Pro WrestlingDownload App

Evolution vs. Legacy : What Is Better for Randy Orton?

NEW YORK - MARCH 9:  WWE wrestlers (L-R) Triple H, Ric Flair, Randy Orton and Batista sit courtside at the New York Knicks v Boston Celtics  NBA game March 9, 2004 at Madison Square Garden in New York City.   (Photo by Ray Amati/Getty Images)
Dynamite BillCorrespondent IDecember 11, 2016

As we all know the WWE superstar Randy Orton has been in two different huge groups.

The evolution of Ric Flair, Triple H and Batista and the legacy of Ted DiBiase Jr. and Cody Rhodes. But which of those two groups was/is the best for Randy. Well, let's see!

 

WHY EVOLUTION

  • In Evolution, all the wrestlers were more experienced than Randy, so they could help him in a few points
  • Evolution was full of great wrestlers...way greater than the ones in Legacy
  • At 2003-2004, Evolution was controlling the WWE because they had captured nearly all the titles (Batista & Flair were tag team champions, Randy was Intercontinental champion and Triple H was World heavyweight champion) 
  • All members of evolution are grown up wrestlers (except Batista) so Randy would have been the new talent

 

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices