How Pete Sampras Fared Against Rival Tim Henman

Aaron Kumar by Scribe Written on October 29, 2009
LOS ANGELES, CA - JULY 27:  Tournament honoree Pete Sampras smiles while taking on Marat Safin in the Millennium Challenge during the LA Tennis Open Day 1 at Los Angeles Tennis Center - UCLA on July 27, 2009 in Los Angeles, California.  Safin defeated Sampras 6-4, 3-6, 1-0.  (Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images) Stephen Dunn/Getty Images

Pete Sampras went into the final of the 1999 ATP Event at Queens Club in London with a 4-0 record against the home favourite Tim Henman.

Henman managed to put his poor record against the legendary American out of his mind as the British No. 1 claimed the first set on a tiebreaker. Sampras fought back and won the second set, 6-4, but Henman was still very much in the match and it looked as though he had a real chance of stunning the tennis world and winning the title.

The final set went to a tiebreaker. Sampras, the consummate pro, held his nerve to seal a superb 6-7 6-4 7-6 victory.

The pair met again a few weeks later in the semifinals of Wimbledon, and although Henman won the first set, Sampras once again proved too strong for his British opponent, this time winning in four sets. The American went on to win the title, beating Andre Agassi in the final. Henman never managed to defy the odds and win a Grand Slam title.

(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

3 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

234
reads

3
comments

written on October 29, 2009 Game Recap

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.