Maple Leafs Analysis: Fans Deserve Better from Franchise

Aaron Balsillie by Correspondent Written on May 15, 2008
Brokenleaf_feature

As the playoffs continue toward the Stanley Cup finals, I feel like I did after the lockout: like I hadn't seen the Leafs in a year. And the problem is, I don't see the Leafs' problems getting better. 

Rather, I see them getting worse. 

You look at all the other teams in the league. When they fire their GM, they have someone to replace him usually that day. One press conference follows the other.  Also, firing the coach is usually followed closely by the announcement of his replacement. 

But as with many things, Toronto does things differently. 

You fire a very unpopular GM, and replace him with an aged re-tread from better times with the Leafs, and handcuff him with the "interim" label, which gives him the power to do only what team president Richard Peddie gives him permission to. That's not at all different from how John Ferguson Jr. had to operate. 

The plan was to fire Ferguson, let the season expire, wait for Anaheim to be eliminated from the playoffs and then fly Brian Burke to Toronto, open the vault and problem solved. 

Of course, like many difficulties Fletcher has had to contend with, Burke's availability was hindered by his existing contract. 

So, Plan A, B, C and D have failed.

As it turns out, they all happened to be the same plan. 

Now, MLSE and Fletcher have to formulate plan E. 

There are a lot of question marks around Fletcher and what his intentions are. I mean, he said Maurice's job was up to the new GM. Well, unless they dropped the temporary label from Fletcher's title, he lied. 

Then there is the question of what if the GM they do eventually bring in really liked Maurice as a coach? What if that new GM and/or coach think they can get the best out of disappointments like McCabe, Tucker, Blake and Wellwood? Is Fletcher doing what he said he was doing, clearing the deck for the new GM, or is he clearing the deck for himself? 

Then there is the question of Mats Sundin. Of course, Fletcher would love to have #13 back...who wouldn't? And while I believe Sundin has three or four good years left in him, with a new fiancee and a new lifestyle, who knows if he'll come back? 

If he does, great -- until mid-February, when the NHL trade deadline rolls around. 

What kind of contract does Sundin get? Will Fletcher sign him to a contract with a no-trade clause? 

Highly unlikely, and I have a feeling if Sundin knows he'll be on the block again in February with no protection, he will retire. He always said he wanted to retire a Leaf. Retiring now would guarantee that. 

Sundin is an excellent, consistent leader and still one of the best players there are.  He performs at a consistently high level with very average support. Imagine if Sundin had a winger like Malkin or Zetterberg? 

He can still take control of games and win games the Leafs should lose. The younger players look up to him and play their best when matched on his line. If absolutely nothing else, he can mentor the younger players and show them how well they can perform. It would be a shame for Fletcher to put Sundin in a position where his loyalty would be an issue. 

Single Page
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

1,134
reads

0
comments

written on May 15, 2008 Opinion

Top Stories from NHL.com

NHL on B/R | Official Partners

The best Maple Leafs newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.