Also, everyone losing in the same round receives the same score. There is no discrepancy based on seed. Here is the detailed scoring breakdown:
Champion: 65 points
Runner-Up: 64 points
Lose in Final Four: 62 points
Lose in Elite Eight: 58 points
Lose in Sweet Sixteen: 50 points
Lose in Second Round: 34 points
Lose in First Round: 2 points
Lose in Play-In game: 1 point
Fail to Qualify for NCAA tournament: 0 points
While my approach is much simpler than ESPN because it only accounts for post-season success, I argue that it is supremely accurate.
While ESPN tries to reward and penalize teams for many different criteria, it is ultimately impossible to score all aspects of a team’s prestige. In total the differences for missed or incorrectly scored criteria may be small, but for certain teams or groups of teams, the discrepancies could be very meaningful.
In addition, the system I use really encompasses all of the important factors. For example, you may think that a No. 1 seed defeating a No. 16 seed should receive fewer points than a No. 12 seed upsetting a No. 5 seed.





We're going to send you the most entertaining Duke Basketball articles, videos, and podcasts from around the web.










6 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete