The Brian Burke Saga Part 2: Pros, Cons, and Everything Inbetween

Bryan Thiel by Senior Writer Written on December 02, 2008
Burke_feature
(Page 2 of 3)
>
Con: While the Canucks were a great regular season team, they were a terrible playoff team. The squad was dogged with inconsistency, questionable goaltending, and unexpected early exits. Three of the four seasons Burke was in Vancouver, the team never made it out of the first round, and the year they did (2002/03) they lost in seven to Minnesota.

If Burke had been in Anaheim a few more years (or at least until the end of this season), it'd be interesting to see if the Ducks would respond more like the '07 team or the '08 team when faced with playoff adversity.

Advantage Con


Although Burke did win the cup with that team in Anaheim, the troubles encountered in the first round with Vancouver and last year with Anaheim don't bode well for Leaf fans hopes, ring or not.

Then again, this is a city that throws a parade when the Leafs make the playoffs.

Burke stands by and supports his players


Pro:
Let's face it—Toronto needs management who will stand by their players through the good times and bad in this media market, it's been the problem going all the way back to the Harold Ballard era.

A vocal General Manager who will support his players and lash back at the media when the going gets rough has helped players gain confidence and let's them like the situation in which they play.

Getting players comfortable is half the battle.

Con:
Burke has a habit of picking favorites and riding them out, whether they work or not. Case in point: Dan Cloutier.

Burke's attitude may also hurt the roster during the beginning stages of his tenure, as he may be seen as picking favorites, which could divide a locker room until the roster is altered to exclude those players, or they decide to play for him.

Advantage: Pro


Whether or not it divides a locker room, this is the kind of person the players need. If it divides the roster then he can just trade the ones who don't like it away anyhow.

Burke has also made no bones about the fact that he offers a ten-day extension on the NHL's no-movement period prior to Christmas.

Burke is a shrewd negotiator who can construct a team based around the present and the future...

Pro: First of all, Burke doesn't deal with no-trade clauses. The only one that he's handed out to his players in Anaheim is the one given to Jean-Sabastien Giguere, and that's due to health concerns over Giguere's children.

From then on, he signed Kunitz, Perry, and Getzlaf to long-term deals, securing the future of the Ducks' until 2011/12 (when Kunitz's deal runs it's course), while he's also left Anaheim with a plethora of young, talented defensemen with size to boot.

Con: While Burke has built a fairly strong team, Anaheim is also crippled with regards to cap space. They currently have just over 300k in cap space, with 15 players approaching free agency.

Advantage (Slightly): Con

(2)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

7 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

329
reads

7
comments

written on December 02, 2008 Opinion

Top Stories from NHL.com

NHL on B/R | Official Partners

The best Maple Leafs newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.