Evolution vs. Legacy : What Is Better for Randy Orton?

Dynamite BillCorrespondent IAugust 20, 2009

NEW YORK - MARCH 9:  WWE wrestlers (L-R) Triple H, Ric Flair, Randy Orton and Batista sit courtside at the New York Knicks v Boston Celtics  NBA game March 9, 2004 at Madison Square Garden in New York City.   (Photo by Ray Amati/Getty Images)

As we all know the WWE superstar Randy Orton has been in two different huge groups.

The evolution of Ric Flair, Triple H and Batista and the legacy of Ted DiBiase Jr. and Cody Rhodes. But which of those two groups was/is the best for Randy. Well, let's see!



  • In Evolution, all the wrestlers were more experienced than Randy, so they could help him in a few points
  • Evolution was full of great wrestlers...way greater than the ones in Legacy
  • At 2003-2004, Evolution was controlling the WWE because they had captured nearly all the titles (Batista & Flair were tag team champions, Randy was Intercontinental champion and Triple H was World heavyweight champion) 
  • All members of evolution are grown up wrestlers (except Batista) so Randy would have been the new talent

  • Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes aren't as important wrestlers as Randy so randy is the center of attention
  • Legacy has helped Randy to capture and defend his title successfully
  • The wrestlers in legacy are all very young wrestlers who can be considered as the future of WWE
  • Let's not forget that all wrestlers in Legacy are sons of legends, so Orton fits in.
My Opinion:   Evolution helped Randy Orton but at the end betrayed him on the other hand, Legacy until now has been loyal to Randy.
Evolution is full of old but experienced wrestlers, while Legacy has young but a bit inexperienced wrestlers. I believe that Evolution is the past and Legacy is the future
So what do you think ??? EVOLUTION OR LEGACY? Vote