2009 New York Mets: A Blessing in Disguise?
When I think about how badly the Mets 2009 season has been, I cringe. I can't help but think what could've been, even though I know that this season was doomed from the start.
This team was not well constructed, and the rash of injuries, no matter how severe they were, highlighted the Mets' shortcomings.
And yes, there were many problems with the Mets that we could focus on today:
• the lack of depth
• the inability to produce quality players in the minors, who could step in right away
• the dependency on old players
• the inability to find proper players to supplement the Mets' core
• all those injuries!
But as the Mets move forward, there's one problem in particular that the Mets need to address before the 2010 season: the starting pitching.
And for the first time in years, I'm actually confident that the Mets will make a move to acquire another top-flight starting pitcher.
Why do I think this? Well, because the 2009 season left the Mets with more questions than answers regarding the guys that they currently have after Johan Santana. Each one of these guys was given the chance to step up and be the Mets' No. 2 starter, but no one did.
Came into the 2009 season as the Mets No. 2 starter...5.08 ERA this year...Can he become the pitcher everyone expects him to be?...HUGE STEP BACK
Came into the 2009 season as the Mets best left handed starting pitcher not named Johan Santana...6.82 ERA this year...dealt with a variety of injuries...INCONSISTENT
Came into the 2009 season as one of the Mets top starting pitchers...4.13 ERA this year, but dealt with a number of injuries and missed significant time...throws too many pitches and almost never lasts more than five or six innings
Pelfrey, Perez, and Maine were supposed to anchor the rotation after Johan Santana, but none of those guys showed anything this season for me to believe that the Mets should trust any of them to be the No. 2 starter. That realization could be a blessing in disguise for the Mets.
Think about it: If the Mets go into the offseason with the mindset that Pelfrey, Perez, and Maine are nothing more than three, four, and five starters, then there should be a very realistic chance that the Mets make a huge run at a big-name pitcher.
It comes down to being realistic: The Mets can longer depend on any of these three to be the guy behind Johan Santana in 2010. None of them have proven it consistently in the big leagues.
Having another top-flight starter to pair with Johan Santana would help jump start the Mets from 2009's laughing stock to contenders in 2010.
And who knows, maybe Pelfrey, Maine, and Perez finally make the leap in 2010 and become the pitchers that baseball people think they could be.
But the 2009 season has made it very clear. The Mets cannot afford to not go after a top flight starter this offseason.
And for Mets fans everywhere, this is a good thing.
(Jorge Says No! on Facebook)
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?