Playing by the current rules, managers and players argue to no avail. Not only does this waste time, but it does nothing to change the outcome of the play, most of the time. With a rule change, not only will arguments be eliminated, but more plays would be called correctly. If a player or manager feels like a call should be reversed, they should challenge it. Otherwise, sit down. Any other form of argument other than a challenge should result in automatic ejection, because that would be a delay of game.
Instant replay should just be relegated to a “tool” umpires can use on the field. Some calls should not be subject to review, just as in the NFL some plays cannot be reviewed. For example, umpires would still be responsible for pitches, since that would be hard if not impossible to review. Umpires need to call each play as though no one will challenge it. Instant replay should be used to correct mistakes at the discretion of the teams, not to make calls.
In the NFL, even instant replay can show inconclusive evidence to overturn the call. Sometimes calls are blown even after being reviewed. Instant replay does not guarantee perfection. However, neither does not having instant replay. Instant replay merely instills a sense of confidence in fans and players that most calls will be correctly made. Umpires are people too, and I’m willing to settle for “close to perfect” in a game that is played by people and called by people.





We're going to send you the most entertaining MLB articles, videos, and podcasts from around the web.










1 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete