He's a winner, plain and simple.
Have you ever heard someone say that "you can put up all the flashy numbers you want but at the end of the say, it is the W that is most important"?
Well if that is true, feast your eyes upon one of the league's most valuable players.
And if the small sample size we've had to work with is any indication of the future that is to come, feast your eyes upon a future Hall of Famer.
22-11, that's Vince Young's record as a starting quarterback in the NFL.
That's an astounding 0.666 winning percentage.
Higher than a number of active quarterbacks whom you might have heard of, Kurt Warner (0.577), Drew Brees (0.560), and Aaron Rodgers (0.462) just to name a few.
As a matter of fact, it isn't even close.
Do you think that Drew Brees is a good quarterback, one of the very best in the league perhaps?
Well it is Vince Young who wins more often.
Heck, so does Rex Grossman (0.613).
As a matter of fact, Vince Young has a greater winning percentage than most Hall of Fame quarterbacks.
For argument's sake, I'll name a few...
Steve Young (0.657), Johnny Unitas (0.645), John Elway (0.643), and Dan Marino (0.613).
Yes, the sample size we have to work with is MUCH smaller.
Understand that in no way am I trying to argue that Vince Young is better than these Hall of Famers, nor do I seek to imply that people would be foolish enough to agree.
My point rather is regarding the circumstantial nature of winning in the NFL.
As stated before, you've heard the people who have preached "results" over "big numbers" which really means "quarterback who wins more games" over the quarterback who is more productive on the field.
Productive and Vince Young don't fit in the same sentence.
Despite being one of the best scramblers in the game (the versatility that is said to be Young's "X-Factor") he has also been one of the least productive starting quarterbacks in the league.
Not compared to let's say, a Tarvaris Jackson.
But to put Vince Young in the same breath as the Mannings, Brees, and Bradys is an insult.
Not to say that people have jumped on his bandwagon that fast this season but there was a time when this man managed to secure a trip to Hawaii (as an alternate, mind you, but still).
Interceptions are much more a specialty of Vince Young's than touchdowns.
25 touchdowns to 34 interceptions.
Interceptions, low completion percentage and lack of production are all in a days work for Vince Young, but if you're someone the likes of Aaron Rodgers with all of your yards, touchdowns, and less-frequent interceptions, expect to walk off the field a loser far more often than Vince Young.
So if far more productive players are winning less often, why is it that Vince Young is running around with a HOF-caliber winning percentage while others struggle to make their teams relevant?
Could it be that their running game, defense, special teams, and coaching staffs also contribute to their chances of winning?
Could it be that different players of different calibers will achieve different results playing under different circumstances?
If the "W's" are the most telling aspect of a quarterbacks value, The Packers better offer to trade Aaron Rodgers for Vince Young right away.
I'm sure the Titans wouldn't mind.