To attempt to make some sense of all this information I have come up with the following formula and results.
For each 5 star player recruited I gave the school 5 points, for each 4 star 4 points, 3 star 3 points, 2 star 2 points and for 1 star of less (since a number of recruited players don't have enough points to even warrant one star), one point.
Based on that formula here are the results of the total recruiting points of the present BCS top ten teams with USC included even though the Trojans are not in the top ten teams presently:
SCHOOL TOTAL POINTS
1. Alabama 325
2. Florida 317
3. LSU 315
4. Texas 299
5. USC 279
6.Georgia Tech 195
7. Oregon 172
(tie) Iowa 172
9.Cincinnati 149
10.TCU 133
11. Boise State 129
So what's all this mean? Well, clearly Florida, Alabama, Texas and USC get the majority of 5 star and 4 star players. You would think that those teams couldn't be beat. Right? So how does Cincinnati, TCU and Boise State compete when they can only attract at best 3 star athletes? (Granted, TCU and Cincinnati did successfully recruit a 4 star or 2 but the majority are 3 star or less). Is it coaching? Remember when Boise State played Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl? BSU was lucky if they had 3 or 4 two star players on the field back then! Oklahoma was loaded with 5 star and 4 star players! Go figure. So what is it that allows these teams with far fewer great high school athletes to compete at such high levels? Don't say it's the schedule either. Yes, Boise State plays in the WAC but they thumped a very good Oregon team already this year and TCU has taken down a couple of SEC teams. CIncinnati has beaten some 'elite' teams as well. So how do they do it?
Comments and ideas welcome!
1 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete