point total because of that. Not to say they don’t deserve 100-plus points; on the contrary. But if they get 115 points, they are really only as good as a 100-point team (did that make sense?). Key stat: The rest of the Pacific teams had a combined 148 wins—worse than any other division in the West.

Minus:

1. Playoffs: Do I really need to explain this?

2. Grit: This is why the Sharks do not succeed in the playoffs. They have extreme amounts of talent on the roster, but they are beaten by anyone who can push them around (see Ducks, Anaheim, 2008-09 playoffs). The Sharks lack the physical play needed to succeed in the postseason and Doug Wilson did not do anything to address that issue this offseason.

Analysis: Still the best team in the league on paper, the Sharks have some big things to prove. We all know they can win in the regular season, but the time is now to win in the playoffs. If they fall very short once again this season, expect there to be some major shakeups in the front office. Doug Wilson swore he would give the team a facelift this offseason and he has not done anything close to that.

Prediction: 1st in Pacific, 1st in West.

Phoenix Coyotes

Plus

1. Prospects: If there’s one plus in the Coyotes’ organization through all this uncertainty, it’s the fact that they have some great prospects going through the organization. With Kyle Turris now being a regular NHLer, along with Mikkel Boedker, Viktor Tikhonov, and now Oliver Ekman-Larsson being drafted. If the finances hold out for a few years, this team could really become a playoff contender by 2012. Key stat: The Coyotes were ranked second in The Hockey News’ 2008-09 version of Future Watch.

2. Motivation: Do any of the players really want to move? I don’t think so and neither does the NHL. The players know that if they play well and draw in fans, there is a better chance of them staying put. Put it this way: if you play badly, you’re going to have to move with your wife and kids and start a new life somewhere. If you play well, you can keep living where you are. Which one do you want? Key stat: Jim Balsillie has 240 million reasons as to why the Coyotes should play poorly this season.

Minus:

1. Financial problems: This is the obvious one that everyone knows, but it will greatly affect the on-ice product. If Don Maloney cannot spend money on players, then he will not be able to improve his team. They are just barely at the cap floor, but they need to

2. Defense: Ed Jovanovski is getting up there in years. Adrian Aucoin was a good signing but he hasn’t had a great season for a while (and is also getting older as well). Keith Yandle was re-signed and Jim Vandermeer can contribute a bit. However, the defensive corps is not nearly as good as it could be. Oliver Ekman-Larsson may make an appearance this season after the Coyotes wind up in last place by the second month, too.

Analysis: Hang in there, Phoenix. You could wind up like Pittsburgh as far as talent goes. There are some great prospects and players in the organization and if the finances work out for another year or two, this team could be making the playoffs.

Prediction: 5th in Pacific, 15th in West.

Los Angeles Kings

Plus:

1. Young talent: Brayden Schenn is now a part of the Kings’ organization, while Dustin Brown, Oscar Moller, Anze Kopitar, Teddy Purcell, Wayne Simmonds, and more are just reaching their potentials. They also have a ton of young goaltenders in the organization, including Jonathan Bernier, Jeff Zatkoff, Jonathan Quick, and Erik Ersberg. Key Stat: The Kings were the top-ranked team in THN’s Future Watch and had three players ranked in the top 31 NHL prospects.

2. Defense: No one can be quite sure yet if the Kings’ defense is good or still just young and promising. Drew Doughty has shown he can play in the big leagues, while Matt Greene and Jack Johnson are also playing well. Rob Scuderi was a good pickup for LA as he should be able to give them some great help and support to their weak offense. Key stat: The average age of LA’s top-six defenders is 24.5—and it will be even lower if Colten Teubert or Thomas Hickey join next season.

Minus:

1. Offensive depth: When your top forward is Dustin Brown and your second-line headliner is Michal Handzus, you’re not looking too good. The Kings have the defense and goaltending, but they really need some support on offense if they hope to get closer to the playoffs.

2. Management: I’ve never quite been a fan of Dean Lombardi. Or Terry Murray for that matter. I saw Murray firsthand in Philadelphia for the years he was coaching the Flyers and he just never seemed like a big time coach. Lombardi hasn’t made the necessary moves to keep his team as competitive as they should be.

Analysis: The Kings could finish anywhere from sixth to 14th in the West. They have some great talent, but not too much experience (which I’ve never been a fan of, anyway). If the young guys simply go out and play the game they love and have fun with it, this team could do some serious damage. However, look for them to spend one more year golfing in April before they can become a serious contender.

Prediction: 4th in Pacific, 10th in West.

Alan Bass is a writer and reporter for The Hockey News magazine and TheHockeyNews.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL 2009-2010 Season Previews: Introduction

Alan Bass — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:26:20 -0400

Welcome to the Alan Bass 2009-10 NHL Season Preview! Well, the preview of the preview. You get the point.

Let’s get down to business!

Here is how the previews will be formatted:

Team Name

Plus:

1. (Positive outlooks for the team this coming season).

Minus:

1. (Two things to watch out for in 2010 that may bring the team down).

Analysis: My awesomely awesome analysis on every team in the NHL.

Prediction: The Alan Bass predictions for the 2009-2010 regular season (because they’re THAT brilliant…kind of).

To quench your NHL preview needs in the meantime, here are some general division roundups going into next season:

Northeast Division

In last year’s Northeast Division, the Bruins and Canadiens were the only teams to make the playoffs and wound up going head to head as the 1 vs. 8 seeds in the Eastern Conference.

On the bottom half of the division were the Toronto Maple Leafs, Ottawa Senators and Buffalo Sabres. The Leafs are in a rebuilding stage, while the Senators and Sabres are trying to stay afloat with the okay talent they have on their teams.

In 2008-09, the Northeast was pretty competitive, but lacked the playoff berths. Will this year be different?

Atlantic Division

Hands down the toughest division in the Eastern Conference, the Atlantic has four potential playoff teams in the Flyers, Rangers, Devils and Penguins.

Pittsburgh is coming off of a Stanley Cup championship and looking to return to the final for the third straight year and become the first team to do so since the Oilers in the 80s. The Rangers made some big moves this summer in hopes of driving up their talent and going a bit further in the playoffs. The Devils have a “new” coach in Lemaire while remaining dormant throughout the summer.

Philadelphia made arguably the biggest splash, trading away future top-four defenseman Luca Sbisa, forward Joffrey Lupul and a helluva lot of draft picks for superstar D-man Chris Pronger, in addition to signing controversial goaltender Ray Emery.

The Islanders are still in a rebuilding stage while phenom John Tavares gets a chance to show the NHL why they should have let him in early.

The big question of the year is this: how many Atlantic Division teams will qualify for the ’09-10 postseason?

Southeast Division

The Capitals are the only sure playoff team in the division, while the Hurricanes and Lightning are the two borderline teams that will challenge for a spot. Ovechkin will tear up the division this season (as always) and propel the Caps to perhaps their best season in years.

The Lightning buffed up on defense and look to be a solid team in the making (yet again). The Panthers replaced Jay-Bo with Jordan Leopold yet were unable to help themselves on offense. Atlanta, though possessing some great young talent, are still one of the worst teams in the league and will be in the running for the Taylor Hall sweepstakes.

Central Division

Arguably the toughest division in the NHL, the Central teams’ only big negative is the fact that they may all bring each other down. Their point totals may be lower than expected due to the incredible competition between the five squads. There are two sure playoff teams in Chicago and Detroit in addition to three borderline playoff teams in Nashville, St. Louis and Columbus.

The Blue Jackets added a little bit of talent to their team but GM Scott Howson decided to mainly let time do its work on the Jackets’ young players in hopes the team will be even better this year. The Predators made very few moves as well and may challenge for a playoff spot at the end of the season, as Barry Trotz usually does. The Blues were a surprise in the West last season before being swept by the Canucks in round one. However, don’t expect them to surprise this year.

The Red Wings lost Jiri Hudler to Russia and Mikael Samuelsson and Marian Hossa to free agency, but with the young talent we saw from them in the playoffs, I have no doubts that they will continue to be atop the league.

The Blackhawks will be oh so close to winning the division this year, but their goaltending questions will be the x-factor when challenging the mighty Red Wings for the Central crown.

Northwest Division

In what was once a greatly competitive division, the competition is all but gone, other than Calgary and Vancouver, most likely the only two Northwest teams that will make the playoffs in 2010. Vancouver changed their defense around but is basically the same team that won the division last year. The Flames added Jay-Bo and a new coach, making them able to challenge for a top-three spot in the conference.

Minnesota lost Groin…sorry, Gaborik and were unable to replace him. They have a new GM and coach, so the team may be motivated for a bit, but don’t expect that to last. Colorado is one of the worst teams in the league, so chalk this year up to a rebuilding year.

If any team surprises, it will be the Oilers, who are chock-full of young talent who could take off at any minute.

Pacific Division

Another tough division, the Sharks will still wind up on top fairly easily. Nonetheless, will their playoff woes continue? Anaheim and Dallas are playoff-capable teams who could do some damage on fellow Western Conference teams.

The Coyotes will be bottom feeders for most of the season while trying to scrape together some money to afford a bag of pucks.

The Kings are my pick for surprise of the season, as their young and talented defense could stop many teams in their tracks and propel the Kings to a playoff berth.

Alan Bass is a writer and reporter for The Hockey News magazine. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

Roberto Luongo's New Contract Proves That CBA Has Failed

Alan Bass — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:09:36 -0400

Recently, The Hockey News, TSN, the NHL and the Vancouver Canucks announced that superstar goaltender and Canucks captain Roberto Luongo has signed a 12-year extension to play the remainder of his days in Vancouver.

TSN reported that the deal would pay him $64 million for the duration of the 12 years. This averages to about $5.3 million per season in cap hit.

Pretty damn good deal for arguably the best goaltender in the world, right?

The 30-year-old goaltender would technically be playing when he is 42, if he retired at the end of this contract. As THN's Ken Campbell stated, "There's also a chance the New York Islanders will face the Phoenix Coyotes in the Stanley Cup final this season."

We've already seen the craziness of the CBA with Marian Hossa's contract, one that is currently under investigation by the National Hockey League because of the lowering of the cap hit by adding extra years of low salary to the end of the contract.

Luongo will make $10 million in the first year of this new extension, which kicks in for the 2010-'11 season. He will then make $7.716 million in 2011-'12, $6.714 million from 2012-'13 through 2017-'18. Then Luongo will receive $3.382 million in 2018-2019, then $1.618 million in 2019-'20 and finally, $1 million in the last two years of the deal.

Now is there really a chance that he will play at a high level after 2018, once the money goes down and he is 38 years old?

For any Canucks fan who thinks yes, you're simply wrong. Rarely do goalies play at that age and even Jacques Plante couldn't dominate playing at a high age. It is possible, but not very likely at all.

So why is the CBA failing?

Well, the NHL wanted the CBA in place to save money and force teams to stay under a salary cap that would even the playing field.

Do you see many low market teams dominating the NHL standings? I sure don't.

By making the cap hit equal to the average salary in the contract rather than the actual amount that a player is making, the NHL is simply shooting themselves in the face.

The irony is simply delicious.

The Detroit Red Wings' payroll for this coming season (as of right this second) is $65.135 million, according to NHLSCAP.com. The salary cap payroll, though, will be closer to $56 million, just under the salary cap.

Could the Coyotes afford to do this? Could the Thrashers afford to do this? Absolutely not.

But by front-loading contracts in order to lower the overall cap hit of the contract, GMs are doing something sneaky, yet brilliant: They are finding a loophole in the CBA that allows them to keep high quality players in addition to allowing them the leeway to sign players that will give them a chance to win a championship.

Is it sneaky? Yes. Is it illegal? Far from it.

In fact, if I were a GM, I would be doing the same thing and I'm sure everyone else would as well. Anything to give my team a better chance to win a Stanley Cup, I would do in a second.

So Gary Bettman and his NHL cronies need to sit down in the upcoming months and figure out their plan for when the CBA negotiations restart in the next year. Because if they try to take this away from the owners and the players, there just may be another lockout.

And isn't that just what the other three pro sports want?

Why Sidney Crosby Still Has a Lot To Learn To Be Considered “Great”

Alan Bass — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:29:48 -0400

“The Next One” has finally won his Stanley Cup and, at just 21 years old, is the youngest captain in NHL history to do so.

Now before you all chew me out and tell me I don’t know the first thing about hockey, let me clarify: Crosby is an excellent player and is one of the top five players in the world, without a doubt. He has incredible speed, an uncanny passing ability and his hockey sense, the best quality of them all, is arguably the best in the NHL.

But Sidney Crosby is far from a role model for young players. In fact, he is probably in the top five of captains I would not want my kid to take after (for now). The main reason for this is that he still acts very immature, considering he is on the international stage as the “Face of Hockey” or the “Face of the NHL.” It’s not one big thing that contributes to it. Rather, it is a series of minor, little things.

And isn’t it the small stuff that counts?

Now for a 21-year-old, it is a huge responsibility to “save” a sport and a franchise; one of which he has already done by winning the Stanley Cup and almost guaranteeing a profit for the Penguins for the next decade.

But when that face is thrust upon you, whether consensually or not, it is the responsibility of the person to deal with it in the best way possible, this being a mature, role model-like way of behavior.

Let’s take a stroll through memory lane—at least the recent memories, that is. Remember that whole chaotic, big deal the media made about Crosby not shaking hands with Nicklas Lidstrom after Game Seven of the Stanley Cup final? Well, contrary to popular belief, it really was not a big deal. But it is indeed something to remember.

If you watch the video (which, I’ll admit, I have watched about a thousand times, because I love watching teams celebrate a Cup victory), you’ll see that every member of the players and coaching staff are in the line to shake hands, while Crosby is talking to trainers, owners and whoever else was on the side of the ice.

Now okay, I understand he is celebrating a Stanley Cup. But if Dustin Jeffrey, a guy who didn’t even play in the finals, can skate over to shake hands with some Red Wings, why can’t Sid do the same?

Okay, Penguins fans, you’re red with rage and ready to reach through your computer and strangle me. (Is that any different than normal?). But before you give me an excuse as to why he missed some of the handshake line, let me give you another example from the same night.

When Crosby finally got to the handshake line, he found himself face-to-face with Coach Mike Babcock of the Detroit Red Wings. Babcock looked Crosby in the face and said, “You played great. That’s great leadership by you.”

Crosby’s response?

A very disheartening mutter of “Thanks,” while looking the other way and skating in the opposite direction. The scene is captured in the article photo (taken from the NBC feed).

Simply watching the scene makes me sick to my stomach.

A Stanley Cup-winning coach and former Jack Adams nominee is saying something extremely heartfelt, yet Crosby treats it like it’s some random fan on the side of Broad Street speaking.

After the scene ends, you can see Babcock in the background walking away with his head down in a sort of shock that he was just disrespected by Crosby.

These are but two examples of the immaturity and lack of leadership that this captain shows for his team.

Once again, he is one of the best players in the world. But he has much to learn about being the captain of an NHL and a Stanley Cup-winning team if he hopes to gain the respect of teammates, opponents and fans across the globe, he needs to clean up his act and realize that millions of children look up to him. What does this teach them?

All I’m saying is that until Crosby starts to be spoken about in the same sentence as Lady Byng, like Gretzky, he will never be talked about in the same way as “The Great One” was.

Okay, now you may chew me out.

Philadelphia Flyers' Goaltending: 2009-10 Season Preview

Alan Bass — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:14:37 -0400

The Basics

Goaltenders: Ray Emery, Brian Boucher

Key Departures: Martin Biron, Antero Niittymaki

Key Acquisitions: Ray Emery, Brian Boucher

Up-and-Coming: Johan Backlund

Everybody get on the bandwagon!

In 2006-07, Ray Emery was 33-16-6 with a 2.47 GAA and a .918 save percentage. Last year in the Kontinental League, he posted a 22-8 record with a .926 save percentage and a 2.12 GAA.

Those numbers alone make you want to jump for joy and start planning a Stanley Cup parade.

In the 2007 Stanley Cup Final, when the rest of the Senators did not feel like showing up, Emery kept his team in the series and almost won a Stanley Cup on his own. But, as anyone knows, no team wins a Cup with one player.

Brian Boucher has put up impressive stats for a backup goalie the past few years, numbers that include a .932 save percentage in 2007-08 with San Jose and 23 wins the same year with the Philadelphia Phantoms in the American League.

Boucher is a reliable backup, as any Flyers fan remembers from his stint at the turn of the century. He is going to be counted on for at least 25-30 games this season, possibly more if Emery doesn’t work out. Therefore, he needs to stay on top of his game.

No thanks, I’m staying back

There are numerous questions regarding Emery and his behavior--and his play, too, for that matter.

Flyers GM Paul Holmgren insists that Emery has indeed reformed, but Philadelphia is far too remembering of Allen Iverson, Terrell Owens, Eric Lindros, and Scott Rolen to take a GM at his word. Fans will need to see him play his aggressive style while being able to keep it all on the ice and not let it slide into the locker room.

As for his play, he hasn’t had a full season in the NHL since 2007 and may have lost a bit of his game. True, he played incredibly well in Russia last season, but that was last season in a league far less competitive than the NHL.

Emery will need to play his absolute best if he doesn’t want to get run out of town.

Keys to success

Staying aggressive on the ice, but calm off of it.

Giving Boucher a fair number of games to play.

Making sure Backlund develops perfectly in the American League.

Grade: A-

I am going to jump on the bandwagon for this section.

Emery has shown that when it matters the most, he can play hockey. Boucher has also shown he is a capable backup. Together, the two of them won’t be Jennings-winning goaltenders, but they will indeed lead Philadelphia to a deep playoff run, perhaps the only chance they have in the next few years.

Philadelphia Flyers' Defense: 2009-10 Season Preview

Alan Bass — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:58:40 -0400

Chris Pronger—Braydon Coburn

Kimmo Timonen—Matt Carle

Ryan Parent—Ole-Kristian Tollefsen

Key Departures: Luca Sbisa, Andrew Alberts

Key Acquisitions: Chris Pronger, Ole-Kristian Tollefsen

Up-and-Coming: Danny Syvret

Everybody Get on the Bandwagon!

The Flyers have the best top-three defense in the East. Yes, I just said that.

Chris Pronger and Kimmo Timonen have 10 All-Star games between them. Timonen was recently named the top Finnish defenseman by NHL.com. Pronger has a Norris Trophy, a Hart Trophy, and the most important trophy, a Stanley Cup.

Meanwhile, Braydon Coburn has yet to garner any league awards, but is one of the most effective and underrated defenders in the league.

Pronger is a team leader, one who can dominate an opponent offensively and defensively. He can deliver a bone-crushing check, then start a breakout the other way. One of the best in the league, he consistently shows he's not close to slowing down at this point in his NHL career.

Timonen has been the Flyers’ top defender since his arrival a few years ago. Aside from his great offensive stats, he has also shown that he's an unbelievable defender. He's a master of defending a two-on-one, in which he does his trademark dive; he blocks both a pass and a shot in one movement. Many have tried to duplicate this move, and many have failed.

Matt Carle is coming too, and may be reaching his potential in the next year or two. He has the capability to be an effective top-four defender this season, yet must work extremely hard throughout training camp to show that he's ready to take a bigger role on the team.

Ryan Parent showed random flashes of brilliance last season after returning from an injury, while Randy Jones struggled much of the season. Yet both players have the potential to succeed and could very well break out this season.

The new addition of Ole-Kristian Tollefsen will add another physical aspect to the Flyers’ defensive corps.

No Thanks, I’m Staying Back

The Flyers have had numerous problems in the past with signing older players based on past stats as opposed to what they can do for them now. Pronger looks to be an aberration, a player who can still contribute in his older NHL years, yet one can never be sure.

Randy Jones had a very poor last season, both statistically and on the defensive side of the puck. Perhaps because of his injury, he looked like he was having trouble performing on the ice.

Losing Luca Sbisa is a huge blow to an organization starving for their first homegrown defensive prospect since Ben Wilson. Getting Pronger in return is clearly a great deal, but in four to five years when Pronger is retired and Sbisa is a cheap top-three defenseman for the Ducks, will the trade look as good as it did this summer?

Simple answer: If Philly wins the Cup, yes. If not, no.

That seems to be how we judge every move now, doesn’t it?

Keys to Success

Finding defense pairings that maximize the potential of the top three defenders.
Getting Jones, Parent, and Carle to hit their strides.
Don’t be afraid to take the body.
Don’t be afraid to take a hit to make a play.
Learn from the best (Pronger, Timonen).

Grade: B+

I’m not going to jump on the defensive bandwagon just yet. They have great potential and some hardcore talent on the roster, but I won’t believe it until I see it. If the only players that show up are the top three, Philadelphia won’t be nearly as successful as most predict. However, if they can find a way to get the most out of their depth defenders, this team will fly (no pun intended).

Philadelphia Flyers' 2009-10 Season Preview: Forwards

Alan Bass — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:34:44 -0400

Welcome to this three-part series on the Philadelphia Flyers' 2009-10 season preview! First up: forwards!

Possible line combinations:

Simon Gagne-Claude Giroux-Danny Briere

Scott Hartnell-Mike Richards-Jeff Carter

Daniel Carcillo-Ian Laperriere-Arron Asham

Riley Cote-Jared Ross-Darroll Powe

Key Departures: Joffrey Lupul, Mike Knuble

Key Acquisitions: Ian Laperriere

Up and coming: Jared Ross, Darroll Powe, Jonathan Kalinski, Andreas Nodl

Everybody get on the bandwagon!

Barring injuries (we say that an awful lot with this team, don’t we?), the Flyers will once again have one of the best teams in the league on offense. Last season, they were the only team with six 25-goal scorers.

Although Joffrey Lupul and Mike Knuble are gone, we will see the emergence of Claude Giroux as a dominant player in addition to a healthy Danny Briere, who can be counted on for at least 20 goals and 60 points.

Captain Mike Richards will only get better (although it’s tough to imagine him surpassing the 90-point or even the century mark this season). Just barely the runner-up for the Selke Trophy, he was compared to Pavel Datsyuk earlier this summer by The Hockey News.

True, it’s a bit of a stretch, but think about it: a dominant offensive forward who can both put up many points and contribute enough in the defensive end to get national recognition. Plus, he’s a helluva leader. Quite the package, no?

In addition to the offense available on the top two lines, the Flyers have great depth as well. Carcillo, contrary to popular belief, can indeed score goals. He simply needs to replace many careless penalties by using that aggression offensively.

Asham showed us last year that he has great hands and can stickhandle in close, perhaps putting up some more points. Laperriere is unbelievable on faceoffs and may even be put out in a penalty kill situation.

On a potential fourth line, there will be the Black Aces; those guys who are just barely in the NHL. Powe and Ross are bona fide checking line forwards, but there are doubts as to whether Riley Cote will be on the NHL roster much longer.

With three enforcers who can also score, Cote, who rarely contributes offensively, may not have a place on the Flyers’ NHL roster too often, even if he is a fan favorite.

No thanks, I’m staying back:

The Flyers were second in the league in penalty minutes in 2008-09 with 1408 (just behind Anaheim) and were shorthanded more times than 22 other teams in the league. With five potential rough guys on the team (Hartnell, Carcillo, Laperriere, Asham, Cote), the Flyers are set to take even more penalties.

The days are over where the team can intimidate others by fighting and hacking away at players (too bad, because from what I’ve seen, those games in the 70s were tons of fun!). Now are the days where a hack of someone’s leg or wrist is going to be called immediately. The instigator penalty has put players in shambles and has, in many opinions, killed part of the game.

But opinions about the game aside, the Flyers cannot risk being shorthanded for half of every period. No matter how many shorthanded goals a team has and no matter how dominant a penalty kill is, nothing kills momentum and offensive opportunities than taking a penalty.

Another potential problem is the abundance of centers on the roster. Claude Giroux, Mike Richards and Jeff Carter are all first-line centers, yet only one can be on the first line.

Coach Stevens needs to figure out the best pairings in training camp and throughout the preseason. It cannot take two months of regular season to discover the best pairings or the Flyers may already be out of the playoff race.

Five players on the team have the potential to top 70 points (Briere, Gagne, Giroux, Richards and Carter), yet Stevens must make the most of this talent by maximizing the playing time of all five forwards.

Lastly, the Flyers often had a problem with backchecking last season, specifically in the playoffs. They must remember that good offense evolves from stellar defense. By stopping the opposing team’s scoring chances, you in turn create your own. If the Flyers have three to four players defending on every rush, very few chances will arise for opposing teams.

A funny thought:

Do you realize that if the Flyers’ third-line is the one suggested (Carcillo-Laperriere-Asham), it might garner more penalty minutes than some full teams do. Scary thought, really.

Keys to success:

-Finding good line combinations

-The French Connection (Gagne-Giroux-Briere). Come on, those three together are much better than Perreault, Martin and Robert.

-Be aggressive, but legal

-Give the young guys a shot

-Playing some defense

Grade: A-

Give me a team in the Eastern Conference that has the depth of the Flyers. Don’t say Pittsburgh, because two superstars do not equal depth. It equals two superstars. The Flyers are set to have some big things happening this year.

Next up: Defense!

Flyers-Flames: Who Has The Best Top Three Defense Corps?

Alan Bass — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:29:28 -0400

There is no question that the two teams with the best top-three defensive corps in the NHL are the Calgary Flames and the Philadelphia Flyers.

With the Flames having a top defensive pairing (at least on the depth chart) of Dion Phaneuf and Jay Bouwmeester and the Flyers having Chris Pronger and Kimmo Timonen (all four of whom have played in All Star games), they are four of the best in the world.

But the third defensemen on each team could be the determining factor; Robyn Regehr for Calgary and Braydon Coburn for Philadelphia.

So which of these two teams have the best top-three?

No. 1 Defenseman

Jay Bouwmeester

The third overall pick in the 2002 NHL Entry Draft, Bouwmeester is a heaping 6-foot-4, 214-pound defenseman. With at least 37 points in every year since the lockout, he signed a 5-year, $33.4 million deal just hours before becoming a UFA.

Bouwmeester has an incredible skating ability, great hockey sense, and is a shutdown defender who can play on both sides of the puck. Unfortunately, he does not play much of a physical game, which hurts his credibility a bit. He also is often called the most overrated player in the NHL by some media outlets.

Chris Pronger

The second overall pick in the 1993 NHL Entry Draft by the Hartford Whalers, Pronger is the biggest defender on the Flyers roster at 6-foot-6, 210 pounds. He has posted at least 46 points in every full season but one since the 1998-99 season. Since the lockout, he has not posted less than 11 goals and 43 points.

One of the best one-on-one defenders in the league, he can punish forwards with his incredible body checks and start the rush the other way. He is also and excellent power play specialist and a vocal leader in the locker room. On the negative side, he is known as a dirty player and tends to take many bad penalties. Since October 2000, Pronger has been suspended six times by the NHL.

Advantage: Flyers

No. 2 Defenseman

Dion Phaneuf

Drafted ninth overall in the 2003 NHL Entry Draft, Phaneuf was a Calder Trophy finalist along with Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin in the 2005-06 season. He has posted at least 47 points in every season and had a career year in 2007-08, when he posted 60 points and 182 PIM in 82 games.

Phaneuf is as good a hitter as Chris Pronger. He unleashes a powerful shot from the point and displays great all-around ability in the offensive zone. His defensive zone coverage needs to improve, though. He sometimes gets himself out of position by trying too hard to make a big hit.

Kimmo Timonen

A diamond in the rough, Timonen was drafted in the tenth round of the 1993 NHL Entry Draft by the Los Angeles Kings. He made his NHL debut six five years later and has posted at least 40 points every year since the 2001-02 season. His career high came in 2006-07 with the Nashville Predators when he posted 55 points in 80 games; a number that included 13 goals.

Timonen’s biggest assets are his speed and hockey sense. He can quarterback the power play and is a master on the rush. His play in the defensive zone is second-to-none. However, due to his small 5-foot-10 stature, he rarely plays physically and often gets worn down by physical play.

Advantage: Flames

No. 3 Defenseman

Robyn Regehr

The 19th overall pick in the 1998 NHL Entry Draft, Regehr has only known one NHL team; Calgary. He is known more for his defensive play as opposed to putting up points, although he does have almost 130 points in his career. He is a bulky guy, clocking in at 6-foot-3 and 226 pounds.

He has an accurate point shot, good hockey sense and an incredible work ethic. It’s tough to get the puck around him going down one-on-one in the offensive zone. However, he is very hesitant with the puck and therefore makes many mistakes on the rush and the breakout.

Braydon Coburn

The Atlanta Thrashers’ eighth overall selection in the 2003 NHL Entry Draft, he was traded to the Flyers for Alexei Zhitnik, the worst trade in Thrashers history. Coburn’s 6-foot-5, 220 pound frame has been able to surpass the 25-point mark the last two years.

Coburn is a great all-around defenseman who can play well in the offensive and defensive zone. He has a booming shot and great hands that can put up numbers offensively. However, he is very inconsistent and often has trouble using his size effectively.

Advantage: Flyers

It is very close, with three completely different types of defensemen on each roster: the bruiser, the point producer, and the defensive player. However, the Flyers seem to have the advantage going into the 2009-10 NHL season. A top pairing of Pronger and Timonen will scare any team that steps on the ice against the Orange and Black, while Bouwmeester has yet to prove that he indeed can play high-quality hockey on both sides of the puck.

Unfortunately, each of these teams only meet once in the regular season.

But perhaps they will meet again in a distant seven-game series.

Frozen in Time: Hockey's Greatest Calls

Alan Bass — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:57:00 -0400

1. “Do you believe in miracles? Yes!” Al Michaels, 1980 Olympics

This call is the top call on the list of NHL play-by-play calls for many reasons. For one, it almost guaranteed a gold medal was coming to the United States. The USA is not a big market for hockey, contrary to Mr. Bettman’s beliefs.

But this game, this goal, this call, brought America out of the dumps of the Cold War, out of a horrible economy and a possible world conflict with the Soviet Union, by watching their team defeat the mighty hockey dynasty.

It was a lot more than hockey game, as many say. It was a sort of political statement (unfortunately) that showed the world of the USA’s power and ability to answer to adversity. And these young college kids did just that.

2. “Heeeeeenderson, has scored for Canada!” Foster Hewitt, 1972 Summit Series

No goal in hockey history changed Canada like Paul Henderson’s goal to defeat the Soviet Union in the 1972 Summit Series. Many have argued he should be in the Hall of Fame for this, though the election committee (and myself) do not agree.

For those of you that argue it should be No. 1, hear me out before you chew me out (then chew me out anyway). Yes, this goal was incredible, it came at a perfect time, and it lifted a nation out of a horrible mindset. Nonetheless, it was an exhibition game.

The Summit Series winner was not given anything but the satisfaction of beating another country. Nothing else. It does not take away from the accomplishment of winning the series. It was still amazing.

3. “The New York Rangers are the Stanley Cup Champions, and this one will last a lifetime!” Sam Rosen, 1994 Stanley Cup Final

The curse is over. Well, it was. Now they have another curse. It’s called Glen Sather.

4. “The Soviets are leaving! They’re going home!” 1976 Flyers-Red Army game

Bob Cole calls the Soviet Red Army team skating off the ice after a nasty hit on Valeri Kharlamov of the Soviet team. What did the Flyers fans do? The same thing they always do. Taunt. Anger. Show the passion they have for their team.

5. “Matteau! Matteau! Matteau! The Rangers are headed to the finals!” Howie Rose, 1994 Conference Final, Game 7, Overtime

The excitement of the Rangers getting a chance to play for the Stanley Cup is reflected in Howie Rose’s call of Matteau’s overtime game winner in the Eastern Conference Final.

6. “Ladies and gentlemen, the Flyers are going to win the Stanley Cup! The Flyers win the Stanley Cup! The Flyers win the Stanley Cup! The Flyers have won the Stanley Cup!” Gene Hart, 1974 Stanley Cup Final

As a Flyers fan, I’ve seen and heard this hundreds of times. And it never gets old. The Flyers even have a ringtone for your phone with this call. Don’t worry, I’m not that much of a freak.

7. “Bobby Orr, behind the net to Sanderson to Orr! Bobby Orr! Scores! And the Boston Bruins have won the Stanley Cup!” Game 4, May 10, 1970, Bruins vs. Blues

The goal. One of the most important and famous in NHL history.

8a. “The Colorado Avalanche have won the Stanley Cup! Raymond Bourque! A dream has come true!” Gary Thorne, 2001 Stanley Cup Final, Game 7

8b. “Joe Sakic will come out to receive it as captain, the Stanley Cup-winning Colorado Avalanche, and after 22 years…RAYMOND BOURQUE!” Gary Thorne, 2001 Stanley Cup Final, Game 7.

The 2000-01 Colorado Avalanche helped make Bourque’s wish come true, as did captain and future Hall-of Famer Joe Sakic when he handed the Cup straight to Bourque after receiving it from Commissioner Bettman.

9. “Rolston ahead, shoves it on, bearing back in is Zajac…backhander, he scooooores! …no!” Doc Emrick, calling a Phantom goal on Mar. 23, 2009 (Flyers vs. Devils)

If I may say, this is one of the funniest moments in recent memory. As everyone knows, Doc Emrick gets a bit crazy when a goal is scored. So what happens when he thinks a goal is scored, but it isn’t? Well, check out the clip that keeps my friends and I laughing on a regular basis.

10. “The drop comes to Kunitz moving in, to Crosby, ohhhhh! What a save! My goodness what a save by Varlamov! The save of the playoffs!” Doc Emrick, May 2, 2009, Penguins vs. Capitals

Play-by-play man Doc Emrick went crazy (as he always does), yelling at the top of his lungs. The simple excitement of the game, the call, and the play itself, all combined, just barely puts it on this list.

Honorable Mentions

“He scores! He scores! Jeremy Roenick! Sends the Flyers to the Eastern Conference Finals! Sudden death magic for JR and the Flyers move on!” Jim Jackson, 2004 Semifinals, Game 6, Overtime.

Jeremy Roenick scores in Game Six of the 2004 Semifinals in the Air Canada Centre to send the Flyers to Tampa Bay for the third round. Unbelievable moment, one of the most memorable. Watch the clip and you’ll understand why it’s so incredible. Simply chaos.

But let’s let Flyers’ play-by-play man Jim Jackson explain why it’s one of his favorite calls.

“That call when JR scored in Toronto jumps out to me because I was out of voice. Basically what happened was play had gone back and forth for quite a long time and Kapanen got hit and I’m describing that and Toronto had a ton of chances, Robert Esche made some great saves and I know that in overtime, I was just about out of gas. And then here they come, two-on-one, I was out of breath, I was pretty much by the time he scores, sucking for air...that call certainly stands out, because I was lucky I made it through it, to be honest (laughs).”

“Here’s May going in on goal, he shoots, he scores! May Day! May Day! May Day!” Apr. 24, 1993, Buffalo vs. Boston.

Extreme underdogs, the Sabres went out and dominated the B’s, culminating in Brad May’s game four overtime series clincher, leading to long-time Sabres broadcast Rick Jeanneret’s famous proclamation.

Jeremiah Masoli: Heisman Dark Horse Pick from a College Football Nobody

Alan Bass — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:36:10 -0400

Before I start, let me explain myself. I am not a college football buff. I am an NHL writer who loves to watch college football. I do not know many specifics about players and their skills. I simply love to watch football, specifically when it is young kids playing for the love of the game.

So please be kind when you rip me for being wrong.

Through the games I saw last season, there was one player who was not noticed much nationally, but who clearly has the talent and the potential to be great.

Quarterback Jeremiah Masoli of the Oregon Ducks began his college football career last season as a sophomore, playing behind then-senior Justin Roper.

After playing in a backup role, he put up fairly good numbers: a 56.9 completion percentage, 1,744 yards, 7.3 yards per down, 13 touchdowns, and an incredible 131.96 rating.

He also threw just five interceptions in 11 games played.

He lead the Ducks to eight wins en route to a 9-3 record, a 10th place AP ranking, and a 19th place BCS ranking.

In the Pacific Life Holiday Bowl, Masoli passed for 258 yards and rushed for 106 yards and three touchdowns en route to Oregon’s 42-31 victory.

Now with new head coach Chip Kelly coming in and the starting job almost guaranteed, Masoli has a chance to play a full season in 2009.

In his last year at junior college, Masoli put up over 3,000 passing yards, including 26 touchdowns, 383 rushing yards, and 10 touchdowns. After running a 4.6 forty, the 6'0", 205-pound quarterback was offered scholarships by Oregon, Arkansas, Auburn, and Arizona—ultimately committing to Oregon on May 1, 2008.

With a dominant Southern California team in the way of a Pac-10 championship, the Ducks have the best opportunity to dethrone the defending conference champs. The Ducks could go 10-2 and even 11-1 if they can upset USC on Oct. 31, when the Trojans come to Oregon.

“He’s certainly on the right track,” said former Oregon quarterback and Hall of Famer Dan Fouts. “If he can build on his last two games, which were outstanding—great leadership in both of them—if he can play at the level, then you may be talking about a trophy.”

Masoli is indeed a possibility to be a Heisman finalist, but he will have a tough time dethroning Sam Bradford and beating out Tim Tebow. Colt McCoy is also a possible finalist who could edge out Masoli.

However, Masoli could very well be sitting in the front row when the Heisman Trophy is present at the end of the 2009 season. After being put on the Davey O’Brien Award watch list recently, he is finally starting to get the national recognition that he deserves.

He also set Oregon’s standard for quarterbacks with a 475-pound squat and a 330-pound bench.

In the final four games of 2008, Masoli had a 170.75 quarterback rating, totaling 14 touchdowns and one interception.

He was recently named to the preseason All-Pac-10 first team.

Sporting News recently claimed that when he graduates, Masoli will be the best quarterback in Oregon history.

The biggest competitions for that honor are Joey Harrington, the school’s only Heisman finalist, and Bill Musgrave, who is one of six Pac-10 quarterbacks to throw for 8,000 yards and 60 touchdowns.

Often called the West Coast’s Tim Tebow, Masoli “opened eyes nationally with a huge Holiday Bowl performance. His bruising running style and strong, accurate arm will cause problems for Pac-10 defenses.”

He could even end up with a Rose Bowl Championship and a Heisman in his cabinet before he graduates to the NFL.

Remember to follow my new blog: GM-Bass.blogspot.com!

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers section, and a writer for TheHockeyNews.com, Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com, and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL: Best Calls in History No. 1-6

Alan Bass — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:07:59 -0400

1. “Do you believe in miracles? Yes!” Al Michaels, 1980 Olympics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGACsSW4Iqw

This call is the top call on the list of NHL play-by-play calls for many reasons.

For one, it almost guaranteed a gold medal was coming to the United States.

The USA is not a big market for hockey, contrary to Mr. Bettman’s beliefs. But this game, this goal, this call, brought America out of the dumps of the Cold War, out of a horrible economy, and out of a possible world conflict with the Soviet Union.

It was a lot more than hockey game.

It was a sort of political statement (unfortunately) that showed the world of the USA’s power and ability to answer to adversity. And these young college kids did just that.

2. “Heeeeeenderson, has scored for Canada!” Foster Hewitt, 1972 Summit Series

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWwN9kHnsKI&feature=related

No goal in hockey history changed Canada like Paul Henderson’s goal to defeat the Soviet Union in the 1972 Summit Series.

Many have argued he should be in the Hall of Fame for this, though the election committee (and myself) do not agree.

For those of you that argue it should be No. 1, hear me out before you chew me out (then chew me out anyway).

Yes, this goal was incredible—it came at a perfect time and it lifted a nation out of a horrible mindset.

Nonetheless, it was an exhibition game.

The Summit Series winner was not given anything but the satisfaction of beating another country.

Nothing else.

Still, winning the series was amazing.

3. “The New York Rangers are the Stanley Cup Champions, and this one will last a lifetime!” Sam Rosen, 1994 Stanley Cup Final

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzq2AhbXSeY

The curse is over!

Well, it was.

Now they have another curse.

It’s called Glen Sather.

4. “The Soviets are leaving! They’re going home!” 1976 Flyers-Red Army game

http://flyers.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=451292&navid=DL|PHI|home

Bob Cole calls the Soviet Red Army team skating off the ice after a nasty hit on Valeri Kharlamov of the Soviet team.

What did the Flyers fans do?

The same thing they always do. Taunt. Anger. Show the passion they have for their team.

5. “Matteau! Matteau! Matteau! The Rangers are headed to the finals!” Howie Rose, 1994 Conference Final, Game 7, Overtime

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZDsIaTmO_k

The excitement of the Rangers getting a chance to play for the Stanley Cup is reflected in Howie Rose’s call of Matteau’s overtime game winner in the Eastern Conference Final.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-feMY5gi1M&feature=fvw

As a Flyers fan, I’ve seen and heard this hundreds of times.

And it never gets old.

The Flyers even have a ringtone for your phone with this call.

Don’t worry, I’m not that much of a freak.

Which ones are your favorites?

Remember to follow my new blog: GM-Bass.blogspot.com!

NHL Trivia: Final Results

Alan Bass — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:38:05 -0400

Congratulations to everyone who participated in NHL Trivia this summer! Here are the answers to the final section:

1. (4 points) J Ross Robertson- Intermediate champion of the OHA until 1991

2. (4 points) J Ross Robertson- Senior champion of the OHA

3. (4 points) Turner Memorial Cup- IHL Champion

4. (3 points) Avco Cup- WHA Champion

5. (3 points) O’Brien Cup- NHA Champion

6. (3 points) NHL Challenge Cup- Soviet vs. NHL All Stars

7. (2 points) Canada Cup- Winner of the Canada Cup

8. (3 points) Memorial Cup- CHL Champion

9. (2 points) Calder Cup- AHL Champion

10. (4 points) Athol Murray Trophy- WHL Champion

Bonus: Order of Canada

Final Standings:

1. Bryan Thiel- 156

2. Chris Hoeler- 144

3. Patrick Quarry- 108

Congratulations to Bryan Thiel for winning NHL Trivia!

NHL: Best Calls in History No. 7-10

Alan Bass — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:32:42 -0400

7. “Bobby Orr, behind the net to Sanderson to Orr! Bobby Orr! Scores! And the Boston Bruins have won the Stanley Cup!” Game 4, May 10, 1970, Bruins vs. Blues

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4yZZLXLmJk&feature=related

The goal. One of the most important and famous in NHL history. 'Nuff said.

8a. “The Colorado Avalanche have won the Stanley Cup! Raymond Bourque! A dream has come true!” Gary Thorne, 2001 Stanley Cup Final, Game 7

8b. “Joe Sakic will come out to receive it as captain, the Stanley Cup-winning Colorado Avalanche, and after 22 years…RAYMOND BOURQUE!” Gary Thorne, 2001 Stanley Cup Final, Game 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGovDkf6JHs&feature=related

Ray Bourque was moved to Colorado in hopes that he would be able to both bring them and himself a championship, something he hadn’t done in his long NHL career. It took 22 years, but Bourque finally found himself on the winning side of an NHL season. The 2000-01 Colorado Avalanche helped make Bourque’s wish come true, as did captain and future Hall-of Famer Joe Sakic when he handed the Cup straight to Bourque after receiving it from Commissioner Bettman.

9. “Rolston ahead, shoves it on, bearing back in is Zajac…backhander, he scooooores! …no!” Doc Emrick, calling a Phantom goal on March 23, 2009, Flyers vs. Devils

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwoZSqsA-rQ

10. “The drop comes to Kunitz moving in, to Crosby, ohhhhh! What a save! My goodness what a save by Varlamov! The save of the playoffs!” Doc Emrick, May 2, 2009, Penguins vs. Capitals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwtNoIIWCLk&feature=fvw

In the semifinals, Penguins vs. Capitals, a two-on-one with Kunitz and Crosby occurs. Crosby has a wide open net and just barely tips it towards the goal. He puts his arms in the air to celebrate, only to see rookie nobody Simeon Varlamov reach back with his stick and just barely tip the puck away, in one of the most incredible saves of the 2008-09 season. Play-by-play man Doc Emrick went crazy (as he always does), yelling at the top of his lungs. The simple excitement of the game, the call, and the play itself, all combined, just barely puts it on this list.

Honorable Mentions

“He scores! He scores! Jeremy Roenick! Sends the Flyers to the Eastern Conference Finals! Sudden death magic for JR and the Flyers move on!” Jim Jackson, 2004 Semifinals, Game 6, Overtime.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4GWnqUeZVQ

Jeremy Roenick scores in Game 6 of the 2004 Semifinals in the Air Canada Centre to send the Flyers to Tampa Bay for the third round. Unbelievable moment, one of the most memorable. Watch the clip and you’ll understand why it’s so incredible. Simply chaos. But let’s let Flyers’ play-by-play man Jim Jackson explain why it’s one of his favorite calls.

“Here’s May going in on goal, he shoots, he scores! May Day! May Day! May Day!” April 24, 1993, Buffalo vs. Boston.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0xxSsEqjIk

Bray May is mainly known for his grit and physical play. However, one of the greatest moments in his NHL career came while on the Buffalo Sabres. In the 1992-93 season, the Sabres had finished fourth in their division and were set to face the first place Boston Bruins in the first round of the playoffs. Extreme underdogs, the Sabres went out and dominated the B’s, culminating in Brad May’s game four overtime series clincher, leading to long-time Sabres broadcast Rick Jeanneret’s famous proclamation.

NHL Trivia Part Six: Name That Trophy

Alan Bass — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:50:41 -0400

Welcome to the final part of trivia! Here are the answers from last time: 1. (4 points) Whose Hall of Fame induction speech was this quote from: “Nobody will become a champion without effort”? Patrick Roy 2. (3 points) Who was the first west coast team to win the Stanley Cup? Seattle Metropolitans 3. (4 points) How many times has a Montreal-based team won the Stanley Cup? 51 times 4. (4 points) Who was the first captain to lead the Winnipeg Victorias to the Stanley Cup? Dan Bain 5. (6 points) Who holds the record with most career goals per game average in the playoffs (hint: it’s not who you think it is)? Frank McGee- 63 goals in 22 games. 6. (2 points) Spell the team that Sergei Fedorov signed with (don’t look it up, it’s more fun this way…) Metallurg Magnitogorsk 7. (3 points) Where is the only ice rink in Central America (outside of Mexico) located? Costa Rica 8. (3 points) Which locker room is this quote in: “To whom much is given, much is expected”? Detroit 9. (3 points) Who said this quote: “When you are the Canadiens, you can’t make excuses”? Henri Richard 10. (4 points) What was the inscription written in Patrick Roy’s blocker in Colorado? “Be a warrior.” Bonus: (5 points) How many times has the name “Montreal Canadiens” appeared on the Stanley Cup? Once (1993). The rest of the time it appeared as “Club de Hockey Canadien.” Standings: Bryan Thiel133 Chris Hoeler 129 Patrick Quarry 94

Begin Slideshow

NHL Trivia Pt. Five: Stanley Cup and More

Alan Bass — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:29:12 -0400

Here are the answers for part four! Part five is the second-to-last part of trivia, so make it count!

1. Billy Smith

2. Darren Pang

3. Gilles Gratton

4. Gordie Howe

5. Jacques Plante

6. Jim Craig

7. Ken Dryden

8. Ken Dryden Pads

9. Laval Voisins

10. Maurice Richard Puck

11. Patrick Roy

12. Pelle Lindbergh

Here are the leaders after three rounds of trivia!

Chris Hoeler: 116

BT: 105

Patrick Quarry: 85

Props to Greg Caggiano, who had the best score on part four, yet still is not in the top three.

1. (4 points) Whose Hall of Fame induction speech was this quote from: “Nobody will become a champion without effort?”

2. (3 points) Who was the first west coast team to win the Stanley Cup?

3. (4 points) How many times has a Montreal-based team won the Stanley Cup?

4. (4 points) Who was the first captain to lead the Winnipeg Victorias to the Stanley Cup?

5. (6 points) Who holds the record with most career goals per game average in the playoffs (hint: it’s not who you think it is)?

6. (2 points) Spell the team that Sergei Fedorov signed with (don’t look it up, it’s more fun this way…)

7. (3 points) Where is the only ice rink in Central America (outside of Mexico) located?

8. (3 points) Which locker room is this quote in: “To whom much is given, much is expected?”

9. (3 points) Who said this quote: “When you are the Canadiens, you can’t make excuses?”

10. (4 points) What was the inscription written in Patrick Roy’s blocker in Colorado?

Bonus: (5 points) How many times has the name “Montreal Canadiens” appeared on the Stanley Cup?

Email the answers to BergHockey24@gmail.com or send them to my BR/Facebook inbox. Thanks!

NHL Southeast Division: Offseason Grades

Alan Bass — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:18:16 -0400

Washington Capitals

Departures: Brent Johnson, G; Donald Brashear, RW; Sergei Fedorov, C;

Acquisitions: Mike Knuble, RW; Brendan Morrison, C; Boyd Gordon, RW;

Upcoming draftees: Karl Alzner, D; John Carlson, D; Simeon Varlamov, G;

The good, the bad, and the ugly

Good: The team is basically the same coming into this season. Plus, they have Simeon Varlamov, who is looking to pull a Ken Dryden (kind of) as far as having his first success in the playoffs, then having a good rookie season.

Bad: Losing Sergei Fedorov is a big blow to the leadership aspect of the organization, especially since he was a good mentor for the various Russians on the Caps’ roster. He didn’t contribute as much as he used to offensively, and Ovechkin surely no longer needs a mentor, but he was a good veteran presence in the locker room.

Ugly: The team has not upgraded its defense at all. They signed no defenders to fill out the back end. Karl Alzner and John Carlson are both ready for an NHL call-up—Alzner is already a sophomore—but neither will be able to contribute on a nightly basis on the level the Capitals need.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer

Karl Alzner started the 2008-09 season with Hershey, but after putting up 20 points in 48 games on the future Calder Cup champs, he was called up to the big league.

He played all right—like a rookie defenseman does. He has a lot to learn, but he will eventually be a big-time NHL defenseman.

He said what?

"[The Capitals] are a legitimate contender. Playing in the Southeast Division has always been seen as the lower-type teams, and I don't think that's the case now."—Mike Knuble, on the Capitals’ chances.

Grade: B-

I like the signing of Mike Knuble, as the grit and physical aspect of the game is what the Capitals are missing. However, other than bringing him in, the Capitals made very few moves to improve their team.

With other rising contenders in the Eastern Conference, do not expect the Capitals to jump any higher on the charts.

Carolina Hurricanes

Departures: Frantisek Kaberle, D;

Acquisitions: Tom Kostopolous, RW; Aaron Ward, D; Brett Carson, D; Bryan Rodney, D; Mike Angelidis, C; Zack Fitzgerald, D; Andrew Alberts, D; Jay Harrison, D; Steven Goertzen, RW; Casey Borer, D; Justin Peters, G; Patrick Dwyer, RW; Michael Ryan, D;

Upcoming draftees: Zach Boychuk, C; Drayson Bowman, LW; Brandon Sutter, C;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: The good of the offseason is the fact that the Hurricanes did not lose anyone other than Frantisek Kaberle, who was recently bought out by the franchise. By not losing anyone, you almost guarantee that your team will not be worse than last season.

Bad: The only upgrade made to the team’s defense was Andrew Alberts, who is the equivalent of a garden gnome—to coin a popular phrase used by THN Senior Editor Brian Costello. Carolina has some talented players in Joni Pitkanen, Tim Gleason, Anton Babchuk, Niclas Wallin and more, but the team cannot expect those four players, among others, to lead this club back to the Eastern Conference final.

Ugly: Captain Rod Brind’Amour is getting up there in years, while others on the roster aren’t getting any younger, either (Scott Walker, Matt Cullen, etc). The team is slowly losing depth on offense, and it needs to make some upgrades or bring in more prospects to be able to replace the veterans.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer

Drayson Bowman is one of the top prospects not talked about in the NHL.

On a weak-ish Western League team, the Spokane Chiefs, Bowman put up 80-plus points in just over 60 games two consecutive seasons.

He is expected to make the team out of training camp, and he will be a big part of the 2009-10 squad.

He said what?

"This move is part of our effort to restructure the Hurricanes' defense to become bigger and more physical.”—Carolina GM Jim Rutherford on buying out Frank Kaberle.

Grade: B-

Most people will tell you that the Canes are not as good as their 2009 third-round berth indicates.

Others will disagree.

Nonetheless, there is a discrepancy among fans about what the fate of the Carolina Hurricanes will be. They have the talent available—after all, it’s a very similar team that won the Cup in 2006—but can they compete with the best of the East?

Tampa Bay Lightning

Departures: David Koci, LW; Vinny Prospal, C;

Acquisitions: Kurtis Foster, D; Stephane Veilleux, LW; Victor Hedman, D; Antero Niittymaki, G; Blair Jones, C; Lauri Tukonen, RW; Matt Smaby, D; Matthias Ohlund, D; Matt Walker, D; Lukas Krajicek, D;

Upcoming draftees: Victor Hedman, D; Matt Lashoff, D; Dana Tyrell, C;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: The defense of the Tampa Bay Lightning is much better than anyone would have expected at the end of last season. With Mattias Ohlund, Victor Hedman, Andrej Meszaros, Paul Ranger, and more, the Lightning have a fairly solid back end.

Bad: The rest of the team. On offense, Tampa Bay still has its top guys in Martin St-Louis and Vinny Lecavalier, yet the Lightning have serious problems with depth. Steven Stamkos, Evgeny Artyukhin, and others give Tampa Bay the potential for success, but many doubt that it will arrive.

Ugly: Mike Smith is not a starting NHL goaltender—the way he plays simply shows that he does not have the talent to compete. Although he has shown flashes of brilliance, he is nowhere near consistent enough to win games for his team. Antero Niittymaki won’t be that great of a backup either, especially for a weak team.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer

Victor Hedman was voted the most NHL-ready player of anyone in the 2009 NHL Entry Draft—yes, that includes John Tavares—by NHL scouts and GMs. He will step in immediately in a top-four role and be mentored by Mattias Ohlund.

You can bet Hedman will ultimately be a No. 1 defenseman on this team in a few years.

He said what?

“We had a really short list. There really wasn’t [a need for more signings]. The No. 1 need we had was to shore up our blueline.”—Lightning GM Brian Lawton on free agency needs.

Grade: B

The Lightning made some minor moves, but they seriously improved their team.

Although they are still weak on their third and fourth lines, and although there is still a big question mark in goal, their solid defensive core will propel them a few spots up in the standings this coming season.

Expect them to be better than people expected, but still miss the playoffs.

Florida Panthers

Departures: Jay Bouwmeester, D; Nick Boynton, D; Karlis Skrastins, D; Craig Anderson, G;

Acquisitions: David Booth, LW; Radek Dvorak, RW; Scott Clemmensen, G; Ville Koistinen, D; Jordan Leopold, D; Clay Wilson, D;

Upcoming draftees: Jacob Markstrom, G; Shawn Matthias, C; Keaton Ellerby, D;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: The team’s defense is much better than people think, even without Jay Bouwmeester. The team may have lost three defenders, two of which are top-four guys, but they also signed three fairly good defenders to replace them: Leopold, Koistinen and Wilson. Now no lies, Wilson won’t be playing much, but Leopold and Koistinen are both top-six defensemen and will contribute a fair amount offensively.

Bad: The “trade” of Craig Anderson for Scott Clemmensen is not a good one. Although Clemmensen did very well in New Jersey filling in for an injured Marty Brodeur, he is a result of a great defensive Devils squad. Florida is not as good defensively, and Clemmensen will not have as much success in the Sunshine State in the games he plays.

Ugly: How can this team still not have a GM (technically)? Randy Sexton is filling in, but they have not yet officially named a new heir to the throne. Going into training camp without someone leading the team from up top is not a smart idea. It’s a recipe for uneasiness in the locker room.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer

Keaton Ellerby had a good year in his first pro season, putting up 23 points in 75 games with the Rochester Americans.

Ellerby should find himself fighting for a final roster spot out of training camp. The 10th overall pick of the 2007 NHL Entry Draft, he has the potential to be a career top-three defender.

He said what?

“We will count on contributions from some of our young prospects such as Keaton Ellerby, Jason Garrison and Dmitry Kulikov. Our defense ranked second in the NHL scoring 49 goals last season and we expect a similar output from our blue line next season.”—Peter Deboer, on replacing Jay Bouwmeester.

Grade: C+

Although they shored up their defense a bit, their offense is still among the weakest in the league.

They have a couple good players who can put up points, but altogether, this Florida team is once again going to be finishing in the bottom part of the Eastern Conference and the league.

Atlanta Thrashers

Departures: Garnet Exelby, D; Colin Stuart, C;

Acquisitions: Evander Kane, C; Scott Lehman, D; Grant Lewis, D; Tim Stapleton, C; Colby Armstrong, RW; Kari Lehtonen, G; Anthony Stewart, RW; Noah Welch, D; Jim Slater, F; Joey Crabb, RW; Nathan Oystrick, D; Joel Kwiatkowski, D; Jason Krog, C; Drew MacIntyre, G; Peter Mannino, G; Pavel Kubina, D; Chris Thorburn, C; Nik Antropov, RW;

Upcoming draftees: Evander Kane, C; Riley Holzapfel, C; Angelo Esposito, C;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: The Thrashers desperately needed to stock up on prospects and their farm system, and they did. They signed tons of minor leaguers this summer in hopes that perhaps a few of them might turn into bona fide NHLers. Everyone knows the Thrashers aren’t going to win right now, but by buffing up their American League team, they have almost guaranteed a brighter future for themselves.

Bad: It can’t get much worse for an Atlanta team that wound up with the fourth pick in the draft. There wasn’t too much Don Waddell could do this summer. Nonetheless, losing Exelby for Kubina was a bad trade in my opinion. Although both are iffy players, Kubina is surely winding down faster than Exelby is.

Ugly: Many media members were criticizing Waddell for thinking about making signings solely to keep Kovalchuk in town. However, he did not do that, so now I will criticize him. He needs to make some moves this season to lure Kovalchuk back to Atlanta. If he can’t do this, his superstar and his job may very well be gone.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer

Evander Kane is the next Jarome Iginla of the league. He compares himself to the Calgary captain, and his game is very similar.

He can score, he can hit, he can lead, and he can win. The Thrashers fans will absolutely adore this guy.

He said what?

“That's the my mindset going in—to make the team. From what I'm being told, I'm going to get an opportunity to do that."—Evander Kane on the Atlanta Thrashers.

Grade: B-

The Thrashers couldn’t do much more this offseason without looking like the New York Rangers—who are buying a team—but they certainly did what they could to make the future a little bit brighter for their fans.

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers’ section, and a writer for The Hockey News, Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL Trivia Pt. 4: Name That Equipment

Alan Bass — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:16:28 -0400

Great job to everyone thus far in NHL trivia! Here are the answers and results for last week. I apologize in advance for number eight, but there was a mistake I made in it, so it does not count. My bad! 1. (3 points) Why did Maurice Richard wear number nine? His child weighed nine pounds at birth. 2. (6 points) Who is the only goaltender in NHL history to win six Stanley Cups and not be in the Hockey Hall of Fame? Charlie Hodge 3. (5 points) Why did Elmer Lach originally sign with the Montreal Canadiens instead of the New York Rangers (answer that is remotely close will count as correct)? He was told the Rangers were cheap and when in his Rangers’ training camp invitation it said, “Please sharpen your own skates,” he decided to go to Montreal. 4. (2 each) Of the “dynasties” that won at least four Stanley Cups, which teams had a different coach in that fourth season (name the old and new coach as well), (there are four, partial credit will be given)? Ottawa Senators 1920-1923, 1927 (Pete Green→Dave Gill) Toronto Maple Leafs 1947-1951 (Hap Day→Joe Primeau) Montreal Canadiens 1950, 1952, 1954, 1955 (Tommy Ivan→Jimmy Skinner) Montreal Canadiens 1965-1966, 1968-1969 (Toe Blake→Claude Ruel) 5. (2 points) Who is the only coach to win five straight Stanley Cups? Toe Blake 6. (2 points) Who scored the fastest hat trick in NHL history and in how long? Bill Mosienko, 21 seconds. 7. (3 points, 3 points bonus) Who ended the longest overtime game in NHL history (Bonus: how long did it last; must get original answer as well for bonus points)? Modere “Mud” Bruneteau, six overtimes, 116 minutes, 30 seconds? 9. (2 points) True or false: All of these defensemen played 15 or more seasons. (True) Bob Baun Brad Park Guy Lapointe David Shaw Rick Green 10. (2 points) Who is the only player whose name begins with a “Q” to be inducted into the Hall of Fame? Bill Quackenbush 11. (5 points) Why was Christopher Higgins named the way he was? So his initials spell "CH," for Canadiens/Habs Bonus: (10 points) What is the first trophy that Wayne Gretzky ever won? Wally Bauer Trophy as most improved player in Brantford Minor Hockey Association. Picture: (7 points) What is wrong with this picture? It is Lester Patrick’s headshot pasted over a picture of Lorne Chabot Here are the leaders: Chris Hoeler: 98 Patrick Quarry: 85 BT: 84

Begin Slideshow

NHL Northwest Division: Offseason Grades

Alan Bass — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:20:27 -0400

Vancouver Canucks
Departures: Mattias Ohlund, D; Jason LaBarbera, G; Curtis Sanford, G;

Signings/Trades: Henrik Sedin, LW; Daniel Sedin, C; Nolan Baumgartner, D; Mikael Samuelsson, RW; Lawrence Nycholat, D; Matt Pope, RW; Shane O’Brien, D; Andrew Raycroft, G; Tanner Glass, LW; Guillame Desbiens, RW; Matt Funk, D; Aaron Rome,D

Upcoming draftees: Cody Hodgson, C; Cory Schneider, G;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: Finally signing the Sedin twins at the last second was a life-saver for Mike Gillis, whose job was said to be at stake. By keeping the Swedish twins (calling them that is very disturbing), he prevented the Canucks from losing 164 points of offense, which would not have been replaced by anyone on the roster.

Bad: Letting Mattias Ohlund go was not ideal, however it seemed he was ready to move on. The money being thrown at him by Tampa Bay, plus the opportunity to mentor Victor Hedman is one that few would pass up.

But without finding a replacement for their top D-man, Vancouver has all but assured that most of their games will end with at least ten goals scored. Against them.

Ugly: Other than signing the Sedins, Gillis did very little to improve the team. The Canucks didn’t make it past the second round for the eighth time in their last eight playoff appearances. With an All-Star goalie in net and two of the best players in the league on offense, that is inexcusable.

Normally, I would mention that the Canucks have to advance past the second round or they’re management is in trouble, but we all know that’s not going to happen. And for all you nay-sayers, I give you three pieces of evidence: Detroit Red Wings, Chicago Blackhawks, and Vancouver’s defense.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer: Cody Hodgson is ready to make the jump. Being assigned to the American League for the playoffs at the end of last season, the Canucks’ management liked what they saw and are ready to test him in big boy training camp. Expect him to challenge for the Calder Trophy this season.

He said what? “It was pretty tough, I don’t think I’ve ever sweat so much in my life.” Evan Oberg on Canucks’ prospect camp.

Grade: B-

I would’ve given the Canucks a “C,” but they did bring in many young players that could take the reigns in a few years. Plus, keeping the Sedin twins is like signing two high-end free agents. Nonetheless, they are still horribly weak on defense.

Calgary Flames

Departures: Adrian Aucoin, D; Mike Cammalleri, LW; Jim Vandermeer, D;

Signings/Trades: Jay Bouwmeester, D; Brandon Prust, C; Garth Murray, C; Riley Armstrong, RW; Brian McGrattan, RW; Carsen Germyn, RW; Ryley Grantham, LW; Staffan Kronwall, D; Nigel Dawes, LW; Keith Seabrook, D; TJ Brodie, D; Adam Pardy, D; Fredrik Sjostrom, RW;

Upcoming draftees: Mikael Backlund, C; Greg Nemisz, RW;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: I’ll be one of the first to say (along with the THN guys) that Jay Bouwmeester is one of the most overrated players in the NHL. However, there is no doubting the fact that he has talent. I wouldn’t have rushed after him the way 90 percent of teams did, but I would be happy to have him on my roster.

What Bouwmeester brings is quiet leadership, much like Nicklas Lidstrom (I’m comparing their leadership, not their skill, critics), speed and the talent to make some great offensive plays. Picking up Nigel Dawes and Fredrik Sjostrom is a good move in an attempt to give two young players a second change to prove what they can do.

Bad: Mike Cammalleri is such a classy guy and the Flames were foolish to let him get away without getting anything in return. Of course, I (nor anybody) knows what the Flames did to keep him or if Cammalleri had decided well before free agency that he was going to test the market.

But if the Flames knew that he was leaving, they could have gotten at least a mid-round draft pick or minor leaguer in return for his rights. But instead, the Canadiens got a free (sort of) pickup in the talented scorer.

Ugly: As much as we know that Kiprusoff can play 70 games in a season, he needs to be given a break. He has perpetually slow starts to the season, plus he is burned out by the playffs, as is evident by his play in them.

Flames fans claim that the organization has confidence in Curtis McElhinney, but I wouldn’t be comfortable putting my confidence in a man who had a 1-6 record along with an .889 save percentage in 2008-09.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer: Mikael Backlund, a first round pick in the 2007 draft and has shown flashes of brilliance, specifically with the Kelowna Rockets of the WHL. Averaging more than a point per game, Backlund has shown that he is NHL ready.

He said what? "I'm familiar with some of the players and believe we have a strong club that is poised to make the next step in becoming a championship club." Jay Bouwmeester.

Grade: B+

Although the Flames failed to acquire a forward to replace Cammalleri and a reliable backup goaltender, they still have many pieces in place to be successful. They have many teams to get past in the Western Conference and I, like many others, have my doubts about what they can do in the playoffs, they still will remain a contender for the Northwest Division crown.

Minnesota Wild

Departures: Krys Kolanos, C; Kurtis Foster, D; Stephane Veilleux, LW; Marian Gaborik, RW;

Signings/Trades: Kyle Brodziak, C; Greg Zanon, D; Martin Havlat, RW; Shane Hnidy, D; Jamie Fraser, D; Jaime Sifers, D; Tyler Cuma, D; Duncan Milroy, RW; Jon DiSalvatore, RW; Wade Dubeilewicz, G; Nathan Smith, C; Ryan Lannon, D;

Upcoming draftees: Benoit Pouliot, LW; Tyler Cuma, D;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: Contrary to others’ opinions, the Martin Havlat signing was a great one. Fans complain about Havlat’s proneness to injury, yet I seldom heard them complaining about Marian Gaborik, who was injured far more often. Havlat brings leadership, grit, talent and the will to win to the Wild. Plus, he’s just 28 years old.

Bad: The Wild’s inability to sign an impact defenseman when numerous were available in the free agent market is inexcusable. Drafting Nick Leddy was a start, but he won’t be in his prime for another six or seven years.

Brent Burns can handle the role of a top defenseman, but he plays more like a top-three D-man. If the Wild want success and a return to the playoffs, they need to be sure that they buff up on defense to help Niklas Backstrom out.

Ugly: There is a lack of prospect depth in the Minnesota farm system. Benoit Pouliot is looking more and more like a bust every year, while Tyler Cuma is still an unknown.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer: Tyler Cuma is the best prospect the Wild have, specifically on defense. Most likely a top-four D-man for his career, Cuma has much to improve on if he wants to become a full-time NHLer this season.

He said what? "Excited to be in Minny where I was welcomed and appreciated by management. The real story about what happened in Chicago to come out." Martin Havlat.

Grade: B-

Although Havlat boosts this grade a lot, the inability to pump up their defense lowers this a fair amount. Plus, many of their draft picks this year were questionable at best.

Edmonton Oilers

Departures: Ales Kotalik, LW; Dwayne Roloson, G; Tim Sestito, D;

Arrivals: Alex Plante, D; Johan Motin, D; Nikolai Khabibulin, G; Jason Strudwick, D; Chris Minard, C; Matt Nickerson, D; Devan Dubnyk, G; Dean Arsene, D; Toni Rajala, RW; Denis Grebeshkov, D;

Upcoming draftees: Toni Rajala, RW; Jordan Eberle, RW; Rob Schremp, LW; Riley Nash, C;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: Nikolai Khabibulin is a great goaltender and should be able to backstop Edmonton to one of the final playoff spots in a competitive Western Conference. Along with the young talent coming out, the Oilers are almost set for the next few years. Much more development is needed, though.

Bad: Losing Ales Kotalik is a fairly big hit on offense, but Jordan Eberle and Rob Schremp, two rookies coming up, should be able to take the role of talented wingers.

Ugly: Is Khabibulin over the hill (man, I hate that term)? Many say yes, others say no. He has a lot to prove as a 36-year-old goaltender who signed for tons of money. If he cannot play his best game in Edmonton, the Oilers’ season will go down the tube as if someone just flipped a switch.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer: Jordan Eberle is the best prospect the Oilers have and he could very well be a second line winger for his career. It may take him a bit to get used to the NHL game, but he has the talent to succeed in the big league.

He said what? "Sometimes you wonder if you have what it takes. I felt like that was a big confidence booster for me that I can play at that level and I can play with those guys and I can produce.” Rob Schremp on a brief hot streak he had last season.

Grade: B+

There isn’t much more the Oilers can do other than wait for their prospects to develop. It’s better to have a few bad years and have home-grown talent on the roster as opposed to signing big name free agents who wind up hurting the team. The Oil will be fine in another year or two.

Colorado Avalanche

Departures: Andrew Raycroft, G; Ian Laperriere, C; Joe Sakic, C; Nigel Williams, D; Ryan Smyth, RW;

Arrivals: Cameron Gaunce, D; Trevor Cann, G; Cody McLeod, F; Craig Anderson, G; David Koci, LW; David Jones, RW; Brian Willsie, RW; Darren Haydar, RW; Chris Durno, LW; Matt Hendricks, C; Tyler Weiman, G; Philippe Dupuis, F; Brett Skinner, D; Kyle Cumiskey, D; Matt Duchene, C; Brian Fahey, D; Kyle Quincey, D; Tom Preissing, D;

Upcoming draftees: Matt Duchene, C; Kevin Shattenkirk, D; Colby Cohen, D; Chris Stewart, RW;

The good, the bad and the ugly

Good: Trading away Ryan Smyth for Kyle Quincey and Tom Preissing (and a draft pick) was a great move by the Avs management. Two young, capable defenders to boost the team was a perfect step to take in rebuilding this horribly disheveled team.

Bad: Sakic’s retirement leaves a huge hole in the team, both talent-wise and leadership-wise. People point to Paul Stastny to replace Sakic, but Stastny will never be as good as Sakic was. Not to say he can’t produce, but Sakic is a one-of-a-kind player whose absence will leave a sour taste in the team’s collective mouth.

Ugly: The team is so screwed this season. Get your popcorn, kiddies.

You’re way too young to be an NHLer: Matt Duchene, the third overall pick in this year’s draft, is ready for the NHL. He has a free year to develop on a team that is poised to be in the running for the Taylor Hall sweepstakes, without fear of making a mistake that ruins the season.

It’s the best thing a young player can do. Have the confidence to develop his skills without fears of getting berated by the management.

He said what? “To be part of an NHL organization is something you always strive for as a kid. This is the first step, but I know I have a lot of work to do to reach my goal of playing in the NHL.” Matt Duchene upon signing his entry-level deal.

Grade: A-

Shocking, I know. But like the Oilers, Colorado can do nothing but draft well and replenish their farm system, which they already have begun to do.

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers’ section, and a writer for Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

NHL: Some of the Funniest Moments

Alan Bass — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:28:54 -0400

We all love funny moments.

But what about us hockey fans, who thirst for blood every time we go to the rink? There's nothing funny about hockey. This game is serious.

Okay, well, a lot of the game is pretty funny. Here are a list of some of the funniest moments in recent hockey history.

Post your own favorite funny moments!

The funniest goalie moments in the history of the NHL…or at least the modern NHL…until the lockout. Nonetheless, this is one of the funniest top ten Sportscenter lists I have ever seen.

The Ron Hextall beating of Chris Chelios makes me proud as a Flyers’ fan, while the No. 1 funniest moment makes me love life.

This clip is probably the funniest clip I’ve ever seen in hockey. They should absolutely remove this rule from the rulebook. There isn’t one hockey fan who wouldn’t stand up and applaud if Roy’s antics led to an Avalanche goal.

This is absolutely me in about 10-15 years. This commercial is brilliant.

I must admit, this is something that has ever happened to me. And if it did happen to me, I wouldn’t be alive to tell the story. But I wouldn’t bet against this happening at least once somewhere in the corporate world.

Michel Therrien is angry at his team. Because they played horribly. Well, I think the team figured out why. Just ask Stanley Cup-winning coach Dan Bylsma. Oh yeah. I said it.

Hitch was never at a loss for words. Talking about Niittymaki giving up a goal from center ice. Didn’t look like Niitty was ready, did it?

“No s**t,” he says.

You won’t like Hitch when he’s angry. Seriously, this guy probably turns into the Incredible Hulk. I wouldn’t doubt it.

Not so much funny, but basically what every coach in the NHL thinks of Alexander the Great.

What hockey fan doesn’t want to see the top ten Sean Avery moments? I know I do!

The classic.

Sloppy seconds. Funniest thing ever. By the way, don’t you wish he was punk’d more often by the NHL?

Bettman: “Sean, we’re gonna give you $20 million to be our spokesperson”

Avery: “Really???”

Bettman: “Pssh, no! Are you high?”

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers’ section, and a writer for Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at BergHockey24@gmail.com.

Eklund: Silencing The Beast

Alan Bass — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:54:02 -0400

Everyone has heard of Eklund, right?

Unfortunately, that answer is yes.

Whether your opinion of him is positive or negative, one thing remains: he has no idea what he is talking about.

The only time any of his “rumors” are correct is when TSN, Sportsnet or another source has already reported it. Anytime Eklund reports a rumor on his own from his “sources,” 99 percent of the time it is incorrect.

-Eklund’s biggest source is his dog (BS3).

Does everyone know how his letters and numbers system works? With E1 through E5? A.K.A. E1 is a “kind of a sorta” source, while E5 is a “done deal we know for sure this crap’s going down.”

On June 30, during the Heatley ordeal, everyone was nervously awaiting his decision on whether or not to waive his no-trade clause.

Eklund had the report at about 10:00 PM EST that Heatley was “waiving his no-trade clause (E5).” Guess what happened two hours later? He didn’t waive it. Shocker.

On July 17, Eklund reported that, “From all I can tell Tanguay will be a Panther officially at some point today. Three teams who were in this are now telling me that they heard they are out of it and that Florida is the team.” It was an “E5.”

-Eklund’s sources system is useless.

Stop the presses! Eklund “knows” that Tanguay is a done deal!

In fact, while in The Hockey News office that day, I happened to see “Breaking News” on the main page of the site. A member of the office saw it on my computer screen and ran across the office, saying, “What breaking news?”

“It’s Hockeybuzz,” I said.

“Oh, screw that.”

Screw that, indeed.

-Eklund is right 0.001 percent of the time (BS2)

The next day (July 18), Eklund issued an apology to the hockey world, which you can see here.

“Eklund should win a Pulitzer for that article,” said Chris Difrancesco.

“As a general rule, I don't have answers as to why a deal doesn't get done,” Eklund said.

-As a general rule, Eklund doesn’t have the answers to anything (BS3)

Now, I realize that this is the internet and people have the right to post whatever they’d like (hence the reason this article is being posted). I also understand that I do not have the answers to any rumors, either. I do not know what is going to happen, nor does anybody else.

The only people that know for a fact what rumors are true or not are the people involved in the trade or signing. Even Joe Schmo, who works in the communications department of the organization, doesn’t know what’s going on.

So how does Eklund?

He doesn’t.

“If a source tells me a deal is done and that source has always been 100 percent truthful, I tell you something like Alex Tanguay to Florida," Eklund said.

-Eklund’s brain does not count as a legitimate source (BS5)

While on the phone with a colleague planning an upcoming article we’re working on together, we were discussing the fact that we expected Randy Jones to be traded from the Flyers this summer.

“Well,” he said, “Eklund hasn’t reported that rumor, so it must be true.”

Touché.

In conclusion, I’d like to restate the fact that people need to stop using Eklund as a source, because he is seldom correct. People often write articles quoting Eklund and it angers me that these people consider themselves writers.

I do not consider myself a journalist by any means. However, I do know that not using Eklund as a source for anything puts me just a little higher on the ladder. I’m now somewhere above three-year-old drawings and just below monkey journalists.

So hockey fans, don’t use Eklund as a source. I could just as well pull a rumor out of my butt.

-Zach Parise is being traded to the Los Angeles Kings for Jack Johnson, Oscar Moller and a first round draft pick in 2010

See?

Stop trusting this fool, because he is no more than we are; bloggers who love the game.

Continue writing, by all means, Eklund, and I mean that sincerely. It’s writing about the game that keeps the passion going. That’s why over 3,400 NHL writers exist on Bleacher Report. We love the game.

But don’t try to convince people you know what you’re talking about, because you simply don’t.

NHL Trivia Pt. Three: NHL History

Alan Bass — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:07:49 -0400

Thanks to everyone who continues to participate in the trivia tournament!

Here are the answers from last week.

1. (Two points) Alexander Ovechkin left the gold medal WJC game in 2005...why?

Shoulder injury.

2. (Five points) What country was the 2005 WJC gold medal game referee from (game was Russia vs. Canada)?

USA

3. (Three points) Who holds the record for most career World Junior Championship goals (with Team Canada) and with how many?

Jeff Carter, Lindros, Tavares, 12.

4. (Three points) What number did Sidney Crosby wear in the 2005 World Junior Championships?

5. (Two points) Which CHL defenseman broke records while on the London Knights in 2004-05?

Danny Syvret

6. (Three points) Who lead the 1995 Memorial Cup tournament in points and with how many?

Shane Doan, nine points.

7. (One point) How many points did Eric Lindros have in the 1989-90 NAHL season before being promoted to the Oshawa Generals?

52 points in 14 games

8. (Two points) Who led the WCJHL in scoring in the 1968-69 season and what team did he play for?

Bobby Clarke (137), Flin Flon Bombers

9. (Nine points each) Who were the only two players in NHL history that refused to don their draft team’s jersey as the No. 1 overall pick?

Eric Lindros and Mario Lemieux

10. (Four points) Who was the only draft pick in NHL history to have the pick cancelled because of ineligibility?

Robin Kovar, Edmonton Oilers, fourth round 2002.

(That Japanese guy wasn't a suspended pick, it was just invalid).

Bonus: (Six points) Name four tests prospects must go through at the Scouting Combine (at least one must be a cardio test).

Everyone who answered this got it right.

Bonus II (Five points): On the screen, a man appears holding a ball and the player must push the right button to show what hand the ball is in. The man appears in different directions, upside down, backwards, etc.

Picture: (Five points) VO2 Max- fatigue recovery

If anyone has any questions, feel free to let me know!

Here are the trivia leaders after two weeks:

Patrick Quarry: 57

Chris Hoeler: 54

BT: 43

Here are the next questions!

1. (Three points) Why did Maurice Richard wear No. 9?

2. (Six points) Who is the only goaltender in NHL history to win six Stanley Cups and not be in the Hockey Hall of Fame?

3. (Five points) Why did Elmer Lach originally sign with the Montreal Canadiens instead of the New York Rangers (answer that is close will count as correct)?

4. (Two each) Of the “dynasties” that won at least four Stanley Cups, which teams had a different coach in that fourth season (name the old and new coach as well), (there are four, partial credit will be given)?

5. (Two points) Who is the only coach to win five straight Stanley Cups?

6. (Two points) Who scored the fastest hat trick in NHL history and in how long?

7. (Three points, three points bonus) Who ended the longest overtime game in NHL history (Bonus: how long did it last; must get original answer as well for bonus points)?

8. QUESTION CANCELLED DUE TO MISTAKE

9. (Two points) True or false: All of these defensemen played 15 or more seasons.

Bob Baun

Brad Park

Guy Lapointe

David Shaw

Rick Green

10. (Two points) Who is the only player whose name begins with a “Q” to be inducted into the Hall of Fame?

11. (Five points) Why was Christopher Higgins named the way he was?

Bonus: (Ten points) What is the first trophy that Wayne Gretzky ever won (and what is it for)?

Picture: (Seven points) What is wrong with this picture?

Sports Movies: The Most Inspirational Speeches

Alan Bass — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:28:01 -0400

Movies are amazing.

They manage to take our minds and warp them to another world for the couple hours we sit in that theater or in front of our DVD players or computers.

Here are some of the most inspirational speeches from sports movies:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-MbgIgPQcY

This is a great promo, showing another one of those inspirational speeches that gets everyone prepared for the big game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M76lMUEX0fo&feature=related

Friday Night Lights is one of the greatest sports movies I have ever seen, in my opinion, other than Slap Shot and Miracle (biased, being a hockey fan). Based on a true story from Odessa, Texas, Coach Gaines helped inspire his team to a berth in the State Championship. I won’t tell you how it ends, so just go watch it. Trust me, it is worth it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwpTj_Z9v-c&feature=related

Almost word for word what Herb Brooks actually said that night in 1980, this is, in my opinion, the most inspirational and best sports speech ever written. The speech led, of course, to that huge win over the famed Soviet Union, and ultimately the 1980 Gold Medal. Herb Brooks, my hero, is the greatest coach never to win a Stanley Cup.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5QXV-W5_g&feature=related

Every sports fan remembers the night they played the Titans. And by that, I mean that everyone has seen this speech in the movie. Motivational, charismatic coaching (acting) makes this movie what it is. Many life lessons learned, but it is an unbelievable and classic movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_HFCYz4x6o&feature=related

This is the speech at Gettysburg, when the coach explains to the Titans about the Battle of Gettysburg, and how they need to come together to be a team. It was an unbelievable and moving speech that truly sums up the Civil Right’s movement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w8BfH1Q_zM&feature=related

Rudy! Rudy! This is the trademark speech for any high school or college team, explaining to the seniors it is the last time they will be playing this game. It was basically the speech my coach gave in our championship game.

NHL Trivia Part 2: Junior Hockey and the NHL Draft

Alan Bass — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:23:55 -0400

Hello to all! Thanks for everyone who took part in part one of trivia! For those keeping track, here are the answers to the questions, along with explanations to the tricky ones!

1. (1 point) Which country has won the most Olympic gold medals (men) and how many (must get both correct for credit)?

Soviet Union/Russia/Unified team (they're all the same country, for the most part), 8.

2. (1 point) Which country has won the most Olympic medals (men) and how many?

Canada, 13

3. (2 points) In the famed Soviet-Flyers game in 1976 when the Soviets left the ice, what made them return to the playing surface?

Clarence Campbell threatened not to pay them for the trip to the NHL (I counted anything close to this, even if you said a name other than Campbell).

4. (2 points) Who was the starting goaltender for the Swedish women’s Olympic team in 2006, a goaltender who ultimately led her team to a silver medal?

Kim Martin

5. (2 points) Who led all women in points at the 2006 Olympics?

Hayley Wickenheiser

6. (3 points) Who had 13 points in the 2003 World Under-18 Championship for Team Russia?

Alex Ovechkin

7. (4 points, 2 bonus points) Put these teams in order based on IIHF men rankings. (Bonus: Include their actual ranking).

16. Austria

23. Lithuania

33. Belgium

36. Israel

42. Ireland

45. Mongolia

8. (2 points) Who scored two goals for the USA against the Soviets in the famed 1980 Olympic game?

Mark Johnson

9. (5 points) Who was the youngest player in Sweden history to play for the World Junior team?

Magnus Paajarvi-Svensson

Picture: (5 points) Who is the man on the right of the picture (the one not in uniform)?

Viktor Tikhonov

Here are the top few trivia-getters after part one:

1. Brandon Ferraro- 25

1. Chris Hoeler- 25

3. Patrick Quarry- 23

The lowest score was 10, and the highest score was 25. The average score was just over 20.

Now for the next part! Trivia part two: Junior Hockey and the NHL Draft! These are going to get trickier!

1. (2 points) Alexander Ovechkin left the gold medal WJC game in 2005…why?

2. (5 points) What country was the 2005 WJC gold medal game referee from (game was Russia vs. Canada)?

3. (3 points) Who holds the record for most career World Junior Championship goals (with Team Canada) and with how many?

4. (3 points) What number did Sidney Crosby wear in the 2005 World Junior Championships?

5. (2 points) Which CHL defenseman broke records while on the London Knights in 2004-05?

6. (3 points) Who led the 1995 Memorial Cup tournament in points and with how many?

7. (1 point) How many points did Eric Lindros have in the 1989-90 NAHL season before being promoted to the Oshawa Generals?

8. (2 points) Who led the WCJHL in scoring in the 1968-69 season and what team did he play for?

9. (2 points each) Who were the only two players in NHL history that refused to don their draft team’s jersey at the draft as the number one overall pick?

10. (4 points) Who was the only draft pick in NHL history to have the pick cancelled because of ineligibility?

Bonus: (6 points) Name four tests prospects must go through at the Scouting Combine (at least one must be a cardio test).

Bonus II: (5 points) What does the aptitude test at the Scouting Combine consist of (be very specific)?

Picture: (5 points) What is the test in the picture called, and what does it measure?

Once again, post a comment to let me know where you're putting your answers! Good luck!

Alan Bass is a Senior Writer for Bleacher Report, the Community Leader for the NHL and Philadelphia Flyers’ section, and a writer for Prohockeynews.com, Insidehockey.com, and Hockey54.com. You can contact him at ALN424@aol.com.

NHL Entry Draft: Revealing The Top-Drafted Goaltenders

Alan Bass — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:52:06 -0400

The most important position on an NHL team is the goaltender. A goaltender can make a mediocre team into the 2005-06 Edmonton Oilers and can turn a great team into the 1989-90 Quebec Nordiques.

One of the toughest jobs for an NHL scouting department is to get a good read on a young goaltender.

Some goalies have had incredible junior careers (see Dan Blackburn), while others have been drafted later and went on to have solid NHL careers (see Patrick Roy).

In the 2009 NHL Entry Draft, there were a surprisingly large number of European goalies taken before the first North American ‘tender was drafted by the Minnesota Wild, despite many rankings having players like Olivier Roy and Edward Pasquale ranked higher.

In some cases, scouts didn't like the physical shape some of the players were in, while in other cases teams did not want to waste a draft pick on a goalie they haven’t seen very much of.

Here are the top five goalies taken in the 2009 NHL Entry Draft.

Mikko Koskinen (SM-liiga, Finland)—2nd round (31st overall), New York Islanders

After being passed over in the 2008 NHL Draft, Koskinen’s future didn't look too bright, despite being ranked second among International goaltenders. His stats were unbelievable, with a .907 save percentage and 2.30 GAA in 2007-08 with the Jr. Blues in Finland and a .931 save percentage and 1.91 GAA in the highest Finnish league in 2008-09, yet scouts couldn’t seem to get a good read on him.

Koskinen’s greatest attribute is his size; at 6'5", he covers the net wonderfully and takes up tons of space while in the butterfly. He hasn't played as many games as scouts would have liked (33 in ’08-09), yet he consistently excels in the games he does play.

His only downside is his quickness and agility. He has great positioning and great hockey sense; two attributes that should help make him a successful NHL goaltender.

Robin Lehner (Frolunda, Sweden)—2nd round (46th overall), Ottawa Senators

The top-ranked European goalie by NHL Central Scouting, Lehner is a big goaltender, measuring in at 6'4" and weighing a whopping 220 pounds. In the ’07-08 season, Lehner posted a .941 save percentage on Frolunda’s U-18 team. This year, however, he posted a mediocre 3.05 GAA and .903 save percentage on Frolunda Jr.; hardly numbers worth being ranked at the top of his class.

Lehner has great overall skills, and uses his size to his advantage. He challenges shooters occasionally, but not consistently. He must improve his rebound control, yet he has great speed and mobility for a goaltender of his size. He is expected to return to Sweden for one more year, but hasn't completely ruled out a year in the CHL.

Anders Nilsson (Lulea HF, Sweden)—3rd round (62nd overall), New York Islanders

Nilsson, another big goalie at 6'5" and 220 pounds, has had tremendous success on Lulea’s junior team, posting a .927 career save percentage and a 2.06 career GAA in 53 games—totals that include six shutouts.

Ranked as the fifth-best European goalie in the draft, Nilsson was picked much earlier than expected. Nonetheless, he has good skills, great athleticism, challenges shooters consistently, and has good mental focus. He also plays the game with incredible calmness, making every save seem easy.

Igor Bobkov (Metallurg Magnitogorsk, Russia)—3rd round (76th overall), Anaheim Ducks

Going well off the board (yes, even for the third round), Anaheim decided to take the 10th-ranked European goalie by Central Scouting. Bobkov played for Metallurg Magnitogorsk 2 in Russia’s third league this year.

Although his stats are not available, he is a big goaltender (6'4", 192 pounds) who can move extremely well. He was named the top goaltender of the 2009 U-18 World Championships after posting a 5-2 record with a .927 save percentage.

A goalie who plays the now-rare standup style, he covers a large part of the net and has extremely quick legs that can stretch out to make the save. He must work on his technicality and ability to challenge shooters, but Bobkov could surprise a lot of people.

Matthew Hackett (Plymouth Whalers, OHL)—3rd round (77th overall), Minnesota Wild

Hackett, the top ranked North American goaltender, helped lead Plymouth to an OHL playoff berth after posting a .913 save percentage in his third major junior season. His 3.04 goals against average was more a testament to a weak Plymouth defense rather than Hackett’s goaltending abilities. In 11 playoff games, Hackett was able to put up a .930 save percentage before losing to the eventual Memorial Cup champion Windsor Spitfires.

Hackett, with his 6'2" frame and solid positioning, led the Whalers to a 24-15-3 record this season. He has much to improve on, but his mental attitude is extraordinary and will help him get better over the next few years.