Bleacher Report - Articles by Taylor Rummel

Any Michigan State Spartans Epic Begins with Key Non-Conference Battles

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:51:49 -0400

The adage “practice makes perfect” has been echoed by mentors for generations.

Michigan State Head Coach Tom Izzo is no exception.

"As we do each year, we've put together an exciting non-conference schedule, featuring some great teams and dangerous squads, said Izzo. "There is no doubt our non-conference schedule will have us well-tested for the start of league play.”

Certainly the words “great” and “dangerous” are mere adjectives used by Izzo to describe the tenacious teams he’ll have to square off again.

To truly fit the bill, those words would have to be upped to potent, and super-athletic, since those “describing words” truly capture the essence of talent he’ll see on the opposing side in these high-flying games.

Beginning the series of collegiate-battles is a bout against perennial power Gonzaga on Nov. 17; just the second game into the regular season.

The next match has the Spartans going up against a tough Florida team in the Legends Classic Tournament; which will modernize a rematch of the 2000 NCAA title game. In December, State travels to both Texas and North Carolina; both likely top five teams.

Here’s the breakdown of each game:

Gonzaga @ Michigan State; Nov. 17

Prior meeting:

The last time these two teams met was at the Maui Invitational in 2005. The Zips ended up winning a thriller in triple-overtime, but at that time, super-stud Adam Morrison was around to head the charge. No longer is that the case.

Gonzaga now:

Although the “Zags” lost four of their top five scorers from last season—including stars Austin Daye and Jeremy Pargo to the NBA—they return second leading scorer Matt Bouldin, who averaged nearly 14 PPG and as well bring in a serviceable recruiting class including two top-25 positional players.

What to look for in the game:

The obvious mismatch on paper is within the guard position. Spartan point-man Kalin Lucas should have no trouble running the show against a lesser defender, and Gonzaga’s lack of stardom will be exploited by the acrobatic play of Durrell Summers and Raymar Morgan. As long as the Spartans capitalize on easy plays, then they should have no trouble attaining the W.

Outcome:

Michigan State 83, Gonzaga 75

Florida @ Michigan State; Nov. 27

Prior meeting:

Michigan State last squared off against Florida in a second-round match-up in the 2003 NCAA Tournament. The Spartans knocked out Florida under the guidance of sensational guards Alan Anderson and Chris Hill.

Florida now:

Billy Donovan’s squad has been a bit weaker the last few years—in comparison to his championship team in 2007.

However, the team possesses a play-making point guard in Nick Calathes, the team’s returning leading-scorer. In fact, the only notable loss the Gators suffered this past season was losing fifth leading scorer Walter Hodge.

Along with a mostly familiar starting five, the team from Gainesville netted one super-recruit: Nationwide number three shooting guard and Mcdonald’s All-American Kenny Boynton Jr.

What to look for in the game:

Kalin Lucas will have his defensive-hands full with powerful point guard Nick Calathes reeking havoc with his impressive skill-set. Boyton Jr. will as well give fits to whoever State has matched up against him.

On the front-lines is where State has the advantage, boasting more than a couple capable big-men. If MSU can generate a staying post-presence, then look for them to come out victorious.

Outcome:

Michigan State 75, Florida 72

Michigan State @ Texas; Dec. 22

Prior meeting:

In what is becoming an annual showdown, these two teams met pre-conference last year. In the game, Michigan State overcame an A.J. Abrams led offense to the tune of a 67-63 victory.

Texas now:

Gone is star point guard Abrams. Returning are defensive-specialists Damion James and Justin Mason, each whom averaged over a steal a game last season, demonstrating their relentless efforts going after the ball.

The recruits Rick Barnes’ team brought in include number five power forward Tristan Thompson and number 15 shooting guard Daniel Bejarano.

What to look for in the game:

Michigan State has the backcourt advantage by a mile, but the mid-game, (3 and 4 spots) will be a hotly contested battle. The offensive prowess from Raymar Morgan and Durrell Summers will be met with the hostile-defense put forth by both James and Mason.

If State has any hope of winning, then their guards will have to show up big time.

Outcome:

Michigan State 66, Texas 63

Michigan State @ North Carolina; Dec. 1

Prior meeting:

You don’t even have to know these two teams in order to answer this question. Virtually everybody remembers watching these clubs go at it for “net-duties” last March.

UNC came out on top—twice that season—but they lost a plethora of that championship team over the summer.

North Carolina now:

Merely one season removed from their title-year, and UNC looks like a completely different team.

Evaporated with their claim as No. 1 is collegiate-legend Tyler Hansbrough, super speedy game-manager Ty Lawson, do-everything guard Wayne Ellington, and athletic big Danny Green. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that all those names fell prey to the draft.

However, one would be foolish to think that North Carolina is out of contention for a repeat. As they are every-year, the team is chock-full of talent, blossoming from all positions and all levels of experience.

Deon Thompson, Ed Davis, and Tyler Zeller all return from a season ago, and UNC brings in a top recruiting-crop that includes four McDonald’s High School All-Americans.

What to look for in the game:

As they did last year, State will have its hands full with perhaps the most-talented team in the country. There really is no weakness on that team, and their talented players will be hard to slow down.

What State will have to do is try to manage the game at their own pace, and not commit costly turnovers—a plague that met the Spartans often last season. Fail to accomplish those goals, and you can kiss any chance at winning goodbye.

Outcome:

North Carolina 80, Michigan State 71

While these four games won’t make or break the entire Spartans season, they will undoubtedly play a big factor in determining what seed the team will have come dance-time, and who doesn’t want cupcake-matchups awaiting them in the Tournament?

That’s why practicing with the best early on will keep the Spartans in perfect-shape for another deep-run into March.

*Quotes obtained from msuspartans.com

Taylor Rummel is a writer for Bleacher Report

Michigan State's Kalin Lucas Readies National Runner-Up for Next March Marathon

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:27:11 -0400

It is widely assumed among the masses that past occurrences are a good predictor for future successes. Of course, that notion has to be taken with a grain of salt.

But the general rationale remains. Set the bar high, attain it and raise it.

For Kalin Lucas, that “bar” constituted the runner-up finish in last year’s NCAA Tournament.

So if the above sentiment is any indication of how the reigning Big Ten Player of the Year is set to perform next season, one would be wise to take a gander—and pay heed—to the words NFL Star Terrell Owens made famous:

“Get your popcorn ready, because it’s going to be a show.”

Last season, Lucas led the Spartans to their eleventh Big Ten Title, while also guiding them to a school-record 8-1 mark in conference play. In addition to showing superb leadership, Kalin also demonstrated his ability to fill up the stat sheet by leading the team in scoring (14.7 ppg), field goals made (173) and attempted (438), free throws made (172) and attempted (213), assists (4.6 ppg) and minutes (31.9 mpg).

The season-long success helped steer MSU to a No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament, where they proceeded to craft some cinderlla-esque magic and make a deep run into March.

They cruised by first-round opposition Rob Morris and survived a meek scare from the team in Southern California before meeting their first tough test: Kansas.

In that game, Lucas provided the Spartans with a veteran performance, netting 18 points, seven assists and four steals with just two turnovers. That last stat is by far the most impressive of the bunch, as it illustrated his ability to keep cool and manage a game effectively under intense pressure against a very tough opponent.

But in perhaps his most notable play of the entire tournament, Lucas drove the lane with 47 seconds left in the game—knotted at 60 apiece—and proceeded to make a tough running jumper, all while being fouled. The play resulted in an “And-1” and as well the winning basket. ESPN Senior College Basketball Writer Andy Katz rewarded Lucas with the coveted National Player of the Week Honors.

In their next matchup against a very tough Lousiville team, Lucas chipped in admirably with ten points and five assists. His efforts enabled the Spartans to reach the National Semifinal against a phenomenal Connecticut team.

As coaches will tell you, stars show up in big games, and certainly Kalin Lucas did just that. Up against the likes of defensive-goliath Hasheem Thabeet and company, Lucas put up a gallant 21 points and five assists, shooting 47 percent from the field and 50 percent from beyond the arc. There’s no doubt that his speed, leadership and perseverance helped put the Spartans over the edge and into the title game.

A familiar foe was in store for Michigan State in the National Championship: the team from Chapel Hill who had dethroned them four months earlier. Although the final score was closer than their first meeting, the outcome remained the same - a Michigan State loss. However, Lucas did everything in his power to give State a fighting chance in the game, managing 14 points and seven assists.

Certainly the season was not a disappointment for the men decked in green and white; merely a heartbreaking loss for a team who had defeated all odds over the course of the tournament.

There is no doubt that the team's long voyage was a great learning tool in shaping Lucas' young career into the mold of an evolving superstar.

At the end of it all, Lucas brought home a barrage of hardware to commemorate his fantastic play over the course of the season. He won Big Ten Player of the Year honors, First-Team All-Big Ten honors, MSU MVP, Midwest Regional All-Tournament Team honors, and Final Four All-Tournament Team honors. He also was nominated as a finalist for the John R. Wooden award, handed out to the top collegiate athlete of the year in the sport.

But as any player would tell you, personal glory is nothing in comparison to team success. And the epitome of team success comes by way of cutting down the nets in March, something State came gravely close to accomplishing earlier this year, and a goal they are hopeful for in the season ahead.

With Lucas at the helm—one year older and wiser—their chances are looking as bright as the spotlight he’s grown accustomed to.

Get your popcorn ready.

Taylor Rummel is a writer for Bleacher Report

Michigan State's Secret Weapon: The Depth Chart

Taylor Rummel — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:55:34 -0400

In the NBA, pivotal bench-players are referred to by the phrase, “Sixth-Man” of their respective team, exemplifying their integral part of the offense that just narrowly misses out on granting them a starter’s (top five) spot. In the collegiate ranks, the name “Super-Sub” captures the commendable efforts put forth by a non-starter.

But for the Michigan State men’s basketball team, a whole new phrase is required.

Alas, I’m no dubber of nicknames (and won’t become one in the duration of writing this article). So instead of making myself out as a fool to the masses, I’ll gladly let another conceive a witty-term to summarize the team’s strength. After all, the lot of role-playing Spartans pretty much speaks for itself.

Durrell Summers, Junior Guard, 6 foot 4 inches, 195 lbs.

Summers was perhaps the most exciting player on the entire Spartan roster last season, dazzling his viewers with an array of spectacular plays, including one dunk in which he posterized UConn Huskie Stanley Robinson in a NCAA Tournament National Semifinal game.

Adding a bang to his flash was his ability to score consistently, (8.6 points per game, fourth-best on the team), and his solid shooting percentages; (.434 FG% and .385 3P%). He also shot a respectable .721 percentage from the free throw stripe.

Summers well never be confused for a lights-out shooter; his role is clearly defined as a high-energy thrasher who can on occasion hit the open-look with some sort of consistency.

But Summers’ calling card is his ability to wow crowds with his gifted athleticism and superb play-making ability.

Opposing defenders beware.

Chris Allen, Junior Guard, 6 foot 3 inches, 205 lbs.

“Sniping” shooting guard Chris Allen was a central part of the Spartans offense last season. As hinted by the nickname, he was the conventional three-point threat on the ball club.

In 38 games, Allen attempted 167 three-pointers, easily leading the team in that category. Of those heaves, he connected on 52 of them, which equated to a .311 three-point percentage. That number doesn’t sound pretty, but consider that he was an underclassman still trying to define his role on the team.

Look for Coach Tom Izzo to demand improvement in that regard this season.

In addition to the treys, Allen cemented himself as a capable scorer, tallying 8.4 PPG, good enough for fifth-best on the team. And like Summers, Allen demonstrated a reliable stroke at the line, connecting on a commendable .787 percent of the freebies.

Expect the three-point shooting barrage to continue next season, but for a far better percentage to follow.

Draymond Green, Sophomore Forward, 6 foot 6 inches, 235 lbs.

“Big Baby” Draymond Green was a fantastic sub for the Men in Green last season. In addition to providing Raymar Morgan and Delvon Roe with a breather, Green made his presence on the floor felt with a plethora of personal fouls, illustrating his willingness to bang down low with opposing bigs.

As well as being involved defensively, Green also contributed admirably on the offensive side of the ball.

In just over 11 minutes of playing time per game last year, Green averaged over three points and three rebounds per night. However, his most impressive stat by far was his monstrous field goal percentage (.556; second best on team). Granted, most of those shots were from within five feet of the basket, but you can’t fault the big man for having an unfailing touch down low.

From the line, Green converted on a respectable .615 percent of his shots, further displaying his soft-touch.

While this super-sub won’t always overpower the opposition with muscle, his versatility is sure to leave them worn-out and frustrated.

Korie Lucious, Sophomore Guard, 5 feet 11 inches, 170 lbs.

Sophomore Korie Lucious was a sensational player for the Spartans last season, exhilarating fans and frustrating opponents with his blazing speed and soft, silky shot.

His PPG totals were hardly impressive, (just over three per contest) but you have to be mindful of the fact that he only played five-to-ten minutes per game.

And if you look at the glass as half “full”, you will notice a developing floor general capable of making the three-point shot, (.354 percent on 82 attempts). Additionally, in three games against number one overall seeds in the NCAA Tournament, he netted 20 points in the 28 minutes that he played in.

That equates to nearly 29 points per 40 minutes.

Such stats show that Lucious is truly capable of accomplishing on the college level.

Lucious may be the most raw on this list in terms of actual development, but there is no doubt that his skills and overall understanding of the game will improve under the tutelage of star-guard Kalin Lucas.

Wrapping it up

On a team possessing an already phenomenal starting-lineup, you would think that the subs would be an inconsequential piece of their team. But when those starters sit down to take a rest, it’s reassuring to know that the production won’t suffer one bit.

Stats obtained from espn.com, msuspartans.com, and the onlycolors.com

Michigan State Recruits Attempt to Fill Vacated Center Spot Left by Suton

Taylor Rummel — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:22:37 -0400

As the proverbial saying goes; “All good things must come to an end.”

And for the Michigan State Men’s Basketball Team, those words echo all too clearly.

One year removed from an improbable title-run, Michigan State will be without star-center and rebounding-crutch Goran Suton, (pictured) due to graduation. Evaporated with his departure are 10 PPG, 8 REB, and an ability to drain the occasional three-point shot.

But while the offensive and defensive prowess will be missed, Head Coach Tom Izzo believes that he has two able-bodied bigs ready—and hungry—to fill the void left by the veteran-center.

Derrick Nix, Center, 6’9” 285 lbs.

Nix, a big-bodied center from legendary Pershing High School in Detroit, was able to capture Mr. Basketball Honors in the state of Michigan this past year; after averaging 15 points and 15 boards a night in his final season at the school.

Due in large part to his massive-size and superior-strength, Nix caught the eyes of both Missouri and Michigan State scouts, but ultimately ended up joining the ranks of Tom Izzo and company.

What he provides to the squad offensively is an interior-presence that was lacking for the most part last season, as center Suton was more of a versatile, jump-shooting talent that was not able to post-up underneath.

With 285 lbs. of man, Nix’s sheer-size can be used to establish position under the rim, which will allow him easy buckets near the basket. Although his hops are lacking, his footwork is decent enough to evade defenders, in turn giving him additional high-percentage shots. But what is perhaps his best attribute, (as noted by Izzo, [see below]) are his soft-hands, which allow him to seize all sorts of passes thrown his way.

On defense, he has the ability to simply clog the middle, forcing offenses to kick it back out upon meeting him in the interior. His weight makes him a tough commodity for opposing bigs to back down, and players attacking the hole will have a hard time getting off a shot with his freakishly long arms.

Here’s what Tom Izzo had to say about Nix:

"Derrick Nix's greatest attributes are his toughness and great hands. He has also played for great programs at both the high school and AAU level, so we know we are getting a well coached player who is very coach-able and wants to get better. Derrick is an intriguing player in that his contributions will rely on his conditioning and his ability to get to a good playing weight. If he can make the same commitment that players like Zach Randolph and Draymond Green made, we believe he has all the skills necessary to succeed. One of the things we like best about Derrick is that he is passionate about the game and he really wants to be at Michigan State. With his knack for getting every loose ball, his great hands and very good footwork, we believe that he is a diamond in the rough."

Garrick Sherman, Center, 6’10” 220 lbs.

Sherman, a slightly taller and much lighter counterpart from his fellow teammate, is the second and final recruit that will be evaluated.

Coming from Kenton High School in Ohio, Sherman averaged 23.4 points and 3.4 blocks in his Senior Season with the Wildcats. He was recruited by the likes of Notre Dame, Purdue, Iowa, and Bowling Green in additional to his eventual suitor: Michigan State.

Offensively, Sherman has huge hands to go along with a big, wide, frame similar to that of Nix. Near the basket, Sherman contains the ability to score using a host of moves, and possesses remarkable footwork for a man of his size.

On the defensive side of the ball, he makes apparent his seemingly never-ending motor, and crashes the boards continually to collect tough rebounds. His enormous hands allow him to grip rebounds that (for most centers) would be considered out-of-reach. In one game, a scout noted the frustration elicited from Sherman’s counterpart, notably inflicted from his [Sherman] relentless pressure on the ball.

What truly makes Sherman stand out though is his ability to go to the line consistently, knocking down the majority of his shots. That can’t be said for most centers nowadays, (Shaq comes to mind).

Izzo had this to say about Sherman:

"Garrick Sherman is a very well-rounded big man, with the ability to shoot, rebound and block shots, as well as being an excellent passer. Because of where he played, he didn't get some of the early recognition that other players received, but we liked what we saw. He has great skills, very good timing, a tremendous work ethic and he is a very intelligent player that does all the little things. His potential to contribute initially will be based on his ability to adjust to the competition at the Division I and Big Ten level."

So while pivotal-center Suton will be missed dearly by the Spartans this coming winter, no worry will be had as these two young power-players are eagerly waiting—and more than ready—to fill the C position on the depth chart, and subsequent stat sheet that Suton seemed to fill up last season.

Stats obtained from ESPN

Quotes obtained from msuspartans.com

Revitalizing the Food in Ballparks

Taylor Rummel — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:34:47 -0400

How cliché is it to go to a ballpark, and spend a few precious dollars on a “dog” in order to satisfy those developing afternoon taste-buds? It’s a silly phenomenon that has captured the hearts of many Americans; and proceeded to destroy those hearts in the name of good health. You see, Americans are tired of the nonchalant menu-options that ballparks possess. We are looking for heartier, more unique options than that of a kid's menu at Applebees—or other amateur dining venue. Hell, I could look in my trash-can and find healthier options than those of an alleged "snack-bar". So for my 50th article here on Bleacher Report, I am not going to look back, (as so many have), but rather look pathetically at the failed food-choices that ballparks contain; (and what trendy, new food-items we can inject into them). And with that I say: “Let the stimulating of the saliva begin!”

Begin Slideshow

ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE AT THE FIRST BLEACHER REPORT MEETING!

Taylor Rummel — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:07:59 -0400

Note: This article is a collaboration between the amazing Taylor Rummel and the awesome Rocky Getters. It is meant for humorous purposes only.

Worried by the scores of issues haunting b/r that had led to many a nasty, ugly debates here, Zander last night called all the Bleacher Report writers for an emergency community meeting at his headquarters in San Francisco. Not everybody could come there in such a hurry, so here is a detailed "live" report of that meeting...

While everyone is getting arranged and settling in, Bleacher Report founder Zander Freund addresses the audience:

“Howdy y’all.”

A collective “Hey” is emitted from the mass, which is saturated with many Bleacher Report writers.

Zander proceeds, “Well, I’ve been sensing a lot of commotion from the public on various issues. Lets tackle all these issues one by one. So, first—who do you guys think is the best wrestler around?”

Chedda Bob is the first to respond:

“Yo, Cena is da man, son. He got mad skillz. He make all dem other wresslers luk liek washed up scum bags, ya dig?"

An infuriated Andrea Claire instantly feels the need to make her voice heard:

“Uh, excuse me! Edge was, is and always will be the best wrestler in the whole world! How dare you insult my Canadian hunka' beef?!"

Leroy Watson also takes heed with the argument, addressing Chedda:

“My man, NOTHING compares to Taker. I don't like to say this, but if you all don't agree with me, my kiddie corps and I will leave BR for good!"

Upon hearing these outlandish words, Zander pleads, “Don't let them go. Catch them!”

In the blink of an eye, Leroy jumps over the chair, rolls under the desk, swings from the ceiling fan and proceeds to land on the wooden frame near the window.

"Ha, you will never catch me! You will remember this day as the day you almost caught Capta...uh... Leroy Watson!" Saying this, he jumps off the window and opens a parachute.

“Well,” Zander starts, “That was quite a fiasco, let’s shift gears here.”

“Who do you guys think is the better NBA player, Kobe Bryant or King James?”

Youngster Graham Brunell, (while listening to Tupac Shakur on his Celtics-skinned iPod) replies, “It has to be Lebron, he's a beast.”

John Lorge counters the debate by explaining how Graham’s reply is biased, since Lebron resides in the same conference as his dear Celtics.

“It’s obviously Kobe, says John. “He is on the reigning NBA Champion team and is in possession of four NBA rings, which is four more than Lebron, and three more than your boy Kevin Garnett.”

(A hefty dosage of snickers and jeering are elicited from those around)

Graham, (not about to be verbally taken to school) becomes enraged and mutters, "Oh you little," and proceeds to reach across the table in hopes of laying hands on the evolving enemy.

However, his intentions are hampered by the combined efforts of Glenn Card and Blaine Spence, (who comes severely close to tearing a muscle in the process.)

Meanwhile, Andrea Claire, (while cycling through pictures on her camera and not paying any attention to what is going on) answers, “It's Kobe, I like him.”

John Lorge instantly goes from defensive mode to frustration, and subsequently buries his head in his hands in order to accommodate his developing headache.

Andrea notices and bellows, “C’mon John! Girls can have opinions too!”

Once again, Zander must take action in order to tame a dangerously explosive crowd. He goes on to ask, “Is soccer doomed to fail in the U.S. of A?

Mohamed El Masri quickly comments, “YOU CHEAP BASTARD! How dare you raise a question of this magnitude? You realize that my cousins live in the States?!”

“They are awesome™, I am awesome™, and the United States is awesome™!” “However, it is doomed…” He then proceeds to make hand gestures to resemble this particular smiley: :'(((((((((((((

Rocky Getters, (while wiping away a tear), provides his answer, (which also happens to be a possible solution), “There is only way to save soccer in the US:

“Cheerleaders!”

He continues…“Right, left, during half-time, before the game, after the game, blondes, brunettes, red-heads….everywhere!”

Mohamed in anger sputters, “YOU SON OF A B****! You read my mind! I love you man.”

Out from the corner, AVR chimes in, “If this was an article, I’d leave a comment like :D, but since this is an actual conversation, I’ll just nod my head.”

Zander, relieved by the apparent calming atmosphere, asks, “What impact has the steroid scandal had on baseball?”

(AVR and Mohamed instantly close their eyes, and as well plug their ears.)

Bob Warja then enters the meeting room after holding a record-long conversation with an anonymous individual regarding the Cubbies chances of making the playoffs. The phrase: “Come to think of it,” was heard an apparent 2,500 times by anonymous writer—which, come to think of it, would be another record.

“Come to think of it guys, players will never be shed in the same light as they once were; Star-players and record-breakers will be viewed as guilty until proven innocent.”

Leroy, (who is able to hear the discussion due to the fact of his parachute getting snagged on a banner sitting exactly one story under the meeting room) yells, “I AGREE MY MID-WESTERN BROTHER, IT CERTAINLY IS A HAIRY SITUATION!”

Stephen Meyer, (with his baseball expertise) begins, “Well, A-Rod tested positive for...”

(Stephen can't complete his sentence due to Daniel Abbas's butt-in)

“ENOUGH with the Yankees Stephen! I'm sick of seeing your Yankees articles dominate the front page every time you write!”

The aftermath of his outburst unleashes an abundance of agonizing faces in his direction, which in turn forces him to look down at the floor, as to avoid the repulsive faces.

Zander, realizing the once-again mounting tension and embarrassed individual, decides to bring up another subject:

“That Usain Bolt is really something isn't he? Is he the most captivating sports figure in recent memory?”

That question from Zander is met with a furious booing from the tennis section. Roger fans start a "Roger chant" while Rafa fans start a "Nadal chant". Poor Rocky is sitting in the corner of the huge room, with clinched fists and hands around his knees, (in a strikingly-similar position to the fetal one), rocking back and forth, murmuring, "Novak Djokovic, Novak Djokovic."

Just then someone from the wrestling section yells, "Orton! Randy Orton is the best and most dominating person in recent history!"

(A period of awkward silence ensues)

The connecting silence is then met with HUGE laughter! Some writer exclaims, "Yeah, right. Wrestling isn't even a real sport!"

Upon hearing the damning words, Wrestling CL Shane gets up and says, "Boys…"

As if on queue, everyone in the wrestling section gets up and takes out their Uzis and start shooting at him. The writer is history.

"Anyone else think wrestling is not a real sport?”

(Silence)

“Thought so.” “Now Zander, are we getting our place on the front page or not?" Shane says in a threatening tone.

"Of course man! Of course! Now put those guns down people!”

“Now, next question, Rocky, can you answer this? It’s about college football. What do you think we can do to improve?"

Rocky turns around, faces a wall, and says in an angry tone, "I’m not answering anything related to CF. Baby Tate never comments on my articles. I am not giving any opinions on his work either!"

(A relatively short-lived uproar follows, only halted when Baby Tate opens his mouth, [as if to speak], but then goes on to yawn—and as a result—the uproar picks back up again)

Z, (growing sick with the escalating disorder) abandons that question and proceeds to ask his next.

"We only have space for one Motorsport on BR now, due to a recession we are having to cut down and stuff.”

“So, what stays: F1 or MASCAR?"

Faster than a ferrari, Saraswathi Sirigina yells "FORMULA 1 FOREVER!"

Coincidentally, at that exact moment, Mary Jo Buchanan, (while sitting on her throne) is in the middle of bribing the waiter to put salt in her [Saraswhathi] water.

Not about to be left out of the discussion, Kelly Crandal stands up and says, "The hell with F1, Nascar is where it's at!"

Kara Martin as well pounds both fists on the table and simply exclaims, "NASCAAAAAAAAR!"

(John Lorge's head goes from up to down faster than a Stephen Strasburg heater—seemingly because of the blatant comment)

"Ahem...is any one of those two beautiful ladies single?" Rocky mutters. That question is met with angry stares from both women.

Fearing that she is outnumbered in collective agreement, Saraswathi threatens to call up Michael Schumacher and have him drive a car through the building. The news brings laughter and as a result, she storms out of the room.

Zander, while sipping on a hot cup of joe, decides that it's time to finally switch subjects entirely.

"OK guys, enough with the debates, my ears are beginning to bleed and I ran out of napkins cleaning my four aotd awards.”

(While the audience remains busy chuckling to themselves at his words, Zander asks his final question)

"So, how is BR doing guys, in need of any change?" With that, the chuckling stops, and evil, death-like glares ensue.

Suddenly there is chaos everywhere!

LJ Burgess shouts loudly, "Anarchy, anarchy!" He gets up from his seat, kicks a few chairs down and runs out of the room pulling out his hair!

There is a loud group that starts chanting, "Change the rankings, change the rankings!" Chedda Bob pulls out his uzi and destroys them all. He then says, “Da rankins are fine dawgs, don’tcha go haytin on my boy joe. You got dat son?”

Blaine cries out, “I just want people to stop calling me Uncle!”

Leroy [still hanging] yells, “Brother Blaine...I feel you, my man! But err, can you help me out here? I am JUST hanging from a rope!” However, Blaine is still fighting with the kiddie corps who are finding humor in calling him uncle.

Dorothy Willis is seen yelling out, “I knew this meeting would go nowhere. It was nice sleeping here on this table, but now I must go back to writing some MMA articles.”

(There is chaos everywhere)

People are fighting and arguing. WWE fans are duking it out with MMA fans. NASCAR faithful letting it rip with F1 fans. Cricket-backers jeering with baseball junkies. And of course, NHL fans fighting with…everyone!

Leroy once again pleads, "Brother Blaine, Rocky my man! T-Rumm—anybody!? You can take half of my AOTDs man...just get me outta here!"

Hearing that, Joe Burgett runs like hell toward Leroy.

Just then, one of Joe's friends texts him that he has won his first AOTD. Joe becomes so joyful that he falls down on the floor unconscious.

Andrea Claire yells back to Leroy, “I'll save you if you admit Edge is the best wrestler in the world!”

Leroy retorts, “Never! TAKER it is!” He decides to stay dangling there for the remainder of his life rather than accepting Edge, (and subsequently being saved). Leroy then proceeds to take out the laptop from his backpack and starts writing another article. By now it has already won another AOTD.

Shortly there after, a helicopter arrives at the window. Two hot chicks dressed in tight leather and dark sunglasses escort Zander into the helicopter.

"See ya later folks," he remarks with a sly grin. Upon saying this he too puts on his sunglasses and flies away, out of sight.

In a matter of seconds, all of the writers have been arrested but due to unstable mental condition, they have been shifted to the nearest mental health facility.

Note to the reader: We will get you the latest on their situations as soon as possible.

Disclaimer: The above article was intended for humorous purposes only. Nobody and no section, was directly or indirectly meant to be insulted or belittled. Bleacher Report is awesome™ and all the writers on it are also awesome™.

Why Professional Athletes Are Going Broke, and What We Can Do About It

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:11:10 -0400

Imagine working hard for a financially-stable living, and then seeing it all turn moot.

Having multi-year, multi-million dollar contracts transformed into mere distant, foggy memories, and holding onto cash assets that run drier than a piece of wood in the Sahara.

Such is the case for many professional athletes nowadays, whose fanatically free-spending ways seem to spiral them downwards into financial purgatory.

Money has become a tough commodity for professional athletes to maintain after their playing days, and in turn more and more players have been filing for bankruptcy.

Author Pablo S. Torre notes in his Sports Illustrated story entitled, How (and why) Athletes Go Broke, that after two years of retirement, 78% of NFL players go bankrupt.

Additionally, in the NBA, after five years of withdrawal from the league, an estimated 60% of players become broke.

Is it just me, or are those statistics eyebrow-raising?

That an individual who pockets more money in one year than an average American makes in a whole lifetime can end up in such a sorry financial state?

Agent Leigh Steinberg in the story claims that athletes make two fatal mistakes which lead them to their financial pit-fall:

“Hiring the wrong people as advisers, and trusting them far too much.”

Certainly, retired NBA player Scottie Pippen fell prey to the act, hiring the wrong financial adviser and losing $27 million in investments because of it.

But his tale is hardly the only one in which a once-glorified athlete fell from financial-grace.

Last July, infamous dog-fighting quarterback Michael Vick filed for bankruptcy because of his inability to pay off $6 million in bank loans that he put toward three different “projects.”

As a result, he’s had to put his Atlanta mansion up for sale to help cover the costs.

Last year, former NBA player Latrell Sprewell fell behind on the payments on his yacht, which ultimately had to be repossessed. His house, too, was filed in a foreclosure suit from a bank as he failed to make outstanding mortgage payments for it.

Fellow NBA player Kenny Anderson earned $60 million dollars over the course of his career, and subsequently filed for bankruptcy in 2005 as a result of poor money management.

The story may vary from player to player, but the fact remains that far too many names have been caught up in the money evaporation fiasco.

And it begs the question:

“Should professional athletes be forced to take financial investment or planning lessons?”

Now I know that they’re not kids, not school children, and most likely not willing to take advice from someone with regards to their money. But wouldn’t it be supremely beneficial to them?

No longer would they be prey to the same mistakes as an uneducated lottery-winner—which young professional athletes are likened to because of their often times free-spending, and financially uneducated ways.

They would learn the importance of saving, both to benefit themselves—and also their family and children—and as well would learn of the risk taking involved with investing money into a business, which seems to be the new fad associated with being a pro athlete.

As it is, pros are careless with their assets, reckless with their spending, and uneducated with their investments. The monumental checks and guaranteed money that they receive might as well be kissed goodbye and flushed down the toilet.

Game paychecks become “Going out money”, and new contracts equal new houses and cars—both investments that either make no money, or depreciate as time goes on (facts that athletes often times overlook or simply don't realize.)

Hardly any money ever goes into bonds, savings accounts, or stocks; all which hold the potential to appreciate in value as time goes on, and thus helping to increase and solidify their fortunes.

This is where education from a financial expert would come in.

I firmly believe that if players of all sports were forced to have clauses in their contract that called for them to have one-on-one meetings with financial advisers or investors, that they would become more knowledgeable with their financial assets, smarter with their spending, and in turn eliminate the chance of becoming “broke” when they finally do decide to hang up the jersey.

It is in this way that they can break away from the aforementioned riches-to-rags stories and instead write—and benefit from—their own riches-to-richer story.

Because what’s more depressing than seeing a life go to waste as a result of an empty wallet?

[Sports Illustrated: How (and why) Athletes Go Broke]
[Business Pundit]
[The Journal Sentinal]

"Comment Etiquette?" This Is an OUTRAGE!

Taylor Rummel — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:02:45 -0400

My recent illness has left me in an almost irate state.

I have not seen the lush light of outside for days, and as a result, my body has turned whiter than a lamb.

Additionally, the continuous confine of my sofa has left permanent red-marks on my back, which have begun to look like a bad case of sun-burn.

I have also gone through more medication and eye-drops than “Sick” Richards, whom I am sure you are all familiar with.

The point of this article is not to be funny, nor is it to contend for an Article of the Day award. Rather, it is for you all to take a shot at me.

“What? Are you crazy?” they ask.

No. Well, yes, I am going insane, but the intent of this article remains the same. (And yes, that was a magnificent rhyme by yours truly.)

You see, ever since my acquaintance with the infamous pirate, Maddox, I have found a far deeper meaning to the cherished possession we all call life.

That deep meaning is the art of insulting another (a common weapon included in many internet troll’s arsenals).

I mean, don’t get me wrong, it is horrible to belittle or write negative things about another person, especially when it stems from disagreement; but if you catch them starting the fire, then I say throw in the gas can and watch ‘er burn, baby!

Not only will you get an intense feeling of self-satisfaction and a sense of mental enlargement, but as well you will feel true. True to yourself, the person you are ripping, and the community in which the ripping is taking place.

It’s normal (and healthy) for human beings to give and receive love just as it is normal (and healthy) for them to give and receive detestation. We need both ends of the spectrum in our repertoire in order to be complete, well-rounded individuals.

However, the masses here have failed to forget that criticism is an imminent part of our society—and Bleacher Report comment threads. Remember that not everybody will think that your latest was your greatest.

Additionally, it is human nature to disagree with another, and even more so when you are dealing with the adversary (who just might be the writer right behind you in “Pick of the Day” votes).

All you can do is either be the nice guy and play diplomat, or, as you should, let your inner Jerry Springer spring out of you in the form of lingo lashing!

And so my fellow Americans:

I feel it is our patriotic duty to set forth and create this totally unnecessary atmosphere of resentment, not so much because we should, but because we can.

And with that, I say, let the ripping commence!

Taylor J. Rummel is a writer on Bleacher Report who is in no way, shape, or form associated with this article despite the ridiculous notion that he authored this piece.

Money In Sports: What's Right, What's Wrong, and Who Should Foot the Bill

Taylor Rummel — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:29:42 -0400

Often times, I find myself reminiscing about a particular Spring Break.

My family and I were in the Caribbean (as part of a cruise voyage) and had reached the third of four ports encountered during our time on the ship.

The "port" was the beautiful island of Roaton, a moderately-sized stretch of land some 30 miles due east of Honduras, which claims ownership of the land.

But as we disembarked from the ship—and allowed our enthusiastic toes to be graced with the warm and inviting sandy beaches—a chilling, yet sadly not shocking, reality set in:

The island reeked of the same third world culture that far too many lands in the Caribbean do.

To say that the island’s populates were "poverty-stricken" would be akin to saying that the current state of economy in America is "sorta bad"—it would be a magnificent and vast understatement.

However, as poor as the inhabitants were, you just never got the vibes of dismay, discouragement, or discontent from any of the population as a whole. Sure, the people didn’t have much materialistically, but what they did have was more than any product or device could offer.

They had hope, they had life, and they had each other—all things that no money in the world could buy.

In America, we are entitled to those above treasures, and many more. We are free to fill our desires under any legal means, to practice any religion if we deem it necessary, and to give voice to what we think about everyday matters. Only the unappreciative find reason to fuss about what fortune we’ve been blessed and born into.

But include me in the category of those who don't appreciate how money is distributed in our country, especially to certain people.

I’m not talking about political issues such as welfare or taxes, but rather, the ridiculous annual salary-differential between two relatively major populations in our country.

Those two populations are "average Americans" and American athletes.

To help put things into perspective for the sake of this article, the median annual salary for an average American is $44,389*. Compare that to $1,470,000** for a professional athlete in one of the four major sports associations.

So, in comparison, the average American makes three percent of what the average athlete makes.

But while there are an estimated 304 million Americans living among us, there are only 4,420 professional athletes participating in one of the four king sports. So while all of that money is "out there," it is going to an astronomically low percentage of individuals—.0001 of a percent to be exact.

That's quite a discrepancy, if you ask me.

The question is then asked: Why should a grown-up playing a child’s game be rewarded with a lot more money than a fellow human who uses a great deal more brains or brawns than them?

It doesn’t add up in the eyes of the public because those people have only experienced one side of the story—albeit the ordinary, non-athlete side.

They seemingly understand the odds of making it big-time, and yet they can’t fathom the benefits of achieving that fairy-tale lifestyle. They are brought up naturally and live normally. They make a decent salary.

Every anomaly that comes into contact with humans regarding a familiar aspect of life (say money) entails some sort of outwards feeling—usually jealously or pity for the opposite side of things.

Confused by the truth? An example has been already given in the story:

Normal Americans earn $44,389 a year. Athletes earn $1,470,000 a year. Normal Americans loathe, and are—presumably—jealous of the fact that someone can make a salary so much higher than their own, when they feel that they are working just as hard, (if not harder) at a job that they may or may not have held for any viable length of time.

But is it right for such emotions to be elicited from someone who, again, can really only tell one-half the story?

True, sports may lay claim to many cherished memories from our childhood, but that doesn’t mean that sports are merely for children.

The uppermost levels of athletics are just as much a profession as banking, teaching and nursing are. They all require extensive knowledge of their subject and superlative execution from the individual when the time and situation calls for it. Additionally, they all require a business-like mind and a drive to succeed.

Fail to possess too many of those attributes, and you’ll be seeing yourself demoted or fired faster than baseball speedster Andrew McCutchen can round second.

The truth is that pro sports are remarkably similar to other professions on so many levels—it’s just that the similarities aren’t presented to the public on a silver platter. They remain concealed and obscured behind other, usually fluffy storylines that take precedent over matters that truly bear any significance at all.

In fact, I don’t blame the public for the resentment that they convey towards the world of sports and athletes specifically. I mean, it isn’t their fault for being misinformed and mislead by the usually disheartening picture that the media portrays of sports and their occupants—is it?

They (the media members) want you to familiarize yourself with all the garish, rich athletes in the world—all 4,420 of them. They want you to fall head-over-heels for particular players and become fanatical over the events of those respective individuals—or gods, as the media would like you to have it.

You can hardly blame them, though—it’s how they generate revenue. They make big money by exaggerating events and portraying stories in ways that will evoke a reaction out of the public, be it positive or negative, thereby making the fans want to come back for more essentially being the goal.

And they’ve accomplished their mission too—evidenced by how they’ve remained in business. As stated above, many people have "beef" with the ludicrous contracts that athletes are receiving nowadays—numbers that the media are glorifying.

Alex Rodriguez received his $225 million mega-deal from the Yankees in November of 2007. Manny Ramirez was given $45 million dollars to stick with the Dodgers for two years. Basketball superstars Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are due to make an amount of money never witnessed before in sports when they become free agents this upcoming summer.

But it’s not just the veteran players who are raking in the enormous cash piles. Rookies, now more than ever, are being presented enormous contracts, heavy-laden with up-front guarantees.

Quarterback Matthew Stafford of the Detroit Lions was handed a record six-year, $72 million deal this past April, which included an absurd $42 million in guarantees.

In baseball, pitcher Stephen Strasburg of the Nationals—who is represented by the notorious money-bagger Scott Boras—is vying for $50 million bucks.

The comical part of it all is that although they haven’t played one second in their new leagues, they are being paid like superstars—just like the A-Rods and ManRams of the sports world who have actually earned their income.

They are in possession of colossal ability and supreme talent, but are you really willing to bet that they will become better players than the best presently in their respective sport?

I know that I’m not, and doubly do I believe that they shouldn’t be paid as such.

It would be a mistake, however, to blame current sport’s figures—owners, athletes, or agents—for the overwhelming dollar figures handed out in today’s game.

To be fully informed, one must take a look at how contracts in sports have progressed throughout the years.

Back in the 1950s and 1960s, when baseball truly broke-out, $100,000 contracts were all the rage. Players like Ted Williams, and Joe DiMaggio were handed these once thought of lucrative contracts to compliment their impressive stat-lines.

Likewise, in football about a decade ago, super-stud Barry Sanders had re-negotiated his contract to the tune of $34.5 million over six years***.

Remember how Stafford got $42 million in guarantees? Who do you think has earned their money more?

The point is that in all sports, big contracts have remained consistent as the times have rolled onwards.

So can you fault athletics for progression? For evolution?

Is it their fault that the economy has inflated?

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not so naïve as to be unmindful of the fact that inflation in sports have grown at a far larger—and way faster—rate than that of the rest of the economy.

But, in their defense, they are just progressing alongside their checks—as all of society is—and the "record" contracts remain a tell-tale sign of that.

I mean, it wouldn’t make sense for players to receive what their counterparts did 50 years ago, so why the abhorrence for all of the money they garner now?

I believe that it is because of the media. They are the artists painting the picture—either rosy or wilted—about how they want sports to be perceived in the public. More often than not, they choose to tell the "wilted" picture, since that is what sells preeminently.

It leaves us fed up, since we are hearing the information in a most negative light.

However, we are the ones who have molded these appalling standards. We are the ones who fuel the journalism fire, by craving and obsessing ourselves with fame and fortune and puffed-up personalities.

If not for our fascination with sports, then athletes wouldn’t be getting paid what they are. Yet, as we continue to complain about the money that they are receiving, we also stand impotent in the sense that we control what’s going on.

For some reason, I can’t find sympathy in that.

Taylor Rummel is a writer on Bleacher Report.

*Numbers attained from Wikipedia

**Number attained from ESPN the Magazine

***Number attained from Wikipedia

The "Original" Four Sports: What America Has Sadly Moved On From

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:49:08 -0400

As a society, we are constantly changing.

Cavemen built clubs, and used their counterparts as test-subjects.

In the Roman Empire, coliseums were built for men to compete against each other, and allowed for fandom to ignite.

During the Medieval Age, jesters filled the scene and provided entertainment for all. Shakespeare thereafter wowed audiences with his story-telling and "play-making ability"…literally.

More recently, in the 1960s and '70s, times were good. Life was, for the most part, care-free. Days were filled with kids playing in yards, neighbors conversing regardless of mutual-likeness, and of course who could forget those Beatles?

Time in between was spent living, laughing, and loving. Even more than those actions were present at sporting events. But the biggest sports back then weren't football, basketball, MMA, and hockey.

Rather they were baseball, golf, tennis, and boxing. All of which were comparatively slow-paced games that had an audience equally as patient. No one in that day-in-age was in a rush to purchase a new video-game, nor was anybody scurrying to check their email.

We could let things come to us, instead of us forcing the issue.

All of the extra time enabled humans to actually have a moment to spare; allowing them to view one of those sports, despite their ability to elicit a snooze or two.

Additionally, great figures like Joe DiMaggio and Ted Williams, Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer, Bjorn Borg and Billie Jean-King, and Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier were born and cherished because of their marvelous ability at these now interest-deprived sports.

Nowadays though, sadly, we have no time to truly appreciate those heroic-figures, or the sports that they dominated. I mean, who wants to, or has the time to, walk 18 holes, or see back-and-forth action that lasts for hours, or see games with less "scores" than hours attended, (baseball)?

I know I don't—and can’t; way too boring for me. Not nearly enough action to suit my fancy or grasp my attention or interest.

So, have sports lost hope? Of course not! Say hello to the 21st Century people. We have laptops, email, cell phones, iPods, MySpace, Twitter, Facebook, MMA, and PDAs.

No more carrier pigeons, or letters, or landlines, or tape-recorders…or time to kill.

We have ability with our fingertips; the potential to check and change in the matter of seconds. Need to make a late fantasy addition to your team before your roster locks?—Easy as ever with any phone.

How about listening to your favorite tune?—Just swap out your iPod and jam away.

The concept of ‘speed’ has taken over the world—whether it is for the better or worse.

Mentioned before was the shift of the four "power" sports. No longer do baseball, golf, tennis, and boxing dominate the sport’s scene. Instead, basketball, football, MMA, and hockey replace and rejuvenate the athletic-side of the world.

They all involve nearly non-stop action; only halting when it is virtually impossible to continue. As fans we like that, since it complements our lifestyles. We are familiar with quick actions, responses, and movements, and these sports—that seemingly fail to stop—find favor with those involved: with us.

As inhabitants of this growing and fast-changing world, we find it necessary to load ourselves up with too tough a task, too tedious a job, and too stressful a commitment. We barely have enough time to breathe, let alone attend—and enjoy—one of the four major sporting events of the past.

But this article is to help remember how "sports" in America truly got started. "The roots that helped form the plant," if you will.

The world today may be moving forward—on a seemingly trepid and torrid pace—but those sports will remain in our hearts and minds forever.

Michael Vick is Back...But Tagged With an Unnecessary Five-Game Suspension

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:34:08 -0400

Earlier today, Michael Vick was "conditionally reinstated" in the NFL by Commisioner Roger Goodell.

Vick had this to say about his reinstatement:

As told to AP:

“I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation
to Commissioner Goodell for allowing me to be readmitted to the
National Football League. I fully understand that playing
football in the NFL is a privilege, not a right, and I am truly
thankful for opportunity I have been given.

“As you can imagine, the last two years have given me time to
evaluate my life, mature as an individual and fully understand
the terrible mistakes I made in the past, and what type of life I
must lead moving forward.

“Again, I would like to thank the Commissioner for the chance to
return to the game I love and the opportunity to become an
example of positive change. I would like to also thank Coach
Tony Dungy for all of his support and for serving as a mentor.”

Vick would be eligible to join any team that he signs with in Week 6, given that he transitions well to life beyond bars.

Additionally, if any team signs him, he would be available to participate in practices and meetings with the respective club right away.

But enough with the journalistic approach.

Personally, I see nothing wrong with Vick being back in the game.

He committed a mistake as we all have—and will continue to do. He's been forced to experience the repercussions of such consequent actions. And he has he lost sponsorships, a reputation, and countless Benjamins. Is a five-game suspension on top of all that really necessary?

Fellow NFL'er Terrell Owens, I believe, hit the nail on the head with his comment regarding Vick's suspension:

"It's like kicking a dead horse on the ground."

Excuse my language, but it pisses me off that Goodell feels that he needs to have a hand in every damn player's situation, especially when it's already handled by the law.

Let society take care of the problem; it's healthier that way. Get it out of the fans' systems. They'll feel better when it's all done.

Now I'm not saying that Goodell was wrong to have kicked Vick out of the league. He was supposed to boot Vick's sorry ass out the door. Anyone who has a hand in cruelty to animals deserves to have his privileges stripped, no matter how big or small, and football (in Vick's case) was one such privilege that he lost out on.

But since then, he's served his time behind bars, expressed remorse, and has come out of the situation a more refined individual. He has learned from the mistakes of his past, just as we all should.

He's met with Mr. Goodell and obviously has him convinced that he's a different person, or else he wouldn't have been admitted back into the game in the first place.

So again, why the suspension?

Goodell has blooped-up several players' situations and his inconsistency in doling out punishment is ridiculous.

For killing a man while intoxicated, Donte Stallworth receives an indefinite suspension.

For illegally possesing a firearm, Plaxico Burress received a four-game suspension before becoming a league outcast on the verge of jail time.

I don't even want to start with Pacman Jones.

Why can't Goodell just let the law handle all the problems off the field?

Last time I checked, he was the commissioner of the NFL, not players' lives.

Ballin' Too Young: Why Parents Need to Let Their Kids Live

Taylor Rummel — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:27:05 -0400

If you were to poll 100 people at random about whether or not they had played at least one sport in their childhood—more than likely you would be met with an overwhelming “Yes.”

However, take it one question further—of course with their permission—and ask them why it was that they decided to play sports: Several individuals are certain to respond:

“Because my parents made me.”

It’s an unethical practice that too many families use with their children: Choosing for them, often times before they are able to make a decision themselves.

“Little Jimmy is gonna be a big pro basketball star!”

Oh, is he?

Are memories of failing to make the High School Varsity team haunting you, forcing these lofty expectations upon your child so as to see your glory through? Did Jimmy even tell you that he wants to be a “baller?”

Wait...he can’t talk yet.

Worse yet, the topic is consistently swept under the rug, seemingly “never” ready to be pulled out for a healthy discussion. No doubt, a large part of the problem is societal.

ESPN (among other social-sporting phenomena) bombards both our youth and older counterparts with all the amenities that pro-athletes receive, and glorifies them to an almost disgusting degree. In truth, who doesn’t want to grow up a multi-millionaire, or a person talked about around the globe?

But it’s lustful desires like those that poison our minds and rub-off on our youth. It seems that girls aren’t the only ones with heavy peer, parental, and public pressure to adhere to "social standards."

Our poor boys have to “be like Mike” or “bend it like Beckham.”

I believe the most ridiculous aspect of the whole notion, however, is the compromising of rights that takes place. I find that while this practice and the act of abortion are immensely different in terms of moral acceptance, they are strikingly similar in concept.

In each case, freedoms of the child are replaced by the supposed “better judgment” or “personal preferences” of the parents, child’s views (and welfare) be damned!

Personally, I don’t believe that either act is morally correct (even though we’re here for the sport’s talk). What will also be potentially hurtful to the child’s overall well-being is the mindset that he will have grown up, unfamiliar with normal kid life.

Part of what I treasured at such a tender age was exploring life. Playing “juggle” with my neighbor, squirting friends in the face with squirt guns at birthday parties, and being particularly rebellious and savage on the school playground were all necessary components, dedicated in helping to define my individuality—and my personality growing up.

Being locked into one activity in adolescence and shunting all other aspects of life is not healthy for the child—nor is it fun. After being essentially handcuffed with tunnel-vision, (regarding a sport) from the parent(s); no manners will be learned, no personality will be picked up, and no exploration will be attained.

Instead, winning, attaining fame, and hogging glory will be cemented into the child’s mind, and become his central focus and overall goal, not enabling him to grasp some of the finer aspects of life such as graciousness, good-times, and religion, (at least the existence of it).

Isn’t the kid supposed to choose his own path, write his own story, and tell his own tale?

How can he if you’re making all the decisions for him?

The Best Active Player in Each of the Four Major Sports

Taylor Rummel — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:27:38 -0400

Everyone has their own take on who the best active player is in their respective sport. Kobe, Lebron, Crosby, Brady and A-Rod all are players who elicit favor and fame from the fans and media, and each of them stun us with their brilliant and spectacular play-making abilities. However, none of those players crack my list, (or would it be their list) of the title "Best active player in their respective sport". Enjoy!

Begin Slideshow

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the B/R Galaxy: The Invaluable Comment

Taylor Rummel — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:40:30 -0400

This kicks off part one of the series "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the B/R Galaxy" put forth by Sulayman Hussein and Taylor Rummel.

Special thanks to Leroy Watson who helped assist with this article.

________________________________________________________________________

Bleacher Report is a site littered with different degrees of users.

You have the "Old, Wise Veterans." The Sages of the B/R world who remain steadfast in their contributing to the well-being of the site.

There are the proverbial "young-guns." The newcomers to the blogosphere world who feel accomplished the moment a senior writer leaves a mark of satisfaction on their work.

And as well are the scum of our communities. The so-called "Internet Trolls" who do little but hamper the progress of the site as a whole. Writer Graham Brunell superbly outlines what exactly a troll is in this article.

If you react too strongly to the last paragraph, you just might be a troll.

But despite the variances from one writer to another, some things will always remain.

Stories will be written, discussions will evolve, and comments will be submitted—necessarily or not.

That last part is a crucial one. It serves as the reason for why I am writing this all too necessary guide.

You see, what helps make this site so successful is its members. You and I. Leroy Watson and BabyTate. Hotnuke and Gray Ghost. Blaine Spence and...(you get the picture).

It matters not who you are though, just that you actively participate and educate within the B/R community.

And what better way to participate and educate than by voicing your own opinion on a fellow writers' work? And what worse way to participate and educate than by voicing your own opinion on a fellow writer's work?

That's not a typo people; it's the undeniable and unfortunate truth.

One great thing about the country we live in is all of the freedoms that it allows its people.

Freedom of the press, religion, and speech are all privileges that we as citizens are entitled to—and all-too-often take for granted.

It's one thing to speak what's on your mind—it's a completely different maneuver to belittle, insult, or offer little more than a two-second brain regurgitation to an author of the story you just read.

When you comment, you are (supposed to be) providing the author with your gratitude, analysis, thoughts, and/or overall feelings about the piece you just read.

It is also your duty as a reader, (and enlightened B/R member) to offer up advice when and where it is desired or required.

Sadly though, the definition of the word "advice" has been both abused and forgotten entirely by and large among far too many threads.

Here's a hypothetical example:

Joe Joseph mentions in an article that NBA Player Kobe Bryant, after leading the Lakers past the Magic, has received his third NBA title ring.

Contrary to what the author has stated, a certain John Jingle-Mouth knows that Mr. Bryant has in fact received his fourth NBA ring after defeating the team from Orlando.

But instead of subtly making the minuscule edit, John decides to publicly rip the author stating this:

"Hey Sasquatch, have you been living under a rock? Anybody worth their grain of salt knows that Kobe got his fourth ring, not his third! Idiot!"

So while not only looking like a fool for suggesting that Sasquatch lives under a rock, John also contributes essentially nothing of value to the discussion, and more importantly gives off a demeanor of negativity that could potentially discourage the writer from pursuing a further career here on B/R.

What John should have done was make an edit, and politely tell Joe that he did so in the Editor Feedback section. If he truly cares about his craft, this should serve as a reminder to him to give his article one last look through before finally publishing in the future.

Another situation that maybe shouldn't (but does) irk me is when people write these little, inconsequential remarks such as:

"Great article Joe!" or "I liked the work, good job."

Again, what is being contributed? Your gratitude, yes, but that's only half of the commenting process. You are forgetting to offer your advice and or tips to make the piece, (and more importantly) the author better. Or at the very least, you are missing a chance to tell the author why you enjoyed their work, so they can keep doing positive things.

Everything about B/R is designed around the idea of creating and maintaining conversation, debate, and/or the free exchange of ideas. Sometimes, that might mean disagreeing (if you really have some objection), or at least adding some unique fact to the discussion, in order to take it to new depths.

We can disagree without being disagreeable, or amplify without embarrassing the author. Always comment with the idea that someone might take the exact some tone to something that you write; would you find it helpful, or is the tone condescending?

It’s application of the Golden Rule; if you wouldn't like seeing it on your comment thread, why place it on someone else's?

So remember folks, please take this message with you. Forward it to all of your fans, share it amongst your communities, spread the B/R word!

Comment to give thanks, to give advice, and to provide a positive, enjoyable atmosphere that can be expressed and felt in our communities and threads. It is in this way that we can further enhance the already successful pool of writers we contain here on B/R.

________________________________________________________________________

Another outstanding article explaining the ethics of commenting can be read by clicking here.

From Worst to "Bess": Davone Bess' Journey from the City to the Spotlight

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:11:01 -0400

Davone Bess was dealt a tougher life than most.

Growing up in Oakland, California, he lived about as rough of a childhood as anyone—growing up with a mostly single mother and never having a true "father figure" to look up to. Additionally, at the age of 10, he witnessed the murder of his uncle at a birthday party.

But Bess would not allow himself to suffer a similar fate.

He became the first person on his father's side to pass high school and the first person in his family to attend college, showing that he wanted to break away from his troubled past and set the bar high for himself.

During his years at Skyline High School, Bess became a letterman in football, basketball, and baseball. In football, he was an All-City wide receiver and led the team to the league championship.

Although he was off to a good start, trouble had not escaped Bess's life completely.

After gaining a scholarship to play football at Oregon State University, he had it rescinded because of an incident where he allowed a friend to place stolen items in his car.

Bess was sent to a juvenile facility for 15 months. While there, he played flag football with fellow detainees. After one game in particular, he impressed a Hawaii scout enough to warrant a four-year scholarship to the University.

While at Hawaii, Bess put his talent on display.

In his first year with the team, Bess caught 89 passes for 1,124 yards and 14 touchdowns. The great season warranted a WAC First-Team selection and a WAC Freshman Of The Year award.

The following season, Bess improved on his already exceptional totals from the previous season. Seven more passes were caught; nearly 100 more yards were netted; and one more touchdown was scored. As a result, Bess gained another WAC First-Team selection.

In his final year with the Warriors, Bess set career highs for both receptions (106) and receiving yards (1,226).

Another accolade was in store for him. The Associated Press named Bess to the Third-Team All-American squad; a prestigious honor considering Hawaii's publicity and overrated reputation.

However, despite the numerous awards and impressive collegiate totals, Bess went undrafted in the 2008 NFL Draft.

However, the Miami Dolphins were willing to take a chance on him. He wasn't expected to produce much for the organization when he was signed, but things changed when slot receiver Greg Camarillo suffered an injury.

Bess stepped in for Camarillo and performed admirably. He scored his first career NFL touchdown against the Baltimore Ravens. At season's end, he ranked among the top rookie wide receivers.

His 54 receptions were good for third in the NFL among first-year players and second-best all-time among undrafted rookies.

Going into 2009, Bess is looking at a full-time gig as a starter. He developed chemistry with quarterback Chad Pennington and cemented himself as a reliable possession receiver in the league.

Given the fact that he is entering his second season in the league, Bess has the time to mature and blossom into a star, an honor that he deserves.

Even when he was faced with the toughest of times, he persevered, fought his way through, and came out a better person—and player—than ever before.

Michigan State Memories From a Fan: Love, Passion and Glory

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:01:37 -0400

Bestowed upon me from a young age was a passion.

One that would provide me with moments of insurmountable joy, and also agonizing and teary tantrums; the kind that warrant an "It's just a game" remark from those oblivious to the levels of excitement that sports command of its followers.

But whatever the case happened to be, one thing remained constant—my love for Michigan State.

I believe that I was first introduced to the Spartans by my late grandfather. If memory serves me right (and unfortunately, it serves me wrong more often than not), he was the one who gave me my "Michigan State Spartans" sweatshirt.

The size of which now requires a comparison to current attire, for nothing more than a few chuckles and memories.

It is also my understanding that I was at the ripe and tender age of four when I was handed that piece of clothing, and therefore could not have realized the significance of that big, mean looking guy on the front; the one who had a spear and shield, complete with a helmet and armor.

To me, it seemed like nothing more than a character mirroring that of one on television, and as a result the thought quickly dropped from my mind without any additional consideration or confusion.

After all, what was more important—comprehending an unrecognizable figure cloaked and armed with unfamiliar clothing and objects, or playing with the Power Ranger action figures stored away in the timeless bucket of goodies in Grandma's closet?

For a child of my age, it was a no-brainer.

Years passed and I began becoming more knowledgeable about life, specifically sports.

I learned that a certain "M" stood for Michigan, that another letter "S" stood for state, and that an ensuing letter "U" stood for university. It also became apparent that the mean-looking guy, who bothered but didn't annoy me, was the school's mascot.

The little-of-importance mystery regarding my childhood sweatshirt was solved, and there born was the first college that I ever knew existed.

Still though was no care, no attention paid to Michigan State University. Perhaps the unfamiliarity with the word University repelled me from having any interest with the school.

I'm not entirely sure.

Not long later I was slapped in the face with some information pertaining to my family's education: My Aunt had graduated from College at this "MSU".

I began putting two and two together, realizing that Michigan State was a part of my family, and in turn I gained a little bit of curiosity as to what this recurring "place" was all about.

Whenever they were either playing on TV or just brought up in discussion, she always made known that she was proud of her school, be it by cheering or praising.

I firmly believe that some of those positive "Sparty Vibes" that she had in her possession rubbed off on me, and I'm sure glad they did.

The continued atmosphere regarding and revolving around Michigan State propelled me to do a little research. I found out that the college was centered in East Lansing (where my Aunt lived and still lives to this day), and also that it was founded in 1855, a year a many before mine.

I also became aware of the school's football and basketball programs, both of which I had not followed up on until that point.

It became apparent that not only Auntie M followed the Sparties, but also my grandmother as well.

Posted on her garage door was a sign that read:

"Spartan parking ONLY, Wolverines will be crushed"

All my years of consuming knowledge regarding MSU finally allowed for me to be able to understand this script, and a special feeling overwhelmed me when I realized that my Grandma (in her 80s going strong), had a passion for this team that rivaled my own.

Since that point in time, I have enjoyed a Spartan life—a short one, but a good one nonetheless.

Multiple games have been attended, man-crushes have been developed (Kalin Lucas, Drew Neitzel), and emotions have stemmed from both desirable and undesirable outcomes.

One game in particular stands out.

Michigan State vs. the Minnesota Golden Gophers.

I was excited to see two coaching legends: Tom Izzo (a God in my mind) and Tubby Smith battle head to head. My dad had promised me good seats to the game. Not so much because I requested them, but rather because it was a mutual feeling that we both deserved to be treated with them.

So we went early, equipped with our MSU ball caps and Michigan State t-shirts, ready to cheer on our beloved Sparties.

We arrived about a half hour before game-time, and started scanning the surrounding scenery for scalpers. We found one and, after negotiating for a few long minutes, came to an agreement that left us with two upper-bowl seats; a disappointment by both our standards, but a necessary acquisition since we were now "inside the arena" as my pops had put it.

But then we found another scalper, one who was working for stubhub. He, like all ticket-sellers, was certain that he had not only the best seats available, but also the best prices. He proceeded to show us the tickets (actually only my dad, as I was fixated on the beautiful Breslin Center). No sooner had I shifted my glance, my dad was calling for me.

"Hey T, look at what I got," he yelled.

I did as told, and was in disbelief at what I saw: Two seats, two rows up, center court.

Somebody pinch me.

The Spartans ended up winning, but it was what happened after the game that was so earth-shattering for me as a fan.

Every single player on the roster went around the court, slapping fives to everyone within reach.

I was included in that group.

Being able to even share contact with some of my idols—athletes who I watched at every given opportunity—was a dream come true for me. I echoed the words "Great game K" to Kalin Lucas, my favorite player.

And, although the words were drowned out by the fight song being played by the Pep Band, the amazing experience and surreal setting remained.

I have a long life to live yet, one that is sure to include many more "Spartan Memories". Hopefully I can maintain my grades and go to college there, keeping the tradition alive within my family.

Hopefully I can remain as loyal and as in tune with the team as my Grandmother is at her age.

Hopefully I will be able to watch my kids and grandkids enjoy the same passion that I have been privileged to.

Because while all roots are born green, only a select (proud) few are white as well, and I understand those to be Michigan State Spartans.

A Formula To Predict Next Year's Super Bowl Winner

Taylor Rummel — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:01:07 -0400

Every year, NFL teams are tasked with a similar goal: To bring home a championship.

No matter if a team already has a solid foundation in place or is amidst a rebuilding project and working from the ground up, the ultimate goal remains the same.

However, it is foolish to suggest that all 32 teams have an equal shot of finishing the season on top.

There are many variables that factor into a team's success, (or failure). Teams' personnel change, players get cut and traded, distractions occur on and off the field, and key injuries occur.

Since the beginning of the millennium, six different teams, (out of nine total), have won "the big one." The Baltimore Ravens, New England Patriots, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Pittsburgh Steelers, Indianapolis Colts, and New York Giants all have a field of players who can proudly boast a ring.

But what was it that allowed for these teams to achieve the league's highest status? For that, we'll have to dive into everyone's favorite subject—math—so as to see the parts that made up the whole on these championship rosters.

Of the nine rosters, each team on average had:

An 11th ranked team offense
A sixth ranked team defense
A quarterback who threw for 3,125 yards and 21 touchdowns on 12 interceptions
A running back who carried the ball 247 times for 1,067 yards and six touchdowns
A No. 1 wide receiver who caught the ball 73 times for 1,012 yards and five touchdowns
A No. 2 wide receiver who caught the ball 59 times for 882 yards and five touchdowns
A defense that housed a player who garnered 11 sacks
A defense that housed a player who garnered six picks

The formula I created for predicting next year's winner calls for giving a point for each category that an NFL team qualifies for.

So, for example, since Philip Rivers surpassed the 3,125 yard, 21 touchdown category last year, San Diego gets awarded a point, (from the quarterback category).

It is important to note that points can be given off for realistic potential as well.

An example is Carson Palmer. He did not meet the 3,125 yard or 21 touchdown requirement last year. But because he was injured, (and does possess the ability to attain and or surpass those numbers), Cincinnati still gets a point from the quarterback category.

Here are the results:

The Pittsburgh Steelers received eight points.
The Dallas Cowboys, Indianapolis Colts, San Diego Chargers, New England Patriots, and Philadelphia Eagles received seven points.
The Green Bay Packers, Houston Texans, and Atlanta Falcons received six points.
The Baltimore Ravens, New York Giants, Carolina Panthers, New Orleans Saints, Arizona Cardinals, Minnesota Vikings, and New York Jets received five points.
The Tennessee Titans received four points.
The Chicago Bears, Miami Dolphins, Washington Redskins, St. Louis Rams, Kansas City Chiefs, Cincinnati Bengals, and Seattle Seahawks received three points.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Detroit Lions, Oakland Raiders, Denver Broncos, Cleveland Browns, Buffalo Bills, and Jacksonville Jaguars received two points.
The San Francisco 49ers received one point.

So based on the formula, the Pittsburgh Steelers are the most likely team to win Super Bowl XLIV. It would be back-to-back titles for the franchise, and its third since the year 2000; joining the Patriots in that regard.

But the Steelers are not the only team with a legitimate shot to go the distance. Perennial powers such as the Colts, Patriots, and Cowboys are all right behind the defending champs, and are looking to claim the title of "NFL's Best" for themselves.

Some "dark horse" teams (teams that have a good percentage to win it all, but aren't perceived the same way by the fans, players, and media) include Green Bay, Houston, and Atlanta.

The numbers don't lie, however, and that is why I am choosing Pittsburgh to repeat as NFL Champions.

As a famous quote reads, "Past instances are a good indicator for future success," and that certainly bodes well for the Steelers.

Fantasy Football: Assessing Dennis Northcutt's Fantasy Value in Detroit

Taylor Rummel — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:05:20 -0400

Earlier this week, the Jacksonville Jaguars and Detroit Lions made an offensive-defensive player swap.

Safety Gerald Alexander of the Lions became a Jaguar, but the most fantasy-relevant side was, without a doubt, Dennis Northcutt heading to Detroit.

In 14 games last year with the Jaguars, the 31-year-old Northcutt collected 44 passes to the tune of 545 yards and two touchdowns.

While the numbers aren't sexy, consider that he totaled 265 yards and both touchdowns within the last three games of the regular season.

Over the course of his career, Northcutt has never eclipsed more than 806 receiving yards or five touchdowns in any given season. He also has never been in much of a role to shine, either.

With Detroit, Northcutt has the potential to emerge as the No. 2 wide receiver on the team behind third-year man Calvin Johnson. It will not be without a fight though, as the Lions have already brought in receivers Bryant Johnson and Ronald Curry this offseason in attempts to take some of the burden off of Johnson.

But a quick look at the stats of the players' careers shows that Northcutt has the upper-hand. Of the three, Northcutt is the most seasoned (being in the league for the most years) and boasts the most impressive stats.

On average, in 12-team mock drafts being held on fantasyfootballcalculator, Northcutt is going undrafted. This is a mistake as he holds within him the potential to be a viable flex-option on any given Sunday.

Draft him as a late-round flyer and know that he's all potential and no risk.

The Truth About Fantasy and Reality Sports

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:17:36 -0400

There exists a fine line between what some call "real sports" and the virtual phenomenon that is fantasy sports.

But they are deeply connected.

Each stem from a passion, a love; for the game, the friends, the fans...the money. Each satisfy the hungriest sport's soul, and enslave us by moments of greatness; trapping us by addiction.

And yet they have such different backgrounds.

One game uses brains, the other, brawn. One uses a computer; an object regarded as holy by its owners. The other uses practice fields and treat them as the battlefield before the war.

Sports have been around since forever; 77 B.C. to be exact, when the first ever recorded sports event, The Olympics were held. The world of fantasy meanwhile has only been around since the 1950s, when someone named Wilfred Winkenbach came up with the concept of fantasy sports.

But while one activity has us actually playing the sport we love, the other one has us following the players who play the sport. And this discrepancy about how one is better than the other has remained a debate widely talked about within the sporting community.

ESPN Personality Stephen A. Smith had this to say about fantasy sports:

"...I've always thought that a lot of these guys (and 96m percent of them are guys) are nerds desperately in need of more sociable leisure-time activities."

Clearly, Smith thinks fantasy sports have no place among the "upper echelon of society" since fantasy sports are for what he calls "nerds".

But he is of course a NBA Analyst as well, and has much respect for the "real" side of sports, as opposed to the "made up" type.

But is Stephen A right? Famous people such as: Snoop Dog, Regina King, Lil Wayne, and countless amounts of professional athletes take part in the hobby.

After talking with Comedian Guy Torry, (who is an avid fantasy footballer), Smith's views did not change.

"All those hours people spend as Monday-morning QBs, quick to second-guess, acting like they're the ones playing, coaching or trading? Sorry, it still seems nerdy to me."

Consider Smith only a "reality sports fan" -sigh-.

Tight End Chris Cooley of the Washington Redskins has a different approach than most. He not only plays sports professionally, but as well participates in a fantasy league.

People have mixed reactions about his involvement on both accounts. On one hand, some say that it is wrong, wrong because he has the potential to fix outcomes in real life, only to benefit his fantasy teams.

But that notion is ridiculous. What's more important to you? Millions of dollars, or a made-up team worth only bragging rights?

The other type of person, (myself included) believe that nothing is wrong with what Cooley is doing. Let the man do whatever he wants to have fun.

Just because he plays sports doesn't mean that he can't participate in a game where he and his teammates are involved.

Consider Cooley the opposite of Smith; someone who enjoys playing fantasy as much as they enjoy the game itself.

In this day in age, over 30 million people both in the United States and in Canada participate in fantasy sports, compared to the much smaller number who participate professionally.

Everyone can play fantasy sports, only a select few possess the ability to play at the sports' highest level.

But the fact remains that both resemble an outlet. An outlet for energy and excitement, passion and addiction, and (while no one wants to think of these aspects): failure and disappointment.

I liken fantasy and reality to vines. They will always grow outwards; go their own separate way, attract their different bugs. But they will always remain one within the other, rooting from the same origin, stemming from the same seed.

Sports fuel fantasy, and fantasy fuels sports. They cannot thrive without one another.

Joe Flacco to Derrick Mason: A Developing Fantasy Duo?

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:19:42 -0400

Rookie Joe Flacco was drafted by the Baltimore Ravens with the 18th overall pick in the 2008 NFL Draft.

Flacco was originally a part of the Pittsburgh Panthers NCAA team, but decided to transfer to Delaware since he was not seeing regular playing time behind fellow QB Tyler Palko.

With the Fightin' Blue Hens in 2006, he put up nearly 3,000 yards and 18 touchdowns to go with 10 interceptions. The next year he accumulated over 3,300 yards and again threw 18 touchdowns. This time honed his accuracy and decision making, evident by his mere five interceptions.

In perhaps his finest performance while in Delaware, Flacco threw for 434 yards and four touchdowns in one game.

Joe Flacco was not supposed to start for the Baltimore Ravens, but injuries to Kyle Boller and Troy Smith thrust him into the leading role, ready or not.

In his first game he struggled, totaling only 129 yards on 15 completions for a 51.7 completion percentage and throwing all of zero touchdowns.

Flacco settled down and showed his maturity through the season, and those numbers remained a season low.

Over his next five outings, Flacco increased his completion percentage by over 15 points and showed the NFL that he was a viable starting option. He ended the season with 2,971 yards and 14 touchdowns compared to 12 interceptions.

The knock on Flacco's fantasy value this upcoming season directly correlates to the Baltimore Ravens' offensive scheme.

Baltimore has long been a run-first team, severely hurting any potential of Flacco's to become a top 10 fantasy QB. However, a report today from The Sporting News offers a glimmer of hope.

It reads "offensive coordinator Cam Cameron is expected to open up the Ravens air attack in Joe Flacco's second season."

This is certainly good news for potential Flacco owners, since it shows from a prominent source that the Ravens are considering becoming a more balanced team (at least offensively).

One wide receiver in particular might benefit tremendously from this news.

His name is Derrick Mason.

Mason, the No. 1 receiver on the depth chart for the Ravens, is a 13-year vet of the NFL, and is heading into his fifth season with the team.

Last year, Mason didn't show one sign of his age, grabbing 80 passes for 1,037 yards and five touchdowns, all team-leading statistics.

Flacco found Mason frequently last year, and should continue to this upcoming season. After all, a young quarterback's best friend is a sure-handed veteran wide receiver.

Derrick Mason is going in the ninth round on average in 12-team mock drafts, while Flacco is going in the 13th.

Fantasy Football: A Winning Draft Strategy Pt. 2

Taylor Rummel — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:54:49 -0400

On my very first article posted to Bleacher Report, I wrote the first part of this piece. However, I have since learned leaps and bounds about players and their respective values [in fantasy drafts], both by participating in countless mock drafts and by reading fine articles on this site about player assessments and positional outlooks.

In this article, I am going to highlight the draft strategy that I would be using if my draft were today (based on a 12-team draft).

First Round

You must draft a running back in this round. This year, there are more running-back-by committees than ever, which means that the top tier of running backs is dangerously thin. After Brandon Jacobs, it can be argued that there are no more safe backs to be had in the entire draft. Plus, the other positions can be had later.

Second Round

Here is where people try to get a little cute with their drafts, and I have to say that I am one of those people.

While old-school fantasy football veterans will advocate taking another back here, I say nay to that notion. On Fantasy Football Calculator's ADP, five out of the 12 picks in the second round belong to wide receivers. This shows that almost half of all the owners in the draft will select their first receiver to complement their running back.

I'm not advising you to do that, either.

Instead, what I am doing is drafting either quarterback Drew Brees or Tom Brady.

Last season, seven of the top ten fantasy scorers at the end of the season were quarterbacks. Did you know that Jay Cutler outperformed running back Adrian Peterson last year? I didn't. Take advantage of this lack of knowledge and grab a top QB early.

Third Round

You're probably thinking that I am going to draft a receiver here, seeing as though I don't have one.

Wrong.

I am picking another running back. It seems like the third-round backs are actually provide more bang for the buck than second-rounders this year. Since few running backs are being picked in the second round, a big horde of them are slipping to the third.

In any event, grabbing a top-20 back in the third round is never a bad thing. The position usually has the most injuries, so stocking up early is a very smart thing.

Fourth Round

Here is where I'll be taking my first receiver.

Not.

I don't know why, but I don't like picking a receiver at this point.

According to Fantasy Football Calculator, high-upside backs like Marshawn Lynch, Reggie Bush, Knowshon Moreno, and Darren McFadden are all going in this round, and all have within them the potential of being a top-ten back come season's end. So, pick another back.

Fifth Round

I'll be grabbing my tight end here, hopefully, if either Jason Witten, Tony Gonzalez or Antonio Gates are available.

These top-tier TEs are projected to score higher than the wideouts still available, so why take the lesser player?

Sixth Round

You can breathe now. Finally, after five rounds of wide-receiver deprivation, I am grabbing my first.

Antonio Bryant, Lee Evans, Eddie Royal, Bernard Berrian, and Santana Moss are all going in this round, and they all have immense upside.

The reason why I have chosen to wait this long before grabbing a receiver is because I feel that there is not much difference between a top-10 receiver and a top-30 receiver

In contrast, there is a bigger difference between a top-10 running back, tight end, and quarterback versus their respective top-30 counterparts.

Plus, is it just me, or do wide receivers tend strain their hamstrings? Boys and girls, it's just not worth grabbing a wide receiver early. Great value can be had now (and later) for this position.

Recap

Right now we have a top-two quarterback, three top-30 running backs, a top-three tight end, and a top-30 receiver.

Seventh Round

I'll be grabbing another receiver, seeing as though I only have one.

Lance Moore, Hines Ward, Michael Crabtree, Donnie Avery, and Torry Holt are all going here on average, and they all represent a fine No. 2 wide receiver value.

Except for maybe Crabtree, being a rookie, every wide receiver just mentioned has the potential to crack 1,000 receiving yards and six to 10 touchdowns; and isn't that what you are getting from wide receivers in the third and fourth rounds?

Eighth Round

One more receiver will be mine after this round, as to finish off the position for my team.

Jerricho Cotchery (potentially my favorite sleeper this year), Steve Breaston, Laveranues Coles, Kevin Walter, and Devin Hester are the wideouts that are going in this round, and like the players from the previous two rounds, they provide great value relative to where they are being drafted.

Ninth Round

I'll take my backup QB here in case Brady pulls, well, another Brady.

Ben Roethlisberger, Matt Cassel, and Kyle Orton will all be available, and they will be fine in a position on the bench.

Orton and Cassel both have potential this year to produce solid numbers, and if they do, could make trading either Brees or Brady a possibility.

Tenth Round

People may think this stupid, but since I have all of my starting positions locked up, I'll snag a top defense here.

I remember going up against teams last year and dreading it when their team's defense put up 15 points in my face while my crummy waiver-wire defense failed to achieve five.

So there you have it, my fantasy football draft plan as of today: June 29.

Hope you guys enjoyed it.

Fantasy Football Forecasting: Who Will Be the No. 1 Tight End in 2009?

Taylor Rummel — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:11:30 -0400

According to 12-team mock drafts being held on fantasyfootballcalculator.com, three high-profile tight ends have been going as early as the fourth round and as late as the end of the fifth.

Jason Witten of the Dallas Cowboys is usually the first one to go (round four, pick four), followed by Charger Antonio Gates (going at round four, pick 12), and then Atlanta Falcon Tony Gonzalez (round five, pick five).

Let's consider each player's situation for this upcoming season, along with their recent statistics, in that order.

Jason Witten

Consistency has been Witten's game (aside from football, of course). Over the last four seasons, Witten has averaged 902 yards and four touchdowns on almost 77 receptions. Those are legit wide receiver numbers in the body of a tight end.

Durability also is an attribute that can certainly describe Witten's play. Among his six years in the NFL, Witten has missed a total of one measly game. One (they don't come much healthier than that).

This season should be his best statistical one yet. Because distracting (and talented) wide receiver Terrell Owens is gone, there will be more targets to go around in the Dallas passing game. Look for Witten to benefit superbly from this since he, out of any other offensive player, has the most chemistry with QB Tony Romo.

Antonio Gates

Gates is the next man on the list. He may be the most talented out of any of the three TEs mentioned here, and that means something.

Gates' averages stretching back the last four years read: 74 catches, 928 yards, and nine touchdowns. Compared to Witten, Gates has the higher yardage and (much higher) touchdown total, but he fails in the receptions category by a minimal three grabs.

However, last season, Gates suffered his worst statistical year since his rookie season, catching only 60 passes for 704 yards and eight touchdowns. Still amazing numbers, especially considering the amount of TDs, but a down-year nonetheless.

This upcoming season, Gates, like Witten, should endure his finest statistical performance to date. He is completely healthy (he, like Witten has been fortunate to have fantastic health during his tenure in the NFL) and has a star at quarterback in Philip Rivers and great wide receivers and running backs to surround himself with.

Tony Gonzalez

The last man on this list, but certainly not least, is the record-setting tight end, Gonzalez.

"Gonzo", as he's commonly called, switched teams this offseason, being traded by the Kansas City Chiefs, his home for his first 12 seasons in the league, to the Atlanta Falcons.

The move should do nothing but benefit him. He goes from a "lowly" and re-building organization in the Chiefs to an up-and-coming franchise in the Falcons.

Gonzalez is the oldest of the three here, but he is also the most experienced, the least injury-prone (only two missed games in 12 seasons), and the most likely to produce solid numbers, as opposed to the other two on the list.

Over his career, Tony G has amassed nearly 11,000 yards and 76 touchdowns. Last year, Gonzo arguably had his second-best season to date, catching a whopping 96 passes for 1,058 yards and 10 touchdowns.

Look for all of these players to continue their "positional dominance" this year, as all are in situations that provide them with great opportunities to produce numbers.

Personally, I have Witten ranked one, followed by Gonzalez, and then Gates. Witten shows the most upside of the group, which should translate into the highest totals, and Gonzalez is over Gates because of his consistency—not in touchdowns, but in yardage totals and receptions, the best indicators of possible success at this position.

Any of the three are fantastic No. 1 tight ends to have on your team. Snag any of them if they fall to you in the fifth round.

Fantasy Football: Predicting a "Breakout Candidate"

Taylor Rummel — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:29:52 -0400

A dream of every fantasy football manager is to draft the "next big thing" in the middle-late rounds. The guy who flashes the potential to be a game-changer in real life and difference-maker on your fantasy roster.

Two years ago, it was the sensational rookie running back from Sooner Country, Adrian "All Day" Peterson who took the fantasy world by storm. Last season the title was claimed by back Michael "The Burner" Turner, who had switched teams during the off-season.

Who is it going to be this year?

To start, lets have a look at ten of the most notable breakout performers from last season and reasons as to why they may have experienced so much success.

-Michael Turner-

Everyone knew he had potential, the question was when would he have a chance to start? An answer came in the off-season when the Chargers let him go; an when the Atlanta Falcons signed him. No longer was he hidden in LaDanian Tomlinson's shadow; Turner was ready to show not just the Falcons, but also the entire NFL what he had, and he sure showed them.

-Roddy White-

Although Roddy White was another Falcon, the similarities between him and Turner end there, (although they both put together sound statistical seasons). White, instead of benefiting from opportunity, benefited from consistently improving in each season he has played in the NFL. In 2005 he caught 29 passes for 446 yards. In 2006 he caught 30 passes for 506 yards. In 2007 he caught 83 passes for 1,202 yards. And last year he caught 88 passes for 1,382 yards.

-Calvin Johnson-

The Big Nasty from Georgia Tech improved upon his rookie numbers last season, raising his catches from 48 to 78, his yards from 756 to 1,331, and his touchdowns from four to 12. Aside from the insane amount of talent that Johnson possesses, perhaps what increased his numbers so dramatically was the fact that fellow talented wide receiver Roy Williams was shipped to the Dallas Cowboys mid-season. No longer did he have to split a significant amount of targets with another receiver on the team.

-Dwayne Bowe-

Bowe, like Johnson, improved upon his rookie numbers from two seasons ago. Receptions increased by 16, yards by 27, and touchdowns by two. He was hampered by inconsistent quarterback play, but now has capable QB Matt Cassel to throw him the ball.

-Steve Slaton-

The first of three rookies on this list of 2008 breakouts. Slaton enjoyed a fine season last year with the Texans, since he was in position to start come the regular season. He proved that his college career was no fluke as he totaled 1,282 yards on 268 carries, and an extra 377 yards on 50 receptions while also scoring ten total touchdowns. Look for these numbers to grow next season since he will hopefully have a fully healthy Matt Schaub throwing him the ball and keeping the passing game, (and in turn running game) honest.

-Chris Johnson-

Rookie number two on the list. Johnson ran the fastest combine 40 time out of anyone in the draft last season, clocked with a robust 4.24 seconds. He let his speed know on the field as well, garnering 1,228 yards on 251 carries, for a stellar 4.8 ypa while also adding in nine touchdowns. Look for Johnson to improve upon these numbers since LenDale White, (the other back in this rbbc) is not looked too highly upon amongst the Tennessee Staff.

-Matt Forte-

The third and final rookie on this list. Forte enjoyed perhaps the best rookie season of any player this decade in terms of fantasy production in his first season in the bigs. He was the starter from day one, and boy, did he let know that he was the starter. Forte rushed the ball a ridiculous 316 times, and caught the ball an equally ridiculous 63 times for a grand total of 1,715 total yards, and 12 scores. Of the three rooks, I feel that Matty F has the highest chance of failing to meet his previous seasons' statistics, just because they were so crazy.

-DeAngelo Williams-

The Panther had a season for the ages last year. Like many on this list, Williams had improved statistically in each of his seasons in the league. In 2006, (his rookie season), he rushed the ball 121 times for 501 yards and a score. Then in 2007, he ran with the ball 23 more times for 216 more yards and an additional three scores. And then there was last season: 273 carries, 1,515 yards, 20 total TDs. It is important to note that his ypa went up each season as well.

-Matt Schaub-

I know what you are thinking, "How can a guy who missed five games last season be considered a "breakout player"? Well i'll tell you why. Despite the fact that he missed nearly 1/3 of the season, he still managed to pass for over 3,000 yards and 15 scores. That's Matt Ryan's numbers in 1/3 less the time. Schaub had talent to work with, (especially with Slaton's emergence) and is looking at a dandy season next year.

-Aaron Rodgers-

After three seasons of waiting on the bench in favor of old man Favre, Rodgers finally got his chance to show his stuff last season. And show his stuff he did to the tune of 4,038 passing yards and 28 touchdowns compared to just 13 interceptions. Rodgers is an example that opportunity can make flourish.

So with all this in check, let's look at a simpler and more mathematical way to look at the above "reasons" as to why these players achieved such high success.

Forty percent of the "break-outs" showed statistical improvement each year.

Thirty percent of the "break-outs" were rookies in a position to start.

Ten percent of the "break-outs" benefited from a key departure on their team.

Ten percent of the "break-outs" benefitted from a key addition on their team.

Ten percent of the "break-outs" benefited from joining a new team.

With that in mind, here are ten players who show one of those pre-requisites for this upcoming season.

Chris "Beanie" Wells- (Rookie in position to start).
Michael Crabtree- (Rookie in position to start).
Derrick Ward- (New team).
Kyle Orton- (New team).
Jerricho Cotchery- (Key departure from team).
Domenik Hixon- (Key departure(s) from team).
Donnie Avery- (Key departure from team).
Anthony Gonzalez- (Key departure from team).
Devin Hester- (Key addition to team).
Greg Olsen- (Key addition to team).

Target these "break-out candidates", and you will sure assume some middle-late round stars on your roster.

Fantasy Football: Philip Rivers or Aaron Rodgers?

Taylor Rummel — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:35:26 -0400

According to 12-team mock drafts being held on fantasyfootballcalculator, Quarterback Philip Rivers of the San Diego Chargers is being selected with the seventh pick in the fourth round, and Quarterback Aaron Rodgers of the Green Bay Packers is being taken two picks later in the fourth.

But which one is better?

We'll start with Rivers since he is the first man being taken.

Last season, Rivers set new career highs for passing yards, (4,009), touchdowns, (34), completion percentage, (65.3 percent) and quarterback rating, (105.5).

Compared to the rest of the NFL's QBs, Rivers finished first in terms of rating, tied for first in touchdown passes, fifth in passing yards and seventh in completion percentage. Certainly these numbers make him a top five quarterback overall.

Rivers achieved these numbers by being the commandor of a great, and star-studded offense. He had sensational tight end Antonio Gates, emerging wideout Vincent Jackson, and solid vet Chris Chambers to chuck the ball to on any particular down.

In the backfield he had perhaps the best in the business, LaDanianTomlinson, to help deflect defensive attention. LT had a down year certainly last season, and the fact that he is an old-man now leads me to believe that the Chargers will use backup Darren Sproles now more than ever. Sproles has shown his elusiveness in the open-field while giving LT a breather, evident by his 5.4 ypa average. He also proves to be a fantastic dump-off option for Rivers, as he[Sproles] implemented a robust 11.8 ypc last year.

No one is leaving from the Chargers offense, so Rivers should continue to enjoy statistical success, just maybe not to the levels that he did in 2008.

Mr. Rodgers, like Rivers, enjoyed a career year in every regard. He surpassed 4,000 passing yards, had a completion percentage of 63.6, threw 28 touchdowns and had a quarterback rating of 93.8.

Those totals were good enough for fourth, tenth, fourth and sixth respectively; and, like Rivers, produced well enough to warrant his selection as a top ten fantasy quarterback, and possibly top five.

Rodgers had star wide receiver Greg Jennings, aged-veteran Donald Driver, up-and-coming receiver James Jones, and tight end Donald Lee to throw the ball to last season. Not a great list of names, but must've been good enough for Rodgers to accumulate the stats that he did.

In the backfield he had underachiever Ryan Grant. A season after he gave fantasy managers the vibe to draft him high, (it rhymes), Grant came up flat, averaging a terrible 3.9 ypa, (compared to the 5.1 in 2007). He should bounce back though, since the passing game will help open up the running game, and vice versa.

The fact that Rodgers was able to put up the stats that he did, while playing in a mediocre offense to say the least, is mightily impressive. Impressive so much that I think he will outperform quarterback Philip Rivers this upcoming year. My reasoning is that while Rodgers can only go up, Rivers can only go down since I think he has achieved as high as he ultimately will statistically.

Draft either as a sure-fire number one fantasy quarterback.

Fantasy Football: Predicting a "Bust"

Taylor Rummel — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:39:22 -0400

The absolute worst nightmare for every fantasy football manager is the thought of spending an early round pick on a player who "busts."

Last year, the following players were major busts:

Joseph Addai, (first round)
Larry Johnson, (second round)
Willis McGahee, (second round)
Braylon Edwards, (second round)
Laurence Maroney, (third round)
Rudi Johnson, (fourth round)
Edgerrin James, (fourth round)
Selvin Young, (fifth round)

Here's a quick take on the situation that each of the above players were in last year, and why they were so bad:

Joseph Addai- He was coming off of a robust season that had him totaling over 1,400 total yards and double digit touchdowns, but missing four games due to injury hampered his ability to "get going" so to speak. Also the fact that he was apart of a high-powered passing and not running certainly could have contributed to why he didn't put up impressive stats last year.

Larry Johnson- Three years removed from his latest great season, (and coming off of two disastrous seasons), many were expecting a bounce back year for Johnson; but it didn't happen. Now he was oft-injured, and did face numerous off-field as well as on-field problems, but that, and the fact that he was apart of the lowly Chief's offense proved to be the reasons as to why he has not achieved statistically the last two seasons.

Willis McGahee- After four consecutive seasons of nearly 1,000 yards, McGahee hit a wall last season. He didn't participate in three games, but that doesn't cover the fact that this guy stunk last season. The Ravens actually used back Le'Ron McClain more than they used McGahee last season, (beating him by 62 carries). The shared job coupled with the injury probably factored into him having a "down" season.

Braylon Edwards- Edwards experienced his worst season since his rookie one last year. Part of the blame fell on the fact that he dropped nearly everything thrown his way, (perhaps a bit sarcastic). Another share of the blame was on the Browns just being terrible last season. They were 4-12. When you are that bad, it's hard for anyone to get going on the offense. And the last fact, (one that gets overlooked), is that quarterback Derek Anderson was missing from six games last season. Edwards probably did not have as good as chemistry with Quinn as he did with Anderson, so perhaps that is why Edwards' stats were not as good as they could have been.

Laurence Maroney- Maroney was injured for all but three games last season, so that fact alone can explain why he had next to no numbers to show. But when you look at his previous career stats, you see that he has never eclipsed 900 rush yards or six rushing touchdowns. Perhaps Maroney has been overrated the last few seasons? It also hasn't helped that he has been apart of the passing machine that is Tom Brady & Co. since his inception in the NFL.

Rudi Johnson- "The Cincy Wonder" fell off the map during the 2007 season, and then again in his first season as a Detroit Lion. The Lions had just selected rookie running back Kevin Smith, and he had started all but one game during the course of the season. The fact that Johnson rid the bench, and was apart of arguably sport's worst team, perhaps kept him from sustaining a good statistical season.

Edgerrin James- This 30 year old suffered his first downer year last season, only totaling 514 yards and three rushing touchdowns. He missed three games, and had fellow running back Tim Hightower breathing down his neck all season for carries, (which he received). That and the fact that he is in a pass-first, second, and third offense could have been the reason as to why he essentially did nothing for fantasy teams last season.

Selvin Young- Who you might say? This guy was figured to handle the load for the notoriously mysterious Denver backfield, and unfortunately for his owners, got injured in week six. But before he got injured, he didn't receive the amount of carries that fantasy owners were expecting, averaging only around nine attempts a game. I know I attribute those low totals to the fact that Denver uses all of their backs equally it seems.

So now let's put all of these players into a "chart" to see just what reasons caused the players to bust.

Three players played in an offense built for the position opposite theirs (e.g.: running back playing in passing offense). 37.5%
Three players played on terrible teams. 37.5%
Two players were part of a running back by committee. 25%

Now let's look at players who are apart of those situations this year:

Steven Jackson
Frank Gore
Kevin Smith
Pierre Thomas
Knowshon Moreno
Derrick Ward
Darren McFadden
Chris "Beanie" Wells
Cedric Benson
Dwayne Bowe
Joseph Addai
Larry Johnson

Steer clear of those players, (and players in the situations mentioned above)- in your upcoming fantasy draft, and you will minimize the chance of selecting a player who will ultimately bust.

Fantasy Football: Terrell Owens or Chad Ochocinco?

Taylor Rummel — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:53:48 -0400

According to 12-team mock drafts being held on fantasyfootballcalculator, Terrell Owens is being selected in the middle-late third round, whereas Chad Ochocinco is being plucked off the board in the middle of the fourth.

Both of these trouble-makers find themselves in brand-new situations this season (Owens going to Buffalo, and Ochocinco being the main man in Cincy).

So who is going to produce the better numbers this year?

We will start with Owens (since he is being drafted first).

Last year with the Cowboys, Owens totaled 1,052 yards on 69 receptions, and also snagged ten touchdowns. It's impressive that he was able to do this while sharing the field with such capable players as: Marion Barber, Roy Williams, and Jason Witten.

However now Owens goes from an established offense to one that is a work in progress. Buffalo's top offensive talent, Marshawn Lynch, is suspended for the first three games of the NFL regular season because of a weapons charge from the offseason.

This will make it easier for opposing defenses to key in on Owens, since the running game will not be a threat. Owens does, however, have receiver Lee Evans to take away some attention, as Evans has shown that he can play as a more-than-serviceable receiver in the NFL.

But perhaps the biggest switch that Owens will have to deal with is the quarterback change. No longer does he have trusty QB Tony Romo to throw him the ball; the new commander in chief is Trent Edwards, the third-year man out of Stanford who has flashed some, but not a ton of potential in his brief stint in the NFL.

Last year, Edwards posted decent numbers for only throwing the ball 374 times. He garnered nearly 2,700 yards and threw 11 touchdowns with a 65.5 completion percentage but also played victim of the pass 10 times.

Edwards should though show more maturity this upcoming season though since he has had a few years to fit under his belt while seeing how the NFL operates.

My gut feeling on T.O says that his stats will regress a bit, just because of the fact that more attention will be focused on him and he has a lesser QB throwing him the ball.

Expect stats around the ballpark of 900 yards, and eight touchdowns.

And now Mr. Golden Toes.

Last season, Ochocinco caught the ball 53 time for 540 yards and four scores; a down year for him to say the least. It is important to note though that Chad missed a total of three games during the course of the season.

Unlike Owens, Chad is remaining with the team that he had played for last season. Also different from T.O is the fact that Chad won't be burdened with having to share a significant portion of targets to another capable receiver on the club; (since fellow receiver T.J. Houshmandzadeh was signed by the Seattle Seahawks in the offseason).

Instead, Ochocinco now has Laveranues Coles to share the load with; which isn't all bad. Coles will help to deflect some of the defensive attention that Ocho would be getting otherwise, since he [Coles] has shown that he can play, and play well.

But let's not kid ourselves: Coles is no Houshmandzadeh. He will not garner the same amount of looks that a player of Housh's caliber would. As a result, look for Ochocinco to receive the leftovers.

Perhaps the biggest reason why Ochocinco suffered such a miserable season was because his quarterback, Veteran Carson Palmer was out for 12 games. 12. That's 75 percent of the season people. Would you expect Reggie Wayne to produce consistent numbers if Jim Sorgi was throwing to him? No, so why should we hold Chad to it?

I believe that he is being undervalued since people just remember the[crappy] stats that he put up, and not the fact that he had a backup throwing to him almost all season.

With Palmer back and healthy, expect Ochocinco's numbers to rebound to their normal lines; lines of- 1,000 yards and ten touchdowns.

And for my final opinion, I would say that I would rather have Chad Ochocinco. He has a better QB throwing to him, and the Bengals will be behind more than the Bills will be, forcing them to throw the ball more often, (which will result in more receptions for Chad).

However, either represent a fine No. 2 option for your fantasy team.

Fantasy Football: Drew Brees or Tom Brady?

Taylor Rummel — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:31:45 -0400

According to the most up-to-date ADP on fantasyfootballcalculator.com, Drew Brees has narrowly edged out fellow gunslinger Tom Brady as the top chosen quarterback in fantasy football mock drafts thus far.

On average, in 12-team mocks being held, Brees is being selected in the middle of round two, (pick five in the round to be exact). Likewise, Brady is also being selected in the middle of the second; (pick number seven in the round).

The fact that they are being drafted so closely together leads me to believe that the opinion on who is best is a much divided one.

Let's take a look at Brees first, (since he is the first quarterback being drafted).

Last season, Brees led the league in passing yards with an insane 5,069 hash mark tallies, beating out runner-up Kurt Warner by more than 480 yards. Pretty significant difference considering that’s more than 10 percent of Warner’s total.

Along with the robust yardage total came the touchdowns; 34 of them to be exact; a number also good enough for lead the league, (tied with San Diego quarterback Phillip Rivers).

So how did Brees manage to accomplish these league-leading statistics?

The answer can be attributed to numerous players on the Saint's roster, (part of the reason why Brees is so highly valued). He has multiple options to distribute the ball to including: Marques Colston, Lance Moore, Devery Henderson, Jeremy Shockey, Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas.

However, one must do a little more research to see just how remarkable Brees' stats actually were.

Mentioned as one of Brees' accomplices was receiver Marques Colston. Colston solidified himself as a legitimate receiver his rookie season in 2006 where he totaled 1,038 yards and eight scores; outstanding numbers for a rookie of any position.

The following season Colston built on the stellar numbers, managing over 1,200 yards and snagging 12 touchdowns.

But then last season, disaster struck and Colston was tagged with an injury that forced him to miss the first five games of the NFL regular season.

But Brees still led the league in passing yards and touchdowns.

Colston wasn't the only prominent Saints player who was affected by the injury-bug, however. Running Back Reggie Bush, (notorious for his pass-catching ability) was ousted for six total games from the middle-late part of the season.

But Brees still led the league in passing yards and touchdowns.

Again I ask, how did Brees manage to lead the league in both passing yards and touchdowns—especially without arguably his two main targets?

Lance Moore, come on down!

Moore had more than a career-year filling in for the injured Colston last season, more than tripling his personal best for receiving yards, (302 to 928), and more than quadrupling his touchdown output, (two to 10).

I guess this just solidifies the fact that no matter who Brees throws to, he will still accumulate his mind-boggling stats.

Another player on the Saints roster emerged last season: running back Pierre Thomas.

He made his "star" known while filling in for the injured Bush in the later half of the season and performed admirably in his place, snatching nine touchdowns.

It's easy to overlook the fact that the Saints have a running game, amidst their ability and persistence to air it out. The fact that they have a viable RB threat can only help Brees as it will help to take a little bit of attention off him.

And the last important note on Brees is that he is finally fully healthy.I stress the word fully, because fantasy managers tend to be a bit leery of quarterbacks who are just coming back from an injury.

Brees is five and a half full seasons removed from his shoulder injury that had haunted him earlier in his career and imagine what a healthy Brees is capable of doing with a fully healthy arsenal to catch his passes.

And then there was Tom Brady.

The record-setting, super-model-dating Brady was a wanted man to say the least last season by fantasy managers.

His unmatched season in 2007 led owners to draft him in the first round, and they were in for a cruel joke as Brady injured his knee not one quarter into the NFL season.

Just goes to show that there are no truly safe fantasy picks.

But the pieces are all in place for Brady to revisit his monster numbers that he attained in '07.

He has everyone that was apart of the run, (minus Josh McDaniels). Moss, Welker, Maroney, Faulk, Belichick all remain from the magical season, just two years ago.

New to the team include burner Joey Galloway, and the seemingly ageless Fred Taylor.

Galloway, suffered an injury-plagued season with the Tampa Bay Bucs last year in an ultimately downer year, only netting 13 catches for 138 yards.

But before last year's debacle, Galloway put up three straight seasons of over 1,000 yards while totaling at least six touchdowns in each. Going from the No. 1 option in Tampa to the No. 3 in New England will certainly take a lot of pressure off of his shoulders.

Taylor meanwhile gives the Pats a viable back to be able to give Brady a rest every few plays. Taylor, (like Galloway), is nearing the end of his career, but that doesn't mean that he still can't be productive.

Last year, he rushed for 556 yards and a score while splitting carries with fellow back Maurice Jones-Drew. In his previous two seasons, Taylor averaged over 1,100 yards, so he still possesses the ability to pound it out.

I liken the Pats to a retirement home since it seems that they house a ton of aging vets each year, but granted they do take damn well care of them.

In Brady's possession are three capable wide receivers, and three capable backs, (Taylor, Maroney, Faulk). There is no reason for him to not come close to his 2007 form. Granted, I don't expect him to match 50 touchdowns but 40 is not out of the question.

Belichick loves to not only throw the ball, but throw when he's ahead, so there's no fear of the team giving up the pass for the run in blowouts.

So the question is, who will be the better fantasy quarterback for next season?

And I say Brees.

The combination of a legit aerial and ground game, and him being a more healthy and less rusty pushes him over the top in my mind.

Draft either if they fall in the second round.

Fantasy Football: Welcome to Fantasy Relevance Roy Williams

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:25:45 -0400

This guy has already been fantasy relevant. But the situation that he is apart of now puts his "relevance" through the roof.

Williams is entering his sixth season in the league, and first full season with the Dallas Cowboys after previously spending his first five seasons with the Detroit Lions.

He didn't do much when he was traded to the 'Boys mid-way during the season, (only accumulating 19 catches for 198 yards and a score) but remember that he was the third and sometimes fourth option for Quarterback Tony Romo.

Now that Top Option Terrell Owens is gone, the door has been left wide open for Williams to emerge as one of Romo's favorite target.

Certainly Williams is capable of the load that is sure to come his way.

Take a look at these stats year-by-year while apart of arguably the NFL's worst team:

2004 - 817 yards, 1 touchdown
2005 - 686 yards, 1 touchdown
2006 - 1,310 yards, 2 touchdowns
2007 - 838 yards, 2 touchdowns

You can't blame him for the inadequate touchdown totals because how often were the Lions in position to score? Never. It's the yards that matter.

The yardage average comes out to 912 per season, not too shabby of a number again considering the situation that he was in. With a better QB throwing to him, one has to imagine that the number can only go up.

What will also help Williams this upcoming season is the presence of a viable backfield. The fact that the Cowboys have Marion Barber, Felix Jones, and Tashard Choice, (all more than capable play-makers), will mean that opposing defenses will have to respect the run. This in turn will allow the passing lanes to be as open as McDonalds; allowing all wide receivers to proceed in their routes with minimal coverage.

On average, Williams has been going in the early stages of the fourth round, along the likes of fellow wideouts T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Brandon Marshall, and Braylon Edwards.

Out of the bunch, I like Williams the most. He possesses the most upside, and the least risk I think of any of the four.

Draft Williams with confidence as your number one, yes, number one, wide receiver. Anyone who has the potential to put together a 1,000 yard ten touchdown season should be considered a fantasy starter.

projection: 1,100 yards, 9 touchdowns

Fantasy Football: Top 50 Overall Rankings

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:11:21 -0400

Every year it's a different list. Players get hurt, have career years, and get sent to different teams; all factors that play a part in a player's ranking.

This year is no different.

Here's my personal Top 50 Players:

Adrian Peterson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Matt Forte
Steve Slaton
Michael Turner
Chris Johnson
Steven Jackson
LaDanian Tomlinson
DeAngelo Williams
Brandon Jacobs
Randy Moss
Larry Fitzgerald
Reggie Wayne
Andre Johnson
Calvin Johnson
Drew Brees
Tom Brady
Frank Gore
Clinton Portis
Brian Westbrook
Greg Jennings
Marion Barber
Steve Smith
Marques Colston
Roddy White
Ryan Grant
Anquan Boldin
Peyton Manning
Brandon Marshall
Kevin Smith
Ronnie Brown
Terrell Owens
Roy Williams
Willie Parker
Marshawn Lynch
Derrick Ward
Pierre Thomas
Jonathan Stewart
Chad Ochocinco
Wes Welker
Dwayne Bowe
Kurt Warner
Aaron Rodgers
Thomas Jones
Knowshon Moreno
Darren McFadden
Vincent Jackson
Joseph Addai
Phillip Rivers
T.J. Houshmandzadeh

Please drop a comment. I'd love nothing more than to argue why I have a player in a certain spot.

Thanks.

You Know You Like Sports When... (Part Two)

Taylor Rummel — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:58:19 -0400

For my 25th career article here on bleachereport, I can't honestly say that I envisioned it being a humor piece. I am not the humorous type and don't particularly like humor, but humor seems to have found favor with me. And hopefully you have first checked out part 1 of this series, (although you won't lose anything if you don't). Anyways, I am under the understanding that my blabbling won't do anyone any favors, so here we go. Enjoy.

Begin Slideshow