Poaching Foreign Youngsters: Not as Obscene as Blatter and Platini Claim

Ben Campbell by Contributor Written on August 20, 2009
LONDON - APRIL 26:  Cesc Fabregas of Arsenal celebrates scoring the second goal during the Barclays Premier League match between Arsenal and Middlesbrough at Emirates Stadium on April 26, 2009 in London, England.  (Photo by Hamish Blair/Getty Images) (Photo by Hamish Blair/Getty Images)

In 2003, a 16-year-old Spaniard left Barcelona for Arsenal on a free transfer, as he was not under contract. Two years later, another 15-year-old Spaniard transferred from Barcelona to Arsenal in similar circumstances.

Arsenal are not the only club to sign foreign youngsters. Bayern Munich singed a 15-year-old Roque Santa Cruz, Manchester United signed the Da Silva twins, and Barcelona signed Lionel Messi.

Lionel Messi joined Barcelona as a 13-year-old. One reason was Barca offered to pay for his medical care. Federico Macheda, Alberto Massacci, and Daniel Petrucci joined the club as their fathers were offered jobs at Old Trafford.  

This is known in the football world as poaching.

Arsene Wenger has come under scrutiny for signing foreign youngsters, now Sir Alex Ferguson is now facing attacks from the Italian media and Carlos Alberto, who accused Sir Alex of raping Brazil.

Morally and ethically, poaching youngsters is wrong; clubs should really promote from within. However, is it morally or ethically right when a player is bought for £80 million? Or, if a club pays a player £200,000 a-week after tax?

The argument coming from UEFA and FIFA, is that these players that are being poached are far too young, to move abroad. They are too immature to make these decisions. Michel Platini and Sepp Blatter are desperate to make Europe more competitive. Both are planning to impose laws that restrict players from moving who are under the age of 23.

The real reason why clubs whose starlets are poached are so aggrieved is because the money they have lost. Macheda, Massacci, Petrucci, Pogba, the Da Silva twins, and Merida are all world class talents who are potentially £30 million. Fabregas and Messi are world-class players, potentially worth more.

Paying Paul Pogba's family vast sums of money to get the player is seen by many as wrong. Bribing a player's family on the face of it is wrong, but ask yourself: Would you turn down the opportunity to play for one of the best teams in the world and improve your family's quality of life?

Can you really say that Barcelona have poached Lionel Messi? Would he have reached the heights of superstardom at the same rate? Would he even have a career in football due to his growth deficiency?

Single Page
(2)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

57 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

386
reads

57
comments

written on August 20, 2009 Opinion

Telegraph.co.uk Football News

Visit Telegraph.co.uk for more news.

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.