The Raider organization, along with its headmaster Al Davis, is often the team many football fans love to hate.
Football experts and sportswriters just can’t stand it when Al baby goes against their words of wisdom. There are many that think the Raiders blundered in taking McFadden instead of Dorsey or Gholston to help the defense.
Grading any draft until after the first year is a futile exercise at best. Rest assured that no matter the outcome of the Raiders draft or upcoming season, Al Davis will never get credit for anything good and for sure will be blasted if it turns to dung.
Poring over the 2007 stats, I thought we needed to pick defense with our No. 1 pick. After stepping back and examining the pick, I concluded that Al Davis did in fact help the defense with this year's pick. Now before you all accuse me of smoking the drapes, I offer a few little nuggets to support my theory.
We all know Al Davis loves numbers and that he depends on such measurable stats such as height, weight, and speed at the combine each year. He also pores over each game stat until late into the evening after every game.
I’m sure he understands exactly what our biggest weakness was last year in terms of winning ball games. To the average fan, the assumption was the defense and our inability to stop the run was the problem. I think he found out something else that was at least as glaring. What I noticed was that we lost seven games that we should have won.
Detroit L-21-36, Note we did not score in the first half. Three touchdown passes by Kitna and three turnovers by us late.
At Denver L- 20-23 TIME OUT! Scored three points in the first half.
Kansas City L 10-12 AGAIN we are shut out in the first half!!!!!!!!!
At Tennessee L 9-13, Shut out in the second half.
Texans L- 17-24, AGAIN, AGAIN we are shut out in the first half.
Bears L- 6-17, Just two field goals by Sea Bass?
Colts L 14-21, Inept offense and turnovers hurt our chances.
Okay, I think you know where I’m going with this. We won four games and we should have won seven more that had nothing to do with the play of our defense!
It is easy to see if you continually fail on offense and you continually ask the defense to save your ass because you cannot make first downs, score points and or keep the other team’s offense off the field. It is a recipe for disaster.
Too often, the enemy just called running plays over and over, not worrying if they made it or not because they did not fear us on offense. Punting to us was nothing to fear and was probably part of the game plan.
Here are some numbers to support where I’m going with this. We averaged 17.7 points per game, 26th in the league. We passed for a net 164.4 yards per game, 31st in the league. Our total yards were 294 per game, 25th in the league. This more than offset being ranked sixth in rushing. Time of possession was decent at 31:06.
With the 2008 draft in the rear-view mirror, there has been much speculation and interpretation of the Raiders No. 1 pick Darren McFadden. Will he take the pressure off JaMarcus Russell? Will he be used occasionally as a wideout or even throw a few passes?
With the addition of McFadden in the backfield, along with Michael Bush and Justin Fargas, we will improve greatly the numbers on offense. That will benefit the defense more than any other area. If we just add six points per game and two minutes of time of possession it will help our defense in ways you can’t imagine.
This will also help knock off as much as six points allowed per game. Last year, we gave up 25.4. With McFadden, I believe this is a distinct possibility. I know some will say I’m drinking the Kool Aid. I assure you my drink of choice is Heineken, very cold. As far as the drapes go, if you got ’em, light 'em up!
comments (30) write a comment »
write a new comment
4 months ago
It's very simple.
You had 5 areas of need going into the draft.
Your first two picks were positions you were already strong at, RB and CB.
Saying getting a player who's listed as prone to fumbling, no tackle breaking ability, little lateral movement, and spindly skinny legs, which explains the not being able to not go down once touched, that is now going to IMPROVE your already strong running game is why Al is getting laughed.
Well, there are LOTS of reasons Al is getting laughed at...but hey...you brought up the topic, so might as well call it like it is.
Again..very simple...you didn't NEED McFumble...you NEEDED Dorsey.
It's not rocket science.
from 4 months ago
And you need to go to a Bronco's forum.
McFadden's college stats and body of work arent rocket science to figure out either. You make it seem like this guy wouldnt make it in highschool. He was one of the SEC RB's of all time. Wake up. Or just wait and you'll feel stupid when he starts tearing up the NFL.
You dont know what your talking about and here is why.
T.Kelly just made a fortune to play his best position UT. Glenn Dorsey is going to make some serious money to play his best position UT. SO why should we pay two guys good money to only play 1 out of position. Thats not rocket science. And you know what else is easy to figure out. That J.Fargas has NEVER stayed healthy at any point during his carreer in football. And Michael Bush hasnt played in 2 years and never taken an NFL snap. Rhodes and LJ are back-up's. No reason not to add an explosive playmaker who many analyst's had as the best player in the draft. we arent drafting for this season, we are drafting for the future and it was a great pick.
Im sure you thought Minny didnt need AP with Chester Taylor and that good line, that worked out OK. The trend in the NFl these days is 2 RB's.
from 4 months ago
is this the same mikey whose been trying to denounce my posts. LOL. your right Mike he is clueless, a legend in his own mind. Not only was DE more the need than DT because of having Kelly playing the same position as Dorsey. Dorsey is also weak against the run. hmm lets see didnt Dmac run all over that great Dorsey defense lol. this is too easy to refute little mikey in this. oh man how can you call yourself knowledgeable and then say those ignorant comments.
hey mikey stick to your team because you have just proved more than ever how ignorant you are. maybe thats why you cant create a good logical reasonable article. see Mikey sooner or later what goes around comes around, and you are just sooo ignorant.
lets see, Fargas is by no means a home run threat, Bush could be great but as you should know its a 2 back system these day. Bush is the power and Dmac is the speed. Rhodes is gone and Jordan will soon follow, its going to be Bush, Dmac and Fargas as the RBs.
good post Rick. i like you thought we needed DE first but after seeing all the evidence now it makes sense. ive seen several things that make a good point why it was the right pick. a good offense that moves the ball keeps the defense off the field. plus when you score alot the other team cant just keep running on you. plus we added a good S in Wilson and another good Corner to crowd the line and be better against the run.
weve addressed the run D but not directly like some would think we shouldve.
but i love it cuz the post by mikey just made his ignorance prove my point. Mikey you mess with the best youll die like the rest. go stick to your 9ers, and stop acting like you know somn about football.
from 4 months ago
The rocket science is mcfadden ran all over dorsey the two times they played. Mcfumble still ran for 1800 yards with his backup felix jones running for over 1200. Fargas and Jordan are injury prone and bush has not played in two years. The pick was a good one. The article proves that even when our defense couldn't stop the run we failed to put points on the board. The 49ers should have picked up a qb since they were almost the worst in passing. Go on a niners blog and bitch about there lousey pick.
4 months ago
On draft day RaiderNation was surprised with our first round pick. But in analyzing the stats like Falter said its pretty obvious why we selected the stand out running back. True we all believed we would go with Dorsey, C. Long, or Gholston but none of those guys score touchdowns nor have the ability to break the game open on one play. True we have glaring needs on D-line but wit the amount of money given to Tommy Kelly it would not make sense to spend the first round pick on another D-linemen. In addition we picked up Kalimba Edwards and several other key defensive players such as Deangelo Hall, Gibril Wilson, and the recent additions of Greg Spires and Ed Hartwell. Our defense continues to play well in games, but gets beat by our inept offense. Usually the problem has been our defense spends too much time on the field wearing down in games, because our offense can't sustain a decent drive. With McFadden time will tell if he can help our offense. One point that needs to be brought up is JaMarcus Russell is our future so investing in a Franchise caliber running back when the opportunity is there is a necessity. If teams try to pack 8 in the box against McFadden because of his speed and abilities that will create plenty of opportunities for our STUD at QB. We are yet to see what Bush can do and Fargas does not cause any sleepless nights to opposing defensive coordinators. With McFadden being so high on many draft boards you could bet those teams defensive coordinators are well aware of his talents.
On a final note it is disappointing to see so many fans lack of knowledge about the great Hall of Famer Al Davis. What he has accomplished for the NFL many could not replicate. His knowledge of the game, his moves in the offseason, the respect he gets from his colleagues each year are hard to follow. Go Raiders!!
4 months ago
... from a 49er goldie above, EVERYTHING Raider is wrong! Lick your own Niner problems at QB, Defense, Offense & lastly and glaringly futile... YOUR Coach! See you in my rearview mirror... GOLDIE!
4 months ago
Rick, nice article, keep up the good work.
9er fan, you have identified our "5" areas of need. But those "5" five areas are your opinions.
Since you have a lot of time on your hands you should either go post on the 9er site with your "great wisdom" in dissecting needs, or ..........
You miss the point all together its about scoring more points than the opponent, our O was inept at best.
Consider this was our first year in the ZBS, we were excellent running the ball, and after a second year in the ZBS we should improve in pass protection, and running the ball.
What is great is that you are downplaying DMAC, but downplay MBUSH. BUSH is at 100% is a hungry beast and will be unleashed on the league this year. I hope you watch college football go watch USC offense, and the amount of weaponry they have. Take a look at our offense now we have a lot of weapons if fact our backfields offensive, and defensive is 10,000 times superior that that of the 9ers. Do a player by player comparison.
We will win double of what the 9ers will win. You guys will be luck to win 5. With the talent we have assembled we will win a Super far before you guys even et to the playoffs.
S
4 months ago
I was and am extremely disturbed the Raiders didn't try harder to get Chris Long. Instead, they settle for proven thug McFaggen. I still say, the Raiders ought to be in talks with the Rams and offer them anything they want to secure Long for the Raiders for the rest of his football career. Long's the type of guy you can build a team around. McFaggen's a guy you gotta hope can stay out of jail long enough to give you a solid season.
4 months ago
As for thew 9er fan, the Niners would be better I think getting rid of Nolan and letting Singletary be the head coach. Nolan's mediocre at best, I like him as a person but I don't think he's much different in fottball, results wise, than Norv Turner. They both stink like poop!
4 months ago
Tim.....is that a serious post....do anything to get long and long is the type of guy to build a TEAM AROUND???? first u build your team around a QB and we did that by drafting DMAC....Our Defense will STEP it up seein that we actually have a good saftey to complement Huff daddy......and our D line wellllll they better step it up cause we need them if we are gonna stop RB's like LT and LJ we do that i think we can win the division this year......OAKLAND
4 months ago
Great analysis and perspective, Nick!
You know the more you think about it, the more you start to believe that Kiffin was behind the selection and Davis was not there pulling the strings here. I believe that the Raider's offensive minded coach thought of developing a running game from the image of what he had established with Bush & Lendale White at USC. Without doubt that if all plays well, this pick will greatly help the defense.
4 months ago
McFadden was a need on draft day. Justin Fargas is not a a great back. Big deal he ran for a 1000 yards. Almost every team in the NFL has a player like that. The #6 ranked rusing offense was similar to our #3 ranked D two years ago. The Raiders put up huge rushing numbers against to poorest rushing defenses in the league. The Browns, Dolphins, Denver, Chiefs and one other team I can't recall. When we played better rushing defense we couldn't run the ball. Almost half our yards on the ground came in those games. McFadden will help the offense with his big play ability and keep the offense on the field longer. McFadden is the best college back i've seen in the past 15 years and as much as I love Dorsey, mcFadden was the right pick. The Raiders have not had a top RB since the Bo and Marcus era. Some were good but never a threat like McFadden. I can't wait for this season to start and watch the next great RB in the NFL. McFadden is the real deal and Raider fans wil love his speed and desire to get to the endzone. Al knows what he was doing. Why would Al take the biggest bust in the draft in Gholston. We already have busts in Gallery and Huff. He went with the sure thing.
from 4 months ago
Pat you make some very good points. I would however point out that many of the good rushing teams fatten up on the lower teams in terms of rush defense. Take San Diego they do have a great RB in LT and a had a great back in Michael Turner. I suppose we could bust their chops for posting great numbers against the Raiders (twice) ranked 31st, Denver (twice) ranked 30th, KC (twice) ranked 28th and the Bears and Lions ranked 24th and 23rd. Justin Fargas is no LT for sure but he is a solid RB for us to have in the back up position. He has shown he can be the guy in spot situations. Last year we had a remake OL, New OL coaches with new schemes all coming from an offense that could not get out its own way the year before. Justin did a great job.
4 months ago
Mr. Faller, I'm in complete agreement with you. It burns my hide to hear use-to-be Raider fans, let alone the media take about Big Al. They talk about Big Al, as if he were a a Jew or Black Man. Anybody with any football knowledge knows that the run game opens up the pass. But I like the way the presented the defensive angle into the mix. Keep up the good work! Rodney in Los Angeles.
4 months ago
Mike49er,
You always seem to gloss over the fact that we just invested so much money into the 3 technique DT in Tommy Kelly, who Warren Sapp believes could be better than himself.
Why do think we should have taken Dorsey? I still can't understand your rants. Here or TFDS.
from 4 months ago
Couple of reasons. Your WEAKEST AREA last year WITH KELLY PLAYING was your D line, right? It's not like he was a beast while in there, regardless of the money you're now paying him. As stated, when he was in, Raiders D gave up 5.2 or so ypc. Once he went on IR, the Raider's D line improved to 4.7 or so ypc. Sure, other extenuating circumstances affected those numbers, but obviously you can't say the D missed him immensely when he went out.
So, you tell me. Considering it's already known that Kelly can and HAS played other positions on the D line, and you have a Dorsey available, who's viewed as the top D lineman in the draft, how is that not a huge upgrade?
Others run the "Well, we didn't score enough, so was wise to grab yet another RB". Others, including myself, would reply the RB'S DID THEIR JOB, and that the passing game is the main reason for the lack of td's..not an area you were strong in. Other teams, once inside the red zone, knew to contain the running game, not fearing the pass as much. 3 plays, then FG attempt, right?
Others state "Well, we didn't score that many rushing TD's" Rather odd to state on one hand that the rushing game was 6th, but severely lacking because of td production, isn't it? Lot of reasons why teams don't score, whether it's the pass not setting up the run, or vice versa, play calling, whatever. (Yes, you HAVE Greg Knapp..who is EXTREMELY PREDICTABLE. We used to sit at Niner games and the whole section would call out the play, and true to form, it was dead on. Man has zero imagination.)
End result is WHAT WAS THE TEAMS NEEDS when the Raiders were on the clock?
Considering what you NEEDED and what was in front of you??? How can you possibly say you needed yet another RB when your D line was 31st against the run, including the fact you lost players as well??
Don't get it...do you?
from 4 months ago
because Castor, Mikey will never get it. last year Kelly played DE not DT idiot. and when he did play DT before he did well. Sapp was never good against the run, but the genius knew that right. and Kelly was injured most of the year. dont even try to come in here with your put downs when you show you dont know squat.
Just like ive said to the trolls on the Raider message board im thru with you, Next.
4 months ago
BTW RICK,
Good article. But some people just don't understand.
4 months ago
ALso if you leave McFadden on the board and take Dorsey, you face him twice a year as a Chief and I think we have our hands full with LT and the Dolts twice a year. Besides that, you now add another threat on every play that has to be accounted for and besides having big play ability, you just helped out a 2nd year QB who will fair a lot better with DMac distracting people which also opens up the passing game more as well since DMac is a great ball catcher out of the backfield and his run threat will pull DB's up to the line leaving the secondary thinly defended. If Drew Carter or Higgins sprint past the CB's, they are gone for a TD every time almost.
Besides that Jordan, who I love, has had perennial back problems he will never be cured of, Fargas has 1 healthy season of production under his belt and Rhodes did not show all star ability so the depth at RB is not quite what you say.
Also, not from my mouth to God's ears but Bill Belichik was quoted as saying the "Tommy Kelly is one of the best defensive linemen in the NFL."
I hope I have made my point and case.
I wanted Dorsey too but if the Chiefs were to get DMac, I would think twice and that was the case as history played out.
4 months ago
luckily gregg knapp will not be calling the plays and boy genious KIFFIN will.....It is funny to see alll the media and other people talking how taking DMAC was a horrible idea...DMAC = best player in the draft, game changer. Dorsey = Best D lineman in the Draft, GAME CHANGER i dont know about that. Just think if we DID take Dorsey the media and you other raider haters would be saying OMG they didnt take DMAC what idiots.....See it doesnt matter what we did either pick was gonna help the raiders tremedisly. with Tommy Kelly and Terdell sands AND gerard warren in the middle we have some goon interior guys who will sharing be time which by the way will make them fresh each and everytime they come in to play......OAKLAND
from 4 months ago
and to add, you know what i love. that these people who think they know somn about Raiders needs dont realize that before the draft we had 4 DTs and 2 DEs, so how is getting another DT going to change the team, especially when that guy isnt a run D DT, didnt he just get run all over by Dmac with his oh so great D at LSU. and saying well Dorsey isnt just another DT being added, well what do you think Dmac is, hes not just another RB added.
one of our biggest problems last year was playmakers on offense. when you score you force the others to pass its that simple, and our pass D will be ready. and weve indirectly addressed the run D. and the years with Gruden making the playoffs and going to SB we had a great offense and a serviceable D with 2 great corners and good safeties, kinda like were doing now.
4 months ago
C: Rick, nice article, keep up the good work.
9er fan, you have identified our "5" areas of need. But those "5" five areas are your opinions.
Mike49er: Not really. Go to NFL.com, draft, click on team. Granted some might differ with their version of what's needed, but regardless, you did NOT need a CB or a RB..those weren't even on any list, much less top of the list..right?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since you have a lot of time on your hands you should either go post on the 9er site with your "great wisdom" in dissecting needs, or ..........
Mike49er: Actually took the time to make caramel corn with my daughter, but thanks anyway.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss the point all together its about scoring more points than the opponent, our O was inept at best.
Mike49er: What I think you should be saying is your passing game was inept at best. If not for the running game you might not have won any games.
================================================================
Consider this was our first year in the ZBS, we were excellent running the ball, and after a second year in the ZBS we should improve in pass protection, and running the ball.
Mike49er: EXACTLY..with the same guys you had, improvement.
Can you imagine Raider boards HAD you taken Dorsey? Solid running game that's due to get better, as per your analysis above, and a huge addition to your D line?
You're saying you wouldn't feel better about the year had your D line problems been addressed? Sure you got a good RB..you already HAD a good RB.
=========================================================
What is great is that you are downplaying DMAC, but downplay MBUSH. BUSH is at 100% is a hungry beast and will be unleashed on the league this year. I hope you watch college football go watch USC offense, and the amount of weaponry they have. Take a look at our offense now we have a lot of weapons if fact our backfields offensive, and defensive is 10,000 times superior that that of the 9ers. Do a player by player comparison.
Mike49er: Save the drama queen bit regarding the Niners. Gore torches anyone on the Raiders..easily. Your D line was 31st IN THE LEAGUE..everyone is better than the Raiders. Here's YOUR reality check..that 31st ranked D line? IS NOW WORSE..yeah...WORSE.
Here's Raider fan analogy.."WE STUPIDLY SPEND MORE HUGE BUCKS ON KELLY..SO THAT MUST MEAN WE'RE GOING TO BE GOOD. As I stated above, your defense did BETTER after he went out.
But hey, thanks for proving my point. You had Bush..you had Fargas..among others..you sure as hell didn't need another RB..but..then again, you KNEW THAT, DIDN'T YOU?
Now, my money says ALMOST EVERYONE OF YOU THAT ARE POSTING ON HERE likely stated "Dorsey or Long...Dorsey or Long". Even while writers were stating 'Al will probably do something stupid like draft McFumble, because Al likes speed. Even though he was crossed off on the board as for needs..Al will still do what Al wants to do" THAT WAS BEFORE THE DRAFT.
Now? The sheep meekly state "oh hell yeah...always wanted him".
Only one who HAD balls was Lame, when he stated loud and clear 'WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER RB..WE NEED DEFENSIVE LINE HELP"..where, of course, after Al pulled an Al, he's got no choice but to give the recording of "We wanted him all along".
He's almost as big a sheep as some of you....almost.
=====================================================
We will win double of what the 9ers will win. You guys will be luck to win 5. With the talent we have assembled we will win a Super far before you guys even et to the playoffs.
Mike49er: LMAO...in your dreams. The talent? WHAT TALENT?? Your O line is porous as HELL. You have our discarded benched bust at your blind side tackle spot. You have NO WR's that are worth a damn..your starting qb looked like total crap last year..HIS backup looked even worse..and as your designated "experienced qb to impart wisdom on the rookie"?? LMAO..yeah...TUI..THAT'S THE GUY WHO'S NOW GOING TO TUTOR RUSSELL...yes...LMAO.
Your D line is even WORSE than last year..you signed gimp after gimp after gimp to guaranteed money..hoping all of their ACL's are fine and dandy...hell dude..only because you have one of the easiest schedules in the LEAGUE you might win 3...maybe..and I wouldn't bet on it.
However, I'll gladly bet ANYONE here on your simpleton suggestion above regarding which team wins more.
Hell..while we're at it..let's bet on QB ratings as well..
Any takers?
Well, there is no avatar's or sig's on this site, but we can always improvise.
A few Ram fans are STILL sporting their Niner Sigs because of our Gore/Jackson bet from last year.
Oh hell..while we're at it...ANYONE CARE TO BET WHO GETS MORE YARDS..GORE OR MCFUMBLE??
Come Sheep....it can't be that baaaaaaaaaaaa-d :)
4 months ago
Little Stevey?? Shut up, little man. Your sorryass got TORCHED on your weak pathetic thread
http://www.bleacherreport.com/articles/24935-Oakland-Raiders-O-Line-Doubters-have-Forgotten-Tom-Cable
You have ZERO credibility. Anyone who states the stupid uneducated crap YOU do, then bails like a little slapped on child, crying NO MAS..LEAVE ME ALONE...I DON"T WANT TO ANSWER means you're toast, little boy.
Oh..just to show you how "slow" you are...thanks for making my point DUMBASS. Kelly DID PLAY DIFFERENT POSITIONS last year..I already STATED THAT..also added that's why having Kelly and Dorsey was a plus..but..then again, reading and comprehension never was your strong suit.
You stick to waving your white flag, backtracking and using stupid non-related examples.
None change the fact you're a fool. Now, for fun? Go explain your IDIOT take about how Kwame "I suck" Harris is going to be transformed into a PROBOWL player, that you GUARANTEED, while Gallery couldn't even be upgraded to an adequate tackle.
You won't..because you can't...now..again..shut up little boy. No credibility means you only warrant an occasional headslap...just because it's fun.
4 months ago
wow a pro mcfumbles article i actually liked.... ok ill play this game but i would take dorsey over kelly in a heartbeat.
4 months ago
damn mike 49er bold statement....3 wins....hmmm we shalll see it shall be a fun year to watch....i will DEF make the bet that JRUSS has a better year than SMITH....cant really bet that DMAC will have more yards cause well we got two other RB's that are gonna be sharing the load.....AS for Gore...the guy is a complete beast but i dont think having Foster behind him is gonna help....Gore will get all the carries. AS for your coaches...GOD DAMN THROW TO A MAN NAMED DAVIS.....nolan will win 5 games next year and get the axe.....as for the raiders D line.....u forget to mention sands and warren now there no GREAT PLAYERS as far as what they have done....but one of the big reasons our Dline was 31st was cause of a man named SAPP....he just wasnt that great of a run stopper last year....get him outta there and our Dline is soooo young.....just like i said before...if we take Dorsey over DMAC alllll u raider haters out there would be saying OMG HOW CAN U PASS OF DMAC......just like last year when we passed on AP....
4 months ago
Simply put ... Justin Fargas has never, until last year, proven that he was a good runner. Like someone said, he did most of his great games against poor run defenses. Give him all this great credit if you want, but Fargas is not the answer and Bush hasn't played yet... we needed a young healthy guy to come in and run.
Defense - Why not take Dorsey? Well, the 3-technique has already been explained to you. But let's address a couple other things. How about Sapp losing more than just weight in the offseason? He looked like he was in better shape, but he was easier to push around. Burgess was hurt for a good part of the year and never played at 100%. We had Gerrard Warren, but he wasn't playing every down which may have been an issue because he was beast.
D-Line: Burgess, Warren, Kelly,Richardson.... William Joseph from the Giants, Kalimba Edwards from the Lions ( 22 starts in 87 games with 26 sacks, 10 forced fumbles and 6 fumble recoveries), and veteran Greg Spires from the Bucs ... I THINK THE D-LINE LOOKS PRETTY DAMN GOOD!!!
LB: Howard,Morrison, Williams, Thomas ... I'm very comfortable with their ability.
Secondary: Nmandi, Hall, Huff, Routt, Wilson, Coop ... Yea, we're set here too.
With that said, what area of the game needed to be addressed? Since the Super Bowl year, the Raiders have not had a consistent running back. Garner gone, Wheatley gone, Kaufman gone ... Jordan had potential coming in but stays hurt ... Fargas is inconsistent and stays hurt as well ... Rhodes was in trouble and on the shitlist ... Bush has a rod in his leg and has yet to be fully tested.
LETS SAY IT ALL TOGETHER NOW ... D-MAC WAS THE BEST CHOICE FOR THE RAIDERS!!!
4 months ago
Rick is right. Don't be fooled by the naysayers. Oakland was right to take D-Mac.
4 months ago
by Mike49er
from 3 days ago It's very simple.
You had 5 areas of need going into the draft.
Your first two picks were positions you were already strong at, RB and CB
we needed safety help which was the second pick!
Saying getting a player who's listed as prone to fumbling, no tackle breaking ability, little lateral movement, and spindly skinny legs, which explains the not being able to not go down once touched, that is now going to IMPROVE your already strong running game is why Al is getting laughed
He had over half of his fumbles at qb and on kick returns which he won't be doing for the raiders I believe I explained this point to you before he had 4 fumbles lost out of 400+ attemps that is great!
Dorsey is not a run stuffer so that is a stupid take. He playes 3 tech which we have 2 strong 3 techs in oakland!
Dorsey actually looked pathetic in the chapionship game and was cositantly shut down by an inferior center or guard combo that was lined up against him. He was a darryll russle clone we didn't need and wouldn't have helped the run d at all.
Sapp's departure will help the run game he was blown off the line in the games we got run on the most!
The truth of the mater is you wouldn't know what we needed or don't need you don't watch the team at the games and that's why you only need to look back at the last game of the season to see we shut LT down all game with Sapp out of there! this is without kelly in there and joseph . Plus hirum eugene sucked out loud and got trucked numerous times that's why gabril is here!
The truth is the o-line was the bigest hole we needed to fill and the tackles were not going to help us as much as run DMC will.
DMC will be the rooky of the year with 1200 rushing 800 recieving!
Laugh on that rolling with Nolan are they going to keep him after this year or is Yorky going to grab a pair and launch that bum?
4 months ago
by Mike49er
from 3 days ago
The draft remindes me why again did nolan take a 1 year wonder tweener with his 1st round pick when he can't stop the run at all!
Bust writen all over him!
I bet Run DMC has a much better year then him and that's if he brakes both leggs in the before the half!
I guess it's okay you spent all that money in free agency on smith that is another tweener and can't stop the run or get to the QB. Look at his tapes one move up and around the end tries to bull rush and gets stoned everytime!
Have fu with that one too!
Are you comming to the net this year to watch the 9ers get pummeled on my birthday?
4 months ago
Mike49er Writes About
Mike49er hasn't written anything yet.
For a guy with sooooooo many know it all opinions you sure the hell don't put yourself out there talking about your team and what they can or can't do!
But it eats up comments for the board to bad it's just that boaring
write a new comment