The 5 Real Reason's why WWE "PG" sucks.

« Prev
1 of 7
Next »
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse the slideshow
The 5 Real Reason's why WWE

I use the term "PG" sarcastically some what.

I'm not one of these people who simply believe that by toning down the WWE product's content—it alone is the sole reason why the WWE is experiencing an apparent "slump."

Smackdown has always been a "PG" program. The 1980's and early 1990's—the same.

The last 11 years of Smackdown have been highly successful in establishing the WWE as the dominant international brand it continues to be today.

While the 1980's and early 1990's gave birth and nurtured everything we take for granted. Some what credited as the "Golden Era"—yet PG rated.

While on the flip side, TNA has been attempting to recapture the essence of the Attitude Era with unpredictable programming, crash television style booking, violence, sexuality and offensive language—ironically some even questioned if Anderson is "crossing the line."

These are The 5 Real Reason's why " PG " sucks.

Begin Slideshow »
Load More Stories

Follow B/R on Facebook