Does USC Football Deserve The Punishment It Received?
If you would of asked me last week if I thought that USC football should get the hammer layed down on them for violations during the Reggie Bush era, I would of been all for it. After learning tonight what the punishment entails, I have second thoughts on the matter.
ESPN broke the story on the USC Sanctions. The Trojans will be banned for 2 years from post season play, give up 20 scholarships and forfeiture the 2004 National Title. The question I asked myself is why do the kids on the current roster get punished for something that happened while most of them were in middle school?
I just don't think its fair to punish the coaches and the players for things they had no control over. I would of been happy with USC giving up the National Championship and Reggie Bush giving up the Heisman Trophy, but to effect what the current program does is not fair.
I am not a big fan of USC since they play my 2 favorite teams every year (Notre Dame and Washington), but I have to say that the NCAA gave out punishments that do not fit the crime. I am sure Lane Kiffin can ride this storm, but to over come something like this will take years for the program to recover from.
I just feel sad for the players on the current USC roster. They came to USC to play for National Titles, not to sit at home after the regular season.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?