MMADownload App

UFC Comentary: Bias and Joe Rogan

Mike RedmanContributor ISeptember 21, 2016

Has anyone else noticed a bias in UFC commentary?

Mike Goldberg has a clear voice and knows the right questions to ask, which is necessary for directing commentating. Joe Rogan, love him or hate him (as it seems to be one or the other), knows his stuff when it comes to the ground game—Jiu-Jitsu.

But what about stand up/clinch? Maybe I'm alone on this one, but I find that it is greatly underrepresented. Joe leads the conversation as the "expert," but his focus resides on the ground.

During stand up he has very little in depth knowledge, or at least he doesn't express it. A knowledgeable patron of the striking game would for instance mention...the direction a fighter is circling: is he circling away from his opponents power hand? Is he inadvertently endangering himself? How is his stance going to help/inhibit him?

Instead we get Goldberg saying: "Nice right hand by _______". To which Rogan replies "He is sooooo powerful".

Or worse still, talking about something completely irrelevant while there is a pause in the action.

This isn't a "I hate Joe Rogan" rant, he's a colourful commentator whose very enthusiastic and knows his stuff concerning the ground game. I just think adding an expert in the striking game or all round MMA would help to offset the bias.

Good idea? Bad idea? Let me know.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices