Dave Reginek/Getty Images
If Hillis officially went up for a trade, a lot of teams would be quick to contact the Browns and try to pick him up. And although it may seem logical for these three teams to make an offer, don't hold your breath on them:
Kansas City Chiefs
Yes, Jamaal Charles is out for the season, and yes, the Chiefs have a significantly weaker ground game. However, there is no reason to suggest that Jamaal Charles won't be back next year, and in the meantime, Thomas Jones and Jackie Battle are doing just fine in the backfield.
Hillis is a very talented player who would require a large amount of money and a very good trade, and the Chiefs would only really need Hillis for one year considering they already have a goal line back in Thomas Jones. And between him and Charles, there isn't much room for a third prominent back.
Surprisingly, the Steelers have been mentioned as a team interested in Hillis, and I can't imagine why. Rashard Mendenhall and Isaac Redman, the two main backs in Pittsburgh, are both more suited for running between the tackles and running over defenders rather than around them.
Peyton Hillis plays the exact same way, meaning adding him would just add one more power back to a crowded backfield and wouldn't give the Steelers much of an advantage.
It makes more sense for the Broncos to try and get Hillis back than for the Chiefs or Steelers to make an offer for him, but it still won't happen. The Broncos don't have the best run game in the league, but Willis McGahee has easily proved he can still start and effectively move the ball, and the Broncos should be more concerned with the passing game than the running game right now.
Willis McGahee is playing much more consistently than Kyle Orton, and it is definitely worth it for the Broncos to continue giving the ball to him rather than trying to make an offer for someone like Hillis.