Mets' 2010 Rotation Is Full of Question Marks

Sports Radio NY AM1240-WGBBContributor IFebruary 16, 2010

NEW YORK - AUGUST 16:  Mike Pelfrey #34 of the New York Mets throws a pitch against the San Francisco Giants on August 16, 2009 at Citi Field in the Flushing neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City.  (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)
Jim McIsaac/Getty Images

Pitchers and catchers report to camp in just a few days.  But, unfortunately, the Mets pitchers are mainly a bunch of back-end rotation guys slotted in behind Johan Santana.  The Mets catchers are a group of back-ups as well. 

Mets GM Omar Minaya seems to be going with a wing (a broken, fragile one at that) and a prayer for the team’s 2010 rotation.  Not overspending on average to mediocre talent is all well and fine.  But since they didn’t make a big play for the only No. 2 starter out there, John Lackey, they really should have tried to come up with a healthy innings-eater to hedge their bet against all the injury-prone pitchers they currently have.

Where has the once-creative, "wheeler-dealer" Minaya been this offseason?  Something akin to last winter’s three-way trade involving Seattle might have been a nice tonic for them again.  Of course, that trade didn’t exactly pan out.  But at the time it was looking pretty nice.

We can look into our crystal ball and make an educated guess as to how starters Mike Pelfrey, John Maine, and Oliver Perez will perform in 2010.  One may have an above-average season (16-17 wins wouldn’t be out of the question), one may be injured for most of the season, and one may just flat-out stink.

The problem is, any one of those three pitchers could easily fit into any one of those three scenarios.  Take your pick.  Pelfrey hasn’t suffered any major injuries yet, but his jitters with runners on base, his penchant for balking, and his insistent hand-licking may qualify him for some type of list, if not the disabled one.

Maine and Perez are not the only ones trying to come back from injury-filled seasons.   Both Fernando Nieve and Jon Niese, who will be fighting for the last slot in the rotation, are also coming off season-ending injuries themselves.

Pelfrey was realistic about his season last year, when he recently said, “I had a lost year. I had a terrible year.” But he doesn’t see what all the hubbub and hand-wringing is about when it comes to the same hurlers taking the mound for the Mets this season: “It’s amazing to me how big of a question there is about the rotation.  I hear about it and I just laugh.”

Maybe he was just another example of the “Verducci Effect,” and the newly svelte Pelfrey will finally find some consistency and realize his potential in 2010. Or maybe not.

And maybe John Maine will win 15 games, just like he did in 2007.  And he’ll make it through a full season without getting hurt.  Or maybe not.  And maybe the new and improved Oliver Perez, after an offseason of training in Arizona at the Facility For Wacky Athletes Who Can’t Be Trusted to Train on Their Own, with a healthy body and mind-set, will win 15 games with a 3.56 ERA (2007). 

Maybe Perez can still be the "late bloomer" that every Met fan is praying for him to be. Or maybe not.  And maybe Nieve will be a diamond in the rough, a great find who will surprise everybody.  Or maybe not. And maybe Niese will blossom and spend a full season in the majors with the big club. Or maybe not.

And that’s the problem. The Mets, as usual, are operating under a “best-case-scenario” mind-set.  A sure thing doesn’t really exist, but Minaya could have done a better job solidifying the rotation with one or two close-to-sure-things. 

And they still don’t have a No. 2 starter or innings-eater.  It’s certainly possible the Mets just don’t have any money to spend; there are rumors about their lack of finances everywhere you turn.

So what can we expect from the rotation? Maybe it’ll surprise everybody and be filled with 16-game winners.  Or maybe not. The Mets have question marks all over their roster, but the biggest ones are in their starting rotation.