As I watched today's edition of ESPN's 1st and 10, I was not at all surprised to see Skip Bayless insult the program's guest, Chad Ochocinco, while failing to substantiate most of the remarks he made.
Skip Bayless has often been known for being one of the more vocal contributors to ESPN's programming, but I must say that I was quite disappointed to see how he carried himself on today's episode of 1st and 10.
Sadly, I expected him to be rude and disrespectful, but even I was surprised to see the arguments he brought to the table in an effort to make a point at Ochocinco's expense.
I had a feeling that he would decide to take the route of insulting rather than discussing, as he continued to criticize Ochocinco in a number of areas.
It should also come as little surprise that he failed to substantiate his remarks or provide evidence to support his criticisms.
What I am now going to do is break down what Bayless has said on 1st and 10 so we can take a closer look at his accusations.
"I used to be a big fan of yours, right? Going back three or four years ago. But over those past few years Chad, you have lost me because you have lost all perspective on what should really matter to you at this point in your NFL career and that is leading a team to the playoffs instead of your over-the-edge self-promotion of Chad Ochocinco."
What I would like to know is exactly how Bayless (who has no real relationship with Ochocinco) can suddenly read his mind and come to an accurate determination as to what Ochocinco's true perspective really is.
He claims that Ochocinco has lost perspective in regard to "leading a team to the playoffs."
Bayless makes no mention regarding the quality of support that the other 52 men on the roster have provided, as he instead decides to blame Ochocinco for what he feels his true perspective to be.
Allow me to bring some facts to the table.
Below is a list of where the Bengals' defense has ranked each year since Ochocinco joined the Bengals in 2001:
2001: 14th
2002: 32nd
2003: 28th
2004: 21st
2005: 22nd
2006: 17th
2007: 24th
2008: 19th
Average: 22nd
Now while I'm no mathematician, it clearly appears to me as though the quality of support the Bengals have been getting out of a unit that comprises 50 percent of their chances of victory has been poor at best.





We're going to send you the most entertaining Cincinnati Bengals articles, videos, and podcasts from around the web.










8 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete