San Jose Sharks: 3 Simple Reasons They Will Be a Better Team This Season

Scott SemmlerAnalyst IIAugust 1, 2011

San Jose Sharks: 3 Simple Reasons They Will Be a Better Team This Season

0 of 3

    The San Jose Sharks and GM Doug Wilson have been extremely busy this offseason. Their flurry of trades and signings have been well documented throughout the league, and some wonder whether or not they were for the betterment of the team.

    The Sharks started off by trading young winger Devin Setoguchi, prospect Charlie Coyle and their first-round pick to the Minnesota Wild for All-Star defenseman Brent Burns.

    They backed that up a week or so later in another trade with the Wild. This time it was Dany Heatley in exchange for the speedy Martin Havlat.

    The main discussion after the trades was how this would affect the Sharks' odds at another Stanley Cup run next season.

    San Jose gave up scoring talent to acquire players that could fill the holes that the team lacked last season.

    In all reality, the Sharks got better.

    Here are three simple reasons why the Sharks will be better heading into next season.

    If you like this article, check out my Bay Area Sports Talk blog!

The San Jose Sharks Defense Is Solid

1 of 3

    The acquisition of one of the best young defensemen in hockey today, Brent Burns, is going to notably improve the blue line for the Sharks.

    In the 2010-11 season, the Sharks' defense seemed to be lackluster and was undoubtedly the team's weakness throughout the season. This became extremely clear during the playoffs.

    The Sharks are reportedly still planning on rolling out the duo of Dan Boyle and Douglas Murray as their first line. That line would be followed by Burns and Marc-Edouard Vlasic; Jason Demers and Jim Vandermeer would take up the third line.

    Burns is the most notable addition to this defense. He gives the team a physical appearance, something that the team lacked last season and were set on improving this offseason.

    The 26-year-old also brings the team a consistent and powerful shot from the point—the loss of which has not been cured since Rob Blake left San Jose and retired from hockey.

    The addition of Vandermeer also gives the team a veteran presence with success in the playoffs, as well as a physical presence along the boards.

    San Jose's three lines on defense are extremely solid and will give the team a whole new look and feel next season.

A Whole New Look to the Offense

2 of 3

    The most obvious thing to take away from both of the Sharks' Western Conference Finals defeats was that the Chicago Blackhawks and Vancouver Canucks were just plain quicker than San Jose.

    It was an issue that GM Doug Wilson was frankly sick of. He knew, however, that they needed to improve if the team was to have a realistic chance at making it to the Stanley Cup Finals in the coming seasons.

    Enter Martin Havlat, whose trade from Minnesota has some loving and others disliking the exchange.

    The pure dislike comes from the fact that the Sharks gave up a pure scorer in Dany Heatley for a veteran speedster in Havlat. Heatley's worst season point totals were Havlat's best in 2010-11.

    There are reports that coach Todd McLellan has a perfect strategy to change the overall skill-set and repertoire of the team.

    McLellan has reportedly chosen to place Havlat on the second line with Ryane Clowe and Logan Couture, while still having Patrick Marleau play with Joe Thornton and Joe Pavelski on the first.

    The idea is that San Jose would have a speedster in Marleau on the first line and another speedster in Havlat on the second line.

    The entire offensive mind of the Sharks will change this next season with that type of strategy—and improve a clear weakness of San Jose that dates back to the 2010 Western Conference Finals.

In Reality, the Sharks Did Not Lose Much

3 of 3

    The current issue of the offseason for the San Jose Sharks is that they acquired too little for what they gave up.

    The two issues are (1) trading the pure scorer Heatley for the veteran second-tier player Havlat, and (2) trading young scorers in Setoguchi and Coyle for an elite, young defenseman. The impression was that they gave up too much in the Setoguchi/Burns deal for Burns to be in the last year of his contract.

    The Burns issue has been cleared up, however, with the Sharks signing him on Monday to a five-year contract.

    Problem solved.

    But why give up Setoguchi, whose future is so bright in the NHL?

    The reality is that the 24-year-old's future was never going to get brighter in San Jose. There were too many scorers and superstars on this team for him to shine in teal.

    At midseason, the call was for Setoguchi to be dealt at the trade deadline because of his lack of production throughout the first half. 

    Now that he is gone, suddenly his potential is what matters. However, as long as Thornton, Marleau, Pavelski and Couture were a part of this team, Setoguchi was never going to get his chance.

    He will flourish in Minnesota, but his talent-level in San Jose was at its peak.

    In return, the Sharks received an All-Star defenseman whose ceiling is much higher than Setoguchi's.

    The Heatley deal is more or less of the same. He never lived up to what others had made him up to be in San Jose, and for that, he was dealt. 

    He thrives when he is the only option on the ice; he is sure to do well in Minnesota.

    The fact that San Jose got the Wild to take his contract and massive cap hit next season was a win for Wilson and the Sharks—it will help them financially stay in contention for the Stanley Cup.