<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Bleacher Report - Articles by BlackandGold36</title>
    <link>http://bleacherreport.com/</link>
    <description>Bleacher Report - The open source sports network</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Pre-Week 1 Power Rankings</title>
      <author>BlackandGold36</author>
      <description>My Pre Week 1 NFL Power Rankings

These will be published once a week, during the NFL season. There will be quite a few changes since my pre draft rankings, and these are based solely on how strong a team is, not their record. Some things you may not fully agree with, but please only comment if you have constructive criticism or thoughts to share, not outright or flagrant flaming.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/252205-pre-week-1-power-rankings"&gt;Begin Slideshow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:28:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/252205-pre-week-1-power-rankings</link>
      <guid>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/252205-pre-week-1-power-rankings</guid>
      <comments>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/252205-pre-week-1-power-rankings</comments>
      <category>Football</category>
      <category>NFL</category>
      <category>Rankings/List</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NFL Standings at the End of the 2009-2010 Season</title>
      <author>BlackandGold36</author>
      <description>The 2009-2010 season of the &lt;a href="/nfl"&gt;NFL&lt;/a&gt; is coming up fast, racing toward another outstanding show. We still have months to go, and all of the offseason workouts, the NFL Draft and Preseason to get through, but here is a preliminary look. I doubt it will be even close to accurate, as there are things that change in the NFL without anyone being able to predict them. Injuries, trades, players breaking out, any of those things could change this standings list. But as of now...here are my thoughts on the final standings after all 17 weeks of the season have been played. I will have new rankings up periodically before the season, and one right after the draft as well, so keep watching. These rankings are my own personal thoughts, so they probably have no bearing on the actual standings after week 17.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/160516-nfl-standings-after-week-17-2009-10"&gt;Begin Slideshow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:32:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/160516-nfl-standings-after-week-17-2009-10</link>
      <guid>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/160516-nfl-standings-after-week-17-2009-10</guid>
      <comments>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/160516-nfl-standings-after-week-17-2009-10</comments>
      <category>Football</category>
      <category>NFL</category>
      <category>Preview/Prediction</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Shifting Status Of The NFL Standings</title>
      <author>BlackandGold36</author>
      <description>&lt;div style=""&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;The &lt;a href="/nfl"&gt;NFL&lt;/a&gt; is a fluid entity. Almost nothing stays the same from year to year save for three things.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;1. &lt;a href="/peyton-manning"&gt;Peyton Manning&lt;/a&gt; will remain as one of the top statistical players in the NFL.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;2. The Detroit Lions will wallow in mediocrity or worse.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;3. At some point within the season, a controversy will arise over a call made by a referee.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Almost everything else is subject to change. And that's something that not too many people understand. When you see the projections for fantasy football, or the "power rankings" for the 32 NFL teams at the beginning of the year, most writers/fans merely plug in the standings from the prior season with a few small changes.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;And almost never are they even close to right. You find me someone who told you "&lt;a href="/tom-brady"&gt;Tom Brady&lt;/a&gt; goes down in Week One with an injury, and the Patriots still go 11-5, and I'll find you a Patriots Homer with the ability to see the future.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Until the games are played, we know nothing. Until half a season is over, there is almost no way of even guessing who will win the eight respective divisions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Case in point, at the beginning of last season, most "experts" said the 8 division winners would be...Indianapolis, New England, San Diego, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Green Bay, Tampa Bay and Seattle. By the middle of the season, those 8 teams had been blown apart.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Pittsburgh was the only one of those eight teams that was still considered an elite team. Indy was hit by the injury bug. New England got hit by a tiny yet incredibly powerful injury bug (named Bernard Pollard).&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Green Bay, Tampa Bay and Dallas were not terrible, but were no longer leading their divisions. And Seattle and San Diego had fallen apart.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;By&amp;nbsp;midseason, the eight division winners were projected to be...Tennessee, New York (New England was considered a contender, but many predicted they'd soon fall apart), Denver, Pittsburgh, New York, Who the hell knows, Carolina and Arizona.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Only one of the eight teams was still projected to have the best record in its' division. ONLY ONE. In only eight games, the entire landscape had changed. And then, with 8 more games, it had changed once again.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;By seasons end, San Diego worked its' way back up due to Denver's complete destruction. Indy and New England got themselves back to great and fairly strong, respectively, but neither one could win it's division.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Tampa Bay had looked strong near week 12, but fell apart near the end. Green Bay was a complete mess, and Seattle finished off the worst season it has had in recent memory.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Dallas was wallowing in NFC mediocrity, and Pittsburgh was one of the only original teams that still looked as strong as it had at the beginning of the season, if not stronger.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;And this happens every year.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Things change, the lines are crossed, small events affect slightly bigger ones, and so on. Nothing stays the same. How else could the Dolphins go from 1-15 to 11-5? How could the Lions go from 7-9 to 0-16? How else could there not be a repeat champion of the NFC South division since it was created?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Going into more detail for the NFC South, since 2002,&amp;nbsp;every&amp;nbsp;team that finished in last place one year won the division the next year.&amp;nbsp;6 years in a row.&amp;nbsp;That trend partially continued last year as the Falcons still made the playoffs, even if they didn't win the division.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;The NFL is a fluid entity. The Patriots, Colts, Chargers and Steelers are looked on as the elite currently, and have been for a few years. The NFC has had no champions emerge and stay at the top. But even with those 4 teams, people forget how quickly they make assumptions.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;In 2006, Baltimore went 13-3 and won the AFC North. The next year, Pittsburgh and Cleveland went 10-6 to claim the best record and Baltimore went 5-11. &amp;nbsp;So this year, when Baltimore took off to end up 11-5, everyone was shocked. Why?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;They were only one year removed from getting a playoff bye with the second best AFC record, and people were shocked they were any good at all. Teams have off years all the time, it doesn't mean they're suddenly horrible.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Look at Pittsburgh's 2003 6-10 record or Philadelphia's 2005 6-10 record. Both of those teams had 10 wins or better in the season before and after their flopped season, and it was obviously an outlier. Yet no one pays attention to these things.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;Don't be shocked next year when New Orleans wins the NFC South, Miami finishes below .500 or&amp;nbsp;any&amp;nbsp;team from the NFC West wins the division. The NFL changes and the teams roll with the punches.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0px 0px 15px;"&gt;So why can't the analysts and projectionists and die hard fans do the same?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:33:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/154859-the-shifting-status-of-the-nfl-standings</link>
      <guid>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/154859-the-shifting-status-of-the-nfl-standings</guid>
      <comments>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/154859-the-shifting-status-of-the-nfl-standings</comments>
      <category>Football</category>
      <category>NFL</category>
      <category>Opinion</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
