The Real Prestige Rankings: Introduction and Outline

Brett Lissenden by Senior Analyst Written on August 18, 2008
Foster_feature
(Page 2 of 5)

Also, everyone losing in the same round receives the same score.  There is no discrepancy based on seed.  Here is the detailed scoring breakdown:

 

Champion: 65 points

Runner-Up: 64 points

Lose in Final Four: 62 points

Lose in Elite Eight: 58 points

Lose in Sweet Sixteen: 50 points

Lose in Second Round: 34 points

Lose in First Round: 2 points

Lose in Play-In game: 1 point

Fail to Qualify for NCAA tournament:  0 points

 

 

While my approach is much simpler than ESPN because it only accounts for post-season success, I argue that it is supremely accurate. 

 

While ESPN tries to reward and penalize teams for many different criteria, it is ultimately impossible to score all aspects of a team’s prestige.  In total the differences for missed or incorrectly scored criteria may be small, but for certain teams or groups of teams, the discrepancies could be very meaningful.

 

In addition, the system I use really encompasses all of the important factors.  For example, you may think that a No. 1 seed defeating a No. 16 seed should receive fewer points than a No. 12 seed upsetting a No. 5 seed. 

 

(3)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

6 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

804
reads

6
comments

written on August 18, 2008 Preview/Prediction

The best Duke newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.