Duke Basketball

March Madness 2010: Duke's Royal Treatment a Conspiracy?

DURHAM, NC - MARCH 06:  Jon Scheyer #30 of the Duke Blue Devils runs off the court on senior night during their game against the North Carolina Tar Heels at Cameron Indoor Stadium on March 6, 2010 in Durham, North Carolina.  (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)
Streeter Lecka/Getty Images
Allen J. KhaContributor IIMarch 15, 2010

Although Duke merited a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament considering its excellence all season and late-season grit, Duke was handed a relatively cupcake road to the Final Four.

At face value, I find myself puzzled by how Duke secured the game featuring the opening-round game winner, which theoretically (and usually) goes on the face the overall number-one team in the tournament in the serpentine seeding format.

In addition, Duke seemingly received weak two-, three-, four-, and five- seeds, as well as a weak regional for that matter.

There is no question that Duke deserved a No. 1 seed, and it is understandable why Duke earned a higher seed than overall number-four seed Syracuse (when comparing each team's late-run form, despite the "last 12" being removed as selection criteria). The question is rather the fact that Duke was handed a path that essentially treats them like the overall number-one seed, which is not fair.

Explaining this result is definitely puzzling to many, but respected sports writer and radio host Jason Whitlock offers a plausible explanation for this tournament atrocity.

Whitlock explains that in the midst of television contract negotiations, the NCAA is using the Duke card to boost ratings and the potential TV contract received from CBS or ESPN.

Duke undeniably is a constant attraction in college basketball, so the NCAA's favorable positioning of Duke helps on three fronts: First, propping a legendary brand back to the forefront; second, providing a safety net for fan viewership that will buffer for potentially bad TV-ratings results and "spice up" matchups; and third, bringing Duke elitism back into the fold of college basketball.

Definitely an interesting thought, and bulletin-board material for the current and constant Duke haters out there.

Read: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/03/14/2606897/why-did-duke-receive-favorable.html

--

If you're filling out your bracket and are looking for X-Factors and scouting reports for the tournament, this is a must read: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/362921-march-madness-2010-players-to-watch-in-the-west-regional.

 

 

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices