CM Punk Gets Punk'd On Smackdown By Undertaker
Well folks it has happened again. CM Punk got slammed yet again on Friday Night Smackdown.
After his grueling match with Matt Hardy, Punk just couldn't let things lie and leave the ring area. He had to hand out more punishment until....that familiar music came on and the lights went out.
When they came back on, Punk had his lights put out by the dead man. Undertaker picked up Punk and threw him through the announcer's table.
Punk's chances of retaining his belt at Breaking Point Submissions has gotten slimmer and slimmer. He's not facing some kid in the street.
We are talking about a dangerous individual.
Taker will appear out of nowhere and chokeslam you before you can blink. Punk is going to meet more than a slam, hes going to meet the devil himself.
On the other hand, Punk has been more aggressive, nastier, and more egotistical in the last few months.
It's possible that along with his new attitude, his martial arts background, and his evil ways, he could pull of an upset to beat all upsets.
However, I don't think WWE is going to let the dead man be embarrassed at his return debut by letting Punk beat him.
It will be a match that will have fans on the edge of their seats.
The arena will no doubt will be in a frenzy; electricity will fill the air. Oh yeah, its going to be a biggie.
Taker is the type of wrestler that will take his opponent apart, little by little. He's like a cat with its prey. They play with it for a while and then, without warning, take it apart.
What addiction is the straight-edge champion going to say is the Taker's? Dirt and flames, the pit of hell? Raising from the dead?
The Taker's addiction is to get the belt, to do what he needs to do to get it.
Even if it means tearing Punk apart, then making him submit. I don't see Punk being able to use the GTS on the Undertaker. He's too big and too powerful. Believe me, he did his homework, knows everything about Punk and vice versa.
Well this is the end of my article for now. Hope you all like. Be back tomorrow with a different article. Ciao!
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?