SPOILER Dixie's Clarification:Two Surprises Are Nicer Than One(Dreamer or Mick?)
This is a spoiler at the bottom so don't read all the way if you are that kind of whiny person.
Start off with another Dixie Carter Tweet...... again.
"To clarify. I will not be making an announcement about how TNA will change forever. You will just see for yourselves in the coming weeks. However, there is still a nice surprise on tonight's Slammiversary pay-per-view. Headed to the venue now."
Okay, so now that makes thing more clear?
I have already touched upon what the earth-shattering announcement would in this article, http://bleacherreport.com/articles/405017-dixies-surprise-at-lockdown-paul-heyman-coming-to-tna .
To sum it up for the lazy, either Paul Heyman is coming to TNA and/or TNA gets another show.
So what would be the nice surprise? I wish Russo and Hogan were hitting the curb, but I doubt that is going to happen.
In more realistic terms, I believe Mrs. Carter has signed another name to the TNA roster.
It has been over 90 days since WWE cleared house and there are a couple of names that could go to TNA and be beneficial. Either Shelton Benjamin and Charlie Haas or Mickie James are the front runners.
Angle has talked about wanting to bring Team Angle back, and Haas and Benjamin are incredibly talented but were poorly used in the WWE.
Mickie James has been talked about a bit more. Carter has gone to James' concerts and has had private meetings with her. Considering how depleted the Knockout division has become and how large her fan base is, it could be a great move for TNA.
Other names could be Tommy Dreamer or Shane Helms: Dreamer for a rumored ECW faction and Helms for a rumored OMEGA faction (OMEGA being the backyard wrestling group the Hardys, Shannon Moore, Helms, Joey Mercury, and a couple other guys started).
So those are my thoughts; what are yours, IWC?
it has been confirmed by pwtorch.com that Tommy Dreamer will appear at Slammiversary tonight........ so yeah, for all those wrestlers above I was wrong about.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?